G
GAAL (געל , loathing) Son
of Ebed (Obed?). He incited the city of Shechem
to revolt against Abimelech, who was a son of
Jerubbaal (Gideon). He
and a Shechemite woman, slew his seventy brothers in a bold coup. He
installed Zebul as his resident
prefect, while he himself dwelt at Arumah.
Gaal incited the citizens to overthrow Abimelech & to restore a native
Canaanite ruler. Abilmelech ambushed
the city during the night and rou-
ted Gaal.
Gaal fled for safety within Shechem, but he and his clansmen
were
promptly expelled by Zebul.
GAASH
(געש, quaking) 1. Mount Gaash, about 32 km southwest of
She-
chem. The tomb of Joshua was at
Timnath-serah in the hill country of
Ephraim and north of Mount Gaash . 2.
The brooks of Gaash, the home
of one of David’s warriors. Probably the
reference is to a region of valleys
in the vicinity of Mount Gaash .
GABBAI (גבי, tax-gatherer) A Benjaminite dwelling in Jerusalem after the
Exile. The text, however, is probably corrupt & possibly should be changed
to
read the phrase “mighty men of valor,” rather than a name.
GABBATHA (Gabbaqa, a Hebrew word spelled with Greek letters, meaning
uncertain) The paved court before
the palace of Herod
in Jerusalem ,
where the governor held court seated upon the high
platform. The term ap-
pears only once in
the Bible, in John 19. Gabbatha is the
setting for the
public trial of Jesus before the Roman procurator Pontius
Pilate. It obvi-
ously lay outside the
governor's residence.
Archaeology
points to a site near the Tower of Antonia . There is an
ancient pavement to be seen in the Convent of Our Lady of Zion’s base-
ment. An extensive court, the central area of which
measures slightly over
2,000 square meters has been excavated there. Each paving stone is
about a meter square, & 30 cm thick. The court extends
eastward. In the
time of Jesus this
paved court lay outside the northern city wall.
GABRIEL (גבריאל, man of
God, or God has shown God's self mighty)
A
celestial being, first appearing in a vision as a man, and called
“the man
Gabriel.” He functions in
Daniel 8 & 9 to reveal that which is to come in
the Day of Judgment (See also the entry in the Old Testament
Apocrypha/
Influences Outside the Bible section of the Appendix.). The New Testa-
ment references show him to be
both revealer & bringer of reassurance.
He announces the birth of John the Baptist, and announces the birth of a
son to Mary.
GAD (גד, cut, good
fortune; actually the name of a god of fortune) The 7th
son of Jacob, from whose name
came the name of the tribe of Gad; its
members were called Gadites. Gad was the older full brother of Asher,
the
son of Zilpah maid of Leah.
Why the
tribe was considered of inferior rank is beyond knowing.
Perhaps the fact that it had to make a lot of
concessions to the native
populations had something to do with it. Gad, along with Reuben, crossed
over into
lands east of the Jordan after trying to gain a foothold in the land
west of the Jordan . Lists of how
the land was divided in Joshua 13 and
Numbers 32 don’t agree. The list in Numbers is the more original of
the
two, as Joshua divides the land into a northern portion for Gad, and a
sou-
thern portion for Reuben. Actually
the Gad and Reuben settlements are
manifestly to be thought of as mingled
together; even the arrangement in
Numbers may be only approximately
correct. During the Divided King-
Gad's
original possession turned out poorly.
It involved, at first, only
the western edge of the land east of the Jordan . Gad’s goal was
to gain a
place also on the Moabite-Ammonite plateau. The judge Jephthah was a
member of Gad; he defeated
the Ammonites & liberated his tribe from their
oppression. Deborah's song reproves the tribe for quietly
staying on the
other side of the Jordan ; Gad had other troubles at this time which caused
both it & Reuben to neglect the interests of the twelve-tribe confederation.
G-1
In
spite of everything said about the military excellence of Gad, it be
comes clear
that the tribe needed space. Gad found
itself in a contested
situation, but masters it. The song in Numbers 21 probably leads into
the
period when the tribes of Gad & Reuben fought for the extension of their
settlement. At this point in history, we
cannot tell whether the song should
be dated before or after the rise of the
Israelite kingdom, because certainly
David's time gave impetus to the advance
of the Israelite settlement.
The
Moabite Mesha Inscription shows that Gadite property rights,
especially on
the plateau east of the Dead
Sea varied greatly,
according to
the weakness or strength of the government of Israel . Mesha
reconquered
Medeba & extended his kingdom to a line extending east from the
northern
end of the Dead Sea , & as far west as the edge of the plateau; the
Gadites
had to flee or submit to Moab .
Jeroboam
II re-established the holding as far south as the northern
end of the Dead Sea , apparently forced to respect the Moabite border.
The Gadite Menahem mounted the Northern Kingdom of Israel's throne
for a decade. Scarcely a decade later, his tribe's remaining territory be-
longed
to the Assyrian province of Gilead . Other literature in the Bible
mentions the
tribe of Gad in lists, for the most part.
The lists appear in
other parts of Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua,
Ezekiel, and I Chronicles.
What I
Chronicles produces about Gad beyond the lists is unverifiable re-
ports
concerning David, the Levites, and Tiglath-pileser. In the New Testa-
ment, Gad appears with Asher
after Judah and Reuben in the list of the
sealed (Revelation 7). (For the territory of Gad ,
see Tribes, Territories).
GAD (DEITY). A
deity of good luck or a supernatural guide worshiped by
Jewish apostates,
probably in the postexilic period. His
cult was popular in
the Hauran, an area east of the Jordan and the Sea of Galilee .
GAD (SEER). A seer associated with David. To him is attributed a history of
David's
reign. At his command David purchased
the threshing floor of
Araunah the Jebusite.
Gad is said to have had a share in the origin of the
of the “Commentary on the book of
Kings,” which was perhaps a collection
of stories compiled at the royal court
by scribes.
GAD, VALLEY TOWARD (הנחל הגד (ha nakh al ha gad))
A place con-
nected with the beginning of David's census. The King James Version
groups the letters differently and translates it as “the river of Gad .”
in gospel accounts of the demoniac's healing. Although Gadara is about
8 km southeast of the Sea of Galilee , its territory included hot springs of el
Hamme, North of the Yarmuk. It had shipping interests, so the “country of
the Gadarenes” may well have extended to the lake's shore . Ancient Ga-
of the Jordan Valley . It was
predominantly Greek in population, and was
equipped with two theaters, basilica, a colonnaded street, and baths.
GADDI (גדי, fortune
(?)) One of the spies sent by
Moses to spy out the land
GADDIEL (גדיאל, Gad is God (?), or God is my
fortune (?)) A member of the
tribe of Zebulun sent to spy out the land of Canaan . His name is
probably
the full form of the name Gad.
GADFLY (קרצ (ker atz),
nipper) A nipping or stinging
insect. Both horse-
flies and botflies are
called gadflies.
GADI (גדי, God is my
fortune; most likely an abbreviation of Gaddiel) The
father of King Menahem.
GADITES (See Gad
entry)
GAHAM (גהם, flame, or
burning brightly) The second son
of Nahor and his
concubine Reumah.
G-2
GAHAR (גהר) Head
of a family of temple servants who returned from the
Exile with Zerubbabel.
GAI (גיא, valley) A locality in Philistia near Ekron, on the Mediterranean coast.
GAIUS (GaioV) 1. A Christian man at Corinth , mentioned in I Corinthian 1,
one of the two men in
that church who were baptized by Paul himself.
He
was prominent enough to be host to Paul while Paul was writing the
letter.
He has been identified with the
Titius Justus of Acts 18.
2. A Macedonian Christian, traveling companion of Paul, one of
the 2 who were seized with him at Ephesus (Acts 19). 3. A Christian
of Derbe, who accompanied
Paul on a journey from Ephesus to Macedo-
(III John 1).
GALAL (גלל) 1. Son of Jeduthun, and an ancestor of one of those who
re-
turned from Babylon . (Nehemiah 11). 2. A Levite among those who
returned from Babylon . (I Chronicles 9).
named after the Indo-European tribe of the Celts or
Galli (Gauls).
The
wandering of the Celts in Europe in the 1,000 years before the
Christian Era took a
group to the Danubian region and into Greece , where
they raided Delphi in 279 B.C. A branch of this movement
was invited to
fight as auxiliaries in Asia Minor by Bithynia's King Nicomedes I. About
20,000
Galatians, including warriors & their families, are reported to have
crossed
the Bosporus . After the more immediate purpose of Nicomedes
had been achieved, the Galatians began to raid in western Asia Minor on
their own.
Their
tactics were to lay siege to cities and to terrorize the country-
side. Seleucid king Antiochus I defeated the
Galatians in battle in 275 B.C.
Perhaps as a result of an arrangement by Antiochus, the Galatians were
assigned a
territory in the interior of western Asia Minor , which
became
known as Galatia .
There
were three tribes of Galatians involved:
the Tolistobogii, the
Trocmi, and the Tectosages. Each of the three tribes was divided into
four
clans called "tetrarchies" by the Greeks, each tetrarchy having
its separate
tetrarch judge, war leader, and two lieutenants. The 12 tetrarchies had 1
council of 300 members. The military
prowess of the Galatian tribesmen
made them desirable as mercenaries, but a
continuous menace as poten-
tial enemies of the societies based on Greek culture
in Asia Minor.
The
land occupied by the Galatians after their defeat by Antiochus
was part of the
central plateau of Asia Minor around the upper Sangarius &
the middle course
of the Halys River . The new Galatia was a region which
had become Phrygian after the
downfall of the Hittite Empire; the leading
Phrygian cities were Pessinus,
Gordium, and Ancyra , which became the
capital of modern Turkey . These cities
managed to maintain their Phrygian
character amidst the spread of Greek
culture.
The
Galatians didn't become urbanized & lived in open sites, retrea-
ting to
mountain fortresses in time of military danger.
Bands of warriors
were constantly out raiding neighboring
territory. The threat was especially
felt at Perga mum , whose kings became the champions of the Greeks in
the division of power in Asia Minor , Galatian infantry and cavalry fought
for Antiochus III against Rome and its allies Pergamum and Rhodes . The
Roman
consul Manlius Vulso went into Galatia in 189 B.C. and thoroughly
defeated the Galatians,
who nonetheless continued to menace Attalids.
Rather than punishing them, the Romans granted them independence.
Galatian
relations with the kings of Pontus were better than those
with Pergamum , until Mithradates V massacred several Galatian
leaders &
their families. The remnants
of the Galatian princes revolted and supported
the Roman cause, especially the
leader of the Tolistobogii, Deiotarus.
After Mithradates' defeat, Pompey reduced the number of Galatian
tetrarchs from 12 to 3.
Deiotarus was given the title of king of a Galatia
which was larger than the area his ancestors
controlled. After civil war,
Deiotarus
emerged as king of all Galatia in 42 B.C., but died soon after-
ward. His secretary Amyntas received the kingdom of Galatia & several
other possessions.
He was killed in an expedition against the tribes of the
Pisidian
Mountains in 25 B.C. This ended the kingdom of Galatia and
marked the beginning of it being a Roman province.
G-3
This
irregularly shaped territory bordered on the kingdom of Cap-
the more civilized province of Asia
to the west. The Galatian city of An-
the capital of the new administrative unit. Over a hundred year period
whole kingdoms &parts of kingdoms were added to this province, which
covered most of central Asia Minor and approached the coast of the Black
All
these changes in the size of the Roman province did not abolish
the differences
between the land originally held by the 3 Galatian tribes
and peripheral districts. The Galatian invaders' descendants maintained
their Celtic language. In Lycaonia the
peasants spoke their own Lycao-
nian language, while the Phrygian retained their
idiom. The peculiar tribal
organization
of the Galatians was kept alive & is referred to on coins until
at least the
end of the 100s A.D.
In
terms of archaeology, explorations of the Galatian district have
mostly
been concerned with collections of surface material. The provin-
cial capital of Ancyra
has been extensively rebuilt. It has
considerable
Phrygian remains, but its major monuments date from Roman times:
the
general it is difficult as yet to identify
material remains of this district as
Galatian.
The Galatian way of living was hardly conducive to the esta-
blishment of
a characteristic style in major or minor arts that could be dis-
covered in
archaeological digs.
GALATIAN, LETTER TO THE. A
letter written by the apostle Paul to “the chur-
ches of Galatia ” and now found as the ninth book of the New Testament
(NT) canon. In it he defends his gospel
of salvation by faith rather than
by works of the law. It is significant because of the light it
throws upon
Paul and the primitive churches, & the influence it has exerted
in subse-
quent history; it has always ranked with the much longer Roman & Corin-
thian epistles in importance. It
has figured prominently in every Church
struggle to maintain the Spirit's freedom against legalism of any kind.
Authorship and Purpose—There can be no
serious question about
the authorship of this letter. The style, vocabulary, and content are those
found in Romans & the Corinthian letters.
The testimony of the ancient
church uniformly ascribes it to Paul with
no hint of doubt or dissension.
There is
also no evidence that the text of the letter has suffered any major
derangement
or revision in the course of its transmission.
Paul
had during the course of his missionary labors established a
number of churches
in the province of Galatia . At some later time his
Galatian churches were in grave danger of falling away from the truth of
Christ
as Paul understood it because of the teaching of a new gospel. The
preachers of the “new” gospel in Galatia also cast doubt on the authenti-
city of Paul's own
apostleship & the authority of his teaching.
Paul wrote
this letter in the first flush of indignation & distress at hearing this news.
The
main issue between Paul and his critics was the issue of the
relation of the
Christian to the Jewish law. This same
issue threatened to
divide, and in a measure did divide the whole church. Although Paul was
not always consistent, his
characteristic position was that to be in Christ
meant being free from the
legal requirements of Judaism. Paul's oppo-
nents
denied that any such freedom was possible.
They held that the gos-
pel fulfilled, but did not displace the law.
Paul
distinguishes between these “Judaizing” teachers and the con-
gregations he is
addressing. Nowhere does he identifies
them as “outsi-
ders”; they may be Galatians themselves. It's clear that the threat of
large-scale apostasy is real; Paul feels he is fighting for the very life of his
churches in Galatia. One gathers that he doesn't despair of countering the
efforts of his opponents and of
winning back to his “gospel” & to himself
the loyalty of his troubled & wavering congregations.
The
issue raised by the Judaizers was, all agree, the principal occa-
sion for the
letter. Some scholars have urged that it
isn't the sole occasion.
“You were called to freedom, brethren; only don't use your freedom as an
opportunity for the flesh . . . If we live by the
Spirit, let us also walk by
the Spirit.”
Paul was it is argued, defending his position on two fronts—
against
legalists who accused him of being too radical and against others
who probably
charged him with preaching circumcision, and who called
him too conservative.
G-4
On
the one hand he seems to want to assert his independence of
the older apostles
at Jerusalem , on the other he seems equally eager to
establish the
fact that he not only consulted with them, but also sought and
secured their
approval of his message. He stands for
freedom from the law,
but he wants to make clear that he doesn't stand for
moral license. He
isn't necessarily
dealing with opponents; most likely he is trying to cor-
rect those who think of
themselves as advocates of his own position.
We
recognize that Paul was concerned, not only with the Gentiles' freedom
from the requirements of the Jewish law, but also with the church's unity.
He wants to establish both his
independence of them and the fact of their
cordial support of his work.
