H
H. The abbreviation biblical scholars use for the “Holiness Code,” whichdesignates a legal section of Priestly material in Leviticus 17-26, most
likely written sometime either side of 700 B.C.
HAAHASHTARI (האחשתרי) A family of the tribe of Judah.
HABAIAH (חביה, whom the Lord protects) An ancestor whose name became
the name of a family of returned exiles claiming priestly descent, but
unable to document their claim, and therefore denied priesthood rights.
HABAKKUK (חבקוק, embrace) A cultic prophet of Judah who lived during
HABAKKUK (חבקוק, embrace) A cultic prophet of Judah who lived during
the last days of Josiah (640-609 B.C.) and under the reign of Jehoiakim
(609-598 B.C.). The book by that name is 8th among the minor prophets
in the Old Testament canon.
The origin of the name Habakkuk is uncertain. The prophet may
The origin of the name Habakkuk is uncertain. The prophet may
be the same one mentioned in the Apocryphal Bel and the Dragon as “the
son of Jesus of the tribe of Levi.” (See also the Habakkuk and the Bel &
the Dragon entry in Old Testament Apocrypha/ Influence Outside the
Bible section of the appendix.) Based on this, he may be linked to the
priesthood.
Many scholars consider the book to constitute a unity, possibly a
Many scholars consider the book to constitute a unity, possibly a
liturgy for a day of penitence. The Dead Sea Scrolls copy of this book
does not include chapter 3. Direct divine utterance, spoken through the
mouth of an official and authorized mediator or cultic prophet, had its
place within the liturgy of any particular day in ancient Israel's cult. It
fell to the temple prophets in the cult of Judah to attend to the position
of the temple singers.
The cultic songs associated with the rituals of lamentation, while
sung in the congregation’s name, would actually be rendered by profes-
sionals, because not many of the common people were at home in the
appropriate ritual details. The songs were not sung with music books
before them, but from memory. It is likely that most of the songs come
from the hearts and minds of the men who belonged to the profession
of temple singers. If the prophet Habakkuk was such a prophet, he was
very familiar with cultic compositions.
Following the title comes the prophetic lament. The date is appro-
ximately 598 B.C. The first destructive blow of the Babylonian might has
fallen upon Judah. Here is sounded the note of national lamentation: “O
Lord, how long?” Habakkuk sees, taking place before his very eyes, and
seemingly ignored by God, destruction and violence on a vast scale. Law
has surrendered to force, so that righteousness has no opportunity. The
wicked are strong enough to throttle the power of justice.
But what is taking place in history has meaning. The prophet
But what is taking place in history has meaning. The prophet
discerns that it is the mighty God who is using the powerful Chaldean
nation set on world conquest. No one lacking faith could see anything
good for Judah or for the entire Near East in what was being done by the
Chaldeans. One is not surprised at Habakkuk’s protest to God. He is
convinced that the Chaldeans express upon Judah the Lord’s judgment
and the Lord’s chastisement. But how can this be? How can the Lord
permit the Chaldeans to sap Judah’s strength?
Habakkuk evidently had a high retreat to which he was accustomed
Habakkuk evidently had a high retreat to which he was accustomed
to go, where he might brood over his problems and await God’s message
in such an hour when he desperately needed light. He designated his
retreat as “the tower,” to which he went to await in eager spiritual recepti-
vity Yahweh’s word. The content of it was to be an abiding truth which
one must wait for in spiritual sensitivity and with hushed eagerness of
expectation. His revelation came in two simple parts. First, “He whose
soul is not upright in him shall fail (i.e. the nation or person that proceeds
upon a policy that is not erect, upright, honest, just, or morally straight,
shall fail. The second part is “The righteous [be it nation or person] shall
live by his faith.”
H-1
Habakkuk lifted against figures of arrogant, wealthy oppressors a
series of five
woes. The 1st woe deals with
Nebuchadrezzar’s lust for
tribute. The 2nd lifts into the open the purpose of the Chaledan pillage
and plunder—to make the empire so strong materially that no nation
would dare challenge
it. The 3rd focuses upon the Chaldean oppressor's
cruelty. The 4th
solemnly teaches that the Chaldean dealings toward his
neighbors in merciless
power will rebound upon the Chaldean nation.
The 5th is a rebuke to the Chaldean worship of their gods, Bel,
Shamash,
and Marduk. He contrasts the
man-made idols with the invisible but
potently present Lord in his holy temple,
before whose majestic face the
entire earth is summoned to awed silence.
Among
the Dead Sea Scrolls there is a Habakkuk commentary,
which neither contains nor
refers to chapter 3. This supports the
view
that this chapter was not part of the original book. After an opening title
which designates the chapter “a prayer of Habakkuk . . .”, comes a majes-
tic poem on Yahweh’s
advent. The poet remembers Yahweh’s
work, & he
pictures the holy God coming from Teman in Edom. God’s destructive
power is pictured in
mythological terms. As Yahweh battled
with chaos,
now it is with the destructive Chaldeans that the mighty God is
angry, as
God goes forth to save his people.
The prophetic liturgy & the psalm con-
clude in triumph. It is trust in God, a magnificent expression of faith's vic-
tory over all misfortune.
The
three chapters of Habbakuk is filled with truths which stand at
the core of
Hebrew religion:
History has meaning if one takes God can overrule an evil nation for
the long view. for God’s righteous purpose
Uprightness
in the soul is neces- Evil is bound to finally fail, even
sary for individuals & nations. though it may seem victorious.
sary for individuals & nations. though it may seem victorious.
The righteous shall live by faith. Wealth is
treacherous as basis of
Trust in God is only sure basis of human dependence for security.
strength, regardless of external Ruthless dealings rebound upon
Trust in God is only sure basis of human dependence for security.
strength, regardless of external Ruthless dealings rebound upon
situations. the doer.
Faith’s
ultimate joy is communion
with God.
Jeremiah.
translation of shuryon (See Biblical entry for Coat of Mail). Armor originally
for the neck and shoulders but later reaching to the thighs or lower.
HABIRU, HAPIRU. The name of a group of people. The 2 versions stem from
the fact that the word is from the Ugarit language, in which b and p are
interchangeable. The word seems originally to have been the denotation
of a social class, though this is very uncertain.
The Habiru's earliest occurrence is found in texts dating from the
Third Dynasty of Ur (roughly around 2050 B.C.). After that they are men-
tioned in texts from all important archives in the Near East. The Habiru
often appear in the service of one king or another, & more particularly
in many cases as soldiers. Some Habiru people have West Semitic
names, but some have Akkadian or even non-Semitic names. Such facts
have led scholars to believe that Habiru is not an ethnic term but rather
denotes some kind of social group. They seem to occupy a position be-
tween the free citizens and the slaves.
But there are texts where “Habiru” seems to have more to do
with an ethnic group. In the Amarna Letters the Habiru people appear
as a separate ethnic group with West Semitic names. The most likely
reason is that the word may originally have been used to indicate a
social class, and eventually it developed into an ethnic term. In that
case we may compare “Habiru” with “Canaanite,” which also originally
may have denoted a social class. Where Abraham is called “the Hebrew”
(Genesis 14), the term could be either social or ethnic. Generally the
term “Hebrew” in the Old Testament is an ethnic term. It seems proba-
ble that Habiru is an Akkadian form related to the Hebrew form. In all
probability, the Hebrew people were a branch of the Habiru.
HABOR (חבור, strong) A tributary of the Euphrates, flowing into the latter
from the northeast. Some of the Israelites were exiled to the banks of the
Habor by Shalmaneser in King Hosea’s ninth year.
HACALIAH (חכליה) The father of Nehemiah.
HACHILAH (חכילה) A hill in the Ziph neighborhood where David took refuge
H-2
when pursued by Saul. It is in the neighborhood of Hebron, but the site has
not been identified.
HACHMONI (חכמוני , wisdom (?)) 1. The family of Jashobeam, one of
David’s Mighty Men. 2. The family of Jehiel, a servant of David.
HADAD (הדד, thunderer(?)) 1. The eighth son of Ishmael (Genesis 25).
2. A king of Edom (Genesis 36). 3. Another king of Edom (Genesis 36).
4. A member of Edom’s royal house who escaped to Egypt when
David conquered Edom, and later revolted against Solomon. There is a
theory that I Kings 11 combines 2 accounts, one of Hadad the Edomite &
one of Adad the Midianite. Convincing reasons have been given for identi-
fying this Hadad with #3 above.
5. The ancient Semitic storm-god who as the great Baal of the Uga-
ritic pantheon figured in the struggle of Israel's religion against Canaanite
religion.
HADADEZER (הדדעזר, whose help is Hadad) A king of Zobah, defeated by
David, who extended his control as far as the Upper Euphrates. The con-
flict between Zobah and Israel had begun in the reign of Saul.
The Old Testament preserves 3 accounts of campaigns by David
The Old Testament preserves 3 accounts of campaigns by David
which involved Hadadezer. 1st, in II Samuel 10, a coalition of Aramean
rulers who had come to the relief of the besieged city of Rabbah were
defeated by Joab. 2nd, in the same chapter a battle is described at Helam
between David and a new army of Hadadezer under Shobach; this army
was also defeated. 3rd, in Chapter 8, another defeat of Hadadezer is
described “as he went to restore his power at the river Euphrates.” Some
critics think the above are all different events; others feel that the
second and third deal with the same series of events.
HADADRIMMON (הדדרמון, thunderer, pomegranate, also the names of 2
Syrian deities.) A deity for whom public mourning was made in Pale-
stine 's great central plain by Megiddo. It was probably a rite which
had its mythical counterpart in the mourning for the dead Baal by his
sister, the goddess Anat.
HADASHAH (הדשה, new) A village of Judah in Shephelah district of Lachish;
identification remains uncertain.
HADASSAH (הדסה, myrtle) Either original Hebrew name of Esther or the
Akkadian title of bride given to her.
HADID (הדיד, sharp) A town of Benjamin overlooking the coastal plain at
the Shephelah's northwest extremity, about 5.5 km northeast of Lydda.
It constituted the ancestral homeland of more than 720 exiles who re-
turned from Babylonia. All Old Testament references to the site are
post-exilic.
HADLAI (הדלי, forsaken) An Ephraimite person or family.
HADORAM (הדורם, honor) 1. An Arabian tribe, called the first-born of
Joktan. 2. Son of Tou the king of Hamath. 3. An official of King
Rehoboam who was in charge of the forced labor.
HADRACH (הדרך) A town in the northwestern part of Lebanon.
HA-ELEPH (האלף, the friend, the thousand) A city in Benjamin, whose
name should probably read “Zela-ha-eleph,” and is perhaps modern
Salah, between Jerusalem and Gibeon.
HAGAB (הגב, locust) Head of a family of Nethinim among the returned exiles.
HAGABAH (הגבה, locust) Head of a family of Nethinim among the returned
exiles; evidently to be distinguished from Hagab.
Gilead . They are
named with the enemies of Israel who dwelt in the Trans-
mu st have come from an very heavy cumulonimbus.
Aleppo on the Orontes in Syria . Hamath was
during long periods the
H-3
HAGAR (הגר, flight) The maid whom Sarah gave as a concubine
to Abraham
and who became the mother of Ishmael. The Hagar stories have been
preserved
primarily by the Jahwist writer and the Elohwist writer, with a
few verses from
the Priestly writer.
In the first story Hagar is identified as barren Sarai's Egyptian
handmaid, given to Abram for children. When Hagar became pregnant,
she assumed an arrogant attitude that infuriated her mistress.
With
Abram’s permission, Sarai treated Hagar so harshly that she fled
into
the wilderness of Shur. At a spring
the angel of Yahweh appeared to
announce that she was to bear a son from whom would come a multitude
of descendants and whose name was to be Ishmael (“God
has heard").
The
second story presumably occurs several years after Ishma-
el's birth. Sarah was seized by the fear that Hagar might
become an heir
alongside her own son.
She demanded the expulsion of Hagar and Ishma-
el. Hagar fled to the dry Wilderness of
Beer-sheba, where God's angel
showed her a well. He assured her that Ishmael wouldn't die but
would
become a great nation. Ishmael
grew up to live in the Wilderness of
Paran, to become an expert with the bow,
and to marry an Egyptian
woman. The
Hagar traditions reflect the Hebrews' belief that they were
related to
the wild, warlike Bedouin peoples to the south of Palestine.
They both had Abraham as father, but their
ancestral mother, of course,
was the inferior concubine Hagar.
In
the New Testament, Paul makes allegorical use of the Hagar
story. Hagar & her son stand for the slavery of
the covenant, in contrast
to the freedom of the new covenant typified by Isaac.
HAGGAI (הגי, celebration) The tenth
in the series of 12 short prophetic books
which forms the final section of
the Old Testament (OT).
His name would suggest that the prophet
was born on some feast
day. He would
appear to have been a conspicuous figure, & Jewish tradi-
tion has it that he
was known as a prophet in Babylon during the Exile.
On the evidence of the very 1st verse he
was active in Jerusalem in 520
B.C. He
doesn't appear to have been of the priestly caste, since he asks
the priests’
guidance.
If he witnessed the temple
before its destruction in 586, he was a
very old man when he became one of the
prime movers for its restoration
in 520.
In association with Zechariah he rouses the people of Jerusalem
and their leaders to undertake this task.
The work of restoration was be-
gun almost immediately after his first
appeal. It later tradition Haggai was
associated with Zechariah and Malachi as
joint founder of the the “Great
Synagogue.”
Haggai is the first of the collection of
prophecy dating from the post-
exilic period, the others being Zechariah & Malachi; Haggai is the shortest.
Its
two chapters are made up of four utterance delivered within the space of
4 months in 520 B.C. Haggai is referred to
throughout in the third person
& is described impersonally as “the
prophet.” Moreover, the book serves as
a
record of the effect of the prophet’s words, & as a collection of his
utter-
ances. The general view is that
compilation was done by some unknown
disciple not long after the time at which
the oracles were first delivered.
According
to the Cyrus Cylinder text, when the victorious Persian
king had taken
possession of the Babylon’s territories, he gave general per-
mission to minorities exiled there to return to their own countries if they
wished. Contrary to the Chronicler’s rosy picture it
seems more probable
that only some Jews chose to go back, & that their first
task was to eke out
some kind of existence in a devastated land.
Under
the leadership of Shesh-bazzar, “prince of Judah” & first ruler
of what
was now the Persian province of Judah, the repatriated exiles laid
the
foundations of a new temple amid Jerusalem's ruins. It's more probable
that the Chronicler,
writing his narrative over 2 centuries later, has given an
idealized account
of what actually happened, to which the more sober con-
temporary evidence of
Haggai & Zechariah lends no support. Both of these
writings tend to confirm that it was not until the
emergence of Haggai as an
inspired leader that any serious steps were taken to
restore the dilapidated
temple.
Many
Jews had preferred to remain in Babylon, including those who
had established
themselves most successfully. Those who
returned didn’t
possess abundant means, and whatever zeal they had for
the house of the
Lord’s restoration was tempered by finding themselves among
people who
had become reconciled to the sight of the ruined sanctuary. The whole area
with its courts would still be
available as a sacred place for those who
wished to worship. There is evidence that an altar for burnt
offerings was
in use. There are other
indications that pagan cults had established them-
selves side by side with Yahweh's worship.
H-4
Economic
conditions must further have lowered the morale of those
who were left among
the fragments of the Jewish state. The
picture drawn
by Haggai is of a people crippled by a succession of bad harvests & subse-
quent poverty, so the period before Haggai’s emergence as a leader can't
have been anything other than a dispiriting struggle for existence. When
Darius I succeeded Cambyses as ruler of
the Persian Empire, revolts broke
out throughout the subject provinces. To a prophetic mind such as that of
Haggai,
this must have suggested the prelude to the end event of history.
With Zerubbabel, a scion of the house of David as governor of Judah, the
time appeared to be ripe for the rehabilitation
of the house of the Lord.
Haggai's 1st prophecy in August-September of 520 B.C., appeals to
Zerubbabel & Joshua the high priest to rally the people to the shattered
temple’s rebuilding. The drought and bad harvests from which they
have
suffered are God’s punishment for their impious neglect. Less than 3 weeks
after that, work on the
temple begins. A month
later Haggai makes a 2nd
appeal.
Apparently the builders had lost heart.
Haggai promises the mes-
sianic kingdom’s advent and the Gentiles’ downfall. Their treasures will
flow to Jerusalem.
The
3rd oracle’s meaning delivered 2 months later is rather
obscure.
It suggests that the prophet
secures a decision from the priests to the effect
that ritual uncleanness is
more contagious than ritual holiness. He
may
mean that the previous unwillingness to rebuild had tainted their service
of
Yahweh, but now that they had started, their prosperity was assured. On
the other hand, “this people” may refer to
the Samaritans, & that Haggai is
recommending that their offer of help should
be rejected on political rather
than religious grounds. In the last oracle, Haggai proclaims the end
of
Gentile domination in the Day of the Lord.
The
value of the book is historical rather than religious. The prophe-
cies represent a sad decline from
the ethical vigor & conviction of the pre-
exilic prophets. Haggai’s chief concern is the cult's re-establishment, the
shell rather than the kernel. Haggai takes the superficial view that
material
prosperity is assured provided the mechanics of worship are
guaranteed.
Yet
on a long-term view it must be said that, without the temple and
the Judaism
which centered on it, the great prophets’ legacy would have
been quickly
dissipated and Christianity would have had no foundations on
which to
build. The hope and encouragement Haggai’s message brought
to Judah's dejected community at that time was a
significant milestone
in the preparation of the good news. From a historical point of view, the
book's value is that it forms a corrective to the Chronicler's inaccuracies &
sheds welcome light on the obscure period between Jerusalem's fall &
Nehemiah's achievements.
HAGGEDOLIM (הגדולים, the great ones) The father of Zabdiel, a priest
(Nehemiah 11).
HAGGI
(הגי, born on a feast day)
The second son of Gad; ancestral head of
the “family of the
Haggites.”
HAGGIAH (הגיה, festal) A Levite; descendant of Merari.
HAGGITH (הגית, born on a feast day) A wife of David; mother of Adonijah,
who later claimed the throne.
HAGIOGRAPHA (כתובים (keth oo beem), writings) The term used for the
third division of
the Hebrew Bible. It is a miscellaneous
collection of 11
varied books which achieved canonization separately. The comparative
order of these books in the
Hebrew and English Bible is listed below:
Hebrew
Bible English Bible
Psalms,
Job, Proverbs (after Ruth
(after Judges)
Malachi) Ruth, Chronicles,
Ezra, Nehemiah
(after Kings)
Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes, Esther
Lamentations Job, Psalms, Proverbs
Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes, Esther
Lamentations Job, Psalms, Proverbs
Esther Ecclesiastes,
Song of Solomon
Daniel Lamentations (after Jeremiah)
Daniel Lamentations (after Jeremiah)
Ezra, Nehemiah, Chronicles Daniel
(after Ezekiel)
HAGRI (הגרי, fugitive) Father of Mibhar, one of the Mighty Men
in David’s
army (I Chronicles 11)
H-5
HAGRITE (הגרי, fugitive) A pastoral Bedouin tribe living in the
region east of
jordan. In Saul's time the tribe of Reuben,
perhaps with the assistance of
the other Trans-jordan tribes, extended its
territory to the edge of the desert
by conquering the Hagrites. David gave Hagrites oversight of the flocks.
HAIL, HAILSTONES (ברד (baw rod); אלגביש (el gaw
beesh); calaza
(kah lah za)) Hail occurs as the result of violent
turbulence in fully deve-
loped cumulo-nimbus clouds, and frequently accompanies
severe thunder-
storms. Raindrops within
the cloud are carried to great heights where the
temperature is below -18 C (0
F); the ice pellets grow in size as they are
carried up & down, until they
are too heavy for the wind to keep aloft. Hail-
storms are recorded in the Bible
as ruining crops and striking down men &
animals in the open. The hailstones which killed the Amorites at Gibeon
HAIR (שער (sah ‘ar)) The hair’s capacity for constant growth
has always
made it seem an important seat of life. In the case of the Nazarite vow,
as in the
case of Samson’s hair, the hair appears to have been left long
in fulfillment
of a vow. The offering of the hair to the dead was part of
ancient religious practices, but forbidden to the Hebrews; the complete
shaving of the head was forbidden for any purpose. In the Old Testament,
long hair on men was greatly admired, but in the New Testament it is
frowned upon as contrary to nature.
HAIRCLOTH (בעל שער ( ba’al sa har))
A termed used in II Kings 1; the
King James Version translates: “He
was a hairy man.” The Revised Stan-
dard Version translation is obviously right in view of the phraseology in
Matthew 3
and Mark 1.
HAKKATAN (הקטן, small one) A member of the family of Azgad; the
father
of a certain Johanan, who returned to Jerusalem from the Babylonian exile
with Ezra.
HAKKOZ (הקוץ, the thorn) An ancestor & the source of the name of
a family
of priests in David’s time.
Members of this family were among those
unable to document their claim
to priestly rank. It is perhaps this
family
that is represented by the Uriah who helped repair the wall of
Jerusalem.
HAKUPHA (הקופא, bent) Head of a family of postexilic temple
servants of
lower rank.
HALACHAH (הלכה, walk) The authoritative Jewish way of life as
expressed
in moral law and ritual precept.
It embraces the whole body of Jewish
teaching, legislation, and
practices from the interpretation of the laws of
the Bible through Jewish
teachers from Ezra onward. Although
legalistic
in content, the Halachah is designed to bring all human occupations
into
relation with the service of God.
HALAH (הלה)
A city or district in the
Assyrian Empire, to which Shalma-
neser exiled some of the Israelites in the
ninth year of King Hosea. The
Revised
Standard Version changed the traditional translation from “the
exile of this
host” to “the exiles in Halah.”
