Monday, September 12, 2016

H-He

      H
H.  The abbreviation biblical scholars use for the “Holiness Code,” which
        designates a legal section of Priestly material in Leviticus 17-26, most
        likely written sometime either side of 700 B.C.

HAAHASHTARI (
האחשתרי) A family of the tribe of Judah. 

HABAIAH (חביה, whom the Lord protects) An ancestor whose name became
        the name of a family of returned exiles claiming priestly descent, but 
        unable to document their claim, and therefore denied priesthood rights.

HABAKKUK (
חבקוק, embrace) A cultic prophet of Judah who lived during 
        the last days of Josiah (640-609 B.C.) and under the reign of Jehoiakim 
        (609-598 B.C.). The book by that name is 8th among the minor prophets
        in the Old Testament canon.
                   The origin of the name Habakkuk is uncertain. The prophet may
        be the same one mentioned in the Apocryphal Bel and the Dragon as “the
        son of Jesus of the tribe of Levi.” (See also the Habakkuk and the Bel &
        the Dragon entry in Old Testament Apocrypha/ Influence Outside the 
        Bible section of the appendix.) Based on this, he may be linked to the 
        priesthood.
                   Many scholars consider the book to constitute a unity, possibly a
        liturgy for a day of penitence. The Dead Sea Scrolls copy of this book 
        does not include chapter 3. Direct divine utterance, spoken through the
        mouth of an official and authorized mediator or cultic prophet, had its 
        place within the liturgy of any particular day in ancient Israel's cult. It 
        fell to the temple prophets in the cult of Judah to attend to the position
        of the temple singers. 
                   The cultic songs associated with the rituals of lamentation, while
        sung in the congregation’s name, would actually be rendered by profes-
        sionals, because not many of the common people were at home in the 
        appropriate ritual details. The songs were not sung with music books 
        before them, but from memory. It is likely that most of the songs come
        from the hearts and minds of the men who belonged to the profession 
        of temple singers. If the prophet Habakkuk was such a prophet, he was
        very familiar with cultic compositions.
                   Following the title comes the prophetic lament. The date is appro-
        ximately 598 B.C. The first destructive blow of the Babylonian might has
        fallen upon Judah. Here is sounded the note of national lamentation: “O 
        Lord, how long?” Habakkuk sees, taking place before his very eyes, and
        seemingly ignored by God, destruction and violence on a vast scale. Law
        has surrendered to force, so that righteousness has no opportunity. The 
        wicked are strong enough to throttle the power of justice.
                   But what is taking place in history has meaning. The prophet 
        discerns that it is the mighty God who is using the powerful Chaldean 
        nation set on world conquest. No one lacking faith could see anything 
        good for Judah or for the entire Near East in what was being done by the
        Chaldeans. One is not surprised at Habakkuk’s protest to God. He is 
        convinced that the Chaldeans express upon Judah the Lord’s judgment 
        and the Lord’s chastisement. But how can this be? How can the Lord 
        permit the Chaldeans to sap Judah’s strength?
                   Habakkuk evidently had a high retreat to which he was accustomed
        to go, where he might brood over his problems and await God’s message
        in such an hour when he desperately needed light. He designated his 
        retreat as “the tower,” to which he went to await in eager spiritual recepti-
        vity Yahweh’s word. The content of it was to be an abiding truth which 
        one must wait for in spiritual sensitivity and with hushed eagerness of 
        expectation. His revelation came in two simple parts. First, “He whose 
        soul is not upright in him shall fail (i.e. the nation or person that proceeds
        upon a policy that is not erect, upright, honest, just, or morally straight, 
        shall fail. The second part is “The righteous [be it nation or person] shall
        live by his faith.”