It
may be that Paul is facing two kinds of Judaizers. Some of them,
truly understanding Paul at the
vital point, recognized him as an enemy;
other Judaizers, misunderstanding him,
were claiming him as a friend. Fol-
lowing
this line of argument, we have in the book of Acts, which is a docu-
ment which
actually misunderstands him in much the same way, based as
it was on older
sources that represented Paul as much less radical than
his own letters show
him to have been.
The
complexity of the different interpretations of Christianity and the
necessity
of answering contradictory claims & charges will help explain a
certain
frustration in Paul's attitude. He has
to turn in one direction against
those who are claiming him as a legalist, and
now in the other, defending
against those who are attacking him as a
radical. Paul is appealing to the
Christian
Galatians against legalists who unfairly attack or falsely defend
him, and who
are tempting the church to reject the truth of Christ.
Contents & Destination—The letter
begins very abruptly, the salu-
tation itself containing both a defense of Paul’s
apostleship and a state-
ment of his gospel. Paul's eagerness and haste to get to the business of
the letter also appear in the omission of thanksgiving & felicitations which
in every other letter immediately follows the salutation. Paul was in this
moment not in the mood for compliments or thanksgiving.
Paul
is astonished that the Galatians are so quickly turning away
from the gospel to
accept “a different gospel.” The one he
gave them was
not a human affair, but had come to him through a revelation of
Christ.
Even after this transforming
experience, he did not go to Jerusalem to see
those who were already apostles until the
third year or 3 years afterward,
and then he saw only Peter and James. 14 years later he went to the city
again to lay before the leaders there the gospel which he was preaching to
the
Gentiles. He reached an understanding that he would work among the
Gentiles and they among the Jews. Although the more conservative “Jews”
had
been willing for Paul to release the Gentiles from the requirement of
circumcision,
they were not willing to admit them to full fellowship in the
church.
The
doctrinal middle section of the letter, which begins with the 3rd
chapter is
not a systematic presentation. Paul is
now defending the sound-
ness of his position, and he makes his points as they
occur to him in the
heat of discussion.
He first reminds the Galatians of how they received the
Spirit simply
upon believing the gospel, and without works of the law of
any kind.
He then appeals to the example of Abraham, who
probably figured
largely in the arguments of his opponents. Abraham received the promise
of God's
blessing centuries before the law. The
law's purpose was the tem-
porary one of revealing human plight as slaves of sin,
that they might throw
themselves upon God's mercy in Christ. Children are under the care of a
guardian or
trustee until they become of age, at which time they become
free. Christ has thus set us free of the law's “curse.”
The
last section, constituting roughly the fifth and sixth chapters of
the letter
begins with a strong appeal that the readers stand firm in the free-
dom with
which Christ has set them free. But it
is just as important that
they not abuse their freedom out of pride of their position
as being “saved
through Christ.” If they
live by the Spirit, they should walk by the Spirit,
exercising among other
things, self-control.
There
is uncertainty as to exactly which churches to which Paul is
writing, an
uncertainty which arises out of the ambiguity of the place name
“Galatia .” In Paul's
period, this name belonged to a large province of the
province's northern part of the. We can't say with certainty whether Paul
is
addressing the smaller region, or the whole province, as Paul does not
identify
the churches more exactly.
The fact that
elsewhere Paul uses geographical terms in the Roman
sense creates the strong
presumption that he means churches anywhere
the province. While the book of Acts mentions Paul’s
evangelistic tour of
in the southern part of the province of Galatia , & the churches established
in Lystra, Derbe, Iconium, and Pisidian
Antioch, it makes no mention of
churches in northern Galatia .
G-5
Date and Inclusion in NT Canon—The
question of the date of the
epistle is both more controversial & more
significant than the location of
Paul's churches. According to one view, Galatians is the
earliest of Paul's
letters and was written from Antioch in Syria before Paul's 3rd visit to
been mentioned the meeting had it already occurred. This group believes
that there were 2 conferences on the Jewish issue.
The
great majority of scholars are not convinced, as Paul seems
to be describing this 3rd meeting as if it already happened in Galatians 2.
The majority of scholars believe that the
letter must have been written
after the 3rd visit that is described in Acts
15. Once Acts 15 ceases to esta-
blish the
earliest possible date for Galatians, there is no reason why the
letter shouldn't be placed as late as the period of Romans & the Corinthian
letters.
A
third possible date, sometime during Paul's imprisonment, needs
to be considered. While it is true that he refers to his
imprisonment no-
where in this letter, it can also be said that he nowhere speaks
of any pro-
spective travel. One
can't help wondering why Paul isn't going instead of
writing. The salutation “all the brothers who are with
me,” seems strange
unless Paul is on a journey or in prison. If Galatians was written from pri-
son, it was
almost certainly written after Romans and was one of Paul's
latest
letters. Romans, as the longer, more careful, statement does not
need to be the later.
The Letter to the Galatians has a very interesting and important
place in the early history of the Canon of the New Testament. The first
definite event in that history was undoubtedly the collection of Paul's
letters. The letters were sought out, assembled, and published as a single
work for the churches' use. There's good reason to believe that the seve-
ral letters were arranged in order of length, with the letter we know as
Ephesians being used as a sort of preface to the particular church letters
that followed. This collection was widely distributed among the churches
in the opening years of the second century.
What
is more important is that Marcion adopted the collection as a
major part of a
new “Bible” for his followers. Marcion
did not leave the
latter in their original order but replaced Ephesians in the
first place with
Galatians. The emphasis with which Paul set gospel
against law must
have appealed especially to Marcion, who saw in it a great
manifesto of
the Christian freedom from Judaism.
GALBANUM (חלבנה (khel beh
nah); calbanh (khal bah nay)) The aro-
matic resinous gum most likely
from a species of giant fennel, imported
somewhat uncertain. It was a “sweet
spice” used as a part of the holy
incense burned in the tabernacle.
GALEED (גלעﬢ, witness
heap) A pile of stones heaped up
by Laban & Jacob
as a sign of their covenant & a boundary mark for their
respective coun-
tries. It is intended to
furnish an etymology for the name Gilead .
GALILEANS. Galilee's Inhabitants included Jews, pagans, &, from the first 100
years after
Christ, Christians. The Galileans may
have been distinctive
in their religious views as well as their accents when
they spoke Aramaic.
There
is rabbinic evidence that in the first century A.D. customs
prevailed in Galilee which were not current in other parts of Palestine .
They may have celebrated the Passover festival a day earlier than other
Jews, & Galileans
refused to accept the Pharisaic rule that meat may not
be eaten with dairy
products. The Pharisees considered the
men of Gali-
be accounted
for by their being 'amme ha arets, or unlettered, conserva-
tive agrarians,
who were perhaps not deeply religious. On the other hand,
some of the Galilean customs suggest the more
conservative Pharisaic
religious party.
Of
all the gospels, Mark’s gospel seems closest to the Galilean
background. The kingdom of God
sayings are all placed in the setting of
the Galilean ministry. The gospel’s ending looks forward to the
Resurrec-
tion in Galilee , which is echoed in Matthew. The later history of Galilean
Christianity is
obscure. James’ letter may exemplify
Galilean Christia-
nity, but this theory rests principally on the name tradition
has attached to
the letter; it may actually reflect the thought of a
conservative Jewish
Christian church somewhere in Palestine .
bing a fixed administrative district under the Romans. The region later to
be known as Galilee was the most northerly part of the northern kingdom
Pileser. Through the next 6
centuries the region passed in turn to Baby lo-
tament Apocrypha /
Influences Outside the Bible section of the Appendix.).
G-6
The
term “Galilee of the Gentiles” or “of the nations” first occurs in
the prophecy of Isaiah (Isaiah 9), referring to Zebulun and Naphtali’s terri-
tory
as occupied by a mixed population. The
name reflects a popular repu-
tation for racial variety and mixture in and around
these northern frontier
districts. To
the south the “Great Plain” Esdraelon provided a natural boun-
dary with Samaria , from Mount
Carmel to Beth-shan. The
northern border
is Tyre , and stretched eastward to Lake
Huleh, about 16 km north of the
western boundary remains uncertain, except that it bordered upon Syrian
Phoenicia.
Its
dimensions in Roman times were roughly 40 km (east-west) by
56 km (north-south). Galilee was itself divided roughly in half, into Upper
and Lower, by the Plain
of Ramah. Lower or southern Galilee ranged from
230 meters below sea level at the Sea of Galilee to 150 meters above, ex-
cept for mountains reaching up
to Mount Tabor (560 meters).
Upper or nor-
thern Galilee included the southern ranges of the Lebanon Mountains from
450 to 1,600 meters high.
When Herod
the Great’s kingdom was split into 3 parts in 4 B.C.,
Sepphoris, about 6 km
north of Nazareth, became Galilee ’s capital. The
tetrarch Herod Antipas made it his
capital in 4 B.C. It was destroyed by
became Galilee ’s largest city, and remained the capital until
replaced by
Tiberias around 25 A.D. In
44 A.D., Herod Agrippa I, Palestine ’s
last
Jewish ruler, died after a 6-year reign over Galilee , and all Palestine was
then formed into a province and was governed by
procurators. After Jeru-
Tiberias and
Sepphoris became Jewish, & the Diaspora came to look upon
Galilee's basic rock is limestone, in which natural caves abound.
There is also volcanic rock, especially in
the east & bordering upon the
the plains, valleys, & terraces. Although the craters are
extinct, there are
many hot springs such as have made Tiberias a popular spa
even to mo-
dern times. At intervals there
were fords, later bridges, for east-west traf-
fic across the Jordan , which led to the natural roadways through valley
and
plain. Several such international highways crossed Galilee between
relationship with world trade and culture.
Life
in Galilee was determined chiefly by the Lebanon Mountains ,
which gathered moisture in the form of dew and snow
and springs & lite-
rally poured it over the land. Terraced farms & orchards dotted even the
northern mountains. With normal
rainfall, crops were especially luxuriant
in the valleys and plains of Lower Galilee . Oil, wine,
fish and grain were
common exports.
Another important source of income was the toll collec-
ted on international trade routes.
A
reasonable estimate for the 1st century would find about 350,000
Galileans,
including a large slave element and about 100,000 Jews largely
Hellenized. The primary language was the universal Greek
Koine; many
Jews spoke Aramaic. Some of Galilee 's most important cities were around
the shore of the Sea of
Galilee. Capernaum , at the north end, west of the
tary post.
Chinneroth, one
of the oldest towns, lay on the northwest coast on
the edge of the Plain of Chinneroth. Tarichaea (Magdala), at the
west cen-
ter of the lake, was a busy center for the processing of fish. Tiberias was a
capital to replace Sepphoris.
The names Chinneroth, Gennesaret, & Tibe-
rias, all were applied to the
great lake at one time. Although the lake’s
eas-
tern half lay outside Galilee , it was referred to as a part of Galilean life.
The
religious worship in this northerly Gentile region was related to
the many
popular cults which had spread around the Mediterranean .
Shrines to numerous deities must have existed in the larger cities of Gen-
tile Galilee. They represented the normal & traditional worship of the
Gentile majority in Galilee and even in the more Jewish towns.
Syna-
gogues likewise were to be found throughout Galilee , not only in towns
primarily Jewish, like Capernaum , but also in towns primarily Gentile, like
Sepphoris.
of Jesus of Nazareth. Almost the entire
career of Jesus Nazareth lay within
this tiny region's borders. It is reported that he traveled once with his
dis-
ciples to Caesarea Phillipi, east of the Jordan , & about 30 miles north from
his home in Capernaum , & another journey of about the same distance to
the “border of Tyre .” Upon occasion,
Jesus entered the Greek territory east
of the Jordan . He may have
traveled to Jerusalem through the eastern dis-
trict of Perea; such a journey through Samaria is much more certain.
G-7
The
gospel record doesn't encourage a conclusion that Jesus regu-
larly attended the
major festivals in Jerusalem , which would be typical of
a Galilean Jew. Much of the teaching of Jesus wasn't
acceptable to ortho-
dox interpreters; indeed, he gained a reputation for unusual
and controver-
sial interpretation. He manifested
a freshness & independence of mind as
to the meaning and application of the
Law, consonant with the religious
spirit of the galil.
After
his baptism by John, Jesus apparently withdrew from his family
in Nazareth and adopted Capernaum as his home, quite possibly
staying,
when in town, at Peter's home.
Here on the lake shore, he secured his 1st
disciples, from among
the fishermen. He may have made one later visit to
near Capernaum and repeatedly in Bethsaida . There's no
gospel report
of his going farther south, to Magdala or Tiberias.
He
preached the gospel of salvation mainly to Jews, Samaritans &
Gentiles (including Romans). He would
have encountered Pharisees and
scribes in Galilean cities, but rarely a
Sadducee or a priest. The controver-
sies
in the gospel deal with interpretation of the law, rather than with the
ritual
or conduct of temple worship. It was
not his debates with the scribes
in Galilee , but his defiance of the hierarchy in Jerusalem that resulted in
his crucifixion.
lih lay ee as)) The larger lake in northern Palestine , the chief feature of
the Jordan waterway and of Galilean life.
This
ancient basin has been called by several names during the
period of Hebrew
history. The earliest of these was
Chinnereth. This
was the name of a
walled town, and probably meant “harp,” as the hill
it is on is
harp-shaped. A later name for the lake
& the same city was
Gennesar, used in Maccabean & New Testament (NT) times. In the
100s B.C. the lake was called
Tiberias, clearly derived from the city
built by Herod Antipas; this name
survives in the Arabic name
Tabariyeh.
The
name by which the lake is best known is Galilee , an old
name for the region to the west. The name as applied to the lake does
not
appear until the gospels use it. It was
translated as “sea” rather
than “lake,” because the Greek word thalassa is
ambiguous and can
mean either sea or large lake. The “Sea” of Galilee is actually a fresh-
water inland lake.
The Lake of Galilee's shape is most like a great
heart. It is about 21 km long (north-south) and 13
km wide. As a natural
phenomenon, the
lake & the Jordan rift are of great age. The high moun-
tains around it fall off
sharply, especially on the eastern side. The sur-
face of the lake is 212 meters below sea level, with the lake's deepest
part
reaching down another 60 meters.
On the eastern side the cliffs of the
Jaulan Plateau present a steep
face to the lake. On this side may be identified the ancient
Gergesa, the
setting for the stampede of swine that rushed down the cliff and were
drowned. On the western side of the lake the mountains form an
amphi-
theater, with a narrow plain along the lake on which several important
towns were situated. The highest
neighboring mountains although at a
greater distance, lie to the northwest
where the town of Safed looks down
from over 800 meters towards the lake.
The Galilee waters drain from as far north as Mount Hermon , over
60 km away.
At one time they formed a single long lake throughout the
entire course
to the Dead Sea . Water reaches
Galilee from Lake Huleh
through a narrow gorge 16 km long, dropping over 280
meters in the pro-
cess. There is a plain
to the northwest, extending 4.8 km along the lake
and reaching back into the
hills about 3.2 km; this is the fertile plain of
Gennesaret, the most
productive and populous area along the coast.
The
lake was an active center of Galilean life.
Roads fanned out
from the lake, westward to Acco, southwestward to Caesarea , and south-
ward to Judea . Jesus of Nazareth, an artisan from a small highland
town,
made a major change when he took up life in Capernaum at the northern
end of the lake. It attracted other Galileans, like Nathanael
from Cana ,
Mary from Magdala, Philip, Andrew, and Peter from Bethsaida to the
east.
James, John, Simon, and Andrew were in a fishing partnership in
city was a Roman military & customs post on the international highway.