HALAK, MOUNT (ההר הלק (ha har hal ak), bald mountain) A mountain
mentioned as the southern
limit of the conquest of Joshua. The
name &
site are preserved in the Jebel Halaq on the Wadi Marra's northwestern
side, north of Abdeh.
HALF-SHEKEL TAX (didracmon (di drak mon)
The temple tax required
annually of every Jew; it was worth about 2 Attic drachmas, (about 36
cents).
HALF-TRIBE (חצי שבט (khay
tsee shay bet)) A term used chiefly in Joshua
and I
Chronicles, & sparingly in Numbers & Deuteronomy, always with
reference to
Manasseh. Half of the tribe, like Reuben & Gad, requested
permission to settle east of the Jordan River. Permission was granted on
condition that they lead the military invasion of Canaan and help in the
establishment of
settlements west of the Jordan. The
half-tribe east of the
Jordan was given a part of Gilead and all of Bashan. The
other half-tribe
settled in central Palestine, just north of Ephraim, southwest
of Issachar,
southeast of Asher.
H-6
HALHUL (הלול, trembling, terror) A
city of Judah in the hill-country Beth-zur
district; 6.4 km north
of Hebron .
HALI (הלי, ornament, necklace) A border town in the territory of Asher ;
it
must be near Helkath, but its exact location is unknown.
HALL (1. לשכה (lish kaw), chamber; 2. אולם העמודים (oo lawm ha’
mood eem), porch of the pillars; 3. ולם
הכסא (oo lawm ha kis say),
porch of the throne or judgment; 4. המלך בית (beth ha ma
leck ),
house of the king; 5.
בית משתיא (beth mish tah ya), banquet house;
6. aulh (ow leh); 7.
raitwrion (rahee it or ee on))
1. A
hall or room connected with the sanctuary, in which the sacri-
ficial meal was
eaten, and to which Saul and his servant were invited by
Samuel (I Samuel 9). This word is also used of the chambers of various
officials in the Jerusalem temple.
2. The Hall or Porch of Pillars was a part of
King Solomon’s palace,
most likely a pillared porch at the entrance of the
House of the Forest of
Lebanon. Others see it as a separate building.
3. The Hall or Porch of the Throne
(Judgment) was another of King
Solomon’s buildings. Here the kings gave their legal
judgments. Some
scholars have made it a
chamber at one end of the House of the Forest of
Lebanon, with that building and pillared porch providing an impressive
entranceway to it. Others have made it an audience chamber at
the en-
trance to the royal residence itself.
4. The
king’s hall or house was the Persian King Ahasuerus' audi-
ence chamber. It was a great
room a little over 58 meters on each side,
with 6 rows of pillars, 6 pillars
in each row supporting the roof. The pil-
lars were 2.1 meters around and almost 20 meters high.
5.
King Belshazzar’s banqueting hall or house was the scene of a
feast & the handwriting on the wall; it was a great audience chamber, a
rectangular room about 15 meters by 48 meters & probably had a vaul-
ted roof. The floors were paved with brick, & the
plastered walls were
decorated with colorful scenes in tile.
6.
King James Version translates aule
as hall; the Revised Stan-
dard Version translates it as “courtyard.”
7. The King James Version translates praitorion
as hall in refer-
ence to the governor's. official residence. The Revised Standard Version
uses “praetorium” to translate this word.
HALLEL (הלל, Praise thou!) A song of praise to the Lord. To praise the Lord
was one of the Levites’ duties. The “Egyptian” Hallel (Psalm 113-118),
according to a tradition of Jesus’ century, was composed by Moses. It cele-
brates God’s great deeds from the
Exodus till the messianic time and was
recited in the homes at the Passover
meal. The “Great” Hallel (Psalms
120-136) praises God for having given rain and food to all flesh.
HALLELUJAH (הללו־יה (Praise
(ye) the Lord!) The form of
doxology used in
the fifth book of Psalms and in the work of the Chronicler.
The
root-word hallel is used in both a secular and a religious sense.
The secular use is the reason for the Jews interpreting the cultic excla-
mation “Hallelujah” as an imperative: “Praise Yah!”
But there is a Jewish
tradition that originally “Hallelujah” is a very
ancient enthusiastic cultic
shout not containing the divine name. It may be
that the verb hallel had be-
fore the Exile a profane & “heathenish”
sense. In any case, there is no rea-
son to see in “Hallelujah” the root of the
Israelite hymns. The custom of
starting songs of praise with an imperative is older than Israelite literature
or
the “hallelujah” in the Psalms.
The
psalms containing “hallelujah” praise the Lord for his power &
his wisdom in
Psalms 104-106, 115-117, 135, 146-150.
The last group of
Psalms listed combines all these motives in a general
praise of all that God
did, does, & will do.
“Hallelujah” appears in III Maccabees 7; the Egyptian
Jews, saved from the king’s elephants, sang it going home in Alexandria.
The
use of “Hallelujah” in the Christian churches varies. In the Eas-
tern churches it has a long & living tradition with a great musical richness.
During the Middle Ages the custom arose of combining the long melody
of
the final syllable “jah” with some words in Latin. Luther accepted (1523)
the “hallelujah” after
the lessons as “eternal voice of the church,” but
sought to banish it without success in 1526.
H-7
HALLOHESH (הלוהש (charmer)) The father of Shallum, who, with his
daughters, helped repair the walls of Jerusalem under Nehemiah.
HAM (הם, violence) 1. The
second of Noah’s three sons. After the
Flood he
shared in the divine blessing and covenant. However, the early Jahwist
story tells that
when Noah awoke from his drunken sleep and “knew
what his youngest son had done
to him,” he cursed Canaan and con-
demned him to the service of Shem and
Japheth. Because of the two
different
sources of this story, it is best to separate this story from the
flood
tradition and to infer that the original order of Noah’s sons was:
Shem, Japheth, and Canaan. To harmonize the two accounts, an editor
identified Ham as the father of Canaan.
Ham’s name is used in Psalms
78, 105, and 106 symbolically for Egypt
since Egypt was one of his sons.
HAM
(הם) A city of the Zuzim in the region east of the Jordan . The name is
preserved in the modern village of Ham about 6.4 km south of Irbid. The
nearby tell or mound shows evidence of a
settlement in the Bronze and
Iron ages (1300-900 B.C.) and the remains of a
triple wall built of very
large stones.
HAMAN (המן, magnificent) The Persian king Ahasuerus' prime minister &
an enemy of the Jews in the book of Esther. Because Mordecai, a Jew of
the line of Kish & the uncle of Esther refused to bow before him, Haman
contrived a plot to
destroy all the Jews. He had a gallows
specially pre-
pared for Mordecai. But
through Esther’s intervention, who was also the
wife of Ahasuerus, Haman’s plot
was revealed, & he met the fate he had
planned for Mordecai. Haman’s ten sons were killed too. Some scholars
view the story of Esther as
reflecting a struggle between the gods of
Babylon & Elam. Others regard it as romantic fiction created
in connec-
tion with the Feast of Purim.
Still others believe it records a genuine
event of the 400s B.C.
HAMATH (המת, fortress) 1. An important town between Damascus and
center of an independent kingdom, the southern frontier
of which bor-
dered on the northern frontier of the Israelite kingdom. The earliest per-
iod of settlement known goes
back to Neolithic times (6000-4000 B.C.).
The eighth level from the top found in excavation seems to correspond
to
the Old Babylonian period. From the
Hyksos period there are no
findings.
Hamath
is one of the important centers for the finding of Hittite
hieroglyphic
inscriptions. In the time of David,
Hamath was the capital
of an important kingdom, with which David
collaborated. The latter
conquered King
Hadadezer of Zobah, perhaps through the help of Toi of
Hamath. After the
North-South split, Jeroboam II seems to have re-esta-
blished the frontiers of
the northern Israelite kingdom, so that the south
frontier of Hamath again
became the northern frontier of the Israelite
kingdom. The power of the kingdom of Hamath is also
recognizable in
Assyrian royal inscriptions.
In the Greek Age Hamath was still of
importance.
2. A town which was also called Hamath-Zobah. This town is per-
2. A town which was also called Hamath-Zobah. This town is per-
haps also mentioned in Ezekiel 47, & it is probably
the same as Zobah.
HAMATH, ENTRANCE OF (לבא המת (lay
bo ha math) The northern
border of the Promised Land’s ideal
limits and of Israel ’s possession in
the New Age.
Solomon’s kingdom extended from the Brook of Egypt
in the south to the
entrance of Hamath. It was somewhere in
the On
Valley between the Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon Mountains. Some place
it between Mount Hermon and Mount
Lebanon. Since it is associated
with
certain cities, it should probably be placed in the territory of Riblah.
It is not improbable, as some have suggested,
that “entrance to Hamath”
should be rendered as “Labo-Hamath”, a town name
below Riblah.
HAMATH-ZOBAH (המת צובה, fortress station) A designation of the town
of Zobah in II Chronicle 8.
HAMMATH (המת, hot spring) 1. The
“father” of Rechab, or the home of
the Kenites of the family of Rechab.
2. A
fortified town in Naphtali. It is
located at Hammam Tabari-
yeh, just south of Tiberias on the western shore of the
Sea of Galilee.
H-8
HAMMEDATHA (המדתא)
The father of Haman, archenemy
of the Jews in
the book of Esther.
HAMMELECH (המלך)
Instead of “the son of
Hammelech,” as in the King
James Version, the Revised Standard Version
translate it as “the king’s
son.” This
phrase may refer to any member of the royal household.
HAMMER. (מקבה (mak keh baw); פטיש (pat tesh);
sfura (seh fur ah))
The hammer stone, a smooth or shaped stone held in the hand, was used
from earliest times down through the biblical period. Beginning in the
Bronze Age (3000-1200 B.C.),
the stone was sometimes perforated for
better grip or to receive a handle. The term makkebah is used of the tool
of the stonemason. The pattesh of
Jeremiah 23 is also a stonemason’s
tool. The Greek equivalent of this word is sphura, which means any
ham-
mer ormallet. In Jeremiah 51, the
context favors the translation “battle
ax” or “war club” for the Hebrew word mappets.
HAMMOLECHETH (המלכת, she who reigns) The sister of Gilead ,
the
source of a tribal name, and the ancestor of several tribal families of
Manasseh.
HAMMON (המון, hot springs (?)) 1. A border town in Asher. It is perhaps
to be identified with Umm el-
‘Awamid, about 8 km northeast of Ras en-
Naqurab. 2. A Levitical town in Naphtali.
HAMMUEL (המואל, warmth of God) A family or clan of the Simeon tribe
(I Chronicle 4).
HAMMURABI. 6th
king of Babylon ’s 1st Dynasty (1792-1750 B.C.); Sin-
muballit’s
son; Samsu-iluna’s father.
The history of the King Hammurabi’s reign is
known only in its
outlines. Apart from royal inscriptions, there are a large
number of politi-
cal and administrative letters and the official names given to
the 42 years
that Hammurabi ruled over Babylon. These names refer to all kinds
of
royal activities, such as special building projects, votive offerings,
temple
statues, pious works, and wars.
The historical section of the preamble to
the Code of Hammurabi presents
more evidence as to his kingdom’s maxi-
mum extent than any other inscription,
though its tenor is clearly hymnic
and not historical. It mentions all the major cities ruled by
Hammurabi.
There
exist two more stone inscriptions referring to Hammurabi
that were poetic in
nature. The first is on a very broken
basalt stela in
Sumerian and Akkadian, an inscription of his conquests. The second is
an inscription on a broken
statue, which addresses the king in Sumerian
and Akkadian, in hymnic
terms. The correspondence of Hammurabi
con-
sists mainly of about 140 letters that he sent to high
administrative offi-
cials touching mostly on legal and administrative matters.
In
the history of Mesopotamia, Hammurabi & his period represent
a crucial phase
in the development of Babylonian civilization as well as
in the history of the
city of Babylon. Under the five kings of
Babylon
before him, the city led an inconspicuous existence. It can safely be as-
sumed that the political
status of Babylon repeatedly shifted from indepen-
dence to more or less
effective control by Isin or Larsa. It
seems that
Babylon’s rise to power started with the father of Hammurabi, who
had
victories over Ur and Isin.
From
Hammurabi’s 7th to his 11th year he conquered Uruk, Isin,
Malgum, and Rapiqu. The following years
up to the 29th have names
that do not refer to war. From his 30th year to the end of
his reign he
engaged in nearly uninterrupted warfare. Most of the names of the war
years refer to
coalitions against which he fought. The
“victories” of the
early war years seemed to be of a somewhat defensive nature
against the
pressures caused by invading mountaineers.
The
second period of wars seems to have reduced rather than
extended his realm, to
which he now likes to refer to as “Sumer & Ak-
kad.” The last years of Hammurabi are named after
clearly defensive
measures to which he resorted in the north of the
country. Walls were
built along the
Tigris and Euphrates, and Sippar was fortified by a wall.
It remains uncertain how much of Babylonia was
held by the five kings
of the dynasty following Hammurabi in the next 150
years, each of them
ascending the throne of his father. One thing, however,
remains as the
enduring success of the rule of Hammurabi: all later kings of
Babylonia
resided in Babylon, the other cities becoming provincial from then
on.
H-9
During
the peaceful period between the 12th & the 30th year,
Baby-
lonia seems to have become not only prosperous and politically important
but also a center of learning. The
centuries which followed the reign of
Hammurabi became something like the
golden age to which the numerous
Old Babylonia texts bear witness. Intimately connected with the name of
Hammurabi is, of course the law code which bears his name.
The
name Hammurabi belongs to those Semitic but not Akkadian
personal names which
begins to appear around 2000 B.C. The
language
of the people who bear these names is referred to as “Eastern
Canaanite,”
“West Semitic,” or “Amorite.”
Apart from some rulers of Larsa, Hammu-
rabi is the first king to have
such a name, as his father & 2 kings before
him had truly Akkadian personal
names. The meaning of “Hammurabi”
is
still debated. The first element,
“Hammu” no doubt refers to a god, &
the second part refers to healing, but a
reliable translation cannot be given.
HAMONAH (המונה, multitude) A city where Gog hordes are to be destroyed
after the unsuccessful attack on Israel by this force of evil.
HAMON-GOG (המון גוג, multitude of Gog) A valley in Transjordan where
the multitude of dead from the armies of Gog are to be buried
(Ezekiel 39).
HAMOR (המון, he-ass) The father of Shechem, killed with him in
revenge
by Simeon and Levi.
HAMRAN (המרן, from the root meaning, “to be
red, agitated”) The 1st son
of clan chief Dishon (I Chronicles 1).
HAMSTRING (עקר (aw kar)) A verb meaning “to cut the muscle tendon
of the thigh.” To hamstring an animal completely disables or lames it.
HAMUL (המול, spared) The younger son of Perez, & the
grandson of Judah ,
ancestral head of the Hamulites.
HAMUTAL (המוטל, father-in-law of dew) Wife of Josiah; mother of Jehoa-
haz and
Zedekiah.
HANAMEL (הנמאל, probably “God is gracious”) Son of Shallum, Jeremi-
ah’s uncle
(Jeremiah 32), from whom the prophet purchased a field at
Anathoth during the siege
of Jerusalem .
HANAN (הנן, shortened form of “God has been
gracious”) 1. A Benjamin
descendant. 2. A Benjaminite who was an ancestor of
Saul. 3. One
of David’s Mighty Men. 4. The
head of a prophetic guild that occu-
pied a chamber in the temple. 5. The
head of a family of Nethinim that
returned to Palestine after the Exile.
6. An
assistant to the temple treasurers appointed by Nehemiah.
7. A
Levite who helped to interpret the law at the assembly of Ezra and
also sealed
the covenant (Nehemiah 8, 10). 8. Another man who
sealed Ezra’s
covenant. 9. Another man who sealed Ezra’s
covenant.
HANANEL, TOWER OF (הננאל מגדל (mig dal han
nah nel) A tower on
the northern
rampart of Jerusalem . The person
for whom it was named
is not known. It
was replaced and eventually the Antonia Tower stood
where it once was.
HANANI (הנני, shortened form of “the Lord is gracious”) 1. The
father
of the prophet Jehu. 2. A postexilic family of Levitical singers
of the
Heman group. 3. A priest who divorced his foreign wife in
Ezra’s time.
4. A
brother or kinsman of Nehemiah whose tidings of conditions in
Judah prompted
Nehemiah’s work and who later was one of those put in
charge of Jerusalem
(Nehemiah 1, 7). 5. A musician at the dedication
of the walls
of Jerusalem.
H-10
HANANIAH (הנניהו, the Lord
is gracious) 1. An officer in Uzziah's army.
2. The
father of a “prince” or administrative officer in Jeremiah's time.
3. A
prophet who predicted Nebuchadnezzar's early fall & the early
return of
those exiled from Judah in 597 B.C. (Jeremiah 28). 4. Grand-
father
or family of a sentry who arrested Jeremiah.
5. A postexilic
descendant
of David; son of Zerubbabel
. 6. A postexilic person or family of the tribe of Benjamin. 7. A
post-exilic family of singers of the
Heman group. 8. One of those who
divorced their foreign wives
in Ezra's time. 9. A perfumer or ointment
maker, who helped
restore Jerusalem's walls under Nehemiah.
10. A
repairer of Jerusalem's walls under Nehemiah. The
confusion in the lists
make it impossible to tell if he is the same man as the
preceding entry.
11. The “governor of the castle”; one of
those whom Nehemiah put
in charge of Jerusalem.
12. A “chief of the
people” who signed the
pledge of reform.
13. A priest, one of the trumpeters at the dedication
of the wall of Jerusalem. 14. Ancestor of a family of Levites returning
with Ezra. 15. One of the three youths who figure in the
stories in the
book of Daniel and its apocryphal additions.
HAND (יד (yawd), power, side) Besides the numerous passages in which
the
Bible uses “hand” simply to designate a part of the body, there are many
others in which the word has a metaphorical sense. Most numerous are
those in which it occurs as
a symbol of “power.” The word can also
be
used, like the words for many other parts of the human body, for “person”
or
in place of a personal pronoun. There
are many references to the
“hand” or power of God. In Hebrew as in English,
the phrase right or left
“hand” can sometimes indicate position.
HANDBREADTH (טפח (tay fakh)) A measure based on the hand's width
at the base of the fingers, slightly less than 8 cm or about 3 inches. 6
handbreadths were equal to the common
cubit.
HANDKERCHIEF (soudarion, (soo dah ree on), from Latin root meaning
“sweat“) It may refer to something like our
handkerchief, used to wipe
away sweat, or to a towel-like head dressing. In Acts 19 the “handkerchief”
was used to
bring power from Paul for the healing of the sick.
HANDPIKE (מקל יד ( mak kal yawd), staff of the hand, javelin) A long
wooden staff with a pointed metal
head; used as a weapon by foot soldiers.
As used in Ezekiel 39, it may have been a quarterstaff, a thrusting
spear or
pike, a javelin, or a battle-ax.
HANDS, LAYING ON OF. A
ceremony occurring in both the Old Testament
(OT) and the New Testament (NT) in
various contexts and meanings.
In the burnt offerings & sin offerings of the OT sacrificial cult, the
In the burnt offerings & sin offerings of the OT sacrificial cult, the
officers
were directed to lay their hands on the victims before they were
slain. In the
case of sin offerings, the ceremony may have meant nothing
more than a setting
apart of the victim in consecration to its sacred pur-
pose. It was only a transference of guilt from
offerer to victim in the case
of the scapegoat.
Laying
on of hands was also used to impart blessing. Jacob blessed
the children of Joseph, & Jesus blessed the little
children. Here the under-
lying idea seems
to be a transference of spiritual wholeness and physical
vitality. Another type of blessing was the conveyance
of the Holy Spirit
by the laying on of hands.
A special type of blessing through laying on hands occurs in rites
A special type of blessing through laying on hands occurs in rites
of
ordination. Moses ordained Joshua as his
successor, a ceremony adop-
ted in later times for ordination to the rabbinate,
which may well have been
the source of Christian ordination. Moses conveyed a
commission, not the
“spirit of wisdom,” for Joshua already possessed this. The ordination was
an outward sign of recognition
of Joshua’s spiritual qualifications.
In the NT ordination has the same sense. The 7 were ordained by
In the NT ordination has the same sense. The 7 were ordained by
the 12 by prayer & the laying on of hands. Paul & Barnabas were commis-
sioned and
dismissed for their missionary journey by the prophets and
teachers at
Antioch. In I Timothy 5, the ceremony
probably refers, not to
ordination, but to the reconciliation of
penitents. In later church usage,
one
finds a variety of associations of the ceremony: confirmation, ordina-
tion, healing, reconciling
penitents, and the imparting of blessings upon
both persons and objects.
HANES
(הנס) The late name of the capital of the 20th
Upper Egyptian district.
The native
Egyptian name reflected in the Hebrew word was Hwt-nn-nsw,
the house of
the royal child.” The Greeks renamed the
city Heracleopolis
Magna.
H-11
HANGING (תלה (taw law); מחנק (maw khaw nak), strangle; apagcw (ap
ag ko), strangle) After having been put to death, public
enemies & crimi-
nals might be hanged as a public warning; the dead man‘s hands
were
tied together & slung over the gallows’ arm. Biblical law does not recog-
nize hanging as an
execution form, but permits it afterward as long as the
corpse is taken down
and buried the same day. Joshua 8 and 10
records
that the Canaanite kings’ corpses were taken down & buried at sundown
on the day they were hanged. Hanging oneself
is referred to twice (II
Samuel 17 (nakhanaq)
and Matthew 27 (apagcho)).
HANGINGS (קלעים (kel ah yeem)) Drapes.