H-1

              Habakkuk lifted against figures of arrogant, wealthy oppressors a
        series of five woes.  The 1st woe deals with Nebuchadrezzar’s lust for
        tribute.  The 2nd lifts into the open the purpose of the Chaledan pillage
        and plunder—to make the empire so strong materially that no nation 
        would dare challenge it. The 3rd focuses upon the Chaldean oppressor's 
        cruelty.  The 4th solemnly teaches that the Chaldean dealings toward his 
        neighbors in merciless power will rebound upon the Chaldean nation. 
        The 5th is a rebuke to the Chaldean worship of their gods, Bel, Shamash,
        and Marduk.  He contrasts the man-made idols with the invisible but 
        potently present Lord in his holy temple, before whose majestic face the
        entire earth is summoned to awed silence.     
                   Among the Dead Sea Scrolls there is a Habakkuk commentary,    
        which neither contains nor refers to chapter 3.  This supports the view 
        that this chapter was not part of the original book.  After an opening title
        which designates the chapter “a prayer of Habakkuk . . .”, comes a majes-
        tic poem on Yahweh’s advent. The poet remembers Yahweh’s work, & he 
        pictures the holy God coming from Teman in Edom.  God’s destructive 
        power is pictured in mythological terms.  As Yahweh battled with chaos,
        now it is with the destructive Chaldeans that the mighty God is angry, as
        God goes forth to save his people.  The prophetic liturgy & the psalm con-
        clude in triumph.  It is trust in God, a magnificent expression of faith's vic-
        tory over all misfortune.                                      
                   The three chapters of Habbakuk is filled with truths which stand at 
         the core of Hebrew religion:
                                                                                                                       
   History has meaning if one takes        God can overrule an evil nation for
         the long view.                                        for God’s righteous purpose 
         Uprightness in the soul is neces-        Evil is bound to finally fail, even 
          sary for individuals & nations.             though it may seem victorious.  
         The righteous shall live by faith.          Wealth is treacherous as basis of 
    Trust in God is only sure basis of              human dependence for security.
         strength, regardless of external      Ruthless dealings rebound upon 
               situations.                                              the doer.    
          Faith’s ultimate joy is communion
               with God.                      

HABAZZINIAH (חבצניה) Grandfather of the Rechabites who were tested by
        Jeremiah.

HABERGEON (שריון (shir yone), coat of mail) The King James Version
        translation of shuryon (See Biblical entry for Coat of Mail). Armor originally
        for the neck and shoulders but later reaching to the thighs or lower.

HABIRU, HAPIRU. The name of a group of people. The 2 versions stem from
        the fact that the word is from the Ugarit language, in which b and p are 
        interchangeable. The word seems originally to have been the denotation
        of a social class, though this is very uncertain.
                   The Habiru's earliest occurrence is found in texts dating from the
        Third Dynasty of Ur (roughly around 2050 B.C.). After that they are men-
        tioned in texts from all important archives in the Near East. The Habiru
        often appear in the service of one king or another, & more particularly
        in many cases as soldiers. Some Habiru people have West Semitic 
        names, but some have Akkadian or even non-Semitic names. Such facts
        have led scholars to believe that Habiru is not an ethnic term but rather 
        denotes some kind of social group. They seem to occupy a position be-
        tween the free citizens and the slaves.
                   But there are texts where “Habiru” seems to have more to do 
        with an ethnic group. In the Amarna Letters the Habiru people appear
        as a separate ethnic group with West Semitic names. The most likely 
        reason is that the word may originally have been used to indicate a
        social class, and eventually it developed into an ethnic term. In that 
        case we may compare “Habiru” with “Canaanite,” which also originally
        may have denoted a social class. Where Abraham is called “the Hebrew”
        (Genesis 14), the term could be either social or ethnic. Generally the
        term “Hebrew” in the Old Testament is an ethnic term. It seems proba-
        ble that Habiru is an Akkadian form related to the Hebrew form. In all 
        probability, the Hebrew people were a branch of the Habiru.

HABOR (חבור, strong) A tributary of the Euphrates, flowing into the latter 
        from the northeast. Some of the Israelites were exiled to the banks of the
        Habor by Shalmaneser in King Hosea’s ninth year.

HACALIAH (חכליה) The father of Nehemiah.
H-2

HACHILAH
(
חכילה) A hill in the Ziph neighborhood where David took refuge
        when pursued by Saul. It is in the neighborhood of Hebron, but the site has
        not been identified.

HACHMONI (חכמוני , wisdom (?))      1. The family of Jashobeam, one of 
        David’s Mighty Men.       2. The family of Jehiel, a servant of David.

HADAD (הדד, thunderer(?))       1. The eighth son of Ishmael (Genesis 25).      
        2. A king of Edom (Genesis 36).      3. Another king of Edom (Genesis 36).
                   4. A member of Edom’s royal house who escaped to Egypt when 
        David conquered Edom, and later revolted against Solomon. There is a 
        theory that I Kings 11 combines 2 accounts, one of Hadad the Edomite &
        one of Adad the Midianite. Convincing reasons have been given for identi-
        fying this Hadad with #3 above. 
                   5. The ancient Semitic storm-god who as the great Baal of the Uga-
        ritic pantheon figured in the struggle of Israel's religion against Canaanite
        religion.