Next
to Capernaum , Bethsaida
drew the attention of Jesus. It lay
at
the northern end of the lake, in the delta east of the Jordan's mouth,
4.5 km from Capernaum . Some distance
from Bethsaida was the setting
for the feeding a crowd. Galilean fishermen have been cautious about
treacherous storms such as those mentioned in the gospels, caused by
cold winds
from the west, or from Mount
Hermon in the north,
chan-
neled down the gorge.
Another lake
town of importance was Chorazin; lying away from
the shore about 3.2 km north
of Capernaum ; the gospels record no epi-
sode here. The northern part of the lake constituted the
entire gospel
setting for the activity of Jesus from, Capernaum around to Bethsaida
and included the single visit to Gergasa. No preaching is recorded south
of the Plain
of Gennesaret, an area known to be Gentile.
G-8
On
the southern edge of this plain was the town of Magdala , about 8
km southwest of Capernaum . It was a
focus of revolt and one of the last
places in Galilee to yield to Vespasian. Probably
the most important city
on the lake was Antipas' capital Tiberias, 8 km
southeast of Magdala. Jews
deliberately avoided ritual contamination from the necropolis there. It was
wholly a Gentile city, with Greek
architecture, customs, and religion.
Its
greatest attraction was its medicinal springs, which even won over Jews
in later years as Jerusalem became more paganized. There are also seve-
ral lesser towns around
the southern portion of the lake, including Senna-
bris, Philoteria, & Semakh;
they are not mentioned in the NT.
The
last Jewish king to rule over any part of Galilee was Agrippa II
(56-100 A.D.).
His puppet kingdom was actually east of the Jordan , but
Nero gave to Agrippa the Galilean lakeside
cities of Tiberias, Magdala,
Agrippa died these were all
incorporated into the Roman province of Syria .
Excavation
around the Lake of Galilee have uncovered the syna-
gogues in some of its cities. The one in Capernaum is a white limestone
structure, built around 200
A.D. Then there is the black basalt
synagogue
of Chorazin built sometime around 250 A.D. Synagogues were unearthed
at Arbela ,
southwest of Magdala, and at Hammath, southeast of Tiberias.
GALL (HERB) (ראש (roshe); colh (ko leh)) A
bitter & poisonous herb; its
juice is commonly thought to be the “hemlock”
poison which Socrates
drank. Where the
King James Version translates the Hebrew as “gall,” the
New Revised Standard
Version will sometimes translate more generally
as "poison" (e.g.
Deuteronomy 29, Jeremiah 9 and 23).
GALL (OF LIVER)
(מררה (mer o raw), bitterness)
This word originally re-
presented just the abstract concept of “bitterness.” It later came to be ap-
plied specifically to
the gall bladder.
GALLERY (אתיק (at teek),
portico; רחט (rekh et), watering-trough)
Atiq is
an architectural feature of Ezekiel's temple complex
of uncertain mea-
ning. The meaning is unknown,
but the context suggests “tresses.”
GALLEY (אני (on ee),
ship) A low and rather narrow
seagoing vessel, pro-
pelled mainly by oars and used principally as a warship.
GALLIM (גלים (gal leem)) 1. The
native city of Palti son of Laish, to whom
Saul gave his daughter Michal
as wife after his quarrel with her husband
David. 2. A town of Benjamin on the route which Isaiah says the
Assyrian army took
on its march to Jerusalem .
GALLIO. Junius Gallio Annaeus, proconsul of Achaea
(51-52 or 52-53), with
headquarters at Corinth . He assumed
the name Gallio when adopted by
a wealthy friend and introduced to a political
career. While Gallio was
in office, Jews
at Corinth brought Paul before his judgment seat. Gallio
refused to let Paul defend himself; he dismissed the case on the ground
that it involved Jewish law. Involved in the conspiracy against Nero in
which his brother lost his life, he finally had to commit suicide.
GALLON (metrhtaV
(met ray tas), equivalent of 9 gallons) In John 2 it
is translated “twenty or
thirty gallons.”
GAMAD, MEN OF (גמדים (ga mah
deem)). Men from a place in Syria , pos-
sibly the same as Kumidi. Men of Gamad were in the army of Tyre , ac-
cording to Ezekiel's oracle against that
city.
GAMALIEL (Gamaliehl, recompense of God) 1. An
honored Pharisaic
member of the Sanhedrin, who counseled moderation in the
treatment of
Peter and other apostles, and is said to have been Paul's
teacher. Gama-
liel was the grandson of
the famous Rabbi Hillel.
G-9
From
33-66 A.D. his learning and generous spirit greatly enhance
the prestige of
liberal Pharisaism. Jewish tradition
erroneously regarded
him as president of the Sanhedrin (the high priest's
job). His caution con-
cerning extreme
measures against the apostles may have been due to his
characteristically
tolerant and generous spirit, to a wish to protect Phari-
saic Judaism, or to a
true piety which divined in the events he had wit-
nessed the purpose power
of God at work. Was
Gamaliel actually Paul's
teacher? Why
then the pupil's persecuting activities, or the lack of men-
tion of
Gamaliel. Answers have been given, but
not wholly satisfactory
ones.
2. The leader of the tribe of Manasseh.
GAME (ציד (tsah yid),
venison) Game in biblical times
consisted chiefly of
“harts, gazelles, roebucks, and fatted fowl.” Esau was Isaac's favorite
because he provided
him game.
GAMES, OT. Of games and play the Old Testament (OT) gives only
scattered
indications. Undoubtedly the
Hebrews had their games. A contest was
associated with the 7-day wedding feast (Judges 14) in which Samson
told a riddle involving a forfeit to be paid to the winner of the guessing.
In II
Samuel 2. while waiting for battle, 12 men were chosen from
each side to engage
in a contest of skill, most likely similar to fencing; the
result was fatal for
both sides. In Zechariah 8 the prophet
envisages the
restored city’s habitants, the children playing in the
streets. In the Greek
period the Jews
readily adopted the Greek games, & the gymnasium and
the theater became popular,
much to the disgust of the orthodox.
Archaeology
has added much to our knowledge of games in OT
times. Some archaeologists suggest that some molded
clay figures may
have been children's dolls.
Most interesting among the discoveries are the
games and their
accompanying playing pieces. In Palestine itself these
have been found in a number of sites,
apparently introduced from Mesopo-
date from the 1500s B.C. in the Middle Bronze Age. The most common is
rectangular divided into
20 or 30 squares. Some boards
have a series of
holes, and the playing pieces are pegs.
At
Mizpah, game boards were carved in the rock walls, made up of
varying sizes of
boxes. Playing pieces took many
forms. One set, associ-
ated with a 12th
Dynasty Egyptian game, consisted of 10 pegs of ivory, 5
with heads of dogs, 5
with heads of jackals; the game has been referred to
as “hounds and jackals.” In the game the pegs’ movement was determined
by casting of knuckle bones. Unfortunately
we have no knowledge of the
rules for these games. But there is ample evidence from archaeology
that
games were common.
GAMES, NT. The word “game” isn't found in the New Testament (NT),
but
there are many references to various kinds of games and sports.
Jesus
referred to the games of the children.
The soldiers cast lots
for the garments of Jesus, probably using dice of
some form. Greeks &
Romans were great
lovers of games & sports. Josephus
often mentions
efforts of the Herodian family to force the Greco-Roman games
upon the
Jews; pious Jews put up stiff resistance. They came from Gentile, pagan
sources, and were often connected with the worship of pagan deities. Ath-
letes would often appear completely naked. And often there was much
brutality and
bloodshed.
The
most important of the Greek games were the Olympics at Olym-
leaves, olive, pine, laurel, or parsley,
but they were held in very high honor
by their fellow citizens. Paul urges the Corinthians to “play the game
so as
to win the prize” I Corinthians 9) and to run the good race (Hebrews 12)
when he speaks of matching the efforts of earlier Christians, and even of
Jesus
himself.
GAMUL (גמול, weaned) A chief of the Levites.
GANGRENE. See Canker.
GARDEN (גן (gan); גנה (ghin naw)) A fenced plot of ground used for various
purposes. The fence might be of stone,
or a mud brick wall or a hedge. It
was often irrigated & might have a shelter built in it. The king's residence
probably included an
elaborate garden or private park.
Gardens were valu-
able for shade, & one might go walking or hold a banquet
in his garden.
With a pool installed,
the garden might used for bathing. Fruit & olive trees,
as well as grape vines, were planted in gardens. Gardens may have been
used for worship & for observing idolatrous rites. They
were also used as
burial places.
G-10
GAREB (גרב, scruvy) 1. An
Ithrite or, more probably, a Jattrite who was one
of the mighty men of David
known as the 30. Depending on what
vowels
are assumed for the Hebrew, he is either an Ithrite from Kiriath-jearim
or
he is from Jattir, located southwest of Hebron . 2. A quarter of Jerusa-
Stemma stem mah), crown)
The English translation of three words.
Livyah is a wreath; pe'ar is
worn as a sign of joy, as by a bridegroom;
stemma is a wreath or chaplet wound around a priest's staff or worn on his
head.
GARLIC (שומים (shoo meem)) A bulbous vegetable of the lily
family. The
Hebrews in the wilderness
craved garlic and other foods. Herodotus
tells
of an inscription on the great Pyramid of Cheops which listed garlic as
one of the vegetable supplied to the builders.
GARMENT. See Dress
and ornaments; Festal garment; Linen Garment.
GARMITE (גרמי, bony) Name given to a people and the
designation of Keilah
in the list of Judah .
GARNER (אסף (o sef),
gathering) A granary, barn, or
store. The noun “gar-
ner” is now nearly
obsolete; granary is commonly used instead.
(See
granary)
GARRISON (מצבה (mats tsay
bah)) A body of troops stationed
for defense,
usually on a frontier post.
In
the 900s B.C., the Philistines had garrisons deep in Judean terri-
tory,
particularly Bethlehem . After David
conquered them, he placed Isra-
elite garrisons deep in Philistine territory & near Damascus . Jehoshaphat
placed garrisons not only in Judah , his southern kingdom, but also in the
northern
kingdom, in cities which Asa, his father, had taken from Baasha.
Elsewhere, however, Asa is portrayed as more or
less at the mercy of the
northern kingdom.
GASH (גדד (ga dad),
cut) To inflict incisions on the person as a sign of
mourning or in ecstatic
pagan worship.
GASPAR. In late tradition a king of India and one of the three Magi.
GATAM (געתם) An
Edomite clan chief.
GATE (שער (shah ‘ar),
opening) The gate of the city
served for defense and
as a civic center.
In II Samuel 18-19, there was actually a pair of gates,
with a chamber above them, and a roof above that which served as a look-
out. The gate was the news center. “Within your gates” may mean within
your
towns. The gate might be the place of
market or the place where the
elders and judges or king might sit officially,
and so might be synonymous
with the court of judgment.
GATE BETWEEN THE TWO WALLS (שער בין החמתים (shah ‘ar
bane
ha kho mo ta yeem)) A city gate to the southeast of Jerusalem .
considerably
south of Ekron, being farther east and nearer to Judah than
any of its sister cities. Because of its position it changed hands now
and
again coming under the control of Judah .
times. A reference in the Amarna Letters confirms its antiquity. There
are traces of early conflict with the
tribes of Ephraim & Benjamin. The
captured
ark was first taken to Ashdod , then Gath , then Ekron after it
proved troublesome in each
city. Goliath was from Gath . The
Philistines
fled to Gath & Ekron after their defeat by Israel .
G-11
David,
in flight from Saul, attempted to take refuge with Achish, king
of Gath , but was not well received as reported in I Samuel
21, or was wel-
comed, as reported in I Samuel 27. When David wished to delay bringing
the ark
to Jerusa lem , he entrusted it for safekeeping to Obed-edom the
Git-
tite. Whether through conquest or
through friendships formed during his
service under Achish, David was able
throughout his later career to have
a Philistine bodyguard
under the command of Ittai the Gittite (i.e. from
During Solomon's time there seems to been easy communication
between Jerusalem & Gath . The Gittite
was still Achish by name, possibly
the same man who had befriended David long
before. Rehoboam fortified
Aram felt it necessary to take Gath in a campaign against Jerusalem in the
time of Jehoash of Judah (837-800 B.C.).
The city apparently reverted to the
Philistines, for shortly thereafter
Uzziah of Judah (783-742) attacked it in a
campaign against the Philistines
and partially destroyed it. Sargon II speaks of conquering and despoiling
Philistine cities in the prophetic
writings noticeably omit Gath . Because of
the place's obscurity since
the eighth century B.C., it is not strange that a
number of sites have been proposed. The 2 best proposals seem to
be 19
km east of Ashdod , due west of Jerusalem , and 24 km east of Ashkelon ,
west and slightly south of Jerusalem .
GATH-HEPHER (גת החפר, well of the wine
press (?)) A border town in the
4.8 km northeast of Nazareth .
GATH-RIMMON (גת רמון, wine press by the pomegranate) 1. A
Danite city
assigned to the Kohathite clan of Levites, probably on the River
Yarkon’s
southern bank. It may also be
the Gath on Thut-mose III’s list.
2. A Levitical city in Manasseh.
GAULANITIS (גולן (go lan)) That portion of the Transjordan Plateau
immedi-
ately east of Galilee . Gaulanitis
extended from the cliffs which rise
steeply along the Jordan Valley . On the south
the border was the Yarmuk
and the north the districts of Ulatha and Paneas.
Although
not mentioned in the Bible Gaulanitis was apparently
named for a city in the
Old Testament. Herod the Great willed
Gaulanitis
to his son Philip in 4 B.C.
After Philip's death in 34 A.D., it was added to
the Roman province of Syria , but later it was given to Herod Agrippa I by
the Emperor Caligula. It formed part of the kingdom of Herod Agrippa II
when it took part in the Jewish revolt against Rome (66-70 A.D.).
Gaula-
nitis was famed in Old Testament times (as Bashan ) & in New Testament
times for its rich crops.
Apparently it was more thickly populated then
than it is now, although
it is still fertile.
GAUZE, GARMENTS OF
(גליון (gil yone), mirror, tablet)
An item of finery
of the daughters of Zion , perhaps filmy shawls or glittering little plates of
metal.
from the Bible as the southernmost of the Philistines' 5 principal cities.
The
city had a long history and was regarded as an important place,
being mentioned
about 20 times in the Bible. Though on
the coast, Gaza
was the land gateway between Egypt and Asia for caravan and military
traffic. Biblical tradition regards Gaza as ancient, going back to Canaanite
times. Thutmose stopped near Gaza around 1468 B.C.
Letters show the
town still loyal to Egypt , but in grave danger from the invading Habiru
around
1360 B.C. The Israelites were at first
able to get a foothold in the
region, but the incoming Philistines soon took
over the southern coastal
territory. Solomon’s territory ended near Gaza but didn’t include it.
Amos
condemns the city for its slave trade with Edom . The pro-
phetic oracle, if actually from Amos would be dated about the middle of
the 700s
B.C. Hanno of Gaza conspired with Egypt against Assyria ; he
was
captured & deported to Assyria in 720 B.C.
Acting against Assyria ,
Hezekiah of Judah attacked Gaza . This brought
Sennacherib to Palestine ;
he took away considerable territory from Judah . It is perhaps
to this peri-
od that we can assign the bitter oracle against Gaza and the Philistines
(Zephaniah 2). When Pharaoh Neco went north around 609 B.C.
to sup-
port Assyria against the Chaldeans, he probably took Gaza into protective
custody. (See
also the entry in the Old Testament Apocrypha/Influences
Outside the Bible
section of the Appendix.).