The hangings which surroun-
ded the court of the tabernacle were made of
fine linen and were hung
from pillars about 2.3 meters high; they were carried
by the Levitical
family of Gershon. Before the gate of the tabernacle court was hangings
of richly colored
material and fine linen, on which was
embroidery. A
similarly constructed
screen hung at the door of the tent of meeting.
HANNAH (הנה, grace) Wife of Elkanah the Ephraimite; Samuel’s
mother.
She made a vow that she would
dedicate her child to God, which she did,
saying that “as long as he lives, he
is lent to the Lord.”
HANNATHON (הנתן, favored place) A border town in Zebulun, perhaps
located
about 9.5 km north of Nazareth ; it could also be located at the
south end of the
Plain of Acco.
HANNIEL (הניאל, grace of God) 1. A
Manassite leader, son of Ephod.
He was
appointed, under the oversight of Eleazar and Joshua, to superin-
tend the
distribution of the Western Jordanian territory among the ten
tribes to be
settled there. 2. A leader or warrior of Asher; a son of
Ulla.
HANOCH (הנוך, initiated) 1. The
ancestor and origin of the name of a
Midianite clan whose ancestry is traced to
Abraham, through Keturah.
2. The ancestor and origin of the name of a
Reubenite clan.
HARAN (הרן,
mountaineer) 1. Son of Terah; brother of Abram and Nahor;
HARAN (PLACE) (הרן, parched,
scorched) A city of north Mesopotamia Turkey ) where Abraham lived, where his father Terah, died,
and from
HARROW (שדד (saw dad),
straight, even) The harrow as a
special tool is not
Galilee ,
north of the Yarmuk River . It marks the
northeast limit of Eze-
The moral nature of the Covenant demanded morality in the
Yahweh differed from the ancient world’s pagan gods in Yahweh’s
Hebron was Absalom’s headquarters for his revolt against David.
Galilee . The only description we have of his reign is one from Josephus,
HANUN (הנון, God has been gracious) 1. King
of the Ammonites. His
insult to the
ambassadors of David caused Israel to besiege Rabbah.
The siege was apparently postponed until the
end of the Aramean wars
(II Samuel 10.
Then, despite stiff resistance by Hanun, the city was
captured and the
inhabitants reduced to slavery.
2. An inhabitant of Zanoah who helped repair 2 sections of the
2. An inhabitant of Zanoah who helped repair 2 sections of the
Jerusalem wall under Nehemiah.
HAPHARAIM (הפרים, 2 wells) A town in Issachar-Haphariam that also
appears in the Shishak list of conquered Palestinian towns.
HAPPINESS. Usually
the human condition of well-being which comes with
God’s blessing or as divine
reward for righteousness. The Hebrew term
is translated either “happy” or “blessed.”
The word “blessed” is appropriate, since man’s happiness is
The word “blessed” is appropriate, since man’s happiness is
recognized as the fruit
of God’s freely given blessing, or as a divinely
granted reward for human
merit. In Luke, the New Testament adds a
feature absent in the Old Testament. The
new note is the prospective
nature of happiness: “Your reward is great in
heaven.”
HAPPIZZEZ (,הפצץ the
dispersion) A descendant of Aaron & the origin
of the name of a family of temple priests under King David.
HARA (הרא, mountainous) The place to which the king of Assyria exiled
the Hebrew tribes Reuben, Gad, and half of Manasseh. Some have
regarded Hara as the local
designation of the mountainous region north
of Gozan-Guzana. Because I Chronicles 5 appears to be a faulty
rendi-
tion of II Kings 17 and 18, in which both the Hebrew and the primary
Greek
Old Testament treat the word as a simple rather than a proper
noun, some have
regarded Hara as a corruption of the “mountains of
Media” that is found in II
Kings.
HARADAH (הרדה, terror) A stopping place in the journey of the
Israelites
from Sinai. The location is
unknown.
H-12
father of Lot , Milcah, and Iscah. 2. A Judahite; son of Caleb and his
concubine
Ephah. 3. A Levite; son of Gershonite Shimei.
whence Abraham migrated to Canaan . The kinsmen
of the patriarchs
continued to dwell as Arameans in Haran ; Rebekah daughter of Bethuel,
was brought from
there. Jacob fled there & married
Laban’s daughters,
Leah and Rachel; all his children except Benjamin were born
there.
The devotions ofHaran to the moon cult of Babylonia indicates
The devotions of
that the city was founded by the Third Dynasty of Ur,
perhaps around
2000 B.C. Current
excavations in Haran have revealed a long and conti-
nuous history from
Assyro-Babylonian through Islamic times.
HARARITE (הררי, mountaineer) A tribal name of an unidentified tribe,
used
in connection with the fathers of three members of “the Thirty”
Mighty Men of
David: Agee, father of Shammah; Shammah,
father of
Jonathon; Sachar, father of Ahiam.
HARBONA (הרבונא)
One of the 7 eunuchs who
served as chamberlains
for Ahasuerus. He
suggested that Haman be hanged upon the gallows
he had prepared for Mordecai.
HARBOR (limhn (lim en)) The
word is used in the account of Paul’s
voyage to Rome with reference to Fair Havens near Lasea in Crete .
HARDEN THE HEART. (קשה (kaw sheh),
stiff-necked; אמץ (’aw mats),
active, vigorous; כבד (kaw bade); pepwrwmenhn
(peh po ro meh
nen), callous; sklhrunw
(skleh
roo no), stubborn) A phrase expres-
sing a firm set of mind, stubbornness,
indifference, callousness, insensi-
bility, inability to understand. The biblical writers speak of God’s har-
dening
men’s hearts. At the same time they avow
men harden their own
hearts. They found
no apparent inconsistency in ascribing this activity
both to God and to men.
HARE
(ארנבת (‘ar na beth)) Any
of several herbivorous rodents. The
common hare of Palestine is somewhat smaller than the average hare,
whereas the
common hare of the northern regions is the same size and
color of the English
hare. The Old Testament refers to the
hare only to
indicate that it is an unclean animal, but its assertion that
hares chew
cud is erroneous.
HAREPH (הרף, autumn, scorn) The founder of Beth-Gader.
HARHAIAH (הרהיה, he was
burning) Uzziel’s father, who helped repair
the walls of Jerusalem under
Nehemiah.
HARHAS (הרהס, poor) Grandfather
of Shallum, husband of Huldah.
HAR-HERES (הר הרס, mountain of the sun) A mountain near Aijalon;
probably
identical with the border fortress of Beth-Shemesh.
HARHUR (הרהור, possibly raven) The name of an ancestor & the origin
of
the name of a family of temple servants listed among return exiles.
HARIM
(הרם, consecrated to God) 1. A descendant of Aaron and
the
origin of the name for a priestly house in the reign of King David.
2. The ancestor & origin of the name for a
non-priestly family among
the returned exiles.
3. A priest who signed
Ezra’s covenant.
4. A
chief of the people, and signatory to Ezra’s covenant.
HARIPH (הריף, autumn, scorn) Head of a family that resided in Jerusalem
after the Exile and one of those who sealed Ezra’s
covenant.
H-13
HARMON (ההרמונה (ha har mo nah), the palace) The name Harmon ap-
pears nowhere else in
the Bible, & no place by this name is known.
Many
of older versions have presupposed a common rather than a proper
noun.
HARMONY OF THE GOSPELS (
See the entry in the New Testament
Apocrypha section of the Appendix).
HARNEPHER (הרנפר, from the Egyptian, meaning
Horus is merciful)
A place or
family in Asher.
HAROD (הרד, trembling) 1. A spring, the site of Gideon’s encampment
while preparing for battle with the Midianites. It is generally identified
with a spring
located on a northwestern spur of Mount Gilboa.
2. The home of two of David’s men, Shammah and Elika.
2. The home of two of David’s men, Shammah and Elika.
HAROEH (הראה, the seer) Son of Shobal; probably the same as
Reaiah
in I Chronicles 4.
HAROSHETH-HAGOIIM (הגוים הרשת (har o
sheth ha goy eem), sculp-
ture [of] the
foreigners) A Canaanite town;
home of Sisera, who was
defeated by Israel under Barak and Deborah. Its location remains
unknown. Scholars have tried to identify it with Tell
’Amir, Tell el-
Harbaj, or someplace on the Plain of Sharon.
HARPOON (שכה (sook kaw), King James Version
has “barbed iron”) Men-
tioned in
Job 41 along with fishing spears as an inadequate weapon for
catching the sea
monster Leviathan.
known in ancient Palestine , but there are biblical references to some pro-
cess
other than plowing.
HARSHA (הרשא, enchanter, magician) The ancestor and origin of the name
for a
family of temple servants listed among the returning exiles. (Ezra 2;
Nehemiah
7.)
HART
(איל, (aw yawl)) the adult male of the Red Deer . The general
color
of their coat varies slightly with the seasons, but it tends toward a
reddish
brown. Various Old Testament
references indicate that the ayal was an
available & edible game
animal. It can only be described as a
reasonable
hypothesis that the deer referred to in the Bible is the Red Deer.
HARUM
(הרום, high) The ancestor & the origin of the name for a family
of the tribe of Judah .
HARUMAPH (הרומף, flat-nosed)
Jedaiah’s father, who helped repair the
walls of Jerusalem in Nehemiah’s time.
HARUPHITE (הריפי, autumn rain) The gentilic designation of Shephatiah,
one of the Benjaminite warriors who joined David at Ziklag.
HARUZ
(הרוץ, diligent) Amon’s maternal grandfather. His name is
proba-
bly Arabic, and his place of origin is probably Jotbah.
HARVEST. The
gathering of the crops. The Gezer
Calendar provides a clue
to the harvest seasons in ancient Israel. Olives were harvested at the
beginning of
their year (mid-September to mid-November) by beating the
trees with long
sticks. In March-April flax was
harvested by cutting it off
near the ground, then laying the stalks out to
dry. The harvesting of
barley took place
in April or early May, while the wheat harvest occurred
in May-June. During
August-September the summer fruits—figs, grapes,
and pomegranates—were
harvested.
HASADIAH (הסדיה, whom the Lord loves) One of Zerubbabel’s sons.
H-14
HASHABIAH (השביה, whom the Lord esteems) 1. A
Levite listed as an-
cestor of a musician of the sanctuary. 2. A Levite, ancestor of Shema-
iah, a
returned exile. 3. A Levite, son of Jeduthun; listed among
the
musicians set apart by David to prophesy.
4. A Hebronite, men-
tioned
as a royal deputy under King David for the area west of the
Jordan. 5.
A chief officer of the Levites under King David.
6. A
chief of the Levites under King Josiah. 7. A Merarite
Levite among those who joined
Ezra’s company at the River Ahava &
perhaps a Levite who was among those
signing Ezra’s covenant.
8. One of the laymen among those persuaded
by Ezra to divorce their
foreign wives. 9. A builder of Nehemiah’s wall. 10.
A Levite,
descendant of Asaph.
11. A priest of the house
of Hilkiah in the
time of Joiakim the high priest.
HASHABNAH (השבנה, God has esteemed me (probably)) One of those
who sealed Ezra’s covenant.
HASHABNEIAH (השבניה, God has
esteemed me (probably)) 1. The
father of Hattush, who helped repair Jerusalem's walls in Nehemiah's
time. 2. A Levite who participated in a liturgical
blessing of Yahweh
Yahweh in Ezra's time ; he might be the same person as
Hashabiah (#7).
HASHBADDANAH (השבדנה, God has
esteemed me (probably)) A man,
possibly a Levite and the same person as Hashabneiah (#2), who stood
on Ezra’s
left hand when the Law was read at the great assembly.
HASHEM (השם) A Gizonite who
was a member of the Thirty Mighty
Men of David.
HASHMONAH (השמנה, rich, opulent, noble) A stopping place along the
route of Israel ’s journey from Sinai.
HASHUBAH (השבה, whom Yahweh has esteemed)
A son of Zerubbabel.
HASHUM (השם, rich) An ancestor and
the origin of the name for one of
the families that returned from exile.
HASIDIM (הסידים, the pious ones) The term hasid applies to one who
practices hesed.
The term hesed is frequently associated with “covenant,” as in
The term hesed is frequently associated with “covenant,” as in
the phrase
“to keep covenant and hesed.” In a
sense, hesed denotes
the joint
liability, the mutual obligation, of persons who are involved in
social, economic,
or political relationships. Hesed has
been defined as
the “virtue that knits together society.” It was applied to the loyalty of
wife to
husband; the friendship of David and Jonathan; the ideals which
the good wife & mother seeks to make a part of her family.
The Bible's
older English translations have used “mercy,” “kindness,”
or especially
“loving kindness.” The
basic meaning of the word appears to be loyalty.
Where hesed applies to God’s dealing
with man, the Revised Standard
Version chooses “steadfast love.”
A
hasid is person characterized by hesed, a man of hesed. As
applied to people, it denotes their ideal
loyalty to God with the commu-
nity of the faithful. The English versions generally render hasidim
as
“saints.” In a few passages the
Revised Standard Version (RSV) has
changed from “saints” to “faithful
ones.” In the passages where the
RSV has
kept “saints,” the word has in each case a possessive suffix
referring to the
Lord. There was a point in time when
merely belonging
to the chosen people was title to the designation hasid, but
with the
development of ethical monotheism the term came to have moral and
spiritual implications.
HASMONEANS (See the entry in the Old Testament Apocrypha/Influences
Outside the Bible section of the Appendix.).
HASRAH (הסרה, poverty) Chronicle form of the name Harhas.
HASSENUAH (הסנאה, thorny) A postexilic Benjaminite family name.
HASSHUB (השוב, considerate) 1. A
member of the Merari clan of the
tribe of Levi, & the father of a certain
Shemaiah who settled in Jerusalem
after the Exile. 2. Either one man who had two assignments in
rebuil-
ding the walls of Jerusalem in Nehemiah’s time or two builders with the
same name. 3. One of those who sealed the covenant in Ezra's time.
H-15
HASUPHA (השופא, bare, naked) Ancestor and origin of the name for a
family of temple servants among the returned exiles.
HAT
(כרבלה (kar beh lah), mantle, cloak) One of the articles of clothing with
which the three Hebrews were cast into the furnace.
HATCHET (כשיל (kash sheel), axe) One of
the instruments used in breaking
down the sanctuary’s carved wood.
HATE, HATRED (שנא (sen ay)) Dislike,
antipathy, aversion, between per-
sons, in a variety of relationships.
In
the Old Testament the concepts derives its peculiar religious
meaning from the
notion that God hates. God hates evil,
and so Israel
must hate evil. God also
hates idolatry & false worship. It is
important
to recognize that hate as a biblical concept is based essentially
upon the
religious commitment to reject and turn away from those who deny God
and his laws. There is no sharp
distinction between the power of evil &
the actor; nor is there any explicit
emphasis on overcoming hate with love.
In the New Testament, Jesus’ teachings contain no holy hate
In the New Testament, Jesus’ teachings contain no holy hate
against people. Jesus
admonishes his disciples to love even their ene-
mies. But increasing hatred is a sign of the kingdom's approaching con-
summation. The difficult passage enjoining hatred of family & self is
intended to stress the unconditional character of discipleship. “Hatred”
is used nearly synonymously with
“denying the self.”
While life in the old
age was characterized by hate, life in the new
age is characterized by
love. Renunciation or hatred of wickedness
is moti-
vated by God’s love for sinners; it moves the disciple to love those
captive
by wickedness. Especially in the Gospel and Letters of John the sharp anti-
thesis between the life of love & of hate is drawn. Hatred assumes
almost
cosmic dimensions in its demonic opposition to God’s love. The church's
mission is to reveal this
love to the world, which continues in hate.
HATHACH (התך) A
eunuch of Ahasuerus appointed to attend Queen Esther.
It was through him that she learned from
Mordecai about Haman’s plot
against the Jews.
HATHATH (התת, terror, dismay) A
Calebite family. (I Chronicles 4.13)
HATIPHA (הטיפא, seize) The ancestor and origin of the name
of a family of
temple servants (Ezra 2; Neh. 7).
HATITA (הטיטא, digging) A family of gatekeepers (Ezra 2; Nehemiah 7)
HATTIL (הטיל,waving) A family of “sons of Solomon’s servants”
(Ezra 2;
Nehemiah 7).
HATTUSH (הטוש)
1. A postexilic descendant of David who returned
to
Judah with Ezra; he was called the grandson of Shecaniah in I Chronicles
3,
but the son of the same man in Ezra 8. 2. A repairer of the wall of
Jerusalem in
Nehemiah 3, perhaps the same as #1 above. 3.
A post-
exilic priest who signed the
pledge of reform.
HAURAN (הורן, cavern place) A district east of the Jordan and the Sea of
kiel’s ideal Israel.
It was occupied apparently by the kings of Damascus
after the Israelite kingdom’s. Tiglath-pileser III overran it in 732 B.C. &
Ashurbanipal crushed a revolt there.
(See also the entry in
the Old Testa-
ment Apocrypha / Influences Outside the Bible section of the
Appendix.).
After the death of Herod, this territory fell to his son Herod Philip;
After the death of Herod, this territory fell to his son Herod Philip;
in 37 A.D.
Caligula bestowed it upon his favorite Herod Agrippa. Hauran
was again under Nabatean control 85 to
106, when Trajan finally added
it to the Roman province of Syria.
HAVEN
(חוף (khofe), shore, cove, harbor) Used primarily in the nautical
sense, as a
place which offers safe anchorage and station ships.
H-16
HAVILAH (הוילה, perhaps “sandy”) A land mentioned in the story of the
Garden
of Eden as producing excellent gold, bdellium gum, and the
shoham (“onyx“)
stone, and as being surrounded by the River Pishon.
The name also occurs as a son of Cush. The Ishmaelites are also said
to have lived
in the territory from Havilah to Shur.
The use of “Havi-
lah” in the passage where Saul pursued the Amalekites is
probably an
error for Hachilah, which is a hill in the vicinity of Shur. Opinions as
to the location of Havilah have
differed widely, but the most widely
accepted location is the west coast of
Arabia. The products of Havilah
give the
impression of an Arabian country, as those products are found
in many parts of
Arabia.
HAVVOTH-JAIR (הות יאיר, villages of Jair [he will
enlighten]) A group of
30 (Judges
10) or 60 (Deut. 3) villages located in Bashan
in Gilead .
There are at least 3 accounts of how these villages
received their name.
In
Numbers 32 and Deuteronomy 3, these cities were taken by “Jair
the son of
Manasseh”—i.e., the Jair clan of the Manasseh group. In Judges
10, there is mention of a judge
named Jair, who had 30 sons, who ruled
over 30 cities. In I Chronicles, there is mention of a
connection between
the clans of Manasseh & those of Judah. These 3 explanations represent
various
traditions that arose to explain the name. The 1st account assu-
ming that the conquest was made by a clan appears
most likely to be
historical.
HAWK
(נץ
(nets); קאת (kaw ath), spew out, pelican) Any of several small
to medium-sized
birds of prey, among them being the sparrow hawk, the
marsh harrier, and the
hen harrier. This group of birds was
unclean.
HAY (See Grass)
HAZAEL (הזאל, whom God beholds) King of Damascus from around 841-
798
B.C. Hazael was a servant of Ben-Hadad I
of Damascus. When
informed by the
prophet Elisha that he was to be king of Damascus,
Hazael murdered his master
and seized the throne of Damascus. In
841
B.C., only Hazael resisted the Assyrian Shal-maneser III in Syria. After
2 unsuccessful assaults on Damascus
Shallmaneser III left Hazael alone.
Hazael menaced the kingdoms of both Jehu of Israel & Jehoahaz of
Judah. He took all the Israelite lands
east of the Jordan River, humbled
Israel & seriously reduced its military
force. When Hazael threatened to
approach Jerusalem, King Joash of Judah bribed him with rich treasure
stripped from his palace and temple at Jerusalem.
A mighty warrior and
perhaps the greatest king of Damascus, Hazael was
also a builder who
adorned his capital.
Hazael died and was succeeded by his son Ben-
hadad II.
HAZAIAH (הזיה, whom the Lord beholds) An ancestor of a certain
Maaseiah, who was a
Jewish lay leader living in postexilic Jerusalem.
HAZAR-ENAN (הצר עינן, village of fountains) According to Numbers
34, a city on the
frontier between Palestine and Hamath at the foot of
Mount Hermon.
HAZAR-GADDAH (הצר גדה, village of fortune) A city in the southern
part of Judah,
mentioned between Moladah and Heshmon.
It may have
been a shrine of Gad, the god of fortune. The site is unknown.
HAZAR-MAVETH (הצר-מות, court of death) A Semitic people descended
from Shem through
Joktan who settled in the Wadi Hadhramaut in
southern Arabia. This valley parallels the coast for about 320
km.
The economy of Hadramaut was based
on the control of the frankin-
cense groves and the caravan route, and Cana, the
major frankincense
port in Arabia. The history of this state is little
known. It appears to
have enjoyed two
periods of great power in the 400s B.C. and from 1
A.D. to 200.
HAZAR-SHUAL (הצר שועל, village of jackals) A town of Simeon in the
extreme south of
Judah, always mentioned in close relationship with
Beer-sheba. It was occupied by the Jews after the
Exile. The name
suggests that it was
originally occupied a Canaanite clan with a jackal
as its totem.
H-17
HAZAR-SUSAH (הצר סוסה, village of horses) A city of Simeon in the south-
western part
of Judah. It was a sort of stables where
Solomon kept the
horses he imported from Egypt and sold to the Hittites and
Syrians.
HAZAZON-TAMAR (הצצן תמר, pruning of the palm) A city of the
Amorites which was conquered by
Chedorlaomer and his allies. It was
apparently not far from Sodom; in I Chronicles 20 it is identified with
En-Gedi
on the west side of the Dead Sea. It may
be the same as the
Tamar fortified by Solomon.