HADADEZER (הדדעזר, whose help is Hadad) A king of Zobah, defeated by 
        David, who extended his control as far as the Upper Euphrates. The con-
        flict between Zobah and Israel had begun in the reign of Saul.
                   The Old Testament preserves 3 accounts of campaigns by David
        which involved Hadadezer. 1st, in II Samuel 10, a coalition of Aramean
        rulers who had come to the relief of the besieged city of Rabbah were
        defeated by Joab. 2nd, in the same chapter a battle is described at Helam
        between David and a new army of Hadadezer under Shobach; this army
        was also defeated. 3rd, in Chapter 8, another defeat of Hadadezer is 
        described “as he went to restore his power at the river Euphrates.” Some
        critics think the above are all different events; others feel that the 
        second and third deal with the same series of events.

HADADRIMMON (הדדרמון, thunderer, pomegranate, also the names of 2
        Syrian deities.) A deity for whom public mourning was made in Pale-
        stine 's great central plain by Megiddo. It was probably a rite which
        had its mythical counterpart in the mourning for the dead Baal by his
        sister, the goddess Anat.

HADASHAH (הדשה, new) A village of Judah in Shephelah district of Lachish;
        identification remains uncertain. 

HADASSAH (הדסה, myrtle) Either original Hebrew name of Esther or the 
        Akkadian title of bride given to her.

HADID (הדיד, sharp) A town of Benjamin overlooking the coastal plain at
        the Shephelah's northwest extremity, about 5.5 km northeast of Lydda.
        It constituted the ancestral homeland of more than 720 exiles who re-
        turned from Babylonia. All Old Testament references to the site are 
        post-exilic.

HADLAI (הדלי, forsaken) An Ephraimite person or family.

HADORAM (
הדורם, honor)    1. An Arabian tribe, called the first-born of 
        Joktan.      2. Son of Tou the king of Hamath.      3. An official of King
        Rehoboam who was in charge of the forced labor.

HADRACH (הדרך) A town in the northwestern part of Lebanon.

HA-ELEPH (האלף, the friend, the thousand) A city in Benjamin, whose 
        name should probably read “Zela-ha-eleph,” and is perhaps modern
        Salah, between Jerusalem and Gibeon.

HAGAB (הגב, locust) Head of a family of Nethinim among the returned exiles.

HAGABAH (הגבה, locust) Head of a family of Nethinim among the returned 
        exiles; evidently to be distinguished from Hagab.
H-3

HAGAR  (הגר, flightThe maid whom Sarah gave as a concubine to Abraham
        and who became the mother of Ishmael.  The Hagar stories have been   
        preserved primarily by the Jahwist writer and the Elohwist writer, with 
        few verses from the Priestly writer.  
                   In the first story Hagar is identified as barren Sarai's Egyptian 
        handmaid, given to Abram for children.  When Hagar became pregnant,
        she assumed an arrogant attitude that infuriated her mistress.  With 
        Abram’s permission, Sarai treated Hagar so harshly that she fled into 
        the wilderness of Shur.  At a spring the angel of Yahweh appeared to 
        announce that she was to bear a son from whom would come a multitude
        of descendants and whose name was to be Ishmael (“God has heard").  
                   The second story presumably occurs several years after Ishma-
        el's birth. Sarah was seized by the fear that Hagar might become an heir
        alongside her own son.  She demanded the expulsion of Hagar and Ishma-
        el.  Hagar fled to the dry Wilderness of Beer-sheba, where God's  angel 
        showed her a well.  He assured her that Ishmael wouldn't die but would
        become a great nation.  Ishmael grew up to live in the Wilderness of 
        Paran, to become an expert with the bow, and to marry an Egyptian 
        woman.  The Hagar traditions reflect the Hebrews' belief that they were
        related to the wild, warlike Bedouin peoples to the south of Palestine. 
        They both had Abraham as father, but their ancestral mother, of course,
        was the inferior concubine Hagar.                
                   In the New Testament, Paul makes allegorical use of the Hagar 
        story. Hagar & her son stand for the slavery of the covenant, in contrast
        to the freedom of the new covenant typified by Isaac.