G-12
In
Roman times Gaza was a flourishing seat of pagan culture, &
Christianity was established only after a long and sometimes bloody
strug-
gle. It has remained solidly Muslim
since 635 A.D. Because of the mo-
dern city's presence on the old site, no significant archaeological work has
been
undertaken here.
GAZELLE (צביה (tsib yaw)) A
species of small Antelope, with recurved
horns.
Two varieties have been known in biblical Palestine , one pale fawn
in color, the other a dark smoky fawn
in color. In biblical times the gazelle
was probably the most abundant of the larger game animals.
Although
not used for sacrificial purposes, the gazelle was a clean
animal and could be
eaten as food, but they were not easy to bag, for their
speed of movement was
proverbial. The oath in the Song of Songs
[Solo-
mon] is difficult. “By the gazelles
or hinds of the field,” may have been
used in order to leave out the name of
God from a solemn charge concer-
ning human love.
GAZEZ (גזז
(fleece-shearing)) Apparently a
Clebite family. The name is men-
tioned twice, both as a son and as a brother of Haran in I Chronicles 2; the
verse is obscure and probably
an addition.
GAZZAM (גזם, locust) A family of Nethinim.
GEAR (skeuoV
(skeh
oo os)) Equipment or
apparatus. The context of Acts
27 indicates that this word is a nautical term, but the precise meaning is
uncertain. It could mean just “sails”;
it could mean “ship's gear,” which
would include sails among ropes, yards, and
pulleys; it could mean anchor.
GEBA (גבע, hill) One of the cities given to Levites out of the
inheritance
allotted to the tribe of Benjamin.
This site played important role in the bat-
tles of Saul, Jonathan, and
David with the Philistines. Gibeah and Gibeon
are sometimes confused with Geba in the Hebrew text. Geba was fortified
by King Asa of Judah
(Southern Kingdom), and is listed by Isaiah as an
important station in the
visionary portrayal of a hostile army's advance on
GEBAL (גבל, mountain) 1. A
Phoenician city between Tripolis and Beirut .
Ancient Gebal was situated on a slope on the Phoenician coast,
north of Berytus. The famous cedars were found in
the neighborhood &
made Gebal an important city for all nations and kings who
needed ships.
Gebal is one of the most
ancient cities in the Near
East , and its history can
be
traced far back. There is physical
evidence that a Mediterranean race
was living in Gebal in Neolithic times
(5000-4000 B.C.).
Some time around 4000
B.C., this civilization vanished rather sud-
denly. At the same time traces of a new civilization
are found. New tech-
nical inventions are
found—the wheel, sailing ships, & the potter’s wheel.
Above all a new metal, bronze, was introduced
by people coming in from
the north. Semites had also mixed with the former population. These dif-
ferent peoples mixed to form Phoenicians.
Egyptian
influence in this Phoenician city was very great. A Cylin-
der from 3000 was found, as were the
names of the Pharaohs Mycerinus,
Unis, and Pepi from the 2600s, 2400s, and
2300s respectively. The Egyp-
tian interest in Gebal wasn't only of a religious character. Gebal exported
jars with oils, spices, wine,
leather, and other products.
Near
2000 B.C., Gebal was destroyed and burned.
The names of
the kings in the 1800s & 1700s B.C. were most likely of
Amorite origin,
but the population was still mixed. Toward 1500 B.C. Hurrians, Hittites,
and Mitannians ruled in Gebal, and the names of kings were primarily
Arameans. In the 1300s, King Rib-Addi of Gebal was one
of the few
kings in these countries who remained faithful to the Egyptian
Pharaoh.
In the centuries following 1000
B.C., Gebal also took part in the great
Phoenician expansion in trade and shipping. Gebal shared the fate of the
rest of Phoenicia , being conquered by the Assyrians, the Babylonians,
the Persians, the Greek, and the Romans.
2. A territory in the mountains south of the
Dead Sea , near Petra .
G-13
GEBER (גבר, vigorous man) Son of Uri; one of the twelve commissariat
pre-
fects of Solomon. He had as his
district the land of Gilead .
GEBIM (גבים, cisterns) A city of Benjamin located on the route the Assyrian
army took on its
march on Jerusalem .
GECKO (אנקה (‘an aw kaw), lizard ) A small, four-legged reptile; the mea-
ning
is uncertain, though its place in Leviticus 11, points to a reptile.
GEDALIAH (גדליה, great is the Lord) 1. A
musician, supposedly of
David’s time, to whom one of the post-exilic Levitical
families traced its
line. 2. Grandson of Hezekiah, and grandfather of
the prophet Zepha-
niah. 3. Son of Pashur; one of the Jerusalemite
princes that coun-
seled Jeremiah’s death.
4. Exilic governor of Judah under Nebuchadnezzar.
Gedaliah’s
father had protected Jeremiah and the son probably shared the
prophet’s
moderate political views. Jewish nationalist fanatics murdered him.
5. One of the priests who put away their
alien wives.
GEDER
(גדר, fence) A city of
the Canaanites, conquered by Joshua. It
is not
mentioned in the list of the cities of that tribe, and may have been
abandoned.
GEDERAH (גדרה, wall) 1. One
of the towns of the Shephelah in the allot-
ment to Judah . Probably Gederah
is to be identified with modern Jede-
rill, around 27.2 km west and a little
north of Jerusalem . 2. A city of
GEDEROTH (גדרות, sheepfolds) A city of Judah in the Shephelah district of
Ahaz’ realm; it has been
identified with Kedron.
GEDEROTHAIM (גדרתים, two sheepfolds) A village of Judah
in the She-
phelah district of Zorah-Azekah.
The site is unknown. It is the general
consensus of scholars that the Hebrew word in Joshua 15 should be read
“and her
sheepfolds.”
GEDOR (גדור, wall) 1. A person or family of Benjamin. 2. A city of Judah ,
mentioned after Beth-zur. 3. A Calebite city in Judah , mentioned with
Soco & Zappah. 4. A
city mentioned as the limit of the conquests of
the Simeonites.
GE-HARASHIM (גיא הרשים, valley of Craftsmen ) A community of crafts-
men named from a valley in the
vicinity of Lod & Ono on the southern bor-
der of the Plain of Sharon .
Joab
of Judah & of the lineage of Kenaz is represented as “father” or
founder of this community of craftsmen. The origin of the name is uncer-
tain, but it
may preserve a memory of a Philistine iron monopoly.
GEHAZI (גיחזי, valley of vision) The servant of the prophet Elisha. In the story
of the Shunamite woman, Gehazi
suggested to Elisha the gift of a son to
the childless woman & her
husband. He later bore the prophet’s
life-giving
staff to the body of the boy when he had died of a head ailment. Gehazi is
primarily known, however, for his
dispassionate rudeness to the woman on
the occasion of her appeal to Elisha on
behalf of her dead son and for the
greedy cunning by which he attempted to
claim for himself the reward
which Elisha had refused from Naaman the
Syrian. Elisha cursed him with
the
disease of which Naaman had been cured.
GEHENNA ( geenna, fiery hell)
Gehenna is the Greek & Latin form of the He-
brew aye hinnom,
or Valley of Hinnom ,
the name of a ravine south of Jeru-
trous cult involving the passing of children through fire. In
the century be-
fore Christ this name came to be used in a metaphorical sense to
denote
the place of fiery torment believed to be reserved for the wicked.
G-14
It
is only in the Greco-Romano period of Jewish history that the
quite distinct concept of a blazing hell begins to emerge.
The concept was
doubtless influenced by the infiltration of Iranian
ideas about judgment.
The application of
“Gehenna” to this place of judgment first appears in the
New Testament. Gehenna is clearly conceived by the New
Testament wri-
ter as identical with the “lake of fire” into which Hades itself
will be cast.
Rabbi Akiba affirms
expressly that Gehenna’s torment lasts only for 12
months. Philo states just as explicitly that wicked Jews will indeed be con-
demned to Tartarus & that their punishment will be
eternal.
The
use of “Gehenna” reflects the tendency to describe of the last
days in terms of
Old Testament places & events; this tendency developed
under Greek influences. Similar terms include
Armageddon, the Damas-
cus wilderness & the new Jerusalem. This tendency which helped at to
Judaize ideas adopted from foreign sources is important for understanding
Jewish and
Christian literature about this age’s end & the new age’s begin-
ning. Gehinnom is likewise employed in an
extended, metaphorical sense
in several Mishnah passages.
GEMALLI (גמלי, camel-owner) Ammiel’s
father, sent from the tribe of Dan to
spy out the land of Canaan .
GEMARA (גמרא, discussion) The specific
term for the discussions carried on
in the rabbinic academies in ancient
Palestine and Babylon of the Mishna;
the Gemaras and the Mishna make up the
Talmud. The term is derived
either from
an Aramaic root meaning “to repeat,” or from a Hebrew root
meaning “to complete.” The 2 Gemaras which existed in the 200s and
300s A.D. were in Tiberias by the Sea of Galilee and
in Babylon .
GEMARIAH (גמריה, whom the Lord completes) 1. An
emissary from
Zedekiah to Nebuchadnezzar who carried Jeremiah’s letter to the
exiles in
Baruch read Jeremiah’s scroll. Gemariah was one of the princes who op-
posed Jehoiakim’s wish to destroy the scroll. 3. Gemariah son of His-
silyahu (589 B.C.).
GENEALOGY A
biblical genealogy is an orderly list of names purporting to
record either the
pedigrees of individual or the assumed relationships of
such groups as families, clans, tribes, or nations. Lineage is traced through
the male with females mentioned only in rare
instances. The Hebrew word
for
generation, ﬨולﬢוﬨ (toe le doth), when applied to the biblical lists,
signifies
descent by birth and family relationship.
Among
the motives responsible for the compilation of the genealo-
gies are: individual
identification for such legal purposes as inheritance;
establishment or rights
to such social positions as nobility, kinship, and
priesthood; proof of racial purity; prideful demonstration of relationship to
a famous ancestor;
strengthening of position or authority.
In agreement
with the general Near Eastern usage, early Hebrew family
records reach
only to the third and the fourth generation.
Hebrew
history is traced back to Adam, the ancestor of all. The
“genealogies” found in the earliest
documents of the Pentateuch are not
individual pedigrees. Rather, they are supposed origins and
recognized
relationship of nations, cities, and people known to the author, set
into
the form of personal genealogical fables. The lists covering the period
before the Flood are probably dependent
upon Babylonian traditions.
The
descendants of Noah set into the pre-exilic narrative and expanded
by the
Priestly Writer in the post-exilic period, contain, not personal
names, but
those of peoples, tribes, countries, & even cities. The basis
of relationship in these lists is not
that of blood but is cultural and
historical.
The
link between and Shem and Abraham has likewise been shown
to be geographical,
with the names used representing places in northwes-
tern Mesopo tamia . Near kinsmen of the Hebrews
are introduced into the
historical narrative as tiny genealogical bits
reflecting independent tradi-
tions. Thus, the early “genealogies” are largely geographical and ethnic
lists rather than
individual pedigrees; at some unknown point, the genealo-
gies become personal
and individual.
Some believe that the
lists have group significance through the
whole tribal period. Others want to recognize personal genealogies
from
the time of Abraham onward. Extended personal genealogies do not deve-
lop until late. Not until the acceptance of the Deuteronomic
law stressing
the congregation’s purity was need felt for complete family
records. From
Then written proof of
purity of descent was essential.
G-15
The
assembling of genealogies extending from the Persian period
(600-400 B.C.) back to the patriarchal age (1900 B.C.) was a difficult task.
Before the proper number of generations can
be assembled, a genealo-
gist must have some estimation of the interval to be
covered by the list
and of the average extent of a generation. The figure used for the length of
a
generation varied from 10 years to 100 years.
40 years was most often
used as a generation’s span.
Some
Jewish writers were ingenious, if not accurate, in producing
chronological
schemes which, by their symmetrical patterns can be recog-
nized as
artificial. The interval between the
Exodus and the founding of
Solomon’s temple was determined as 480 years. The time between Solo-
mon’s temple and
Zerubbabel’s temple was believed to be equal to it.
Within
the period to be covered approximately the correct number
of names must be
placed. At the time the lists were
compiled, it is unlikely
that much written genealogical data had survived. Patriarchal tribal struc-
ture was lost in the monarchy, and war & exile
doubtless destroyed some
family records. More complete and trustworthy records were the postexilic
records
contemporary with the genealogists. Their
sincere efforts nonethe-
less had to rely on faulty, conflicting and even
spurious sources, thus resul-
ting in errors.
Additional names needed to fill the gaps in
the genealogies, could
be drawn from other lists of names, or repeated from the
same list. Clan
geographical names are
often personified as “fathers” and “sons.”
Some
proper names are but corruptions of Hebrew words. The names of the
sons of Heman in I Chronicles 25 are the words of a psalm fragment.
It
should have been possible in the post-exilic period for any Hebrew
to prove his
origin by tracing his line to remote tribal connections. Actually,
this was impossible, because only a
few lines are fully developed and colla-
teral lines are dropped. The Chronicler, who gives the most complete
lists
omits any genealogy, shows special interest in the tribes of Levi ,
Judah , &
Benjamin, which contributed the bulk of the
post-exilic community. These
tribes
contain the pedigrees of the religious leaders, & the houses of Saul
and
David.
Many
difficulties face the student of genealogies.
Family terms are
used to describe relationships other than blood and often are less precise
than the context calls for. Lack of surname intensifies the importance of
the father’s name. Repetitions may be
duplicate names, or the name may
be part of a family tradition and frequently
used. The same person may be
known by
several names. Personal names & geographical or group names
are mingled in some genealogies.
Omission
can be demonstrated in some genealogies.
Some are
from faulty copying; others are deliberate. Because of these omissions, &
uncertainty about the length of the generations, genealogies offer compara-
tively little
certain chronological assistance. The
genealogist’s interest is
historical and biographical rather than
chronological.
There are other means
than birth for relationship to a group. When
non-Israelites were incorporated
because of service or loyalty, genealogi-
cal connections then had to be invented
for them. It also cannot always be
determined whether “personal” names refer to individuals or to groups.
Lists of names suffer greatly in
transmission, since it is a matter of copying
with no means of checking
connections. Valuable & authentic
bits of gene-
alogical data are doubtless incorporated in the biblical
genealogies, but
they can be recovered only with great difficulty and with
little certainty.
GENEALOGY (CHRIST) The
genealogy of Christ is found in Matthew 1 and
Luke 3. These genealogies of Christ are all based on
multiples of 7
names. Matthew 1 estimates the interval between Abraham & Jesus as 42
generations, which he divides into 3 groups of 14 generations each. Luke
3 has 4 series of names in multiples
of 7, with a total of 77. For the
inter-
val of David to Jesus, Matthew has 28 generations, while Luke has
42. 17
names occur in both genealogies.
In
Matthew, Jesus’ genealogy is traced back through Judah ’s kings,
through David to Abraham, because the
Messiah would be a descendant
of David, & the promises were made “to Abraham
and to his offspring.”
Matthew begins
his genealogy with Abraham, and his list of names may be
divided into 3 groups, Abraham to David, Solomon to Jeconiah and the
Exile, and Shealtiel to
Jesus.
The first 2 contain 14 names and
the third contains 13 names. The
names
from Perez to David are from the Greek version of Ruth 4; the list
from Solomon
to Jeconiah agrees with I Chronicles 3, but omits Ahaziah,
Joash, and
Amaziah. In the third division
Zerubbabel is called the son of
Shealtiel.
Several names among these last 13 occur only here in the Bible,
and a
period of almost 500 years is covered by 10 names. Jesus’ grand-
father is listed as Jacob.