HAZER-HATTICON (התיכון הצר, middle court) A place mentioned in
Ezekiel 47 as the
northeast corner of his ideal boundary of Israel. It may
have been copied
wrong, and should perhaps be “Hazar-enon.”
HAZERIM (הצרים)
The King James Version
interprets this word as a
place name.
The Revised Standard Version interprets it as a common
noun meaning
“villages.”
HAZEROTH (הצרות, settlement) A camping place of the Israelite after
Kibroth-hattaavah. Here Miriam and Aaron
disputed with Moses over
his marriage with a Cushite, and over his unique
position as the sole
mediator between God and God’s people.
HAZIEL (הזיאל, vision of God) A Gershonite Levite. (I Chronicles 23).
HAZO
(הזו, vision) The
fifth son of Nahor and Milcah; probably to be
identified with the mountainous,
uninviting region of Hazu in Northern
Arabia.
HAZOR
(הצור, enclosure) 1. A tell or mound about 8 km southwest of
Lake Huleh, 16 km north of the Sea of Galilee.
The huge tell domi-
nates the Plain of Huleh and the ancient Via
Maris.
Hazor was a Canaanite royal city; its king, Jabin, headed the
Hazor was a Canaanite royal city; its king, Jabin, headed the
northern Canaanite
coalition against Joshua. The alliance
was defeated;
Hazor was sacked. About 100
years later Deborah and Barak led a
revolt against another Jabin who ruled
northern Israel. Israel won the
Battle
of Taanach and routed Jabin’s forces under Sisera. To protect
the Huleh Plain, Solomon rebuilt
and fortified Hazor. In 732 B.C.,
Tiglath-pileser took it.
Archaeology has discovered cities from the Hyksos, Amarna, &
Archaeology has discovered cities from the Hyksos, Amarna, &
post-Amarna periods, the
last one possibly destroyed by Joshua.
The
“Lower City” of Hazor wasn't rebuilt after its destruction. A disco-
very of great interest in this area
was a series of 4 superimposed
Canaanite temples, one on top of the other. On the tell, 21 habitation
levels have been
identified, dating to 2750-2500 B.C.
After Joshua’s
conquest in the late 1200s B.C., 2 Hazors, presumably
Israelite and
much poorer than the Canaanite one, preceded Solomon’s.
On the tenth level, a gate like those that Solomon built at
On the tenth level, a gate like those that Solomon built at
Megiddo and Gezer was
discovered. Over this city, Ahab
(869-850)
rebuilt the city, erecting a large public building & a heavily
fortified
citadel on the western tip of the mound. The next city, from the time
of Jeroboam II
(786-746) contained the buildings of wealthy merchants.
Above this were the ruins of the city
destroyed by Tiglath-pileser in 732;
there is a three-foot layer of ashes to
mark this period and level. The
Persians
used the citadel in the 400s and 300s.
2. A city of Judah in the Negeb, about 14 km southeast of el-’Auja.
3. A city of Judah in the Negeb, according to the King James
2. A city of Judah in the Negeb, about 14 km southeast of el-’Auja.
3. A city of Judah in the Negeb, according to the King James
Version. The Revised Standard Version has the name as
“Hazor-
Hadattah.”
4. A city north of Jerusalem reoccupied by the Benjaminites after
4. A city north of Jerusalem reoccupied by the Benjaminites after
the Exile.
(Nehemiah 11).
5. A still unknown place in the Arabian Desert east of Palestine
5. A still unknown place in the Arabian Desert east of Palestine
which Nebuchadrezzar despoiled in 598 B.C., either a
single place or a
group of tribes.
HAZOR-HADATTAH (הצר הדתה, new town) A village in the Negeb
district of
Beer-sheba. It is possibly southwest of
Tuwani toward the
Dead Sea.
HAZZELELPONI (הצללפוני, shade turned towards me)
A sister of certain
descendants of Judah (I Chronicles 4).
H-18
HE (ה (hay)) The Hebrew Alphabet's 5th letter as placed in the King James
Version at the head of the 5th section of the
acrostic psalm, Psalm 119.
HEAD
(ראש (roshe), from the root “to shake”; kefalh (ke fah leh))
A
term used both literally and metaphorically in the Bible. In an extended
sense it is an appropriate
name for the topmost part of anything, or as a
“source of authority.” The word “head” in the Bible is never
connected
with the intelligence; the intellectual powers were believed to be
situated
in the heart. The most
distinctive theological use of the word “head”
occurs in Ephesians and
Colossians, where it describes the relationship
of Christ to the Church.
HEADBAND (שביס (shaw beece), netting) Probably a head ornament of
gold or silver.
(Isaiah 3).
HEADDRESS (פאר (peh air), turban) A woman’s head-covering, ornamen-
tal in
character. It was wound about the head
without any undercover.
The Hebrew word
is also used of the wedding garland of the bridegroom.
HEALING, GIFTS OF. Primitive Christianity possessed miraculous powers,
including the power to heal. From the beginning of his ministry Jesus
performed healing miracles. His enemies attributed this power to Satan.
In the power of the Spirit he began his ministry, proclaiming the kingdom,
and affirming that healing was a sign, among others, that the rule of God
had been inaugurated.
The healing activity of Jesus and his disciples explains the place
of healing in the primitive church. The gift is conferred by the Spirit.
The New Testament gifts of healing are an integral part of the mission &
message of Jesus, and of the early church’s consciousness of their fulfill-
ment; they must not be confused with psychiatry, or faith healing.
HEALING, HEALTH (שלם (sha lem), wholeness, peace) Healing may
be described in terms of the
curing or restoring to health of a sick person
by the closure of wounds or
effective curing of the body or mind. A
person may be described as healthy when they exhibit a body & mind
in which
is functioning harmoniously.
Health: Longevity & Environment in the Bible—In antiquity,
Health: Longevity & Environment in the Bible—In antiquity,
as in all ages, health was a highly prized possession among the Near
Eastern peoples. The Hebrews tended to
think of health as physical
strength and well-being. Mental or emotional disturbances were
gene-
rally related to some specific organ.
The Hebrews’ pastoral and agricul-
tural
pursuits made a robust physique desirable. The weakling and
the invalid were treated with contempt by the ancient
Hebrews. The
structure of society made life very difficult indeed for anyone
who was
not in full possession of his faculties.
Whenever blessings were invoked, length of days was one of the
Whenever blessings were invoked, length of days was one of the
benefits most frequently
sought. However, if the individual
lived beyond
threescore and ten years, hardship and sorrow were the logical and
expec-
ted outcome. In actual fact, life
expectancy was nearer 60 than 70. The
advanced ages of the patriarchs living before the Flood are modest com-
pared
with early Babylonian mythology. The
advanced ages ascribed to
Seth, Enoch, and others are symbolic or have to do
with the clan or tribe
that the name came to represent.
Palestine does not appear to have had widespread infection. The
Palestine does not appear to have had widespread infection. The
valleys & wadis didn't normally afford
a breeding ground for mosqui-
toes, while the incidence of imported diseases was
probably less than
in countries with flourishing trade. Even with more city-dwellers in the
700s
B.C., the overall situation did not change.
It was only late in the
period of Old Testament (OT) history that the
cities became overcrowded.
Some diseases which were scourges in the ancient world have
Some diseases which were scourges in the ancient world have
now largely disappeared
while others which were unknown in ancient
times are very common. There can be no question that infant
mortality
was extremely heavy in antiquity; perhaps only 3 of every 10 children
would expect to survive to adulthood.
There was widespread lack of
hygiene and neglect of elementary precautions
for safeguarding public
health.
In earlier phases of Hebrew thought, disease was divine visitation
In earlier phases of Hebrew thought, disease was divine visitation
consequent
upon sin; this theory persisted throughout the entire biblical
period. There appears to be little awareness of the
connection of environ-
ment to disease.
Since God was the physician of God’s people, healing
constituted a
manifest token of God’s forgiveness.
Health was maintained
by a punctilious observance of the divine
commands.
Disease Prevention and the Mosaic Code—An important legis-
Disease Prevention and the Mosaic Code—An important legis-
lative step to counteract
the effects of ignorance was achieved with the
Mosaic code's sanitary section, which were more advanced than other
Near Eastern peoples. Moses may well be spoken of as preventive medi-
cine‘s father. In the OT's first 5 books, social hygiene became a science.
The
code’s requirements were for a time when the Hebrews
would be a sedentary
people occupying the promised land. The
Mosaic
law was a complete repudiation of magic.
By establishing Yahweh’s
moral supremacy, they eliminated the need for
magic, and placed the
entire disease situation on a spiritual footing, where
the personal relation-
ship of the individual and God was the determining
factor. This did not
exempt the righteous
from sickness any more than it condemned the
wicked to lifelong affliction.
The moral concepts of holiness contained in the law indicated a
H-19
The moral concepts of holiness contained in the law indicated a
new approach to
sickness. If one pursued a life of
spiritual fellowship
with God, one was entertaining a valuable safeguard
against sickness.
If one attempted to
cure disease when it arose, that was a trespass upon
God’s prerogatives.
Instruction in the medical code, such as those in
Leviticus was a priestly
function. This was in keeping with the
practice
of giving to the priesthood the responsibility of instructing the
people
in all knowledge.
The custom of observing certain days during each month on
The custom of observing certain days during each month on
which most activities
were suspended had its roots in the religion of
the Old Akkadian period. The ancient Babylonians interpreted the
lunar
phases in the light of divine activity.
A type of horoscope was
drawn up which stated whether or not the
particular day was propitious,
and what kind of activity might be pursued. In the older Babylonian
calendars there were
nine principal days. During Ashurbanipal's reign,
the moon phases were represented by the 7th, 14th,
21st, and 28th days;
activity was restricted on these
days. The term shapattu was reserved
for the day of the full moon.
While
the Hebrew Sabbath was perhaps associated with the new
moon at one time, it was
essentially a religious observance. It was
intended to provide an opportunity
for mental and spiritual recreation,
and to keep vigor and efficiency at a
consistent level. Somehow, one
rest day
in 7 best suits the needs of the human body; different ratios
have been
tried, but have failed to achieve the same success. The pro-
per Sabbath observance
will determine how much physical well-being
an individual can expect. Thus, the idea becomes a principle of great
importance for the physical and spiritual health of both the individual
and the
community.
If the preventive concepts enshrined in Sabbath observance were
If the preventive concepts enshrined in Sabbath observance were
intended to
promote individual and social well-being, the legislation
concerning the
varieties of food was evidently enacted to serve as a
guide for maintaining health and vigor. While other nations adjusted
their diets to
the dictates of tradition, regarding some foods as “clean”
and others as
“unclean,” they were not as careful in identifying foods
as the Hebrews.
Some scholars have suggested that this classification developed
Some scholars have suggested that this classification developed
from the system of
primitive taboos. In ancient Egypt those
animals &
birds which were considered sacred were forbidden for food. Only those
animals which chewed the cud & parted the hoof were suitable for food,
since they were exclusively
vegetarian. Vegetarianism was only
restric-
ted in that the fruit of newly planted trees was forbidden. Under no cir-
cumstances was the flesh of an
animal that had died from natural causes
to be eaten. Of the aquatic creatures, those which had
fins and scales
were clean, even those which preyed on other fish.
These rules were designed to protect the individual and communal
These rules were designed to protect the individual and communal
health. There is far less chance of contracting food
poisoning from a
vegetarian animal in the tropics, than there is when
carnivores are eaten.
The pig's flesh, which might cause trichinosis (tapeworm infestation), is
especially
dangerous in this way. The pig is also
the intermediate host
for a small tapeworm, which causes liver, lung, & other
tumors. It must
also be remembered, that animals who chew cud aren't wholly
free from
parasitic organisms.
It
is probable that the rules against eating animal flesh without
discrimination were
intended to safeguard against certain fly bites. The
Hebrews, like other ancient Near Eastern
cultures, restricted their diet to
only to those aquatic creatures which had
fins and scales. The exclusion
of all
crustaceans removed one possible source of epidemic disease.
However, even certain varieties of clean fish
can convey tularemia.
The
risk of infection by the parasitic organisms dealt with above
was greater then
than it is now, because the preservation of meat under
subtropical climatic
conditions was almost impossible. Even
with com-
paratively fresh meat, Hebrew cooking would seldom ensure that any
parasitic organism would always be destroyed.
Under such conditions
the preventive approach is the best method of
ensuring comparative free-
dom from infestation.
The
concern for public health also expressed itself in the effort to
protect food & water from pollution. Insistence on
having a clean supply
of water was most effective in forestalling amoebiasis,
enteric fevers,
cholera, and spirochetal jaundice. These preventive measures were of
particular
importance for the welfare of a nation living under primitive
conditions in the
subtropics.
[Health and Sexuality]---In the ancient world, circumcision was a
[Health and Sexuality]---In the ancient world, circumcision was a
quasi-religious rite, the mark of
initiation into a tribe, or the sign
required
for manhood. Among the
Jews it claimed an overriding religious signifi-
cance through its association
with the Covenant. It was the only form
of
physical mutilation which the law sanctioned. In antiquity the practice of
circumcision was
thought to have certain positive hygienic values. Modern
medicine recommends circumcision as a
way of preventing penis cancer,
although they have begun to question
its value.
The
laws governing sexual union were based on the concept of the
family social
unit, and precluded inter-marriage and polygamy. The union
between a man & his paternal
half-sister, a not infrequent occurrence in the
patriarchal period, was
forbidden. Because of the dangers of
marrying
someone too closely related to oneself, the Mosaic law made it clear
that
marriage was forbidden with certain degrees of blood relationship, & bran-
ded as incestuous many of the unions common in other nations. Marriage
to half-sisters, stepdaughters,
daughters of a stepson or a step-daughter, &
the sister of a living wife is prohibited.
H-20
The moral nature of the Covenant demanded morality in the
“chosen people,” which
meant no incest. In view of the many
sexual
deviations, the regulating of sexual function was of great importance if
their witness to their Deity’s morality was to be believed. A lack of
restraint in marriage would
subordinate the rights and privileges of
society as a whole to the dictates of
a few dominant families, leading
to monopolized land and wealth, while the
families themselves would
inevitably be plagued with jealousy and
intrigue. Most believed that
biologically, prohibited unions led to reduced fertility & deterioration
of
physical and mental vigor. In fact,
there is no adequate reason for
regarding the prohibited unions as particularly
dangerous.
Provisions for individual sexual hygiene form an important part
Provisions for individual sexual hygiene form an important part
of the
Levitical approach to health. The sexual
act was associated with
concepts of uncleanness. It is probable that the feelings of
uncleanness
were intended to serve as a form of control over sexual activity,
and
as a safeguard against the promiscuity of the Canaanites or other
con-
temporary nations.
The
presence of blood, forbidden in all forms to the Hebrews,
meant that
menstruation was a particularly defiling occurrence. Any
object of contact with a woman during the
period of menstruation was
considered unclean.
Levitical law saw the possibility of intercourse
during menstruation & legislated against it vigorously. Any
man who
came into contact with the menstrual discharge was considered
cere-
monially unclean for seven days. Coitus
interruptus was held to be
an improper use of natural instinct.
In instances of prolonged or heavy menstruation, the woman
In instances of prolonged or heavy menstruation, the woman
was regarded as unclean
throughout the period of discharge and for
seven further days. Childbirth was surrounded with certain
degrees
of defilement, although the baby itself was always considered to be
ceremonially clean. The defiling
influence of the birth of a female
child was greater than the birth of a male
child. Under normal circum-
stances the
parents didn't cohabit again until the baby had been weaned.
It could be as long as two years.
Defilement also occurred from seminal emissions, and could
Defilement also occurred from seminal emissions, and could
be removed by washing when a prescribed period of time had
elapsed.
Deviations of sexual practice
such as homosexuality & bestiality were
rigidly condemned in the Mosaic
code. These laws employed religious
sanctions, restrictions on human sexual behavior, and at the same time
they
laid considerable stress on personal hygiene, when such matters
were regarded
with varying degrees of indifference.
The prescribing
of a period of isolation was an important aspect of the
preventive
approach implicit in this legislation.
Among the Hebrews great emphasis was placed upon the
Among the Hebrews great emphasis was placed upon the
washing of the body, despite the
frequent shortages of water. These
ceremonial washings were in a general religious sense symbolic of the
removal
of sin or moral defilement. The stress
laid on the cleansing
of anything which might be suspected of defilement was of
fundamen-
tal importance. The risk of
disease would be reduced appreciably,
while the isolation of potential carriers
of disease for a specified period
would also help control the incidence of
disease.
The nomadic tribes of antiquity paid scant attention to sanitary
The nomadic tribes of antiquity paid scant attention to sanitary
practices. Mosaic legislation laid down carefully
regulated sanitary
procedures for the Israelites. The significance of the sanitary regulations
is much greater than the amount of space they occupied in the Mosaic
preventive
legislation. A measure of control over
air-borne & fly-borne
plagues was afforded.
Thus an advanced degree of protection from
infectious disease was
afforded. The preventive approach was
the
special contribution of the Hebrews to medical theory, and the principles
enshrined in the OT are in harmony with the basic precepts of contempo-
rary
medicine.
In the light of earlier observations it
will appear that health was a
divine gift.
When disease occurred, the sufferer could only look to God,
the
Physician; any human aid would usurp divine prerogatives. Because
sickness was a spiritual matter,
healing could only properly follow a revi-
val or revitalizing of the
relationship between the individual and God.
There is no outline of medical treatment for disease in the OT.
Jesus’ Approach to Health and Healing—While Jesus Christ
didn't attempt to explain disease, his attitude toward it marked an advance
in thought on the OT opinions. Instead of showing contempt for the sick,
Jesus showed that his ministry was closely related to the frailty of body
and soul. Jesus was firmly convinced of God’s purpose for human whole-
ness and salvation, and never once supported the OT concept of disease
as God’s punishment. He frequently envisaged disease as evil producing
imbalance within the personality.
H-21
Because Jesus regarded each individual separately, he was able
see the influence of body and mind upon each other, concerning him- self with the sufferer’s body, mind, and spirit. His encounter with the
Samaritan woman changed a casual conversation into a powerful analy-
sis, and confronted her with the person of the living Christ as the answer
to her deepest needs. This talk is a superb example of non-directive coun-
seling Any knowledge of Jesus’ approach to healing must come mostly
from inference, since his healing acts were not described in clinical
language.
He rejected the idea that sickness was God’s punishment, nor
did he encourage the belief that the sufferer ought to remain ill in order
acquire courage or learn patience. Fundamental to his healings was his
conviction that disease was not a part of the divine order of things. In
some instances he attributed the incidence of illness to the evil in human
life. Since his mission was to destroy the Devil’s works, it followed that
he would heal the sick and the diseased. The circumstances largely deter-
mined the mechanisms he employed, but these were generally secondary
to his desire to grapple with sin.
Jesus’ ministry was as much to the mind as to the body. He was
Jesus’ ministry was as much to the mind as to the body. He was
acutely aware of the place emotional conflict and “negative” emotions
had in causing disease. Jesus was aware that the bias towards evil in
humans meant that sin could have a great affect on one’s life. Modern
psychiatry has shown that sin’s effects takes place in the unconscious
mind. Christ’s healing influence and spiritual authority penetrated this
level, where many disorders have their beginning. It is interesting to note
that different techniques were used for eachperson, indicating that Jesus
diagnosed the patient’s ailment and was aware of what contributed to it.
Apparently, Jesus was trying through healings to raise the degree
of the sufferers’ spirituality. It was Jesus’ desire that people should be won
for the divine kingdom. Entrance into the spiritual realm indicated the
operation of divine love, and human faith, by either the sick person or
someone close to them. The degree of faith varied with each person, but
Jesus called for some measure of faith to be present in each healing. Cer-
tain healings took place without faith being mentioned, but it was implied
in the sufferer’s response to Jesus’ words.
It must be remembered that the therapy Jesus did contained
spiritual and psychological components, but the healings were more than
the work of a shrewd psychologist. Matthew envisaged Christ’s healing
ministry as a fulfillment of Isaiah 53, which speaks of God’s Servant. The
Hebrew text employs the simple words for “diseases” and “pains,” which
relates the healing of sickness directly to the Servant’s work. If the Chris-
tian church interprets the Isaiah passages correctly, it would appear that
the incarnate Lord dealt with disease, sickness, & human sin on the cross.
His atonement avails for the mind, body and soul of a person.
The restoration of the sick formed part of apostolic practices as
The restoration of the sick formed part of apostolic practices as
well, in conformity with what Christ commanded. In the days after Pente-
cost, many healings took place at the hands of the apostles. In the main,
however, the healings were achieved by a powerful degree of suggestion
linked to the sufferer’s faith. As time passed, the treatment of disease
became more uniform, employing the name or the power of Christ in
response to the expectant trust of the sufferer. From the experience of
Paul with Trophimus, it may be concluded that the healing power given
to the apostles diminished with the passing of time.
There is little mention of anything specifically medical in biblical
There is little mention of anything specifically medical in biblical
literature. Consequently, there are no written lists of drugs such as have
survived from Mesopotamia and Egyptian cultures. Incense was an impor-
tant tool in healing. While its primary function was to honor God in the
sanctuary, it probably served as a fumigant and deodorant also. The use
of aromatic oils & perfumes, such as myrtle, saffron, aloes, cassia, myrrh,
spikenard, & cinnamon, for personal hygiene was dictated by climatic &
other considerations.
Therapeutic substances in use among the Hebrews included the
Therapeutic substances in use among the Hebrews included the
renowned balm of Gilead as an unguent preparation. A number of herbs
were employed, including fennel, dill, spelt, cumin, anise, and the caper
berry. Olive oil was frequently administered internally and externally.