HAGGAI  (הגי, celebration) The tenth in the series of 12 short prophetic books
        which forms the final section of the Old Testament (OT). 
                   His name would suggest that the prophet was born on some feast
        day.  He would appear to have been a conspicuous figure, & Jewish tradi-
        tion has it that he was known as a prophet in Babylon during the Exile.  
        On the evidence of the very 1st verse he was active in Jerusalem in 520 
        B.C.  He doesn't appear to have been of the priestly caste, since he asks 
        the priests’ guidance. 
                   If he witnessed the temple before its destruction in 586, he was a 
        very old man when he became one of the prime movers for its restoration
        in 520.  In association with Zechariah he rouses the people of Jerusalem 
        and their leaders to undertake this task.  The work of restoration was be-
        gun almost immediately after his first appeal. It later tradition Haggai was
        associated with Zechariah and Malachi as joint founder of the the “Great 
        Synagogue.”
                   Haggai is the first of the collection of prophecy dating from the post-
        exilic period, the others being Zechariah & Malachi; Haggai is the shortest.
        Its two chapters are made up of four utterance delivered within the space of
        4 months in 520 B.C.  Haggai is referred to throughout in the third person
        & is described impersonally as “the prophet.” Moreover, the book serves as
        a record of the effect of the prophet’s words, & as a collection of his utter-
        ances.  The general view is that compilation was done by some unknown
        disciple not long after the time at which the oracles were first delivered.
                   According to the Cyrus Cylinder text, when the victorious Persian 
        king had taken possession of the Babylon’s territories, he gave general per-
        mission to minorities exiled there to return to their own countries if they 
        wished.  Contrary to the Chronicler’s rosy picture it seems more probable
        that only some Jews chose to go back, & that their first task was to eke out
        some kind of existence in a devastated land.
                   Under the leadership of Shesh-bazzar, “prince of Judah” & first ruler
        of what was now the Persian province of Judah, the repatriated exiles laid 
        the foundations of a new temple amid Jerusalem's ruins. It's more probable
        that the Chronicler, writing his narrative over 2 centuries later, has given an
        idealized account of what actually happened, to which the more sober con-
        temporary evidence of Haggai & Zechariah lends no support. Both of these
        writings tend to confirm that it was not until the emergence of Haggai as an 
        inspired leader that any serious steps were taken to restore the dilapidated
        temple.
                   Many Jews had preferred to remain in Babylon, including those who
        had established themselves most successfully.  Those who returned didn’t
        possess abundant means, and whatever zeal they had for the house of the
        Lord’s restoration was tempered by finding themselves among people who
        had become reconciled to the sight of the ruined sanctuary. The whole area
        with its courts would still be available as a sacred place for those who 
        wished to worship.  There is evidence that an altar for burnt offerings was 
        in use.  There are other indications that pagan cults had established them-
        selves side by side with Yahweh's worship.

H-4

                   Economic conditions must further have lowered the morale of those
        who were left among the fragments of the Jewish state.  The picture drawn
        by Haggai is of a people crippled by a succession of bad harvests & subse-
        quent poverty, so the period before Haggai’s emergence as a leader can't
        have been anything other than a dispiriting struggle for existence.  When
        Darius I succeeded Cambyses as ruler of the Persian Empire, revolts broke
        out throughout the subject provinces.  To a prophetic mind such as that of
        Haggai, this must have suggested the prelude to the end event of history.  
        With Zerubbabel, a scion of the house of David as governor of Judah, the
        time appeared to be ripe for the rehabilitation of the house of the Lord.
                   Haggai's 1st prophecy in August-September of 520 B.C., appeals to
        Zerubbabel & Joshua the high priest to rally the people to the shattered 
        temple’s rebuilding.  The drought and bad harvests from which they have
        suffered are God’s punishment for their impious neglect. Less than 3 weeks
        after that, work on the temple begins. A month later Haggai makes a 2nd
        appeal.  Apparently the builders had lost heart.  Haggai promises the mes-
        sianic kingdom’s advent and the Gentiles’ downfall.  Their treasures will 
        flow to Jerusalem.
                   The 3rd oracle’s meaning delivered 2 months later is rather obscure.
        It suggests that the prophet secures a decision from the priests to the effect
        that ritual uncleanness is more contagious than ritual holiness.  He may 
        mean that the previous unwillingness to rebuild had tainted their service of
        Yahweh, but now that they had started, their prosperity was assured. On
        the other hand, “this people” may refer to the Samaritans, & that Haggai is 
        recommending that their offer of help should be rejected on political rather
        than religious grounds.  In the last oracle, Haggai proclaims the end of 
        Gentile domination in the Day of the Lord.
                   The value of the book is historical rather than religious.  The prophe-
        cies represent a sad decline from the ethical vigor & conviction of the pre-
        exilic prophets.  Haggai’s chief concern is the cult's re-establishment, the 
        shell rather than the kernel.  Haggai takes the superficial view that material
        prosperity is assured provided the mechanics of worship are guaranteed. 
                   Yet on a long-term view it must be said that, without the temple and
        the Judaism which centered on it, the great prophets’ legacy would have 
        been quickly dissipated and Christianity would have had no foundations on
        which to build. The hope and encouragement Haggai’s message brought
        to Judah's dejected community at that time was a significant milestone 
        in the preparation of the good news.  From a historical point of view, the 
        book's value is that it forms a corrective to the Chronicler's inaccuracies &  
        sheds welcome light on the obscure period between Jerusalem's fall & 
        Nehemiah's achievements. 