G-16
Luke
3 traces Jesus’ genealogy backward from Jesus all the way to
Adam and beyond to
God. Luke lists 77 names in contrast
with Matthew’s
41. There are 21 names
from Jesus to Zerubbabel, 21 names from Sheal-
tiel to Nathan, 14 names from
David to Isaac, and 21 names from Abra-
ham to Adam.
The
list from Adam to Abraham is the same as Genesis 5 and 11,
and I Chronicles 1. The list from Abraham to David is the same
as Mat-
thew’s except for the addition of Arni and Admin. The only other names
appearing in both are
Shealtiel, Zerubbabel, & Joseph. The
dissimilarity
in the genealogies of Matthew & Luke from David on is due to
the fact
that Matthew traces Jesus’ li neage through Solomon, while Luke traces
it
through Nathan, another of David’s sons.
The men referred to in Luke’s
list between Nathan and Shealtiel and
between Zerubbabel and Joseph
are all unknown.
The
differences between the genealogies in Matthew & Luke have
caused
difficulties from early days; some consider the genealogies to be
symbolic,
that Matthew’s represented Christ’s royal character while Luke
represented Christ’s priestly role. The genealogies
were probably drawn
up independently, quite early, by different Jewish
Christians in the interest
of substantiating Jesus’ messiahship.
GENERAL (שר (sar); ciliarkoV
(chil ee ar kos) The chief officer of an
army. The term is used in an indefinite sense of
persons of high rank in
Revelation 6.
GENERATION (דור (dure),
circle; תולדות (toe le doth); gennhma (gen
neh
ma), brood; genoV (ge nos), race) 1. Frequently
in the Old Testament,
dur is a circle, or the period from a man’s birth
to that of his son. 2. In
the plural, toledoth is a list
of successive births of family history.
GENESIS (בראשית (beh ray sheeth), in the beginning) The first of Moses' 5
books. This discussion of Genesis will consider the
1st 5 books or Penta-
teuch of the Old Testament (OT) as a whole from time
to time, while
recognizing that Genesis exhibits a greatness of a special type
in contrast
to the remaining books of the Pentateuch; the 5th book, Deuteronomy will
not be taken into consideration or included in this
treatment.
List of Topics—1. Introduction; 2. Composition;
3. Sources of Material from Genesis (9-page Table);
4. 4 Sources: Focus and Time of Origin; 5. 4 Sources:
Place of Origin & Method of Combination;
6. Prehistory of Narrative Threads; 7. Historicity.
1. Introduction—The
first of the 5 books of Moses is named by the
Jews after its first word berasheyeth,
“in the beginning”; by the ancient
church after the inscription in the primary
Greek OT “genesis of the world.”
Like other books of the OT, Genesis was also divided from early times
into
“sections,” which do not coincide with the chapter numbering to which we
are accustomed. The division of the OT books into chapters occurs for the
first time in its Latin
translation.
The
first unit of Genesis is the primitive history that occurs
in slightly
over 10 chapters, ranging from the creation of the world to the
cessation of
the building of the tower and the dispersion of humankind. The boundaries
of the remaining 40 chapters
are roughly: Abraham (11-25); Isaac
(25-26);
Jacob, his protagonists (27-36); Joseph & his brothers (37-50). In the form
in which these 50 chapter are
known to us they afford a continuous narra-
tive of happenings extending over about 2,400 years. But the 50 chapters
don't represent a complete whole fashioned according to a unified plan.
Thus, the view that the OT's 1st 5 books were all written by Moses, which
is attested by the OT & the New
Testament & sanctioned by Jewish and
Christian tradition, cannot in any case
be true.
2. Composition—A formal literary
examination of facts, to seek an
explanation for the manifold repetitions,
contradictions, gaps, & seams as
they strike every observant reader's eye, have led to many attempts at
explanation. If combined into 3 main groups, we have:
the fragment hypo-
thesis; the completion hypothesis; and the documentary
hypothesis.
The
fragmentary hypothesis reckons with a number of independent
literary units
which were compiled later by an editor, having had no connec-
tion of any kind until that time. The completion
hypothesis assumes that
our Genesis is based on a continuous narrative thread & that this was com-
pleted by means of previous disconnected fragments of many
varieties.
According to the documentary
hypothesis, the form of Genesis which
we know now is explained as the
compilation of several parallel narrative
threads. The last is the most plausible explanation of Genesis' manifold
literary problems, but it does not offer a solution to all of the difficulties
found in Genesis.
Some of those difficulties are more easily explained ac-
cording to the completion hypothesis or the fragment theory.
G-17
The
form of the documentary theory which claims the widest circu-
lation and
acceptance is the three source theory, the conception that Gene-
sis is a
compilation of 3 parallel narrative threads. One of these uses the
name “Yahweh” for God
& is therefore designated as Y(J)ahwist (J), while
both the others say “Elohim” instead. One was given the
name “Elohist”
(E), and the other, to differentiate it, & to recognize its
emphasis on priest-
hood & ritual, is given the designation “Priestly Code”
(P).
This
division of chapters 1-13 into 2 threads isn't satisfying, because
there are
fragments assigned to J which disturb the course of its narrative,
such as the
genealogy of Cain in chapter 4, the incomplete story of the
marriages of the
sons of God with the daughters of men & the giants resul-
ting from this union,
the blessing of Noah’s 2 elder sons, and the cursing
of the youngest (a section which uses a different name for the youngest
son than in the Yahwist portion), the tower building story, and the parting
of Abraham and Lot.
The
inconsistencies and contradictions with the J strand continues
after chapter
13. These fragments cannot come from
the same narrator as
the surrounding segments.
Upon closer inspection, one soon recognizes
that here it is by no means
a question of isolated blocks. These
fragments
form a continuity which demonstrates how the oldest sons—Reuben,
Simeon, Levi, and Judah—lost their birthright to Joseph.
Since these fragments do form continuity
among themselves, one
must give up the idea of them as isolated fragments in
favor of the assump-
tion that they are part of an independent narrative thread
which runs paral-
lel to the J material.
In other words, one must replace the 3-source theory
by a 4-source theory. This fourth source may
be designated as the “Lay
source” (L) out of consideration for the fact that by
its outspokenness for
the world of the “profane” or “laity” it becomes the
polar opposite of the
Priestly Code (P).
The
most widespread agreement is found in the designation of P
material, which tends to be sketchy except where the story turns to ritual
and
legal observances. What remains after P
and L are taken into account
belongs to J and E. J begins its statement with the creation of
human and
beast, while E does not begin until Abraham. The two threads are easily
recognizable,
especially where they have been placed side, but not always
easily separated
where they have been blended together. (See the next 9
pages for a detailed
breakdown of Genesis into these four sources).
Fixing
the 4 parallel threads in time is extraordinarily difficult be-
cause references to events which can be precisely determined chronologi-
cally don't exist in any of the threads. Facts which
are ambiguous scarcely
permit an entirely clear decision. Nevertheless it is clear that all threads
presuppose the conclusion of the seizure of the land Canaan
and its settle-
ment from the time of the judges & the kings—namely from around
1200
B.C. This means that they can
scarcely have originated in their present
form before the formation of the Israelite empire by David.
3. Sources
of Material from Genesis
Legend
L=Lay
Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J =
J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic
writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
1 1-31
2 4b-25 1-4a
3 1-24
4 1 2-16
4 17-24 25-26
5 29 1-28
5 30-32
(In 7:6)
(In 9:28 -29)
6 1-4
6 5-8 9-22
G-18
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
7 1-5 6
7 7-10 11
7 12
7 16b 13-16a
7 17 18-21
8 2b 1-2a
8 3a 3b-5
8 6-12
8 13b 13a
8 20-22 14-19
9 1-11
9 12 13-15
9 16 17
9 18-19
9 20-27 28-29
10 1
10 2a, 3a 2b, 3b
10 4a, 5a 4b, 5b
10 6a, 7a, 7c 6b, 7b
10 8-12
10 13-14 13-14
10 15-18a 15-18a
10 18b-19
10 20-21
10 22a 22b
10 23a 23b-29
10 30 31
10 32
11 1-9
11 10-27 10-27
11 28-30
11 31-32 31-32
12 2 1
12 3
12 4a 4a-5
12 6-9 9-20
13 3-4
13 5
13 6b-7 6a
13 10-11a 8-9
13 12b 11b-12a
13 14-18 In 19:29
G-19
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
14 1-7 8-9
25 1-6 7-11
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
44 1-34
45 1-2 1-3
49 1a 1a
Israel .
Canaan
from abroad. But the narrative leaves no
doubt that El & El alone
GETHSEMANE (
Geqshmanei) The
site on the Mount of Olives where
GEZER (גזר, piece, part)
A city in the plain of Palestine, 32 km west of Jerusalem.
The nameGezer can be recognized in hieroglyphic and Akkadian
Thut-mose III included Gezer among the captured Canaanite cities
2. A city of Benjamin identified in various forms, located most likely
GIBEON (גבעון, hill-city) A city of the tribe of Benjamin 9.6 km
northwest of Jerusalem .
The earliest occurrence of Gibeon is in connection with the conquest
At the north side of the site was a round, rock-cut pool, which mea-
Paradise (See the Eden entry.)
lem in the 500s B.C.
GILEAD (גלעד, heap of
testimony) 1. Son of Machir and grandson of Manas-
GILEAD , BALM OF An aromatic resin reputed in antiquity for its
medicinal
14 10-11 12
14 13
14 14b 14a,c
14 15 16-20
14 21-24 In 19:29
15 1 1
15 2 3
15 4-6 5
15 6-11 7-11
15 17-21 12-16
16 1a
16 1b-2 3
16 4-15 In 25:
13b-17
17 1b-2 1a
17 2b-5
17 6
17 7c 3-7ab
17 6
17 7c 3-7ab
17 8c 8ab
17 9
17 10-11 12
17 10-11 12
17 13a 13b-14
17 15-16a
17 16b-20 21
17 16b-20 21
17 22
17 23-27
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
18 1bc-8 1a
18 9-15
18 17-21
18 22a 22b-33
19 1-23 24-25
19 26 27-28
19 29, 30b-38 30a
20 1-18
21 1
21 2a 2a
17:27 )
21 7 6
21 8 8
21 9-21
21 In 25:12-15
21 25-31 22-24
21 32
21 33-34
22 1-19 1-19
22 20-24
23 1
23 2ab 2ab 2c
23 3-6
23 7-11
23 12-15 12-15
23 16a
23 16b 16b
23 17-18 19
23 20 20
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
24 1-5 6 ab
24 8-9 7
24 10a 10b
24 11
24 12-15
24 16a 16b-20
24 21
24 22b-27 22a
24 28 28
24 29ab
24 30ac 30b
24 31 31b
24 32 32a
24 33
18 17-21
18 22a 22b-33
19 1-23 24-25
19 26 27-28
19 29, 30b-38 30a
20 1-18
G-20
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
21 2a 2a
21 2b-5
21 (In after 21 7 6
21 8 8
21 9-21
21 In 25:12-15
21 25-31 22-24
21 32
21 33-34
22 1-19 1-19
22 20-24
23 1
23 2ab 2ab 2c
23 3-6
23 7-11
23 12-15 12-15
23 16a
23 16b 16b
23 17-18 19
23 20 20
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
24 1-5 6 ab
24 8-9 7
24 10a 10b
24 11
24 12-15
24 16a 16b-20
24 21
24 22b-27 22a
24 28 28
24 29ab
24 30ac 30b
24 31 31b
24 32 32a
24 33
24 34-39 34-39
24 40 40ac
24 41bc 41ab
24 42a 42-46
24 47
G-21
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
24 48ab 48ac
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
24 48d-49 48d-49
24 50-53 54-55
24 56 57-59
24 60-62 63-65
24 66-67a
24 67c 67b
25 1-6 7-11
25 12-15
[In at 21:21 ]
25 13b-17
In at 16:16
25 18
25 19a
25 19b 19b
25 20-26a 26b
25 27-28 27-28
25 29-34
25 [in 36:9,15-39]
26 1
26 2-6
26 7-17
26 18-21
26 18-21
26 22a
26 22b-25
26 26-33 34-35
27 1-19 1-19
27 20
27 21-23
27 24-27a
27 27b 28
27 29ac 29bc
27 30-33 30-33
27 34
27 35 35
27 36a 36b-37
27 38-40
27 41a, 43b
27 41-44 41-44a
27 45a,c 45b 45b
27 46
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
G-22
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
28 1-9
28 10-11 10-11
28 13-16 12
28 17-19
28 20a-21 20
28 22b 22a
29 1-3 1-2b
29 7-9 4-6
29 10b 10a, 11
29 12ac 12bc
29 13c-15 13ab
29 16
29 22 21
29 23
29 24-28a 24-28a
29 28b
29 29-30 29-30a
29 31
29 32 32a
29 33 33ac
29 34 34ac
29 35 35acd
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
28 13-16 12
28 17-19
28 20a-21 20
28 22b 22a
29 1-3 1-2b
29 7-9 4-6
29 10b 10a, 11
29 12ac 12bc
29 13c-15 13ab
29 16
29 18 17
29 20 19 29 22 21
29 23
29 24-28a 24-28a
29 28b
29 29-30 29-30a
29 31
29 32 32a
29 33 33ac
29 34 34ac
29 35 35acd
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
30 3 1-3
30 4-9
30 10, 11b 10-11a
30 12, 13b 12-13a,c
30 14-17 14-18a
30 18b 18c
30 19, 20b 19-20a,c
30 21-22 21-22
30 23b 23a
30 24b-25 24a, 25
30 26b 26a
30 31b 31a,c
30 32-37 32-37
30 40-42 38-39
30 43 43
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
30 10, 11b 10-11a
30 12, 13b 12-13a,c
30 14-17 14-18a
30 18b 18c
30 19, 20b 19-20a,c
30 21-22 21-22
30 23b 23a
30 24b-25 24a, 25
30 26b 26a
30 29-30
30 27-28 30 31b 31a,c
30 32-37 32-37
30 40-42 38-39
30 43 43
G-23
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
31 1
31 2-3 2
31 4-18a 18b
31 19-22 20-22
31 21
31 23 24-25
31 26-28a 28b-29
31 2-3 2
31 4-18a 18b
31 19-22 20-22
31 21
31 23 24-25
31 26-28a 28b-29
31 30-32a 32b
31 32c-35
31 36-37 36
31 38-41ac 38-41ac
31 42
31 43
31 44-45
31 46 46
31 48-49 47
31 51-52 50
31 54a 53
31 54b-55 54b-55
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
32 3-8 1-8
32 3-8 1-8
32 9b 9a
32 10-23 10-23
32 24-32
33 1-4 1-5
33 6-9 6-9
33 12-13 10-13
33 14-16
33 17
33 18a
33 18b 18a
33 19-20
34 1-31
35 1-4
35 5
35 6b-8 6a
35 14 9-13
35 16-20 15
35 21-22a 22b-29
35 27
G-24
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
36 1-2a 36 2b-5
36 9 6-8
36 15-39 10-14
36 40-43
37 3 1-2
37 4 4
37 5-7 6-7
37 8a 8bc
37 9-11 9-11
37 12
37 13a 13b
37 14a 14b
37 14a 14b
37 15-20 15-20
37 26
37 21-22 23a, 24a
37 25 24b-25
37 27 27
37 28 28
37 31-34
37 29-33
37 35-36 35-36
38 1-30
39 1a 1b
39 2-3 4
39 5-6a 6b-10
39 11-16
39 17-18
39 19
39 20
39 20 20
39 21-23
40 2-3 1
40 4-6
40 6-7
40 8a, c 8ab
40 9-23 9-23
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
41 2-8 8a
41 9-13 9-13
41 27
41 29 28-29
41 31 30
41 32
41 34 33
41 35-36 35-36
41 37 38
41 39
41 40 41-42
41 43a 43bc
41 48b-49 48a
37 26
37 21-22 23a, 24a
37 25 24b-25
37 27 27
37 28 28
37 31-34
37 29-33
37 35-36 35-36
38 1-30
39 1a 1b
39 2-3 4
39 5-6a 6b-10
39 11-16
39 17-18
39 19
39 20
39 20 20
39 21-23
40 2-3 1
40 4-6
40 6-7
40 8a, c 8ab
40 9-23 9-23
G-25
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
41 1 1a 41 2-8 8a
41 9-13 9-13
41 14 14
41 15 15-24 41 25a 25
41 26a 26-27 41 27
41 29 28-29
41 31 30
41 32
41 34 33
41 35-36 35-36
41 37 38
41 39
41 40 41-42
41 43a 43bc
41 44
41 45 45-46a
41 46b 46b
41 4741 48b-49 48a
41 50a 50
41 51a, 52a 51-52
41 53 53
41 54a 54b
41 55 56
41 57
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
42 1-2 1-2
42 3-4 5
42 6-7 6
42 9-11 8
42 15-16 12-14
42 17 17-20
42 21 21
42 23-26 22-28
42 29 29a, c
42 30-34 30-34
42 35
42 36
42 38 38, 37
43 2 1-2
43 4-5 3
43 8-10 6-7
43 11-12 11-15
G-26
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
43 15 15b
43 15 15b
43 16-22 16b-26
43 27ab 27a, c
43 28a 28b
43 30-34 29-34a, c,
44 1-34
45 1-2 1-3
45 4 4
45 12-13 5-11
45 14-15 1
45 16-18
45 19-20 19-20
45 22 21, 23
45 24 24
45 25
45 26 26
45 27 28
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
46
1ab 1
46 2 2a
46 3b-4 3-4
46 5a, c 5
46 6b-7 6
46 7-27a
46 31 31
46 32
46 33-34
47 1 1
47 4 2-3
47 5-6 5-6a
47 7-9
47 10 11
47 12-21 12-21
47 22-26a 23-26
47 27-28
47 In 29a at 49:33
47 In 29b at 48:2
47 In 30-31 at 49:33
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
48 2 1
46 3b-4 3-4
46 5a, c 5
46 6b-7 6
46 7-27a
46 27b 27b
46 28a 28b-30 46 31 31
46 32
46 33-34
47 1 1
47 4 2-3
47 5-6 5-6a
47 7-9
47 10 11
47 12-21 12-21
47 22-26a 23-26
47 27-28
47 In 29a at 49:33
47 In 29b at 48:2
47 In 30-31 at 49:33
G-27
L=Lay Source (900s B.C.) P = Priestly writer(s) (500s B.C.)