Herbs of a culinary nature, like dill, fennel, cumin, anise, spelt, marjoram,
thyme, mint, and sage, played a prominent part in Hebrew diet. The bitter
herbs of Exodus 12 were probably lettuce, endive, chicory, & water cress.
H-22
HEAP OF STONES (גל אבנים (gal ‘eh beh neem)) A symbol used in
several different
ways. A heap of stones was raised over
the body of
Achan after he and his family had been stoned and burned. A heap
of stones was made as a witness to the
compact between Jacob and
Laban.
It
is also used with the connotation of a place which has be-
come a heap of ruins & a reminder of the fate which God has in store
for the sinful. To warn that a city or house or an altar will
become a
stone heap is to announce impending destruction. The ancient Israe-
lite, as the modern Arab
peasant, thought that such heaps of stones
were inhabited by evil or dangerous
spirits.
HEART
(לב
(labe); kardia (kar dee ah)) In the Bible it is the central and
unifying
organ of personal life. The ancient
Hebrews tended to attribute
psychological functions to certain organs of the
body. Of all such organs
the heart was the
chief, the center of physical vitality.
In the recesses of
the heart dwelt the thoughts, plans, attitudes,
fears, & hopes which deter-
mined the character of an individual.
The
word “heart” is only rarely used in a purely physical sense; it
denotes
primarily the psyche at its deepest level.
All the emotions of which
a person is capable may be attributed to the
heart. More than that, it is a
distinctly Hebrew conception that the heart is the center of intellectual
life.
The Hebrew language can hardly
express the idea “to think” except by the
phrase “to say in the heart.”
From
this idea it is a natural step to the thought that it is the center
of the will
and the moral life. The hard or stubborn
heart is sometimes
described as “uncircumcised.” The idea of “perfection” or “wholeness” is
also conveyed by the phrase “with all the heart.” The heart, as the inner-
most spring of the human
personality, is directly open to God and God’s
influence, while at the same
time being naturally inclined to evil.
As such,
its betterment must lie rather in God’s transforming grace than
in any
educational activity on the part of humans.
Since
the term “heart” can mean the totality of feelings, thoughts,
& desires of
a person at the deepest source in his inner life, it sometimes
has the modern
psychological term “personality.” For
Hebrews, persona-
lity was diffused through the whole of the body, & the
assignment of special
functions to particular organs was loose and often
inconsistent.
HEARTH (יקוד (yek ode), burning; מוקדה (mo ked
ow); הראל (har el)
and ריאל(ar ee el),
both translate as “altar” or “hearth”) In biblical times
the hearth was a
depression in the floor for cooking food.
Ezekiel 43 uses
both harel and ariel for the uppermost
ledge of the altar of burnt offering,
upon which the sacrifice was laid.
HEAT AND COLD (חם (khome), heat; חרה (khaw raw),
cold; kauma
(kaw ma), heat;
yucoV (psoo kos), cold) Extremes of atmospheric
temperature,
annual and daily.
HEATH (ערער (‘ar ‘ar), needy, outcast) The true heath rarely is found in
Bible
lands and doesn’t fit the geographical associations of the passage.
HEAVE OFFERING (תרומה (ter oo
maw)) The portions of sacrifices
and
offerings which were set apart, removed, or taken up, elevated, or
“heaved”
for Yahweh and the priests.
HEAVEN (שמים (shaw maw yeem); רקיע (raw kee
ah), firmament; רק
(rak); ouranoV (oo rah nos))
The word “heaven” is used in the Bible
in 2 senses: the upper part
of the cosmic ocean which envelops the earth;
or the immediate ceiling or
canopy of the earth. Heaven is
portrayed: as
a metal strip; as a curtain; as a garment; with windows; with
water skins;
with storehouses; with levels; and with pillars.
The
word raqia is translated “firmament,” but the word denotes
properly a
strip of hammered metal. In Job 26, God
is said to polish it by
breathing upon it with his wind. Alternatively, the expanse is portrayed
as a
strip of gauze stretched like a tent or a curtain. Lastly, heaven is
regarded as a garment, an
outspread blanket, a mantle or wrap in which
God enfolds God’s self. Several other world religions also use this
image.
H-23
The
firmament, or celestial dam, was believed to be punctuated at
intervals by
grilles or sluices, through which the rain was released. These
sluices have
their counterparts in the “springs” or “fountains.” The celes-
tial waters were also conceived as
being stored in skins or bottles, which
were tilted and emptied by God at his
good pleasure, an image also found
in other religions. In the heavens were located the store-houses
of the
winds, the hail, & darkness. Heaven was thought to rest upon pillars, which
is also found in other
religions.
Finally,
the concept of successive stages or strata of heaven is no-
where explicitly
articulated in the Old Testament. It is
in the Apocrypha
that we first encounter that notion of the seven heavens which
was later to
become a commonplace theme of Jewish and Arabic folklore. In the
New
Testament, only three strata appear to be recognized, which is the same as
the number found in rabbinic sources.
HEBER (הבר, companion) 1. The
ancestor & origin of the name for an impor-
tant clan of the tribe of
Asher. 2. A Kenite; Jael's husband, the woman
who killed Sisera. 3. A man or family of the tribe of
Judah. 4. A family
of the tribe of Benjamin.
HEBREW LANGUAGE (עברי ('ib ree),
from the root meaning to "pass over")
In order to understand the Sitz im
Leben, the "life situation" of the Old
Testament (OT), we must
understand OT culture & the Hebrew culture,
of which the Hebrew language
was a part. The name of the ancestor
Eber,
son of Shem, is probably a construction from the name of the people. It is
a term denoting the Israelites and is
often used by foreigners. The word is
also used by the Hebrews as a name for themselves. In such cases, "He-
brew" and
"Israelite" would be interchangeable.
In other passages, the
Hebrews are a separate ethnic group in Canaan.
Eber's
descendants include Abraham, Nahor, and Lot.
According
to the OT, Abraham is the ancestor of the Hebrews, Nahor the
ancestor of
the Arameans, and Lot the ancestor of the Moabites and the
Ammonites.
The genealogies we have are
constructions, and individuals appearing in
them may reflect ancient ethnic
groups, towns, or countries. Later
inva-
sions into Canaan are reflected in the traditions about the exodus from
Egypt and the entrance into Canaan under Joshua. After the expulsion of
the Hyksos from Egypt
in the early 1500s several migrations probably
took place during more than a
century.
The Hebrew language is a branch of Canaanite & Amorite; Canaa-
nite and Amorite are ancestral dialects, the merging
of which explains the
growth of biblical Hebrew. Some OT texts are written in a language of a
more ancient structure than others.
Biblical Hebrew, the closest relative
of which is Moabite, is the result
of the linguistic development which took
place since the time when Ugaritic
texts were written between 2100-1500
B.C.
With
the exception of the small sections (Ezra 4 & 7, Jeremiah 10,
and Daniel
2-7) which are in the Aramaic language, and a number of odd
words and names in
different languages, the OT canonical books are in
the Hebrew language. The Hebrew language is called the
“language (lip)
of Canaan”; Judean language is called yehudiyot (יהודית) "the language
of Judah.” In the New Testament, “in Hebrew” is used to designate both
Hebrew & Aramaic. “Hebrew” 'ibriyot (ﬠבﬧיﬨ) is used only in the
later
rabbinic literature.
Hebrew
is one of the Semitic languages and shares the general
characteristics of
3-letter roots, having mainly consonants represented by
the letters of its
alphabet, and the simplicity of its sentence structure.
More specifically it belongs to the
Canaanitish branch of the northwest
Semitic group; its closest connections are
with Ugaritic, Phoenician,
Moabitish, and Edomitish. Inscriptions from Byblos, dating from the
1700s B.C., & Ugaritic texts from the 1300s indicate that this Canaanitish
was not a uniform language across the region.
There was an eastern
Canaanitish, as well as a northern and southern
Canaanitish. Semitic
people were trying
to adapt Egyptian hieroglyphic into a Semitic alphabet,
as well as using an
alphabet based on Assyrian cuneiform signs long
before the Hebrews entered the
land.
The
Biblical tradition is that the Hebrews' ancestors were associated
with
the incoming Arameans. These early
Hebrews entered the southern
area of Palestine, and adopted the local dialect
of southern Canaanitish as
they settled.
The earliest evidence of it in monument form is the Gezer
Calendar of
perhaps the 900s B.C. Some of the early
songs and other
passages embedded in the OT may have been composed as early as
the
900s. Evidence shows a northern and
southern dialect of Hebrew, but it
was the Jerusalem dialect which gradually
imposed itself as the standard
literary dialect.
H-24
The
earliest Hebrew writing so far known uses a form of the old
Canaanitish
alphabet of 22 characters, but the language had a wider
range of sounds than
these signs could express. The pronunciation of
several letters was indicated
by the presence or absence of a dot.
He-
brew, like most Semitic languages is written from right to left.
Hebrew
Phonetics & Grammar—In the ancient
form of writing,
consonants alone were written, & there was no indication of
what vowels
were to be used. A first
step toward indicating vowels was the use of ו,
י, ה, and to a lesser extent א, to
represent long vowels. The primary
Greek
translation of the OT shows that they were used inconsistently in
the text from
which that was translated. They were always regarded as
secondary to the
texts.
As Hebrew came to be less and less the
language of common inter-
course, however, it was needful to have some way of
indicating more
fully the vowel sounds.
This was done by the so-called “pointing,” or
providing the consonants with
small signs, written above, within, or below
them, to indicate the vowels with
which they are to be pronounced.
Two
older systems of this pointing are the Babylonian and the
Palestinian,
which were used only when it was necessary to clarify what word
was
being used.
All
three systems are the work of the schools, and would seem to
have appeared
first in Mesopotamia in the 400s B.C.
Thus at best they
represent only the late tradition as word
pronunciation. There was no
pronunciation
in the early writing & often not even word division. One
attempt at minimizing some elements of
confusion was the reserving of
a special form of 5 letters as final
letters. At the end of words, ך was
used
for כ (k), ם was used
for מ
(m), ן
was used for נ
(n), ף
was used
for פ (p or ph), and ץ was used
for צ
(ts).
The
early writers of Hebrew would have been as little conscious
of grammar as were
the pre-Islamic Arab poets. However, as
any lan-
guage comes more and more into use as a literary medium, it tends to
become "fixed." In the case of
Hebrew, the Jerusalem dialect came to be
regarded as the standard form of the
language. It is doubtful that we can
ever know the "when" & "how" of this process of
"fixing," since we are
never sure which forms were written by the
author and which are due to
later hands.
Historical
development in the language is discernible; the language
of the poetical books,
for example, is often more archaic. The
language
of such books as Ezra-Nehemiah, Chronicles, the Song of Songs, Ecclesi-
astes,
and Esther reveals a later form of Hebrew, showing a development
of certain
words and grammatical forms borrowed from surrounding cul-
tures. The literature produced in the period after
the close of the canon
uses a language which shows even further
development.
There
has been continuous cultivation of Hebrew as a literary lan-
guage from the 900s
B.C. to modern times, but whether there was conti-
nuity as a spoken language is
debatable. The language of the Mishna
has
been cited as evidence that Hebrew was still a spoken language. It is not
impossible that Hebrew may have
continued to be spoken in limited
circles of pious Jews on through the Middle
Ages.
The
grammar of biblical Hebrew may be briefly summarized.
Hebrew words, which are combined in
meaningful arrangements to form
sentences, belong to three categories: nouns, verbs, and particles, which
indicate varying types of relationship among nouns and verbs. Two
genders are recognized, masculine & feminine; 3 persons, the speaker,
the one addressed, and the one absent;
two numbers, singular and plural.
The
nouns includes pronouns, adjectives, & the numerals. There
is a definite article, which is the letter added at the beginning of a word.
Nouns may be an original 3-letter word, or
they may be derived from a
3-letter verb.
Personal pronouns have a form separate from the word or
are added as a
suffix at the end of a word. The
indefinite pronouns are
expressed by common nouns specialized in meaning. The possessive is
indicated by a shortened
form of the noun with a prefix or suffix.
The
dual ending is for the most part limited to things which go in
pairs, and
may be added to either a masculine or feminine form.
For
numbers, “one” is an adjective which follows its noun; “two”
is the noun senayim
or sethayim (masculine and feminine respectively)
in the dual form;
the gender of the number agrees with the gender of the
noun with which it
stands. “Three” to “ten” are nouns which
are the
opposite gender of the nouns with which they stand. The tens are the
plurals of the units, with
the exception of 20, which is the plural of “ten.”
There are special words for “hundred,”
“thousand,” and “ten thousand.”
There
are no true tenses for the Hebrew verb, but there are three
states—perfect
(e.g. “I wrote,”), imperfect (e.g. “I write,” “I am writing,”
“I will write,”),
and imperative or command (e.g. “Write!”).
Verbs are
inflected or changed for number, person, and gender. The characteristic
feature of the verb,
however is its system of derived stems to represent
aspects of the verbal
action. In Hebrew there are 7 basic
forms which
involve changes in the 3-letter root word, most often by adding a
letter,
which transform the word into the active, passive, intensive, or
causative
sense of the original word.
H-25
Particles
are also added to words, and are of various kinds. The
letter ה (he) and the letters אי (ah ee) are added for questions
of “where.”
The interrogative pronouns
are מי
(me) for “who,” and מה (meh) for
“what.”
The negative particle is לא (low) for “not,” and אל (al) for
“nothing” or “never.” The conditional
articles are אם
(eem) for “lo!” or
“if,” לו (loo) for “if,” and לולי (loo lay) for “if not.” Other particles are
prepositional and added
to words. ל (lah) is for “to” or “for;” ב (ba) is
for
“in, at, by, with.” The particle מן (min) is
usually separate from the
word it is with and means “from” or “out of.” There are no real Hebrew
adverbs in Hebrew.
With limited grammar, it cannot be expected that biblical Hebrew
should have
the flexibility and adaptability that classical Greek has for
expressing
thoughts. The skill with which biblical
writers have used the
resources of the language is remarkable. Sentences are of two kinds:
nominal, where the verb "to be"
is understood in the sentence; & verbal,
where the verb commonly precedes its
subject. The sentence order nor-
mally is
predicate, subject, object.
There is no verb “to have”; the possessive
particles serve instead
(e.g. “I shall have peace” is “It will be peaceful for
me”). Hebrew also
lacks that useful
preposition “of;” it uses the form of adjective + noun
instead. This form of expression's great
defect is that it isn't possible to
express
the indefiniteness of one member & the definiteness of the other
at the same
time.
Sentence
formation in early Hebrew was almost exclusively whole
strings of sentences
being connected merely by “and.” The
monotony is
relieved by skillful use of the perfect and imperfect states. The perfect
can be used for things conceptually
finished and complete as well as for
those actually completed. Similarly imperfect may be used for
things
which have not yet happened, or for things which are conceptually incom-
plete
though they have already happened. There
is also a characteristic
use of the imperative to replace the conditional
sentence. The most char-
acteristic
construction is when a narrative passage begins with a verb
expressing an
imperfect state, & all the succeeding verbs are expressed
in the perfect
state. In other words, the imperfect
expresses an action yet
to take place, and all the other actions are regarded
as an inevitable result
of that action.
Poetic
Forms and Loan Words—Hebrew poetry, like the poetry
of other languages,
preserved many archaic forms & constructions.
There
is no regular rhyming, but there is a rhythmic structure dependent
on the
accent, and a characteristic feature of parallelism. All attempts to find in
biblical Hebrew
generally applicable patterns for the grouping of verses
into stanzas have
failed.
There
is a considerable body of vocabulary borrowed from surroun-
ding peoples & adopted into Hebrew with very little sense of their original
meaning. They may be words from the pre-Semitic
inhabitants of the land,
or words borrowed from one or another of the non-Semitic
people with
whom the Hebrews had contact.
Several Hebrew names of months are
Akkadian or are descriptive of
different civil officials or classes of people.
Another group is of Egyptian origin and has
to do with luxury items; words
for other luxury items seem to have come from
India. In writings from
the Persian
period we find words from Iran having to do with government
offices and
functions.
HEBREW RELIGION. Israel's religion was a phenomenon unique in the
ancient world. It first appeared along with the emergence of
the Israelite
people in the 1200s B.C., and had a history of approximately a
thousand
years before becoming the Judaism that existed in the centuries
immedi-
ately before Christianity. This 1,000-year history wasn't an evolution from
lower forms of religion to a
higher one. Israel's faith retained
throughout
its history the essential and distinctive character with which it
began.
List of Topics—1. Religion of the Patriarchs;
2. Formative-Period; 3. [Covenant Response and Hope];
4. [God's Uniqueness]; 5. [Israel's Institutions];
6. Monarchy: Saul; David; Solomon; 7. [Changes Under the Monarchy]; 8. [Israel’s (Northern Kingdom’s) Cult];
9. 700s B.C. [and Prophets] to Jerusalem’s Fall; 10. [Josiah's Reforms]; 11. Exile and Beyond; 12. [ Judaism: Mono- theism; Keeping the Law; The Book].
1. Religion
of the Patriarchs—Though Israel's distinctive religion
began with Moses, it
was prepared for by the religion of the patriarchs,
who were part of a
semi-nomadic migration to Palestine from 2000-1500
B.C. Their religion was of a distinctive sort
quite different from the offi-
cial paganism of the surrounding lands. Their God was the God of the
clan, the
personal God of the clan chief.
The
clan had archaic names for its deity (e.g. “the God (shield?) of
Abraham”; “the
fear (kinsman) of Isaac”; and “the Mighty One of Jacob.”).
There were also personal names, such as
Abiram and Ahimelech, in which
God is spoken of as the "(divine) father/
brother” of the worshiper. The
God of
the patriarch was the unseen head of the clan; this God's cult was
simple and
presided over by the clan father himself.
H-26
As patriarchs entered Palestine, their cults were carried on at local
shrines,
and their gods were no doubt identified with the gods worshiped
there. The patriarchs worshiped God under the name
El, often with a
descriptive word attached to it. While these gods were worshiped locally,
the
patriarchal deity was no local god, but the patron deity of the clan
over whose
fortunes that god watched. As the
patriarchal stock evolved
into Israel, their gods were identified with Yahweh
and their traditions
were normalized as those of all Israel. Their religion, with its sense of
an intimate
bond supported by covenant & promise, profoundly influ-
enced Israel's faith. It is probable that much of
Israel's legal tradition
came to her through her own patriarchal ancestors
rather than through
Canaanite mediation.
2. Formative Period—Although it adapted
practices of pre-Mosaic
origin, Israel's religion began, as Israel did, in the
events of the Exodus
and Sinai. Its
founder was Moses. Studies revealed a
considerable body
of material apparently stemming from Israel's formative period,
including
cultic confessions, poems, the Decalogue, and the Book of the
Covenant.
From material of this sort a
fair picture of Israel's religion in the formative
period may be drawn.
Israel's religion did not center in an idea
of God, but in the memory
of a historical event as interpreted by faith. It was a response to that event
in covenant
form. In that event a group of Hebrews,
who had been held as
state slaves in Egypt, were led from there by Moses, who
in turn was led
by the “new” God, Yahweh, to the accompaniment of happenings so
marvelous that they were never forgotten.
This rescue was interpreted as an act of Yahweh's unmerited favor
calling a people from bondage to God’s self.
These Hebrews then moved
to Sinai, where they made a solemn covenant
with Yahweh to be Yahweh’s
people. A new
society was thus formed where none had been before; their
obligation was a covenant
response to the favor of Yahweh already
experienced.
3. [Covenant Response and Hope]—The
covenant form is an an-
cient one which has its closest parallel in certain
Hittite suzerainty treaties
of a day slightly before that of Moses. The King reminds them of his bene-
volent acts,
lays down the stipulations which he imposes and which they
are to accept. These typically include the prohibition of
foreign relations,
& of enmity with others of his vassals. Unlimited trust is to be felt towards
the
Great King. Vassals are to appear before
him annually with tribute. A
copy of the
treaty is to be placed in the shrine & periodically read publicly.
Sanctions are supplied by a series of
blessings and cursings.
The
covenant was no bargain between equals, but a vassal's
acceptance of the
overlord's terms. Early Israel was a
primitive theocracy
in which Yahweh was king.
The covenant could be maintained only so
long as the Overlord's
stipulations were met. The heart of
these was that
Israel honor Yahweh and have nothing to do with any other god.
A
note of hope & promise is also primitive.
This had been an origi-
nal element in the religion of the patriarchs. Yahweh's call to Israel in
Egypt had come
precisely as one to a new future and to hope.
The earliest
poems reveal a robust confidence that Israel will be
assured her land,
given all material blessings, and made a great people
victorious over all
her foes.
Though
Israel's religion did not center in a doctrine, her notion of
God was unique
from the beginning. Israel’s God was
called Yahweh.
Though there is no
agreement as to the meaning of this name, it is proba-
bly best taken as a
causative verb “to be” (He causes existence).
In the
course of time the original meaning was lost, & Yahweh became a
proper
name. The name shows that
Israel's God was from the beginning a high
God of cosmic domain. Whether or not a God called Yahweh was
wor-
shiped before Moses is unknown.
4. [God's Uniqueness]—From
the beginning Israel was forbidden
to worship any god but Yahweh. So marvelous were his acts, Israel didn't
conceive of Yahweh as having any rival.
Yahweh created the universe
quite alone.
For this reason Israel created no myth.
Her earliest poems
show that she was free of thinking in terms of
myths. Yahweh did have a
heavenly host
that was tempting to worship, but this was always prohibi-
ted. Even the gods of the patriarchs survived only
in identification with
Yahweh. Early
Israel did not explicitly deny that other gods existed, but
if their existence
was not denied, neither was their status as gods tolerantly
granted. They were robbed of all that made them gods,
and were rendered
nonentities, were undeified.