J = J(Y)ahwistic writer(s)
(800s, 900s B.C.) U = Unknown Source
E = Elowhistic writer(s) (700s B.C) In=Insert
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
48 2 1
In 47:29b
48 3-6
48 7
48 8-22
49 1a 1a
49 1b-2
49 3-28a 28b-29
49 30 31
49 32 33
In 47:29-31
49 33
50 1-2a 1-2
50 3-9 3-11
50 13 12
50 14-16 14-16
50 17a 17b
50 18 18
50 21 19-20
50 22-24
50 26 25
Chapter L Verses J Verses E Verses P Verses U Verses
4. 4 Sources: Focus and Time of Origin—The stories of Jacob &
Esau obviously
all look back on the subjugation of Edom by David. And if
the blessing which Isaac gives to
his elder includes a suggestion of the
possibility of shaking off this yoke,
then this presupposes at least the first
attempt of Edom to free itself from Israel's rule. This blessing
is scarcely
conceivable before the middle of the 900s B.C. None of the four threads
is older, & the
only question is how much later they originated and how
they are related to
one another with respect to age.
In
many respects the elements allotted to L make an especially ar-
chaic impression. The poetic, saga-like, and
novelistic clothing of the
events of tribal history includes only as many
motifs as are absolutely
essential to make possible a story intended as a
family-type proceeding.
The L thread is
concerned with tribal-history content, while J & E threads
are concerned with individual human beings, such as a mother in the dis-
tress of pregnancy or
fearing her child’s death from thirst, an overindulgent
father, or a son who
has grown over-confident & has caused his brothers
to hate him.
It
is obvious that these detailed narratives, which turn a specifically
Israelite
story into the universally human are younger than those accounts
of situations in tribal history. Noah’s blessing of
his two elder sons, Shem
and Japheth, & his cursing of his youngest son, Canaan
is in all probability
older than the genealogical table. In the blessing-curse, Shem probably
re-
presents the Israelites, Japheth the Philistines & Canaan the Canaanites.
In the table Shem, Japheth, and Ham represent
all the people of the then
known world.
Finally, many of the L stories bear witness to Yahweh as
jealously guarding his divinity. According to this, there's no serious obsta-
cle in the way of establishing L in David or Solomon's reign (900s B.C.)
G-28
Of
the remaining three narrative threads, J and E are so similar in
their structure that it stands to reason that they belong to approximately the
same period, with E being younger than J. The
conception of God repre-
sented by J is more anthropomorphic than E, & E has
been more strongly
influenced by the Prophets and therefore was written further
along into that
era. All things
considered, J can be dated around the mid-800s B.C., with
E dated around 800 or
750 B.C.
The
P source was once considered the oldest source, but it is now
almost unanimously considered the most recent.
P has furthered shor-
tened the older Genesis narratives then known to
bare genealogical tables.
The ritual
regulations which are present by P aren't taken in consideration
by the older
histories, while the historical works of the 300s B.C. presuppo-
ses P's existence. This necessitates the
assumption that P originated
around 500 B.C.
5. 4 Sources: Place of Origin & Method of Combination—While
the time of origin of the four narrative threads can be decided with at least
some certainty, it's impossible to get much beyond conjecture with regards
to their place of origin. The
preponderance of Judaic or southern Israel
elements in J & of Israelite or northern elements
in E isn't enough to permit
a firm conclusion as to the home of the 2 threads. Since the north & south
border didn't exist for intellectual traditions which were cherished on both
sides of the border, it doesn't matter much where the 3 oldest
threads
originated. Only 2 spots come
into consideration as the home of P, either
the exile community residing in Babylon or in the land of Judah ; there is
more to support Babylon than Judah .
It
is impossible to make definite statements as to the manner in
which the four
narrative threads of the Pentateuch were combined. It is
unlikely that what we have today is the
work of one person or process of
combining the threads. Perhaps J & E were already combined before
they
were combined with L.
The changes in outward circumstances
caused the older presenta-
tion of the prehistory of Israel to seem out of date some time after its com-
position & made a new draft necessary more than once.
In each instance
the new creation failed to achieve its intent of taking
the place of the re-
spective older work, which was too solidly rooted in the
consciousness
of the Jewish national and religious community to be completely
replaced.
Finally the whole thing was understood from the point of view of P. A
similar
process occurred 500 years later with the Old and New Testament.
The Old was understood in the light of the New.
6. Prehistory of Narrative Threads—If the
four-source theory is
correct, L probably represents the first attempt to write
a history of Israel
connected with the creation of the world and the history of
the first human
beings, extending up to the occupation of Canaan. The materials it used
were much older than it
was and in large measure, actually go back to the
time about which they want to
tell. More over, these materials
certainly
existed for L, mostly as separate stories with some already in small
to mid-
dle-sized collections.
There
are occasional real lists, mere enumerations of nations, tribes,
or men, devoid
of every narrative motif. These must be
regarded as old &
reliable & probably derived from the first half of the
900s B.C. The songs
and maxims which seem the most closely connected with their narrative
context must come from the authors of the narrative threads, In addition,
songs and maxims are to be found here & there in Genesis, many of which
represent something found by them and incorporated into their narrative.
This
is especially the case where they have no close connection with the
context in
which they are now inserted.
A special group is formed by the stories of Creation, the marriage
of the sons of
God, and the two stories of the Flood combined in chapter 6.
They are of a mythological nature and show a
strong resemblance to the
Sumerian-Akkadian writings or motifs. The two series, the first of which
connects
Noah with the Creation, & the second which connects Terah or
Abraham with
Noah are probably also copied from a Babylonian prototype,
with the Babylonians
having a list of kings rather than a list of forefathers.
It is possible, however, that such lists of
fathers arose of their own accord
in Israel .
Another
type of legend is one which tended to tell about curious in-
stitutions and
customs of foreign countries. The story
of the failure of the
tower-building project takes place in Babylon , and wants to show why hu-
mankind doesn't form a
united community speaking the same language.
The Joseph story, about how Joseph made the Egyptian with their fields
slaves of the Pharaoh, surely had in mind a historical phenomenon shoc-
king to
non-Egyptians. The stories of Ishmael
and of Jacob and Esau take
place in the steppes stretching out in front of the
land of the Palestinian cul-
ture to the east and south of Palestine . The
non-Israelitic element here is
made subservient to the story centering around Israel and its ancestors.
Not
a few of the Genesis stories are connected with Canaan
and
seek to explain peculiarities to be found there. Nature stories play a rather
slight role among them; only the story of Sodom's downfall can be called
a nature story. Regardless of how it is interpreted, it is
certain that we are
concerned here with a saga connected with that region,
taken over by
Israel, with its capture of the land, and woven into its own history.
G-29
There
is in Genesis an abundance of cult legends which seek to give
the origin of
certain places and customs of worship.
These cult legends
are in a great measure, originally Canaanite and were
probably taken over
then by the Israelites in their conquest of the land.
Several examples are:
Abraham’s meeting
with Melchizedek king of Salem & priest of El Elyon;
El
Roi’s revelation to Hagar; God’s revelation to Jacob in Bethel; Jacob’s
wrestling with the El of Penuel; and the burial of the unknown god-images
by
Jacob in Shechem.
Although
detailed legends about them have not survived, the cults
of Beer-sheeba and Hebron have left such clear marks on our narratives
that one must surely trace the latter back to more detailed traditions about
them which were once available. Beer-sheba as the
scene of a covenant
between Abraham or Isaac, & Abimelech, gives an inkling
of the religious
significance of Beer-sheba.
The blessing bestowed on Abraham is cere-
moniously repeated in Beer-sheba
for Isaac & Jacob. This repetition
sug-
gests the assumption that God’s covenant with Abraham, which is now set
in
no definite location, took place in Beer-sheba, which is also where God
established his name El Olam.
The religious
significance of certain locations in or near Hebron is
attested to in chapter 18, where three heavenly
beings were entertained
there under a tree by Abraham. The instructions for and the circumcision
itself took place in Hebron . And God made
known his name “El Shaddai”
in Hebron . Finally, Hebron ’s sacred character is explained by the fact that
Abraham acquires a burial place here for Sarah, himself, Isaac and Jacob.
All these cult legends, just like the
portions of other literary genres taken
over into Genesis, have been coupled with
the history of the ancestors of
Tribal
& folk sagas have their roots in genealogical lists of nations,
tribes, and
races & proceed from the assumption, or perhaps even the fic-
tion, that each of these groups is descended from its own forefather, who
is given a wife or wives that bear the members of a group.
The “first-born”
of the group is set off by name, in order thus to
underline and explain the
differences in the importance of the individual
groups. Often, the father is
given 2 wives, 1 fully authorized, the other recognized to a lesser degree.
Examples of this are the 12 sons of Nahor, 8 by a head wife, 4 by a
concubine, and the 7 sons of
Abraham, Isaac by Sarah, & 6 by the con-
cubine Keturah. Abraham made Isaac his true heir, gave
portions to the
descendants of Keturah, & sent them away to the east.
The
surface content of stories such as Cain and Abel, Jacob and
Esau, and Joseph
& his brothers, has obscured the tribal history that was
being explained. Up until the 1800s, the Cain and Abel story
was quite
generally understood to deal with the first murder. Its tribal history was
first recognized in
the last third of the 1800s. The motif
of the amazing
outstripping of the elder brother or brothers by the younger
experienced its
most imaginative development in the stories of Jacob's crafty
usurpation
of the birthright & of Joseph’s advance over his
brothers.
The
obscuring of the tribal and folk-historical background has not
reach the same stage
in the story of the rape of Dinah by Schechem, the
son of Hamor, and the
terrible judgment carried out by Dinah’s brothers
Simeon & Levi, sons of Jacob. These characters are so
realistically depic-
ted as men of flesh and blood that one has the impression of
individual
men and not of friendly negotiations and bloody disputes between two
tribal groups.
Tribal and folk-historical background has been obscured by the
numerous and varied
literary motifs that have been used in many cases to
greatly expand the
originally very simple facts. The
marriage notice, very
short in the case of Abraham and Nahor, has been replaced
by stories of
courtship which are detailed & full of feeling in the case of
Isaac & Jacob,
in particular the meeting of Jacob with Rachel and his
services rendered for
many years to Laban willingly for her sake.
The
story of Abraham’s offering of Isaac in sacrifice in its present
form and in
its present context seeks to show two things: first, that God’s
promise can be
questioned but never made invalid, and then, that Abra-
ham understood with
exemplary obedience the unbelievably difficult test
of faith that God imposed
upon him. In the case of the endangering
of the
ancestress, which appears 3 times in Genesis, God’s promise seems to
be
called into question. It answers a
religious concern by showing that God,
in spite of all reverses is still able
to attain his goal.
G-30
7. Historicity—As great as the religious
content of the stories of the
Creation and the Flood is, they are no more able
to give information about
the world's origin than about the time and
extent of the flood, which most
likely took place in southern Babylon . The same is
true of the Sodom story.
The story in chapter 14 of Abraham deals with his victory over 4 Canaanite
kings, and his meeting with Melchizedek, king & high priest of Salem . It
is a
unique combination of very legendary material with recollections of
figures who played a role in the Near East around 1500 B.C., albeit in very
distorted form.
Historically
valuable content is preserved in only 2 kinds of narrative
contained in
Genesis: the tribal- or folk-historical accounts and the cult
legends. Historical accounts imagine all societies to
be derived from one
ancestral father. While these great men existed, there's no guarantee that
the fathers named in the Cain and Seth genealogical trees belong in the
early period in which they now appear.
The
Cain & Abel story reflects the amazement of the tribe of Israel
that the tribe of Cain hadn't also established
itself in Canaan , but had
clung to the nomadic life. The Noah-Canaan story assumes that Shem
founded the Israelites, Japheth founded the Philistines, & Canaan
founded
the Canaanites, and it assumes Israel ’s settlement in Canaan . The correct
place for the two narratives as
far as time is concerned is actually the book
of Joshua.
The
forefathers assumed that the historical communities belong to a
period in the
distant past, having an almost mythical character, and there-
fore were timeless. This meant they could be put
into any period of tribal
history. The historical value of these stories is further limited by the fact
that the
Genesis stories reflect very clearly conditions of the period of the
judges or
even of the kings. This does not mean
that they are mere reflec-
tions of later conditions that yield nothing for the
time about which they
claim to speak.
Actually, the features coinciding with the time of judges
has been blended with traditions which have clung to reliable memories of
figures,
conditions, and events in the prehistory of Israel . The tradition
that
Abraham came from Haran to Canaan in the period before Moses, is pro-
bably correct.
While in the case of Abraham it probably
is actually a question of a
single individual, it is very questionable whether
this is also true for Isaac
and Jacob. The association that made Isaac the son of Abraham & Jacob
the son of
Isaac, is probably just as non-historical as the derivation of the
twelve
tribes of Israel from the twelve sons of Jacob.
It is probable that Abraham spent some time
as a guest in southern
Palestine, and that the other two spent time, not as
individuals but rather
as tribes, Isaac in the extreme south, and Jacob in the
land east of the Jor-
dan. The stories do
not permit a more exact placing in time of the figures.
While many have examined accounts outside of
the Old Testament having
to do with the period from 2000 to 1000 B.C., such
investigations have
not led to results in any way guaranteed or even
probable.
The
situation is very similar in the case of the Joseph stories. If one
probes the stories for historical
elements, one might discover that perhaps
one or two centuries before the
conquest of the land of Israel, ancestors,
apparently of Joseph and Levi, had
gone to Egypt out of concern for food
& had stayed there for several decades
at least.
The
biblical traditions seem to indicate the movements of two dif-
ferent groups of
Israelites into Canaan : the Abraham/ Isaac/ Jacob group
from Mesopo tamia ; and a later group of them, after a temporary residence
in Egypt , coming from the south and east under Moses' leadership. The
first group worshiped El as the authoritative God, the Mosaic group wor-
shiped Yahweh. El is used in conjunction with other
titles.
It's clear that the patriarchs
worshiped other lower gods, brought to
is the god to whom respect is due. We may consider it a historical fact
that
the ancestors of later Israel , who came in the pre-Mosaic period were
worshipers of
El. This is confirmed by the fact that
the names of people
& places formed with “Yahweh” were preceded in history by
other names
which contained “El.”
Genesis
contains a whole series of features which are of a national
rather than a
religious nature, or at least they are so judged by us. It is
actually difficult to separate the
national or political from the religious.
The blessings of the patriarchs are not only concerned with religion,
but
are aimed at the same time at the possession of economic and political
power. One should recognize those portions of Genesis which give strong
expression to national sentiments, should see the unique character of
those portions, and should not attempt to
understand them as expression
of pure religiosity.
Creation
stories in Genesis give powerful expression to the joyous
certainty of faith in
God. The stories of the Fall and the
Flood say that
because of man’s guilt, man and the world did not remain as God
had
desired them and created them, but even so, the world and man aren't
for-
saken by God. Even if obstacles
appear again and again, God can over-
come them all and bring the story to the
conclusion God intended and
wants to have.
Joseph replies to his brothers, “You meant evil against me;
but God
meant it for good . . .”
G-31
Just
as the religious content of Genesis has lasting meaning, so too
does the
ethical content. These stories have
lifted the figures of their pro-
totypes into the eternal and universally human
realm & now cause human
beings to appear before our eyes as members of
families as they have
always existed & always will. These figures are presented without any
embellishment; but precisely because this is the case they make an irre-
sistible
impression on hearers and readers all over the world, and radiate
to them
educational forces such as can scarcely be found elsewhere.
GESHEM (גשם, rain) An “Arab” who joined with Sanballat the
Horonite and
Tobiah the Ammonite in opposing the reconstruction of Jerusalem's wall
under Nehemiah. Their opposition consisted of ridicule, an plot to trap
Nehemiah, and
the threat to send a letter to the Persian king, charging
him with sedition.
GESHUR (גשור, bridge) A small kingdom located to the north of Bashan
and
south of Syria . It served as a buffer state between Israel & Aram. David
was on friendly terms with it when he was still only Judah’s king
and
sealed the alliance by marrying Maacah, King Talmai‘s daughter; she
became
Absalom‘s mother. Geshur was Israel’s
vassal state, but after the
kingdom’s division, it joined in alliance with Aram
and raided Bashan.
GESTAS A
name given the unrepentant thief in the stories prompted by
Luke 23.
GETHER (תרג)
According to Genesis 10, one of the sons of Aram ; hence
an Aramean town and kingdom.
Jesus agonized in prayer before his betrayal
there by Judas. The story is
told in
each of the four gospels. Mark and
Matthew identified it by name,
Luke calls it simply “the place,” and John calls
it a garden.
To
ascertain the site of this episode seems impossible today, both
because the
gospels afford scant data & because the ancient olive groves
were destroyed when Titus besieged Jerusalem in 70 A.D. Clearly it was
not far from the city gate. Early tradition placed it east of
the valley at
the base of the Mount of Olives, outside the eastern gate. Another early
identification located
Gethsemane higher on the slope. From the
lan-
guage of John, some have deduced that Gethsemane was walled in, be-
cause
Jesus “entered” and “went out.” However, the two Greek verbs do
not require or support such an assumption.
The Gospel of John
states that Judas knew this grove from the dis-
ciples’ repeatedly gathering here
with Jesus. The Synoptic accounts
sug-
gest that is was an extensive area within which members of the party
could
separate at a distance from one another.
GEUEL (גאואל, majesty of God ) A member of the tribe of Gad sent to spy
out Canaan ; son of Machi.
The name
renderings. Rock inscriptions marking
the “boundary of Gezer” have been
found in a rough arc encircling Tell
el-Jazar, between 1.6 and 2.4 km from
the south and east sides of the
city.
The
site lay at the inner edge of the coastal plain, at a spot well sup-
plied with
water from different springs. It
overlooked both the coastal
road approaching Lydda and Aphek. Gezer was settled around 4000 B.C.
The first inhabitants mostly lived in natural
caves which they roughly adap-
ted.
Subsequent architecture was of the usual Palestinian village. Three
defensive walls were built at different
times, enclosing a narrow oblong
lying east and west, with two summits.
The
second wall, which might have been built in the Middle Bronze
Age, (around 2100
B.C.). It contained 2 gates, one on
the north & on the
south. The latest
wall which was the outermost, presumably existed in the
Maccabean Wars. At all times of Egyptian imperial expansion,
Gezer was
sure to attract the Pharaohs' notice. Commercial relations are revealed by
many
imported objects, & the beginnings of an alphabet on a stray pot-
sherd from
the later part of Middle Bronze Age (about 1700 B.C.).
G-32
Thut-mose III included Gezer among the captured Canaanite cities
enumerated on the walls of the temple
at Karnak. As the “Handmaid of
the
King,” Gezer was plundered and had to buy off raiders with gifts of
food and
oil. No signs of these troubles appear
in the excavations.
The
Canaanites were early concerned with safeguarding their water
supply, and their
most impressive monument was a rock-cut shaft and pas-
sage which descended by
steps from a point in the western half of the city
to a subterranean cavern and
spring. Also, a great reservoir was excava-
ted near the center of the city. Neither of
these works can be exactly dated;
but the tunnel went out of use toward the end
of the Bronze Age.
Another impressive relic of Canaanite Gezer was
a row of 8 stan-
ding monoliths. Their
majestic size and careful alignment strongly sugges-
ted a religious
purpose. W. F. Albright suggests that the monoliths are to
be explained as funeral stelae. Mer-ne-Ptah can't have destroyed Gezer,
for the Israelites, who were active at about the same time, failed to capture
the town. Gezer lay on the boundary of
Ephraim; allotted to the Levitical
tribe of Kohath, it remained a Canaanite
city.
Pharaoh
Shishak (around 945-924 B.C.), took Gezer from the Cana-
anites & gave it as a
dowry to Solomon’s Egyptian wife.
Solomon fortified
the city, & it must be assumed that Israelites
formed the garrison. The style
of
building matches Megiddo's and Hazor's, which I Kings indicates was
built
by Solomon.
To the earliest
Israelite period belongs the “Gezer Calendar,” a dog-
gerel list of agricultural
operations for 12 months, inscribed in early Hebrew
characters on a clay
pendant. Tiglath-pileser III left an
inscription showing
the Assyrian army storming the town of Gazru , & when Sargon destroyed
the northern kingdom in
721 B.C., Gezer must have passed into Assyrian
control (See also the entry in the Old Testament Apocrypha/ Influences
Outside the Bible
section of the Appendix.).
GHOST (אוב (obe), spirit of divination; fantasμa (fan tas ma), phantom)
The apparition of a deceased person.
GIAH (גיה, breaking forth) An unidentified site along Abner’s path
of flight
from Gibeon toward the wilderness descent to the Arabah. In the place of
“Gibeon ,”
the similar “Geba” should perhaps be read, which was on the
threshold of the
wilderness descent to the Jordan .
GIANT (נפילים (neh fih leem), from the verb
“to fall”; רפאים (ref ah yeem),
from the verb “to heal”; גבור (gib bore), mighty warrior) In common with
other peoples the early
Hebrews believed in a race of giants.
Biologists ac-
cept the position that giants deviated from the norm, & usually were sterile.
2 circumstances undoubtedly led to belief in giants. 1st, the Hebrew knew
of the existence of individuals of giant proportions; several are listed in the
Bible, most famous of whom is
Goliath. 2nd, the Hebrews found in many
megalithic structures for whose erection they assumed a giant
strength.
Giants were thought of as
coming from a divine father & human mother, or
they were associated with
certain tribes & nations. It should be observed
that physical size, as well as long life, was thought to have spiritual
significance.
GIBBAR (גבר, hero) The head of a family that returned to Palestine after the
Exile.
GIBBETHON (גבתון, hilly) A town in west central Palestine assigned to the
tribe of Dan, several km west of Gezer . It was also
supposed to be a Levi-
tical city of the clan of Kohath. In actual fact, it fell into & remained in
the
hands of the Philistines.
GIBEA (גבעא, hill) A grandson of Caleb, in the lineage of Judah . The
geo-
graphical associations of Judah’s descendants through Caleb suggest that
it is the name of a town in the hill country south of Hebron.
GIBEAH (בעהג, hill) The Hebrew word commonly designates a
hill or
“height.” In three of the following
cases, it is employed as a place name.
The fourth case is a hill of special note. 1. A city in the hill country of
Judah,
possibly 12 km southwest of Bethlehem, although it is listed among
a group of
cities southeast of Hebron.
G-33
2. A city of Benjamin identified in various forms, located most likely
5.6 km north of Jerusalem, at a place now
called “the mound of beans.”
The city
first enters upon the scene of Hebrew history for its inhospitable
treatment
of a journeying Ephraimite and the fatal raping of his concubine.
As both the city & the tribe of Benjamin
refused to deliver the culprits to jus-
tice, Gibah became the focal point of
Israel’s war against Benjamin, resul-
ting in the destruction of the city and the
near annihilation of the tribe.
Gibeah
was Saul's home. It remained his
home & became his pro-
vincial capital after he was acclaimed king at
Mizpah. As such it played an
important role in his struggles with the Philistines.
From Gibeah came 3
Mighty Men who helped him in war: Ittai,
Ahiezer, and Joash.
The
city occupied a place of prominence in the prophetic thinking of
the 700s
B.C. Isaiah envisions it standing in the
fearful path of an Assyrian
advance on Jerusalem. From the Old Testament it is clear that
Gibeah lay
north of Jerusalem, between Jerusalem and Ramah. Thus its position on
the central mountain ridge made it an important watch tower over the hill
towns of southern Benjamin.
Excavations
at the “mound of beans” match up very well with the
biblical history of Saul’s
Gibeah. A small village of the 1100s
B.C. was
found to have been destroyed by fire, which perhaps ties in with
Judges
19-20. The village which followed
had near 1020 B.C. a fortress of mas-
sive, rough-hewn masonry, perhaps representing
Saul’s citadel. Around
1000 B.C., a
2nd fortress of less massive masonry quickly rose on the de-
struction of the
first, only to be abandoned after Jerusalem became the
capital of the kingdom.
3. A town in the northern hill country of
Ephraim, given to Phine-
has, Eleazar's son, and Aaron's grandson; it was the
burial place of Elea-
zar and Phinehas. 4 places it could be include 2 northwest of Gophna
(modern-day
Jifna), one northeast of Gophna, and one southeast of
Nablus. 4. A hill at Kiriath-jearim where the ark of
the Lord was
lodged in the house of Abinadab.
GIBEATH-ELOHIM (בעת האלהיםג, hill of (the) God) A site where Saul, in
accordance with
prediction of Samuel, prophesied with a band of pro-
phets. It is the same as 2 in the entry
above, and has both a high place &
a symbol of Philistine hegemony, the
symbol being either a garrison, a
pillar or a prefect. The presence of this symbol would seem to
equate
Gibeath-elohim with the Gibeah of I Samuel 13, or Saul’s own city.
GIBEATH-HA-ARALOTH (גבעת הערלות, hill of the foreskins) A location
in the vicinity of Gilgal,
between Jericho and the Jordan , commemorating
the circumcision of the Israelites
following their entry into Canaan .
The earliest occurrence of Gibeon is in connection with the conquest
of central
Palestine by Joshua. After Jericho’s & Ai’s destruction, the men
of Gibeon secured through a ruse a peace covenant, which the Israelites
felt obligated
to keep regardless. 5 Amorite kings,
on hearing of collabo-
ration of the strong warriors of Gibeon with the
invaders, besieged the
town until they were routed by Joshua in a surprise
attack.
Gibeon is
mentioned in Joshua 9 along with 3 other cities, Chephi-
rah, Beeroth, and
Kiriath-jearim. Mizpeh, Ramah, Chephirah, & Beeroth,
are listed with Gibeon in Joshua 18, which consists of a list of Benjamin's
cities. Around 1000
B.C., the site is the setting for a spectacular contest
between David and Saul's forces, where 12 men from each side transfixed
their 12 opponents with swords. A tradition in II
Samuel 21 attributes the
hanging of the seven sons of Saul to Gibeonites. At the beginning of the
reign of Solomon, Gibeon
was the place of sacrifice; it was here that
Solomon had his famous dream (I
Kings 3).
After 4 centuries Gibeon's name comes to the fore in an
account of
the events of the years 586 B.C. The false prophet Hananiah was from
Gibeon. The men of Gibeon were among those who helped
rebuild the
wall of Jerusalem in the 400s B.C.
In the Egyptian king Sheshonk I's list
(biblical Shishak), Gibeon is
mentioned as one of the cities he either visi-
ted or took.
The
hill on which el-Jib stands rises some 66 meters above the
plain and is watered
by eight springs which flow from the base.
Leading
up from the main spring into the hill is a rock-cut tunnel which
was partly
entered in 1889.
The area of the south hill’s top, the site of the ancient
settlement, is
approximately 64,000 square meters or 16 acres.
The earli-
est settlement was in the Early Bronze Period (around 2800
B.C.).
In the Middle Bronze Period (1800
B.C.), the tell's northwest por-
tion was inhabited. At the time of the Hebrew monarchy (1000
B.C.),
buildings covered the northwest part of the mound. The most extensive
settlement appears to have
been during the Iron II Period (900-600 B.C.),
when a city wall with a width
ranging from 3 to 8 meters, surrounded the
entire area of the top of the
hill. From 100-1 B.C., there was extensive
settlement.
G-34
At the north side of the site was a round, rock-cut pool, which mea-
sured slightly more than
11 meters in diameter. 79 rock-cut steps
were
uncovered down the shaft's sides.
The pool is almost 25 meters deep.
A
tunnel, which extends from inside the Iron II Age (900 B.C.) city wall
for
50 meters through solid rock to the spring of the village
below, was used
as means of reaching the vital water supply of the city when it
was under
siege; The tunnel has 93 steps.
In the debris which has washed down into
the rock-cut pool from the hill
to the South there were found 56 jar han-
dles, many of them inscribed with the
name Gibeon.
Excavations have also found 66 bell-shaped vats, cut
from the solid
rock of the hill.