H-27
Yahweh differed from the ancient world’s pagan gods in Yahweh’s
essential nature. No image of Yahweh could be made, and
although God
manifested power through nature, no one aspect of nature was more
cha-
racteristic of God than another. God
was not to be seen as a fertility god.
Nature itself was robbed of personality. It was primarily in historical
events that
Yahweh manifested the existence of Yahweh.
Israel's religion
offered no ritual technique for manipulating the
unseen powers of nature
for selfish ends.
God was one who had called Israel from bondage to a
new future as God’s
people, and who demanded her obedience.
5. [Israel's Institutions]—Israel's
faith expressed itself in certain
tangible institutions. Chief among these was her tribal league. Israel
began her history as a league of 12
tribes, a sacral league of clans united
in covenant with Yahweh. There was no machinery of statehood
whatso-
ever. The clans enjoyed complete
independence, being obligated only to
assist in the care of the central shrine
and to respond to the call to arms.
In
times of danger there would arise someone endowed with the divine
Spirit, a
charismatic leader called a judge. But
the authority of the judge
as not permanent or hereditary. He was in no sense a king. The tribal
league persisted for some 200
years, and in it Israel's distinctive institu-
tions gained normative form.
The
focal point of the league was the tent shrine, housing the ark
of the covenant,
which came finally to rest in Shiloh, where it remained
as long as the tribal
league endured. Clans would gather on
feast days to
seek the presence of Yahweh and to renew their allegiance to
Yahweh.
Shiloh was the heart of the
covenant league. This shrine had a
clergy
claiming Levitic lineage. Though
the later theory that all cultic personnel
must be of the clan Levi didn't
then apply, Levites enjoyed a great prestige.
Since “Levite” could also refer to one pledged by vow, men of various
clans came gradually to be reckoned to Levi.
As
was true of all ancient religions, Israel's cult involved various
kinds of
sacrifice. A precise description of
early sacrificial ritual is impos-
sible.
In the wilderness it was certainly simple, and early Hebrew sacrifice
had many parallels with Canaanite practice.
We may assume that as Israel
entered Palestine, her worship was enriched
by borrowing, and what was
borrowed was given the rationale of Yahwistic faith.
At
the heart of Israel’s cult wasn't sacrifice, but great annual feasts,
such as
Passover, Feast of Weeks, & Feast of Booths, among others. All
these were older than Israel and, except
for Passover, were of agricultural
origin.
Israel gave them a new meaning, making them celebrations of Yah-
weh's
historic acts in the Exodus. Israel’s
cult was thus no “history-less”
maintainer of material well-being, but a
reminder of history.
Since
Israel's existence was based on her covenant with Yahweh,
covenant law was a
central factor in her life from the beginning.
Laws fall
into two general categories as regards form: casuistic (“if a man—”) and
apodictic (“thou
shalt [not]”). Casuistic have numerous
Mesopotamian
parallels, while apodictic are Israel's distinctive contribution
and state the
covenant's basic stipulations.
As need arose to apply these stipulations to
tangible situations, Israel
drew upon the legal tradition of her environment.
Such borrowing was made into an expression of
Israel's covenant faith.
Law was
normally administered by the village elders in accordance with
tradition. The priest had the duty of deciding hard
cases, and of giving
instruction on the law’s basis.
6. [Monarchy: Saul, David, and Solomon]—The period of Judges
was a
period of adjustment to situations, of the disintegration of old pat-
terns & the intrusion of new ones. Israel was
driven to set up a monarchy
when the tribal league was destroyed by the
Philistines late in the 1000s.
The change brought an inner transformation of her society which affected
her religion profoundly.
The
monarchy brought the old order’s end.
The first king, Saul,
was made king by popular acclamation. Because of his inability to over-
come tribal
independence, he failed. But David
succeeded. First beco-
ming king over
Judah with Philistine consent & popular acclaim, he was
later acclaimed king
by the northern tribes as well. Seizing
Jerusalem, a
city which had been Canaanite, as his capital, he also conquered Pale-
stine’s other Canaanite cities and incorporated them in the state, & subse-
quently won
a sizable empire.
Since
the state was created by David and centered on his person,
it was necessary
that a son succeed him. As the state was
progressively
organized under the crown, the tribal system became of less
practical im-
portance, until it was replaced by twelve administrative
districts. The
basis of social
obligation was no longer Yahweh's covenant, but the state.
A certain weakening of the covenant idea was
inevitable.
Adaptation
that had been going on since the Conquest brought
Israel into contact with Canaan's material culture. As she
adopted the
agrarian life, she was tempted to take up the practice of the
fertility cult.
This was especially so
since she had absorbed into her structure peoples
who lived in one place in the
land. Though these became worshipers of
Yahweh, their local cults continued.
H-28
The
monarchy speeded up the process. David
and Solomon incor-
porated thousands of Canaanites into the state, most of whom
became
no more than nominal Yahwists. As
Solomon made treaties & marriages
into royal families from surrounding lands,
the cults of his foreign wives
were fostered in Jerusalem. His treaty with Tyre was the most profitable
one. Solomon's temple, built by
Canaanite architects, introduced in its
symbolism many features that were
foreign to Israel. The institutions
of
state that Israel adopted had to be borrowed from outside, so rites &
concepts that were unknown to Israel before were introduced. As a
result, there was an inevitable
reduction in the stress placed on the
Exodus and Sinai events.
7. Changes in the Monarchy—The
social and economic
changes were sudden and drastic. As a clan society, she had no ruling
class,
no social distinction or extremes of wealth and poverty. This was
all changed. The royal court grew very rich, and the urban
population
grew very rapidly; this weakened tribal ties and traditions. Further, the
demands of state required a
burden of taxation. Solomon ultimately
drafted his subjects into forced labor.
As life was regulated under the
crown, notions of aristocracy and class
distinction began to intrude.
David
sought to link his state with the old order.
By installing the
ark in Jerusalem, and by appointing Abiathar of the
house of Eli as one
of its two chief priests, he was able to present the state
as a patron and
protector of the national religious heritage. Although some thought that
the temple that
Solomon later built was a dangerous innovation, and
although other shrines were
freely tolerated, the link that was to bind the
future of Israel's faith to
Jerusalem had been forged.
The
king played a central role in the temple cult.
The dogma was
developed that Yahweh had chosen Zion as his seat and
promised to
David an eternal dynasty.
The temple cult was enriched by sacrifices,
feasts, music, and poetry
early on in its history. Literary
activity flou-
rished as the traditions of the past were collected and written
down.
Because of economic and sectional
grievances, and because of tension
between the old order and the new, the
northern tribes rebelled when
Solomon died, and thereafter went their own
way. The North became
the kingdom of
Israel, and the South became the kingdom of Judah.
Throughout
her history Judah remained loyal to the house of
David, who had brought the
nation to its Golden Age. Later
genera-
tions idealized him and desired no future save in terms of a restoration
of
the glories of his rule. The state's theological
basis was Yahweh's
choice of Zion and David. This dogma gave to Judah a remarkable
stability. Yet it meant a further shift
from the ancient notion of covenant.
The
Davidic covenant was of a different type from that of Sinai.
In it, the relationship of God and nation was
unconditional and based
on promise. In
the process of guaranteeing God's favor, the people's
obligation to God was
obscured; stress shifted from obedience to cove-
nant law to meticulous
celebration of the ritual. It was in
this official
cult that hope & promise were given definitive form. The hope persisted
that a future king,
perhaps the next one, would make the promises actual.
As the element of promise indigenous to Israel's
faith was shaped by the
dynastic ideal, there were sown the seeds of hope of
the Messiah.
8. [Israel’s (Northern Kingdom’s) Cult]—The northern state of
Israel began without dynastic tradition or official
cult. Selection of kings
by prophetic
designation and popular acclamation, though increasingly
a fiction, continued
in principle until the days of Jehu.
Jeroboam I desig-
nated Bethel and Dan, both ancient cult places claiming
a Levitical tra-
dition, as official shrines.
At both, Yahweh was seen as standing or
enthroned on a bull. The bull had associations with the fertility
cult and
was thus an entering wedge for blending other beliefs into Yahweh's cult.
This
tendency was magnified by the large number of Canaanites
absorbed by
Israel. Shrines other than the two
official ones, and of pre-
Mosaic origins, were equally popular. It was easy for pagan practices &
notions
to infiltrate the national religion. In
the 800s Israel was threa-
tened with the official introduction of a foreign
paganism, when Jezebel,
wife of King Ahab brought the cult of the Tyrian Baal
to the royal court.
Many Israelites
became overtly pagan, and those who resisted were per-
secuted. By the 700s Israel, even her official cult,
was shot through with
pagan practices.
Obligation to God was discharged by sacrifice & ritual,
and God's
promises were regarded as unconditional.
Society
meanwhile progressively disintegrated; covenant law
inevitably ceased to have
meaning. Though both Israel and Judah
knew
hard times both politically and economically, they were as well off as
they had been since Solomon. In
Israel wealthy landowners amassed
property and dispossessed and enslaved the
poor. There was so such
moral
degeneration that Israel's society was without moral standards.
9. 700s B.C. [and Prophets] to Jerusalem’s Fall—Protest
against
these social trends was not slow in coming. About the middle of the 700s
B.C. there began
the flowering of the prophetic movement in classical
form. The prophets are not to be described as great
spiritual pioneers.
On the contrary, they
were heirs of a tradition centuries old who attacked
abuses and pronounced
judgment upon them in the light of the covenant
faith of Israel's past.
H-29
Prophets
had been active in Israel since Saul; when they roused
their fellows to fight
holy wars for Yahweh. Later we find them
on
good terms with the state yet reserving the right to criticize it. After the
North-South split, they were active
in both states, but especially in
Israel (North). They both encouraged and rebuked King
Ahab. Their
opposition to Jezebel's
policy was met with persecution. A split
arose
in their ranks, with certain of them opposing both the state and those
prophets who sided with it. Jehu's purge
probably satisfied most of
them; making peace with the state, they placed their
patriotic fervor &
their integrity at its disposal. The classical prophets held these
profes-
sionals in contempt, and broke with them.
The
first two prophets, Amos & Hosea, addressed the northern
state in the
generation before its fall. Amos attacked
mainly social
injustice, while Hosea's main target was the mixing of Yahwism
with
paganism and outright apostasy.
Rejecting the empty paganized cult,
& the notion that Yahweh's
promises were unconditional, both preached
a message of judgment. Though they called for penitence, they were
sure that the nation was doomed. But
neither they nor the prophets
who followed them sought to overthrow the state. Yahweh was the
one to execute sentence. Yet for all this, the note of promise was not
given up.
As
Israel collapsed, the prophetic movement was carried for-
ward in Judah (South)
by Isaiah and Micah, who followed the pattern
of Amos and Hosea. All injustice, idolatrous practice, and
rebellion
against Yahweh was viewed as breaches of the covenant. Isaiah and
Micah also attacked the external
cult by which the nation hoped to
satisfy God's demands, and the corrupt clergy
as well. They preached
a message of
judgment. Isaiah in particular, was
influenced by the
Davidic covenant's official theology. His message was a powerful
reaffirmation of
that theology, and a summons to the nation to trust in
its promises; for
Isaiah, the sole hope of Judah was to trust in Yahweh.
As in the Davidic covenant, sinful Judah will
be disciplined but not
cast off utterly.
Isaiah's hope was positively expressed in the promise
of a just and
victorious king of David's line. Here
the hope of the
Messiah, which became the norm in later Judaism, took shape.
Judah had always gone back and forth
between periods of reli-
gious laxity and efforts at reform. In the late 700s, the reform move-
ment gained
momentum, beginning with Hezekiah. His
predecessor
Ahaz had been forced to give official recognition to Assyria's
gods.
As the Assyrian cults were
offensive not only to loyal Yahwists but to
all patriotic citizens as well,
Hezekiah's struggle for independence
naturally led to their removal, & also
awakened a nationalistic reaction
against all religious features considered
foreign. Prophetic threats of
fate
for Jerusalem similar to that of Samaria also played a part. Effort
was also made to close outlying
shrines of Yahweh. But Hezekiah's
reform
didn't endure; the people weren't ready for it. When Manasseh
resumed loyalty to Assyria, the
Assyrian cults were reinstated. All
sorts of pagan rites were fostered.
Israel's religion was in danger of
becoming a polytheism.
10. Josiah's Reforms—Assyria’s
collapse during Josiah’s reign
left Judah open to the most sweeping reform of
her history, aimed at
purging everything foreign. There was a search for security in the
surer
things of the past. Reform was given
added impetus & direction
by the discovery of a “book of the law,” which was
probably some form
of Deuteronomy.
Reflecting faithfully the Mosaic covenant's obliga-
tions on both sides of
the relationship between God and God's people,
Deuteronomy declares that the
national hope lies in keeping covenant.
The
reform resulted in a ruthless purge of all pagan cults & prac-
tices, both
native and foreign. It also abolished
shrines of Yahweh
throughout Judah. The
ideal of a purified Israel united under the throne
of David seemed to be
largely realized. Centralization of the
cult was,
however, resisted & never accepted by many. The written law was
ele-
vated at the expense of the prophetic word.
The confidence grew that
the national safety had been secured, by
meeting the demands of cove-
nant law through cultic reform and ritual. With Josiah's death in 609,
Judah's
independence ended. Subject first to
Egypt, then to Babylon,
she was destroyed by the latter in 587.
Josiah's
violent death and independence’s end seemed to many a
contradiction of Deuteronomy’s
theology. Under Jehoiakim, the reform
was abandoned, yet clergy and people alike clung to the official dogma,
that
national safety was assured by the presence of Yahweh's temple.
Down to the end a miraculous intervention
was expected. The nation’s
fall raised
doubts about the national religion’s truth, as popularly under-
stood, into
question.
Israel's
faith was saved in good part by prophets who addressed
the nation in its
darkest hour. In all of them, the
problem of the divine
justice is the central issue. Jeremiah rejected the popular trust in the
permanence of temple and dynasty. In
his writing, the Babylonians
were the instruments of divine judgment. Ezekiel declared that the
present calamity
wasn't only God's doing, but positively his vindication
as the righteous and
sovereign Lord. Explained thus, tragedy
could not
destroy Israel's faith.
H-30
The
prophets prepared for the survival of faith in other ways. Jere-
miah insisted on a repentant heart rather
than cult ritual, & Ezekiel based
divine justice on the actions of the
individual. The summons of both
these
prophets to individual decision laid the foundation for a new com-
munity of
faith; both regarded the Exile as an interim, a purification.
Hope to both of them thus lay in a new act of
divine grace. Exiled Israel
was thus not
left hopeless, but could look forward to the promise of a
new future.
11. Exile
and Beyond—The Exile was a watershed
in the history
of Israel's religion; the postexilic community gave the faith
of old Israel
a new form. In 587, Jewish
life in Palestine was totally disrupted.
The
Jews around Jerusalem were few and poor. Although the Exile was a
grievous emergency,
Israel's faith persisted through it with an amazing
tenacity. Traditions were jealously guarded, handed
down & sometimes
edited. The sayings
of the prophets were likewise preserved.
Yet, many
still viewed the national disaster as proof of Yahweh's
powerlessness, and
these were acutely tempted to turn to the worship of Babylon's presuma-
bly mightier gods. The
Exile had opened new horizons, because her faith
could no longer continue as a
national cult. It had to adapt itself to
the
great nations and their gods as never before, if it was to survive.
With
the comforting assurance that the penalty for sin had now
been paid, the writer
of the second part of Isaiah declared that the Exile
was soon to end. There would be a great new exodus, with
Yahweh lea-
ding the flock of Israel back to Zion. None is God but Yahweh, who is
creator. Israel is Yahweh's chosen witness before the
world that Yahweh
is God.
Yet
Israel's role is not to be a passive one; she is to be Yahweh's
servant to
bring the light of Yahweh's rule to the nations. In the figure of
the Servant of the Lord the
prophet gave the national suffering and the
national hope profound
reinterpretation. Yahweh's purpose is to
triumph
through his suffering, persecuted, and rejected Servant. Israel's hope was
given a novel pattern quite
different from the popular one, and one which
was richly played upon in the New
Testament.
Having
conquered Babylon, Cyrus allowed the Jews to re-establish
their life in Palestine. The resulting post-exilic community was a
church
rather than a nation. It
understood itself as the remnant of Israel.
It was
not a national unit or, strictly speaking, an ethnic one—there
were foreig-
ners and proselytes. The
danger of assimilation by pagans had to be com-
bated vigorously, which led to a
growing particularism and a tension with
the universalism implicit in
monotheistic faith. Judaism did not
become
an actively missionary religion; the tendency was to look down on the
Gentile and to wish as few dealings with them as possible.
12. Judaism: Monotheism; Keeping the Law; The Book—In
Judaism, monotheism triumphed completely.
The hard core of Judaism
turned from paganism & idolatry
resolutely. The divine name, Yahweh,
came to be considered too sacred to be spoken; & various substitutes for
it were developed. There was profound
devotional piety & an equally pro-
found concern for the conduct of the good
life. Yet in all this Judaism had
no
doubt that her God alone was God. As God
was exalted above his
creation, great play was allowed for the role of angelic
beings. Partly
from reflection on the
problem of evil and partly from outside influence,
the figure of Satan
developed from an accuser of evildoers into God's
great adversary, who tempts
all to evil. Yet no proper dualism emerged;
God remained the sovereign Lord in whose providence all things occur.
Hope
for the future, always present in Israel's faith continued. The
old national hope of the messianic king
attached itself to Zerubbabel, only
to be disappointed. This hope was divorced from the existing
order and
attached to the new order which God would establish at the end of
history.
Later Hebrew prophecy turned
almost entirely from present history to the
last events of Yahweh's judgment
and the establishment of Yahweh's trium-
phant rule.
As
prophecy died out, there emerged a literature which sought to
describe in
cryptic language the final cosmic struggle between God and
evil. In this literature there appears the figure
of the Son of Man, a pre-
existent heavenly deliverer who would come in glory at
the end of days.
Judaism also began to
develop a belief in the resurrection, a thing
unknown in old Israel. It was a borrowed concept, but it was adapted
to
the Judaic faith.
Judaism's most characteristic feature was its stress on keeping
the law; in
fact, to be a Jew was to keep the law.
The prophets had ex-
plained the Exile as a result of a breach of covenant
law; and this naturally
led people to take the law more seriously. And the postexilic community
had been
constituted by a covenant committing it to the observance of the
(now written)
law. As hope was pushed to the end of
history, the law was
accorded absolute validity for regulating conduct; it
became virtually the
whole content of the obligation. The temple cult remained a requirement
of the
law, but one of lesser importance than overall obedience to the law.
Every village had its synagogue, where the
law was read and expounded.
The law
superseded both priestly powers and prophetic word; prophecy
ceased in Israel.
H-31
Judaism
gradually developed a fixed, if unofficial, canon of scripture.
The 1st 5 books of the OT had
authoritative status from the time of Ezra or
soon after; and to this were
subsequently added the prophets' books. By
the 100s B.C. most of the books of the OT as we know it were regarded
as holy scripture. But the first five
retained the pre-eminent position.
Judaism became a religion of the Book, committed to the observance of
written law.
There
was also the desire to build a “fence” around the law lest it be
broken
inadvertently. The Pharisees arose as a class of scribes who devo-
ted
themselves wholly to studying the law and teaching it. The oral law
became the hallmark of Judaism & ultimately crystallized into the Talmud.
It enabled Judaism to survive when its temple was finally
destroyed. The
New Testament, however,
affirms that this whole history of faith found its
conclusion in Christ, who is
the fulfillment of its law and its hope, & who
gave to the Christian church,
the Israel according to the Spirit, the awaited
new covenant.
HEBREWS, LETTER TO THE. The
19th book of the New Testament (NT)
canon. Although we call Hebrews a “letter,” it has
no author’s name and
no addressee, nor can we recognize an occasion or
purpose. It was not
written by Paul;
style, form, and Christology speak against his authorship.
The western part of the early church refused
until about 300 A.D. to accept
Hebrews into the NT canon. It was not until Pope Innocent I (405) agreed
upon all 27 books, that Hebrew became a fully acknowledged part of the
NT
canon. The letter’s christological parts alternate with moral
appeals.
There is a constant rhythm
between these 2 components. Except for
the
last 4 verses, which seem like Paul’s writing, the integrity of the letter
is
not questionable.
Neither the word “letter” nor the term “to write” occurs in Hebrews.
Neither the word “letter” nor the term “to write” occurs in Hebrews.
Instead, we find the terms “word,” “speech,”
“proclamation”(logos).
Hebrews is
a unique book in the NT canon, especially as regards literary
character. It is an epistle, or literary
piece meant for general reading. A
sermon or lecture has been used, because the good style and rhetorical
forms of
Greek suggest a teacher or preacher. It
is probable that we have
in this epistle several sermons combined and collected
by the author
himself.
When the Old Testament (OT) is used here, it is taken from the
When the Old Testament (OT) is used here, it is taken from the
primary Greek
OT. Moses and Jesus are discussed
together in a simple
comparison. The Old
Covenant is the anti-type of the New Covenant; the
author regards Christianity
in the historical continuity with Israel and
Judaism, even though the author
considers Christianity superior.
The earliest witness is Clement of Alexandria, who tells that Paul
The earliest witness is Clement of Alexandria, who tells that Paul
wrote the letter
in the Hebrew language. He further tries
to explain why
Paul didn't mention his own name at the beginning. Origen has his doubts
and concludes: “Who really wrote the letter is known to God
alone.”
Hebrew was taken as Paul’s until
the Reformation. Today, we do not have
the resources any longer to make a clear decision, except that it isn't Paul.
Nothing can be derived from the title “To the
Hebrews,” because there are
too many attributes of the typical Jewish Christian
literature missing from
this epistle.
As to where the epistle was sent, Alexandria, Rome, and Palestine
As to where the epistle was sent, Alexandria, Rome, and Palestine
have been
mentioned. For Alexandria, no weighty
arguments can be
given, except for the epistle’s kinship with Philo’s writing. For Rome as
destination, it is also
noteworthy that Rome always preserved a tradition
that Paul wasn't the
author. The salutation “those who come
from Italy”
could point to expatriates sending their greetings homeward. Although
nothing can be said for sure, Rome is
most likely the letter’s destination.
And
the close relation of Hebrews to writings like I Clement & the Reve-
lation of
John speak for the time at the end of the first century (81-96).
Hebrews’
theology is that of a post-apostolic Greek Christianity.
Hebrews stresses the coming of the end; the
present time is called “these
last days.”
This idea is emphasized for the practical purpose of overco-
ming
weariness and weakening of faith. In
response, Christians should
disassociate themselves from the world & live as
strangers upon the earth.
Hebrews
affirms that Christ has “appeared once for all at the end of the
age.” The affirmation that the end of the age is
present is more of a
Gnostic idea than it is a Jewish one. Connected with the end of this age is
the
idea of pilgrimage. Israel as the people
wandering through the wilder-
ness can be recognized as the prototype of
Christianity. In our pilgrimage
we have
Christ as leader; Christians are to follow in his steps by suffering.
It is the way to the heavenly Jerusalem, the
“new and living way.”
The Christology of Hebrews is immediately developed in the opening chapter. After the redemption “he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high.” In Hebrews, there is no way to separate the sonship and the high priesthood of Christ; he was pre-existent and participated as Son in God’s creation. He is God’s representative in the midst of this world and is our representative in heaven before God. He is now the final one and has a cosmic power superior to angels and Moses.
There is no explicit mentioning of Christ’s resurrection; the accent is upon his being in heaven. In the same way, the crucifixion is not explicitly referred to, but is pre-supposed. He had to suffer and undergo temptations, and because he did “he is able to help those who are tempted.” He revealed himself as the very Messiah, the perfect one forever.
The concept of Christ as the high priest runs through the letter as a whole. By his death he unlocks the door to the eternal sanctuary in heaven. His work means atonement for the sins of humans. The title of high priest is used as if it was a familiar one to the readers. With the philosopher Philo, Logos is also the high priest. In Hebrews, Greek and Jewish traditions come together in this title and figure. He is called by God, chosen from among men, acts on behalf of all, deals gently with all, is beset with weakness, is bound to offer sacrifice for himself, and he is bound to offer sacrifice for the sins of the people. These characteristics and functions of the high priest explain the work of Christ Jesus. The unique Melchizedek passages of Hebrews go back to Psalm 110 and perhaps to earliest liturgical traditions. Melchizedek’s name means “Sedek is king,” or in Hebrews, “king of righteousness.” Probably he is meant as the primeval man who returns as Messiah. Philo also speaks of Melchizedek, so there must be a common tradition which is Gnostic in origin.
In Hebrews more than in any other book of the New Testament canon, “faith becomes “faithfulness.” “Faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.” Faith is obedience to that word which God has finally spoken in Christ Jesus. Confession is the human response to God’s action in Christ.
The christological intention of Hebrews leads to the primary point of the ethical admonitions by speaking of “Son and sons” of the first-born in the singular and giving an ethical implication. The admonitions are primarily concerned with the danger of apostasy or weariness and lack of hope. Faith is perceived as faithfulness and sin more as the weakening of faithfulness than as disobedience or actual deed. The historical setting has more to do with Gnosticism, perhaps in Jewish form, than it does with rabbinical ideas. The author makes use of Gnostic material in his own independent way.
H-32
The Christology of Hebrews is immediately developed in the opening chapter. After the redemption “he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high.” In Hebrews, there is no way to separate the sonship and the high priesthood of Christ; he was pre-existent and participated as Son in God’s creation. He is God’s representative in the midst of this world and is our representative in heaven before God. He is now the final one and has a cosmic power superior to angels and Moses.
There is no explicit mentioning of Christ’s resurrection; the accent is upon his being in heaven. In the same way, the crucifixion is not explicitly referred to, but is pre-supposed. He had to suffer and undergo temptations, and because he did “he is able to help those who are tempted.” He revealed himself as the very Messiah, the perfect one forever.
The concept of Christ as the high priest runs through the letter as a whole. By his death he unlocks the door to the eternal sanctuary in heaven. His work means atonement for the sins of humans. The title of high priest is used as if it was a familiar one to the readers. With the philosopher Philo, Logos is also the high priest. In Hebrews, Greek and Jewish traditions come together in this title and figure. He is called by God, chosen from among men, acts on behalf of all, deals gently with all, is beset with weakness, is bound to offer sacrifice for himself, and he is bound to offer sacrifice for the sins of the people. These characteristics and functions of the high priest explain the work of Christ Jesus. The unique Melchizedek passages of Hebrews go back to Psalm 110 and perhaps to earliest liturgical traditions. Melchizedek’s name means “Sedek is king,” or in Hebrews, “king of righteousness.” Probably he is meant as the primeval man who returns as Messiah. Philo also speaks of Melchizedek, so there must be a common tradition which is Gnostic in origin.
In Hebrews more than in any other book of the New Testament canon, “faith becomes “faithfulness.” “Faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.” Faith is obedience to that word which God has finally spoken in Christ Jesus. Confession is the human response to God’s action in Christ.
The christological intention of Hebrews leads to the primary point of the ethical admonitions by speaking of “Son and sons” of the first-born in the singular and giving an ethical implication. The admonitions are primarily concerned with the danger of apostasy or weariness and lack of hope. Faith is perceived as faithfulness and sin more as the weakening of faithfulness than as disobedience or actual deed. The historical setting has more to do with Gnosticism, perhaps in Jewish form, than it does with rabbinical ideas. The author makes use of Gnostic material in his own independent way.
HEBRON (הברון, alliance)) 1. A
Levite, third son of Kohath and the origin of
the name for the Hebronites. 2. Son of Mareshah in a Calebite genealogy.
HEBRON (CITY) (הברון, alliance)) 1. A
city about 30 km south of Jerusalem
and 27 km west of the Salt (Dead) Sea. Hebron was built on the hill er-
Rumeideh just
west of the modern city. Hebron was a
Canaanite royal city
in the hill country of Judah, around 1350 B.C.
Abraham purchased the cave at Mamre, near Hebron, for a family
Abraham purchased the cave at Mamre, near Hebron, for a family
sepulcher from a Hittite
chieftain named Ephron. At the time of
the foun-
ding, it was called Kiriath-arba and later came to be called
Hebron. In the
1300s the Hebron region
was ruled by a local prince, Shuwardata, who ap-
pears in several of the Amarna
Letters. 3 clans of Anakim lived at
Hebron
in Moses' time. A
generation later Hoham, king of Hebron, died at the
hand of Joshua & his
forces in the latter’s victory over the southern Cana-
anite coalition.
Hebron itself was destroyed and its
population devoted to the sword.
Hebron
seems to have been reoccupied by the 3 clans of the Anakim and
wasn't
effectively controlled by the Israelites until its recapture by Caleb’s
forces
after Joshua’s death. Hebron was designated
a Levitical city and a
city of refuge.
In the royal administrative reorganization, it became a dis-
trict
capital.
Hebron
is prominent in the story of David’s early career. It was one
of the cities to
receive a gift from David. For the first
7½ years of his reign
it was the southern kingdom's capital while Ishbosheth
ruled the north from
Mananaim. Several
of David’s sons, including Absalom, were born at He-
bron. After Ishbosheth’s assassination, the north
was united with the
south, and the capital moved to the newly captured
Jerusalem.
H-33
Hebron was Absalom’s headquarters for his revolt against David.
Rehoboam (922-915 B.C.) had the fortifications
at Hebron strengthened.
Hebron was
probably occupied by Sennacherib in 701 and destroyed by
Nebuchadrezzar in
587. Hebron may have been a royal
pottery at this time.
It is not
mentioned in the New Testament (See also entry in the appendix’s
Old
Testament Apocrypha/ Influence Outside the Bible section.)
HEDGE (גדרה (geh day raw), fence; משוכה (mes oo
kaw); שוך (sook))
Hedges were constructed to protect vineyards
from predators. Figuratively
the verb “hedge” is used to express God’s
protection and his constraint.
HEDGEHOG (קפוד (kip pode), King James Version translates
as “bittern”)
Any small
insect-eating mammals, around 25 to 30 cm long, covered with
a coat of short
spines and having the power to roll themselves up in self-
protection into a
ball-like form. The three passages that qippod
appears in
describe inhabited areas which are to become desolate & the
home of vari-
ous wild creatures.
HEEL, LIFTED (הגדיל עלי עקב (ha ga
deal ‘il lee ‘ay keb), “made great the
heel [?] against
me”) The expression refers to
the treachery of friends
(Job 13), who have interpreted the sick man’s distress
as divine punish-
ment, and have made him an object of social rejection. It may have no
reference whatever to raising
the heel to kick one and may simply mean
“has turned his back on me,” or “has
turned his heel on me.” Jesus ap-
plies
the words to Judas’ treachery & brought fresh significance to these
words. The emphasis would seem to be
that one who partook of one’s
bread, had violated the laws of hospitality, and
had turned on his host.
HEGAI
(הגי) A eunuch of Ahasuerus, in charge of the women.
HEGLAM (הגלם, captivity) Son of Ehud,
and the father of Uzza and Ahihud
(I Chronicles 8). The father of Ehud is not
mentioned in I Chronicles; in
Judges 3 he is Gera, grandson of Benjamin, father
of both Ehud and the
Shimei who cursed David.
Gera would then be the ancestor and the ori-
gin of the name for Heglam’s
clan.
HEIFER (עגלת (‘eg lath)) The heifer was used on the threshing
floor and pre-
sumably for other agricultural work. A three-year-old heifer was sacrificed
in the
Lord’s covenant with Abraham. The neck
of a heifer was broken in
removing the guilt of a murder from an unknown
assailant from a commu-
nity. The term
“heifer” is used figuratively in Judges 14, Jeremiah 46 and
50, Hosea 4 & 10. The phrase which the King James Version
translates as
“heifer of three years old” is in other translation taken to be a
place name,
Eglath-shelishiyah.
HEIR (יורש (yay roshe )) An owner of property’s son. The heir, as
a child, was
no more than a slave. Through Christ humankind ceased to be slaves
and
become heirs. All of the poor are “heirs of the grace of life.”
HELAH (הלאה, necklace) One of the two wives of Ashhur,
descendant of
Judah and ancestor of Tekoa.
HELAM
(הילם, strength of the people)
A city near the northern boundary of
Gilead, between Damascus & Hamath, where David defeated the Syrians.
HELBAH (הלבה, fertility) A town in Asher, from which the
Israelites couldn't
expel the Canaanite population; it could be the same as
Ahlab, because of
their similarity in Hebrew.
HELBON (הלבון, fertile) A town northwest of Damascus, mentioned in
the
lamentation for Tyre; particularly famous for its wine (Ezekiel 27).
HELDAI (הלדי, mole (animal)) 1. One of David’s Mighty Men; a Netophathite
(II Samuel 23). 2. One who brought gold and silver with
which the pro-
phet Zechariah was to make a crown for Joshua the high priest.
H-34
HELECH (הילך, from the root meaning strength) Possibly the Old Testament
name of
Cilicia in Asia Minor. Assyrian records
refer to Cilicia as Hilakku.
It revolted
against Sennachraib in 696 & again under Esarhaddon (680-
669). There were mercenaries from Helech in the
army of Tyre.
HELEK (הלק, portion, lot) A member of the Manasseh tribe, one of Manas-
seh’s and Joseph’s descendants.
HELEM
(הלם, blow) A family
of the tribe of Asher. This name should
proba-
bly be Hotham (I Chronicles 7).
HELEPH (הלף, exchange) A Naphtali border
town, possibly to be identified
with modern-day Khirbet ’Arbathah.
HELEZ
(הלץ, he has saved) 1. One of David’s Mighty Men;
either a Paltite
or a Peolonite; the latter is most likely the correct clan (II
Samuel 23).
2. A family of the tribe of Judah (I Chronicles
2).
HELI
( Hli) The father or grandfather of Joseph in the genealogy
of Jesus
(Luke 3).
HELIOPOLIS (בית שמש (beth sheh mesh, house of the sun)) The
capital
of the Thirteenth Lower Egyptian nome, situated where the Nile Delta
begins, just northeast of modern-day Cairo.
In Genesis, its name is On.
Potiphera of the Joseph story is priest of
that city. Elsewhere Heliopolis is
mentioned only indirectly.
Heliopolis
is perhaps best known as the home of the Egyptian theo-
logy which bears its name. The chief deity was Atum, which became
Atum-Re, the sun-god, who dominated the other gods: Shu (atmosphere);
Tefnut
(moisture); Geb (earth); Nut (sky); Isis; Osiris; Seth; and Nephthys.
Although Heliopolis played no important
political role in Egyptian history,
it remained one of its most outstanding
cult centers. The present site is
re-
latively poor in archaeological remains and shows no evidence of ancient
occupation after 525 B.C.
HELKAI (הלקי, portion of the Lord) A
priest, head of the Meriaoth house in the
days of Joikim the high priest.
HELKATH (הלקת, partition) A Levitical border town in Asher, perhaps to
be
identified with Tell el-Harbaj, located at the southern end of the Plain of
Acco in northern Israel, near the Mediterranean coast. It is a low mound
with a surface of over
25,000 square meters. It was occupied
from 3000-
2100 B.C., 1550-1200 B.C. and 1200-900 B.C.
HELKATH-HAZZURIM (הלקת הצרים, field of
sharp rocks) An area, presuma-
bly near Gibeon’s Pool, the place where
12 of Joab’s men of war dueled
with 12 from the ranks of Abner.
HELL.
See Dead, Abode of the; Gehenna.
HELLENISM The
Greek spirit, character or civilization, or an enthusiasm for or
devotion to
this culture. It is the civilization
which spread over the Medi-
terranean world as a result of Alexander’s conquests
in the decade 334-
325 B.C.
Unfortunately the aggressive actions of Jerusalem’s pro-Helle-
nist party
led to persecution. It also created
internal tensions with Juda-
ism, resulting in attitudes of superiority which
continued for centuries.
HELLENISTS. Greek-speaking
Jews referred to in Acts 6 and 9, and contras-
ted with the “Hebrews. The tension between the two groups
intensified the
problem of the admission of Gentiles to the church. Foreign-born Jews in
Jerusalem spoke various
languages, including Greek. It was
probably
these “foreigners” or Greek-speaking Jews who were designated by the
term “Hellenists,” rather than Gentiles.
HELMET (כובע ( ko bah); perikefalaia
(peh rie keh fa lay ee ah) A defen-
sive headgear worn in battle, ordinarily
made of leather for ordinary sol-
diers, but of bronze for royalty and
heroes. In symbolic usage, the Lord
is
pictured wearing the helmet of salvation, which is also part of a Chris-
tian’s
“armor.”
H-35
HELON (הלון, strength) A
Zebulunite; the father of Eliah (Numbers 1, 2, 7, 10).
HELPERS ( antilhmyeiV (an ti lem
psay ees)) One of the charismata
or “gifts
of the Spirit,” named by Paul. It is not a ministerial order, but
rather a gift
possessed by deacons of the church. The verb form appears as a syno-
nym of
Martha’s service.
HEM
(שול (shole), skirt; kraspedon (kras peh don), fringe) The King James
Version
translation of shol and kraspedon (See Skirt and Fringe
entries).
HEMAM (הימם, defeat) The clan chief,
Lotan’s second son, and a Horite sub-
clan’s ancestor in Edom.
HEMAN
(הימן, faithful) 1. A
Horite (Genesis 36). 2. A “wise man” of the
“sons of Mahol,” part
of a guild of dancers in Solomon’s time.
He is
called a son of Zerah, and is probably the same as Heman #3.
3. A Kohathite, son of Joel; one of the leaders of the temple musi-
3. A Kohathite, son of Joel; one of the leaders of the temple musi-
cians under David
and Solomon. Perhaps the guild of Heman
was origi-
nally a guild of cultic prophets, which later became a musical guild.
HEMDAN (המדן, pleasant) The first son
of clan chief Dishon; ancestor of
a native Horite sub clan in Edom.
HEMLOCK (לענה (lah an aw), wormwood ) The King James Version
translation of the
Hebrew word.
HEMORRHAGE (pusiV (poo sees)) Any bleeding or flow of blood. In the
Old Testament hemorrhage brought with
it ceremonial defilement, thus im-
posing serious restrictions upon the
individual‘s religious & social life.
The woman with hemorrhage ( Matthew 23; Mark 5; Luke 8) probably had
a uterine cyst.
HEN (PERSON) (הן, grace) It is probable, however, that the
original reading
was “Josiah.”
HEN
(orniV (or nis), bird, fowl) The female of the domestic fowl and of
vari-
ous other birds.
HENA
(הנע) A town mentioned in II Kings 18, 19; Isaiah 37. Its location is not
known. Hezekiah had begun
an anti-Assyrian policy. The Assyrian
envoys
stated that Hezekiah would have no success and cited Hena among other
cities as an example of cities that had failed in their resistance of Assyria.
HENADAD (הנדד, perhaps favor of Hadad (weather
god)) The ancestor and
origin of
the name for a Levitical house of priests mentioned in connection
with the
building of the temple under Zerubbabel, the repair of the Jerusa-
lem wall, and
the signing of Ezra’s covenant.
HENNA
(כפר (ko pher)) A
fragrant flowering shrub or tree. In the
Song of
Solomon 1 the lover is likened to the fragrant cluster of henna
blossoms.
In the same book, chapter 4,
the tree is listed with other fragrant spices in a
metaphor in praise of the
bride.
HEPHER (הפר, pit, well) 1. Ancestor and origin of the name for a
clan of the
Manasseh or Gilead tribe. 2.
A man or family of the Judah tribe. (I
Chron. 4). 3. One
of David’s Mighty Men (I Chron. 11). 4. A Canaa-
nite city whose king was defeated
by Joshua and which is found in the lis-
ting of Solomon’s administrative
districts. Hepher’s exact location is
un-
known; a site 3.2 km east of Arubboth, & Tell Ibshar have been suggested.
HEPHZIBAH (הפצי־בה, my delight is in her) 1. The
wife of King
Hezekiah, and the mother of Manasseh (II King 21). 2. symbolic name
for the restored Jerusalem , when God’s “delight” will again be in her.
H-36
HERALD (khrux, (keh ruz), preacher) An officer making state or royal
pro-
clamations public, or bearing ceremonial messages between princes and
powers. In Daniel 3 it is used as
“herald”’ in the New Testament it is used
metaphorically for the
“preacher.” The metaphor suggests the
preacher is
a herald in that he bears a message or proclamation given him by
the hea-
venly King.
HERB
(ארה (‘aw raw), to gather; Lacanon (lak an on))
In II Kings 4, it
is more likely that a cereal or grain is
meant. Lachanon is a cultivated, as
opposed to a wild plant.
HERDSMAN (רעה (raw aw); בוקר (bo kare), cattle-tender) A keeper of
domestic animals that go in
herds. Ra’ah is more often translated as “shep-
herd.” Amos’ claim to be a boqar is interpreted
as evidence of his lay ori-
gin. However,
recent study by some suggests that it may be an official
priestly title.
HERES, ASCENT OF (מעלה החרס (mah ‘ah
leh ha khah res), ascent of the
sun) A place where Gideon turned back from
pursuing the Midianites.
The translation
is doubtful, but there is no agreement on an alternative.
HERESH (הרש, mute) A Levite listed
among the returned exiles. The name is
not in the parallel Nehemiah 11.
HERESY (h
airhsiV (hah ee res is), sect, faction) Originally, a school, sect,
faction;
later, the opposite of orthodoxy. The
term “heresy” meant a philo-
sophical school with its special doctrine. The New Testament language is
influenced by
Greek and Jewish terminology. The new
Christian usage of
the term, with reference to inner-Christian factions began
with the Church.
The Greek term was used
in a bad sense, yet without the technical mea-
ning of “schism,” which meant a
dogmatic and organizational break.
Heresies were to be expected before the end time, while the possibility
of
schisms were to be rejected.
HERETH (הרת, to cut) A forest between Adullam and Giloh, about
10.4 km
east of Beit Jibrin, in which David hid after his sojourn in Moab.
HERITAGE. There
is no clear distinction between the terms “inheritance” and
“heritage.” In the Revised Standard Version, heritage is
used for spiritual
things, inheritance is used for spiritual things.
Land
and territory were believed to come into possession of Hebrew
families by
heritage. They were theirs by divine
gift, not by conquest, and
were passed on by inheritance. Spiritual qualities, relationships with God,
and prosperity were accepted as part of the heritage.
HERMOGENES ( ErmogenhV, born of Hermes) Someone mentioned with
Phygelus as having deserted Paul.
HERMON, MOUNT (הרמון, from the root meaning
destruction) The moun-
tain which
forms the southern spur of the Anti-Lebanon
Range . Mount Her-
mon reaches
a height of about 2,700 meters, and its crown is seen from
many places in
Palestine. The impressive view of Mount
Hermon has
always fascinated people, and it has long been a sacred
mountain. Mount
Hermon was used as a
cult place also in later periods.
HEROD (FAMILY) (הורדוס, from the
root meaning descent) The dynasty
which under Rome ruled Jewish Palestine from 37 B.C.-70 A.D. (See also
the entry in the Old Testament Apocrypha /
Influences Outside the Bible
section of the Appendix.).