Fermenting vats, wine presses, and channels were found
cut in the rock
of the winery area. After the wine was
pressed from the
grapes, it was placed in large jars and lowered into the
cellars, where a
constant temperature of 65 degrees could be maintained. 12 shaft tombs
were discovered on the hill's western side. The tombs had
been cut during
the Middle Bronze period, 2 of them had been reused in the
Late Bronze
period.
GIDDALTI גדלתי) , I praise God)
A son of Heman; one of those designated
by King David to prophesy with music in
the sanctuary.
GIDDEL (גדל, over-grown ) 1. Ancestor
of one of the families of temple ser-
vants among the returned exiles. 2. Ancestor of one of the families of
the
“sons of Solomon’s servants.”
GIDEON (גדעון, cutter) Son of Joash of the clan of Abiezer of
the tribe of
Manasseh. He was
distinguished by unusual signs from Yahweh and by
his completely delivering
Israel from annual Midianite raids.
Bedouin
bands from across the Jordan would descend at harvest time like
a plague
of locust, seizing the hard-earned products of the western Jordan
Israe-
lites’ labor. The harassed farmers
fled into caves and
mountain hideouts.
These were the first
raids of camel riders known to Near Eastern history.
The Midianite raiders could come from their
home 320 km to the south-
east , sometimes going as far west as Gaza on the Mediterranean coast
and return again unscathed.
Gideon’s
story is clearly a composite of at least 2 sources: an ex-
tension of the
J(Y)ahwist source and a later Elohist source.
According to
the earlier source, Gideon’s call to his task came when he
entertained
God or his angel unawares.
The huge meal became a sacrifice, as the
messenger brought divine fire
from the rock. In the later source, his
loy-
alty to Yahweh was shown by his breaking down his family’s and com-
munity’s
Baal altar and its sacred pole or Asherah, thus receiving the
name Jerubbaal.
There are different theories as to the
origins of the names “Gide-
on” & “Jerubbaal.”
The first theory is that the name came from the earlier
period of cultural syncretism when “baal,” meaning “lord” or “master,” was
also used for
Yahweh. Jerubbaal was then the name
given Gideon at
birth, and “Gideon” was perhaps an honorific title. The second theory is
that Jerubbaal & Gideon were actually 2 different heroes.
The third view
is that whatever the validity of either of the above 2 views, the real point
of the story is the conflict between Yahwism and Baalism.
The story of Gideon’s rout of the
Midianite camp by a surprise attack
is apparently a composite of both early and
late narratives. Gideon’s own
Abiezrite
clansmen were the fighting force both in this attack and in the
eastern Jordan
pursuit. This emphasizes the marvelous
deeds of God-
empowered men. The water-drinking
contest served the purpose of selec-
ting the 300 most alert warriors. The question of psychological fitness for
battle lay behind the excusing of the 22,000.
Stung by their defeat at the foot of Mount Gilboa, the Midianite fugi-
tives headed for the highlands beyond the Jordan. Two traditions record
Gideon’s pursuit. In the earlier tradition, Gideon valiantly pursued the
15,000 survivors of the one-time 135,000 Midianites raiders to their camp
at Karkor, east of the Dead Sea, & later killed their kings Zebah & Zal-
munna. In the later tradition, the leader of the Midianite fugitives were two
princes, Oreb (“Raven”) and Zeeb (“Wolf”). These 2 princes stayed on the
western side of the Jordan and fled south into Ephraimite territory, where
they were beheaded by the Ephraimites, who were incensed at not having
been called into the fray sooner, rather than simply guarding the Jordan
River. Gideon appeased them by praise and self-disparagement.
G-35
Historically
very significant was Gideon’s ridding the Israelites, ap-
parently permanently,
of the Midianite camel raids.
Politically and religi-
ously significant was Gideon’s refusal to inaugurate
a hereditary monar-
chy; he refused the offer of kingship made by the people to
their hero in
favor of primitive tribal democracy. Not only would he not be king over the
tribes, but at his death his own authority over his clan would be dissipated
among his numerous sons. The language of Gideon’s refusal, that Israel
is a theocracy and God alone is ruler is the
language used in the 700s or
later by the author of I Samuel.
Religiously
significant was the charismatic nature of Gideon’s
judgeship. He was peculiarly Yahweh’s man, favored with
special divine
revelations and unusual power.
The ephod he fashioned from the spoils of
his campaign became a source
of contention after his death, & the people
“made Baal-berith their "god” and
“did not show kindness to [Gideon’s]
family.”
In the New Testament, Gideon appears as the first of the her-
oes of faith
whom the author of the Letter to the Hebrews would have told
about if time had
permitted.
GIDEONI (גדעוני, cutter ) The father of Abidan, who was the leader
of Ben-
jamin in the wilderness.
GIDOM (גדעם, cutting down) A site in Benjamin, near the Rock Rimmon in
the wilderness east of Gibeah, which marks the terminus of Israel ’s pursuit
of Benjamin.
GIER EAGLE (רחם (ra khawm);
in the King James Version “gier-eagle”; in
the Revised Standard Version,
“carrion vulture”)).
GIFT (שחד (sha khad); מﬨנה (ma taw naw); δωρον (doe
ron); χαισμα
(kar is ma)) There are three types of gifts in the
Bible.
1st,
a “gift” may be a euphemism for “tribute.”
Some gifts from peo-
ple to other people are also gifts from God, like the
“spiritual gift” which
Paul desired to impart to the Roman Christians in Romans
1. 2nd are the
gifts from God to humans. “Every good endowment and every
perfect gift
is from above” (James 1). God’s crowning gift to humankind is God’s Son.
Among things called “gifts of God” are honest
labor, salvation, eternal life,
& the Holy Spirit. (See also the entry on Spiritual Gifts). 3rd are the gifts
from humans to God. Various sacrificial offerings are called
“gifts.” The
gift to be presented by the
healed leper in Matthew 8 was required accor-
ding to Leviticus 14. The gifts of Luke 21 are freewill offerings
for the
temple treasury.
GIHON (RIVER) (גיחון, from the root meaning “gush
forth”) One of 4 rivers of
GIHON (SPRING) (גיהון, from the root meaning to “gush
forth”) A spring in
the Kidron Valley , beneath the City of David . Its
identification with the
Fountain of the Virgin is certain. It is mentioned in connection with the
anointing of Solomon and with Hezekiah’s defense of the City of David,
when he
diverted its waters to the west of the City of David.
The
spring gushes forth intermittently from a natural cave, once
or twice a day at
the end of the dry season, four or five times a day after
a rainy winter. The pre-Israelite inhabitants of Jerusalem
had dug an
underground passage which permitted them to draw the water of Gihon
without being exposed to an enemy. After the conquest of Jerusalem by
David, the water was collected in a
reservoir for irrigating the valley.
The
Assyrian threat prompted Hezekiah to block the spring and the
aqueduct & to
make a tunnel which led the water to new reservoirs with-
in the fortified perimeter of the city.
GILALAI (גללי, from the root meaning to roll
stones) A musician who took
part
in the great procession at the dedication of the rebuilt wall of Jerusa-
G-36
GILBOA, MOUNT (גלבע הר, boiling fountain) A ridge of limestone hills rea-
ching an elevation
of 526 meters above the Mediterranean, at the east
end of the Valley of Jezreel
about 9.6 km west of Beth-shean.
Gilboa
is best known as the place where Saul was slain in a battle
with the Philistines. Because it was near one of
the two valleys leading
into the Plain of Jezreel from the Jordan Valley, it
was frequently the
scene of military strife.
It was probably the place of Gideon’s camp
when the Midianites were
located on the north side of the valley.
In
choosing to defend Gilboa against the Philistines, Saul was
taking advantage of
the heights offered by the mountain where the ene-
my's superior equipment would be less effective. The famous
lament of
David over Saul & Jonathon contains what seems to be a curse on
Gil-
boa (II Samuel 1).
seh; his name was given to the tribe or territory of Gilead. It's often difficult
to tell whether a given
occurrence of the name refers to a person, a tribe,
or a place. 2. Jephthah's father. 3. A clan or family of the territory of Gad
4.
The name of a territory, a tribe, & possibly a city situated in the
region east of the Jordan. Gilead is mentioned as a “city of evildoers”
in
Hosea 6, but here it may stand for such a city as Jabesh-gilead or
Ramoth-
gilead. In the Song of Deborah
(Judge 5), Gilead is evidently a tribe.
Else-
where, Gilead is always used for a stretch of territory, and its inhabitants,
which may be of more than one tribe, as Gileadites.
The
term “Gilead” is used somewhat loosely in the Bible. In its nar-
rowest sense it refers to the area
bounded by the Arnon on the south, the
Jordan Valley on the west, the
south-to-north beginning of the Jabbok & the
desert to the east, and the
limit of Bashan, several kilometers south of the
Yarmuk, on the north, roughly
25 km east-to-west and 125 km north-south.
In a broader sense, it extended farther north into Bashan & even
beyond
the Yarmuk. Manasseh is sometimes
mentioned as overlapping into Gile-
ad, and in others it is only the tribes of
Reuben & Gad who were settled
there.
Gilead
is in general a highland region, rising from the valley of the
Jordan, at least
210 meters below sea level, to heights of more than 1,000
meters. One outstanding feature is the river Jabbok,
which flows east to
west across its entire width. There is no single “Mount Gilead”; the
Re-
vised Standard Version’s use of “hill country” is more accurate. There,
hills and valleys were well watered, and the region was well-forested.
Northern
Gilead had a permanent settlement from the 2200s B.C.;
but southern Gilead,
below the Jabbok, had in the same period less popu-
lation from the 1900s-1200s
as other southern regions. Before the
Israe-
lites it was occupied by Amorites and Moabites. The Israelites under
Moses forced the
Amorites out, & Gilead was given to Reuben, Gad, and
Manasseh, who often
refused to come to the aid of the western tribes.
Soon,
however, they in turn were assailed by enemies from the
east. Midianites and Amalekites, overran the
entire country. Gideon,
from western Manasseh came and drove back the invaders.
Later Ammo-
nites took possession of the area, and the Gilead elders had
to summon
Jephthah to deliver them from this oppressive rule. Despite Jephthah's
victory, the
Ammonites remained a constant menace.
Saul
rescued Jabesh-gilead from the Ammonites; after he was slain,
Abner set up
Ishbaal’s kingdom in Gilead, from which, as the Philistines
withdrew, he could
extend his reign over the greater part of Palestine.
David had to fight the Ammonites; Gilead
became a place of refuge for
him when he was fleeing from Absalom, and it was
in Gilead that the deci-
sive battle was fought that restored him to the throne.
During
the 800s & 700s B.C. a new menace arose in the Syrian
kingdom of
Damascus. The territory became the scene
of battles in which
first Syria & then Israel prevailed; Ramoth-gilead was
fiercely contested
for. There was a faction which preferred an alliance with Syria. Shallum
overthrew the dynasty of Jehu, but was slain by pro-Assyrian Menahem.
The 20 years of his reign can only be explained if he set up an
independent
kingdom in 750 that he ruled until 735. He attempted to unite all the sur-
rounding
regions against Assyria. The result was
that the Assyrians carried
away all the Israelite population of Gilead.
properties. It probably
received its name by being exported from Gilead to
Egypt and Phoenicia, since
it is not native to Gilead.
G-37
GILGAL (גלגל, wheel) The word means “circle or stones”; such “circles” are
still to be found in
eastern Palestine . The name was
applied to many towns,
but always with the definite article.
1.
There was a Gilgal near Jericho , a city of the tribe of Benjamin.,
about 3.7 km east
of modern Jericho at Khirbet en-Nitleh.
A second site at
Khirbet Mefjir, about 2 km from ancient Jericho has
received some scho-
lars' support, as the historical data fits Khirbet
Mefjir much more precisely.
The
1st encampment after the crossing of the Jordan was at Gilgal.
The Israelites erected the twelve memorial
stones taken from the bed of the
Jordan there.
It was also a base of operations in the Conquest & a great
sanctuary
if only for the tribe of Benjamin. Joshua had his extraordinary
encounter with
God, and made a treaty with the Gibeonites here.
It
is clear that Gilgal was a center of the loose tribal government.
Gilgal was one of the towns the prophet Samuel
visited on his yearly cir-
cuit. It was there that Saul was made king, but there too that he was re-
jected. It is probably to this Gilgal that we must
assign the references in
the prophets of the 700s B.C.
2. There is a second Gilgal mentioned in connection
with Elijah
& Elisha (II Kings 2 & 4).
Although some scholars assume the one men-
tioned is the same as the
first, other scholars locate it 10 km north of
Beth-el. It was from here that the prophets went to
the Jordan River
where Elijah was taken up to heaven.
3. The Masoretic text contains a reference
to a Gilgal in Canaa-
nite kings' list in Joshua 12. It is variously placed in the mountains of
Samaria, on the Plain of Sharon, and 24 km northeast of Joppa.
4. The reference to Gilgal in Deuteronomy 11
is difficult, as the
context would lead us to the first Gilgal mentioned above,
but the lan-
guage seems to suggest a region near Shechem.
5. In Joshua 15 there is reference to Gilgal,
but in the parallel
passage of Joshua 18 we read instead “Geliloth,” which
agrees with the
Syrian version of the Old Testament.
GILOH
( גלה, captivity) A village of Judah in the hill-country district of Debir,
8 km north-northwest of Hebron .
GIMEL
( ג ) The Hebrew alphabet 3rd letter, placed in the
King James Version
at the head of the 3rd section of Psalm 119, where each verse
of this sec-
tion begins with this letter.
GIMZO
(גמזו, place of sycamores)
A city of Judah in the Shephelah; about
4.8 km southeast of Lod and 6.4 miles east of
er-Ramleh. Gimzo was
captured by the Philistines during the reign of Ahaz
(735-715 B.C.)
GIN
(מוקש (mo kash), snare) The
word is a contracted form of “engine,”
now obsolete but formerly used of a mechanical device employed as a
trap.
GINATH (גיגת, garden) The father of Tibni, the pretender to the
Israelite
throne.
GINNETHON (גנתון, gardener) 1. A
priest who witnessed the covenant
renewal under Ezra. 2. Head of a family of priests in Joaikim's period
(Nehemiah 12).
GIRDLE (אבנט (ab nate); חגור (khaw gore), girded; zwnη (zo nay))
Abnat
is the linen sash of a priest or official (Exodus 28, 29, 39; Isaiah
22). Hagor is being wrapped around with an article of clothing, though
frequently with the specialized
meaning of a soldier’s belt. Zone was
originally the lower of two girdles worn by women; in the New Testa-
ment, it is
sometimes an article of clothing worn by men, as by John the
Baptist.
GIRGASHITE (גרגשי)
A Canaanite tribe named 7 times. They have been
identified with
the Hittite tribe name of Qaraqisha. It
may mean “client
of Gesh,” a Sumerian god of light.
GIRZITES (גרזי, inhabitants of a sterile land) An otherwise unknown people
probably
living between the Philistines and Egypt . They were the
vic-
tims of raids by David during his sojourn at Ziklag.
GITTAIM (גתים, two wine-presses) The village to which the Amorite
inha-
bitants of Beeroth fled for refuge, perhaps from Saul’s cruel persecu-
tion. A location in the vicinity of modern Ramleh
is most probable.
G-38
GITTITE. See
Gath.
GITTITH. See Music.
GIZONITE (גזוני)
A gentilic name linked with
the name Hashem, whose
name appears in the catalogue of the Mighty Men of David
known as
the “Thirty.” The place upon
which the word is based is unknown.
No comments:
Post a Comment