Assuming that Jesus was born in 6 B.C., he was born towards the
end of Herod the Great’s rule. Herod’s grandson was poisoned by his
remaining uncle; that uncle, Antipater, was the last of many executed by
Herod, only 5 days before Herod himself died in 4 B.C. The usurpation
of the throne by Herod and the many murders throughout his reign can't
be condoned. But, when taken in context with the common practice of
the royalty of his time, it must be said that his behavior mirrored that
found in Rome itself. The greatest condemnation of Herod would have
to be that he was as bad as all those around him who sought the power of
a throne. Josephus’ account shows that Herod felt only indifference and
unconcern for Jewish law and ethics.
Certainly his unadmirable career discloses qualities which, if ad-
Certainly his unadmirable career discloses qualities which, if ad-
dressed to worthy purposes, would have appeared admirable. His rise to
power took place at a time of civil war and of internal upheavals. Out of
this chaos, he carved a relatively tranquil kingdom in his segment of the
Roman Empire. And within that kingdom that he paid so dearly for, he
established a high degree of order and peace in the midst of chaos.
Archelaus was aware of the Jews’ broad hostility to his family.
H-37
Archelaus was aware of the Jews’ broad hostility to his family.
He placated his own countrymen through kindliness and forbearance and
by the gesture of deferring his ascension to the throne until the kingship
willed to him by his father could be confirmed by Rome. His intentions
were frustrated first by a revolt in 4 B.C., and second by his brother
Antipas, who contested his right to the throne. He went to Rome to plead
his case, but before a decision could be rendered, a third Jewish deputa-
tion was in Rome to plead for autonomy.
Augustus’ decision divided the kingdom into halves. He named
Augustus’ decision divided the kingdom into halves. He named
Archelaus ethnarch, rather than king, of Judea, Idumea, and Samaria. In
the other half, Antipas became the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, & Philip
the tetrarch of several small northeastern regions. The brutal treatment by
Archelaus of Jews and Samaritans caused people to go to Rome to de-
nounce him to Augustus. Archelaus was banished to France in 6 A.D.
The tetrarchy of Herod Philip, Herod and Cleopatra’s son, inclu-
The tetrarchy of Herod Philip, Herod and Cleopatra’s son, inclu-
ded Batanea, Trachonitis, and nearby districts northeast of the Sea of
namely that it was one of tranquility and prosperity. There is some con-
fusion as to who Philip’s wife was. It is most likely that Mark 6 is in
error in speaking of Herodias as the wife of Philip. Philip’s wife was
Herodias’ daughter, Salome, who dance for Herod right before the behea-
ding of John the Baptist. When Philip died without issue in 34, his tetrar-
chy was for three years attached to Syria, but in 37 it was assigned to
Agrippa I.
Herod Antipas was a younger brother of Archelaus, son of Herod
and Malthace. He was named tetrarch of Galilee and Perea. He founded
the city of Tiberias by the Sea of Galilee. Antipas met Herodias, the wife
of Herod II, and wanted her. Antipas divorced the daughter of the Naba-
tean king and married Herodias. John the Baptist was put to death, either
because of fear of rebellion, or John’s criticism of Antipas’ marriage to
Herodias.
War broke out in 36 between Antipas and Aretas, king of Nabatea;
Antipas’ army was destroyed. Agrippa, the brother of Herodias, was
given the territory previously held by the tetrarch Philip, & received the
title of king in 37. Antipas went to Rome seeking a more royal title, but
due to some damning charges by Agrippa, Antipas was banished to Lyons
in France in 39.
Agrippa, son of Herod the Great’s son Aristobulus, had been in
Rome since he was 6 years old. In 23 or 29 A.D. financial need brought
him to Palestine. After several failed attempts at employment, he man-
aged to borrow money in Alexandria and returned to Rome. There he
succeeded in becoming a protégé of Caligula. When indiscreetly he ex-
pressed openly the wish that Caligula would soon succeed Tiberius, the
latter cast Agrippa into jail. After Caligula acceded to the throne, he gran-
ted to Agrippa the tetrarchy of Philip.
On arriving in Palestine Agrippa incurred the jealousy of Herod
Antipas; thereafter Antipas lost his tetrarchy, which came to be added to
Agrippa’s possession. Agrippa was helpful in the ascent of Claudius to
the Roman throne, and gained more territory as a result. From 41-44
Agrippa as king ruled over virtually the same land that Herod the Great
ruled over. He died at the age of 54, survived by three daughters and a 17
year-old son named Agrippa. Until he was old enough, the kingdom was
reduced to a province.
At the age of 23, Agrippa II succeeded an uncle and brother-in-law,
Herod, to the throne in Chalcis. A little later Nero added to his territory
portions of Galilee & Perea; thereby Agrippa was king over part of Judea.
Little is related about Agrippa II in subsequent times, and this little is most
unfavorable. When the rebellion against Rome broke out in 66, Agrippa’s
troops participated in the assault on Jerusalem by Cestius Gallus. The
emperor Galba was murdered before Agrippa reached Rome; Vespasian
was now elected emperor. At the end of the war, in 70, Agrippa had addi-
tional territories added to his possessions. He and Bernice moved to
Rome around 75. There Bernice was the mistress of Titus. The end of
the Herodian dynasty came to an end with his death in 100.
Herod’s Family in the New Testament (NT)—Virtually all that is
told in the NT about the members of the family of Herod is either missing
or different from what Josephus reports. What follows is a comparison
between the NT and Josephus material on the Herod family:
1. Acts 12 relates that Agrippa [I] persecuted the church, slay-
ing James the son of Zebedee and arresting Peter, who was re-
leased from jail by angels. Agrippa, angry with the people of Tyre
and Sidon responded with a speech. “An angel of the Lord smote
him, . . . he was eaten by worms and died.”
In Josephus’ Antiquities, he relates that Agrippa, on seeing an
owl, was seized with abdominal pains, taken to his palace, and died
there five days later.
H-38
2. After Paul has appealed to Caesar, it is related that when
Agrippa [II] & Bernice arrived at Caesarea, Festus laid Paul’s case
before the king (Acts 25). Agrippa gave Paul permission to speak.
Agrippa and Festus agreed that Paul had done nothing to deserve
death or imprisonment.
Not one word of the narrative is found in Josephus.
3. The passages in Mark 6, Matthew 14, and Luke 3 relate the
circumstances of the death of John the Baptist. Mark calls Antipas
“king”; Luke correctly designates him tetrarch. The name Antipas
does not appear in the NT. The NT knows nothing of the “seven
veils” in which legend dressed Salome. In Luke 13, the Pharisees
told Jesus that Herod wanted to kill him. In a third passage, found
only in Luke 23, Pilate, learning that Jesus was a Galilean, brought
him to Antipas. Jesus answered none of Antipas’ questions. Herod
and his soldiers mocked him and sent him back to Pilate. The ab-
sence of a comparable passage in Mark, Matthew, and John sug-
gests strongly that this passage is legendary.
The account in Josephus of John’s death is bare. The “seven
veils” of Salome in Josephus is probably an embellishment. There
is no mention of Herod’s intent to kill Jesus, or of Jesus’ appea-
rance before him.
4. Only Matthew mentions Archelaus.
Josephus’ account of Archelaus can be found in the fourth
paragraph of this article.
5. Paul in Romans 16 sends greetings to the family of Aristo-
bulus.” The conjecture that this Aristobulus is Herod the Great's
grandson is farfetched.
6. Drusilla is mentioned in passing (Acts 24) as one of Felix’s
three wives, and as the third and youngest daughter of Agrippa I.
In 53 or 54 she married the Roman procurator of Palestine, Felix.
7. Bernice, the sister of Agrippa II is mentioned in Acts 25.
No mention is made of this incident in Josephus’ accounts.
8. While not a Herodian, Felix was married to a Herodian
(Acts 23).
For Josephus’ account of Felix, see Biblical entry on Felix,
paragraph 2.
9. Luke 1 states that the events described in the gospel began
“in the days of Herod [the Great].”
Mat. 2 states that “Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in
the days of Herod the King.” The 3 Wise Men and the “slaughter
of the innocents” is a part of Matthew’s account. Those who have
assessed this material have expressed a range of judgment from
full confidence through full skepticism. The price of skepticism as
to the reliability of ascribing Jesus' birth to the last year Herod the
Great’s reign is that the precise year of his birth becomes quite
unknown. It is, however, the price which strict historical study
demands.
All the above NT material is absent from Josephus.
10. For the Herodians see separate Biblical entry.
11. Herodias is mention in Mark 6 as first the wife of Herod
Philip. She was the second wife of Herod Antipas, and he was her
second husband. She had a hand in the death of John the Baptist.
Actually, Herodias’ first husband was most likely Herod II,
not Herod Philip.
12. Philip is mentioned in Luke 3 in order to fix the chrono-
logy of John the Baptist. Luke describes his tetrarchy as Ituraea
and Trachonitis. Philip plays no role in the gospel. He was the
son of Herod the Great and of Cleopatra of Jerusalem. The city of
Caesarea Philippi was founded by him. Philip married Salome,
the daughter of Herodia.
13. Salome was the daughter of Herodias; we get the name
from the historian Josephus, the daughter in Matthew 14, Mark 6,
and Luke 3 is unnamed. Salome danced before her stepfather,
Herod Antipas on his birthday. She asked for and received John
the Baptist’s head on a platter.
Josephus is silent on the above incident. Modern, liberal scho-
larship regards it as legendary. On the assumption of a historically
reliable account, the problem of the age of Salome at the time of
the incident is frequently raised. It is argued by some that Salome
could scarcely have been a young maiden at the time she danced,
since her husband-to-be was 50; if Salome danced at all, she must
have been 45 or 50.
The best judgment of the gospels is that they are religious tracts
rather than historical research; the material they include about the Herod
family is clearly legendary. It is used primarily to set chronology and to
relate Christianity to its Jewish background. The NT material on Herod’s
family adds virtually nothing to the knowledge of them. It increases the
perplexities rather than illuminating dark places.
H-39
HERODIANS (’Herwdianoi (hare od ee ah noy)) Literally adherents of Herod or as one scholar put it: those among the Jews who . . . Desired the resto-
ration of the national kingdom under the sons of Herod.” In 3 passages
(Mark 3 and 12; Matthew 22), the Herodians are mentioned as opponents
of Jesus, along with the Pharisees; the Herodians are not mentioned in
Luke or John.
The problems we face are: a more specific identification of the “He-
rodians” than just a Herod or their dynasty; an answer to why Luke avoids
the term altogether; and making the Herodians synonymous with the
Sadduccees. More specific identification of the “Herodians” from the 3
passages is impossible because of their vagueness. If some specific
identification must be made, the best is that they are followers of Herod
Antipas.
The avoidance of the term by Luke may be a deliberate attempt
by Mark, whom Luke uses, to avoid the more far-fetched assumptions.
Finally there is nothing in Matthew which actually identifies the Herodians
with the Sadducees, for Matthew 16 merely substitutes the Sadducees
for the Herodians of Mark 8. There's no direct statement in the gospels
which equates Herodians and Sadducees.
HERODIAS ( ‘HrodiaV ) A
wife of Herod Antipas and the daughter of Aristo-
bulus and Bernice;
granddaughter of Herod the Great. Herodias’ exact
dates are unknown beyond
placing her between 1-50 A.D.
Herodias was first married to one of her uncles. Mark 6 and Mat-
Herodias was first married to one of her uncles. Mark 6 and Mat-
thew 14 identify him as Philip. From historical data outside of the Bible,
it
is more like the uncle’s name is Herod.
Herod Antipas was a half bro-
ther of the first husband of Herodias. Antipas had divorced his first wife,
a
Nabatean princess, to make room for Herodias. John the Baptist de-
nounced this marital
irregularity. After Salome’s dance and
demand John
was beheaded. According to the historian Josephus, Herodias
prevailed
upon the reluctant Antipas to go to Rome to petition Caligula to make
him
king. Instead, the emperor banished
Antipas to Lyons, and Herodias ac-
companied him there.
HERODION (‘Hrwdiwn) A Christian man greeted in Romans 16 by Paul,
who
called him a fellow countryman.
HERODIUM (‘Hrwdeion (hare od ay ee on)) A
fortress palace and tomb
monument some 6 km southeast of Bethlehem . The ruins of
the Herodian
citadel are still visible.
Herodium was both a desert retreat & part of a chain of fortresses
Herodium was both a desert retreat & part of a chain of fortresses
Herod erected to
protect his kingdom. After 40 B.C., when
he was attacked
by hostile Jews nearby, he erected a fortress called Herodium
on the Idu-
mean frontier, & the luxurious palace by the same name near
Bethlehem.
Herod artificially raised and
crowned the hill with a ring of three concentric
walls with round towers at the
four cardinal directions. A grand
stairway of
200 white marble steps mounted to the citadel; an expensive
aqueduct
was built to provide water.
Under Roman administration Herodium was
the capital of one of 11 toparchies. As one of the three last
stronghold of
Jewish resistance, Herodium was reduced by Lucilius Bassus in 72
A.D.
HERON
(אנפה (an aw faw), unclean bird)
Any of a family of wading birds
with a long thin neck and long legs,
whose haunt is water, and whose food
is fish and other water animals. In the 1800s, Tristam found 7 varieties
of heron common in the lake regions of Palestine in his day.
HESHBON (השבון, an accounting or understanding)
An important city in the
northern part of Greater Moab, the city of Sihon, king
of the Amorites,
about 80 km due east of Jerusalem. The city about it was bitterly contes-
ted between Moab and Israel; it was conquered by Eglon of Moab & won
back by
Israel in the time of the judges. The
territory then remained perma-
nently Israelite until after Ahab's death. From that time on, it remained in
Moabite hands. Around 600 B.C., Heshbon
seems to have fallen into the
hands of the Ammonites. In the period of Greek influences, it was
part of
the Nabatean kingdom. After the
fall of the Jewish state, Heshbon was an-
nexed to the Roman province of Syria.
HESHMON (השמון, rich soil)
A town in southwestern part of Judah; it may be
the source of the word
“Hasmonean,” another label for the Maccabee
family.
H-40
HETH (הת, terror) An ancestor and
originator of the name for the Hittites; it
appears in the story of the acquisition
of the cave of Machpelah by
Abraham.
HETHLON (התלן, covered place) A place on the hypothetical northern
border
of Israel (Ezekiel 47).
HEWERS OF WOOD (עצים חטבי (khaw ta by ‘ates eem)) One of the lowest
classes of Servant. These workers are to be distinguished from those who
felled trees for building purposes. These are really gatherers of fire-wood,
listed last among covenanting people.
HEXATEUCH. The
modern scholarly designation of the first 6 books of the
Bible. It had been apparent to scholars for a long
time that the Pentateuch,
traditionally understood to be the work of Moses, was
not only a composite
of different strands, but the truncated section of a more
extensive composi-
tion. It must have
included the book of Joshua, if there was to be a suitable
conclusion to the
story of Israel’s beginning.
The Promised Land theme
demands the fulfillment related in the
conquest & settlement found in
Joshua. Source analysis located the
fami-
liar Pentateuchal sources in that book.
The composite narrative was as-
signed to the combination of Jahwist and
Elohwist, while the boundary lists
and other technical data were apparently the
work of the Priestly writer.
The whole
book bore the unmistakable stamp of Deuteronomic redaction.
It was generally agreed that the Priestly Writer
was present in Joshua but
did not extend beyond it.
In recent scholarship, the Hexateuchal
reconstruction has come un-
der suspicion.
It is clear that the Hexateuch and the Deuternomic history
represent
overlapping and conflicting reconstructions.
In the larger biblical
narrative, Joshua is in the middle, with strong
connections in both direc-
tions. The claims
made for the integrity of the Deuteronomic history have
more evidence to
commend them than those of the Hexateuch.
It
may be best to postulate the existence of two major and slightly
overlapping
works covering the books from Genesis through Kings: the
combined Jahwist, Elohwist, and Priestly
history, plus an account of the
conquest and settlement in the Promised Land;
and the Deuteronomic his-
tory beginning with Moses’ farewell speeches and coming
down to the fall
of Judah and the Exile.
The editor who combined these two strands either
removed the last part
of the Jahwist, Elohwist, and Priestly account or blen-
ded it into the present
book of Joshua. The term “Hexateuch” has
proved
useful in the history of criticism, but it is doubtful whether the
literary com-
position it designated ever existed as an independent entity.
HEZEKIAH (הזקיה, strength of the Lord) 1. King
of Judah (715-687 B.C.);
son and successor of Ahaz.
Hezekiah came to the throne at the age of
25 and reigned 29 years.
Hezekiah was
remembered by later generations as an able and vigorous
ruler and a pious king.
He came to the throne at a critical
time. Israel had
fallen in 722-721 B.C. into the hands of Sargon
II, Judah had been seri-
ously weakened by the Syro-Ephraimitic
War and by the Edomites and
Philistines.
The annual tribute to Assyria was an intolerable burden upon
her
resources. Further, religious conditions
under Ahaz had become chao-
tic. People
were beginning to see that only the power of Yahweh could
save them from the
might of Assyria.
Unquestionably,
a religious reform took place. The
disastrous fall
of Israel to the north was powerfully used by the contemporary
prophets
Isaiah and Micah to point to the moral of a return to the worship of
Yah-
weh. It may be contended that
Hezekiah’s interests were largely political,
but the distinction between
religious enthusiasm and patriotism was not
always easy to see in ancient
Israel. Hezekiah removed the high
places,
broke down the pillars, and cut down the Asherah. These & other reforms
would not have the
support of all the people, and the inevitable reaction
came during the reign
of Hezekiah’s son Manasseh.
The Chronicler has a long account of the religious reformation in II
The Chronicler has a long account of the religious reformation in II
Chronicles
29-31. The restoration of the temple was
followed by a great
celebration of the Passover. Then the whole land, including the northern
territories of Ephraim and Manasseh was cleansed of idolatry. What took
3 chapters to describe in II Chronicles,
is given only one verse in II Kings
18.
The tendency has been to disregard in large measure the account of
is based on reliable traditions. Isaiah makes no specific reference to any The tendency has been to disregard in large measure the account of
the
Chronicler. Such a judgment, however, is
unwarranted, as his material
reformation during his time, perhaps because he saw that the real motive
was
not a religious one, and because the religious reform was successful
only in part.
There is also no reason to doubt that Hezekiah’s messengers met
H-41
There is also no reason to doubt that Hezekiah’s messengers met
with little success in Ephraim and Manasseh, but had
limited success in
Asher and Zebulun farther to the north. The Assyrians probably saw the
importance of
having a place of worship to rival the official place in Jeru-
salem. That the sending of messengers had political
implications is certain.
Hezekiah’s other concern was to strengthen Judah politically. He
Hezekiah’s other concern was to strengthen Judah politically. He
began to strengthen the defenses of
Jerusalem. He cut through the solid
rock in order to bring the water of the
Gihon spring into the city. Sargon
records a victorious campaign against Aziru, Ashdod's king, but apparently
Hezekiah did not join in this rebellion in 711.
Six years later Sargon died,
& widespread intrigue began. In all probability Hezekiah intrigued openly
both with Merodach-baladan of Babylon & the Ethopian Pharaoh Shabako
against
Assyria; he withheld his tribute. Hezekiah also saw an opportunity
to retaliate
against the Philistines.
After
settling affairs in his eastern kingdom, Sennacherib turned to
the west. In 701 Sennacherib invaded Palestine and in
an extensive cam-
paign put down the rebellion.
A large Egyptian and Ethiopian army had
marched to relieve Ekron, but it
was defeated. Then Sennacherib turned
against the fortified cities of Judah, such as Lachish and Debir. While the
siege of Lachish was still in
progress, Hezekiah, seeing that further resis-
tance was useless, sent a message
to Sennacherib offering to surrender &
promising to pay whatever tribute was
imposed upon him. Hezekiah took
all the
silver from the temple and the royal treasuries, and “stripped the
gold from
the doors of the temple of the Lord.
II Kings 18-19 raises many difficult problems, as it contains a
II Kings 18-19 raises many difficult problems, as it contains a
second list of demands from
Sennacherib. Also, the siege of Libnah
was
interrupted by news of an approaching Egyptian army under Tirhakah, but
Tirhakah did not become king until 689 B.C., 12 years after the original
story. From the evidence available to us
it is not possible to reconstruct
the history of subsequent events. It seems preferable to adopt the hypo-
thesis
that the existing story is made up of 2 campaigns, the second of
which took place between 689-686 and was made memorable by a plague
which
decimated the Assyrian army.
2. An ancestor of the prophet Zephaniah (Zephaniah 1). 3. Son
2. An ancestor of the prophet Zephaniah (Zephaniah 1). 3. Son
of Neariah,
descendant of the royal family of Judah (I Chronicles 3).
4. Head
of a family whose descendants returned with Nehemiah from
Babylonian exile.
(Nehemiah 7).
HEZION (הזיון, vision) Grandfather of Ben-hadad I of Syria (I Kings 15)
HEZIR (הזיר, swine, boar) 1. A
descendant of Aaron; the ancestor and origin
of the name of a priestly house in
King David’s time. 2. One of the
chiefs of the people who sign
the covenant of Ezra (Nehemiah 10).
HEZRO
(הצרו, protected) A
Carmelite who is numbered among David’s Thirty
mighty men. (I Samuel 23).
HEZRON (הצרון, enclosed, protected) 1.
The ancestor and origin of the
name for a clan of the tribe of Reuben. 2. The
ancestor & origin of the
name of a clan of the tribe of Judah. The name is included in both of the
New Testament genealogies (Genesis 46; Numbers 26; I Chronicles 2;
Matthew 1; Luke
3). 3. A city on the southern border of Canaan,
be-
tween Kadesh-barnea and Addar.
H-42
No comments:
Post a Comment