HAGGEDOLIM  (הגדולים, the great onesThe father of Zabdiel, a priest 
        (Nehemiah 11).

HAGGI  (הגי, born on a feast dayThe second son of Gad; ancestral head of  
        the “family of the Haggites.”

HAGGIAH  (הגיה, festalA Levite; descendant of Merari.

HAGGITH  (הגית, born on a feast dayA wife of David; mother of Adonijah,  
        who later claimed the throne.

HAGIOGRAPHA (כתובים (keth oo beem), writingsThe term used for the 
        third division of the Hebrew Bible.  It is a miscellaneous collection of 11 
        varied books which achieved canonization separately.  The comparative 
        order of these books in the Hebrew and English Bible is listed below:
                                                                  
                          Hebrew Bible                                    English Bible  
        Psalms, Job, Proverbs (after                     Ruth (after Judges)
              Malachi) Ruth,                                    Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah 
                                                                                           (after Kings)
   Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes,               Esther   
   Lamentations                                           Job, Psalms, Proverbs
        Esther                                                       Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon
   Daniel                                                      Lamentations (after Jeremiah)
        Ezra, Nehemiah, Chronicles                    Daniel (after Ezekiel)    

HAGRI  (הגרי, fugitiveFather of Mibhar, one of the Mighty Men in David’s
        army (I Chronicles 11)

H-5

HAGRITE  (הגרי, fugitiveA pastoral Bedouin tribe living in the region east of
        GileadThey are named with the enemies of Israel who dwelt in the Trans-
        jordan.  In Saul's time the tribe of Reuben, perhaps with the assistance of
        the other Trans-jordan tribes, extended its territory to the edge of the desert
        by conquering the Hagrites. David gave Hagrites oversight of the flocks.

HAIL, HAILSTONES  (ברד (baw rod); אלגביש (el gaw beesh); calaza
        (kah lah za)Hail occurs as the result of violent turbulence in fully deve-
        loped cumulo-nimbus clouds, and frequently accompanies severe thunder-
        storms.  Raindrops within the cloud are carried to great heights where the
        temperature is below -18 C (0 F); the ice pellets grow in size as they are
        carried up & down, until they are too heavy for the wind to keep aloft. Hail-
        storms are recorded in the Bible as ruining crops and striking down men &
        animals in the open. The hailstones which killed the Amorites at Gibeon 
        must have come from an very heavy cumulonimbus.

HAIR  (שער (sah ‘ar)The hair’s capacity for constant growth has always    
        made it seem an important seat of life.  In the case of the Nazarite vow, 
        as in the case of Samson’s hair, the hair appears to have been left long
        in fulfillment of a vow.  The offering of the hair to the dead was part of
        ancient religious practices, but forbidden to the Hebrews; the complete 
        shaving of the head was forbidden for any purpose. In the Old Testament,
        long hair on men was greatly admired, but in the New Testament it is 
        frowned upon as contrary to nature. 

HAIRCLOTH  (בעל שער ( ba’al  sa har)A termed used in II Kings 1; the 
        King James Version translates: “He was a hairy man.”  The Revised Stan-
        dard Version translation is obviously right in view of the phraseology in 
        Matthew 3 and Mark 1.

HAKKATAN (הקטן, small oneA member of the family of Azgad; the father
        of a certain Johanan, who returned to Jerusalem from the Babylonian exile
        with Ezra.

HAKKOZ  (הקוץ, the thornAn ancestor & the source of the name of a family
        of priests in David’s time.   Members of this family were among those 
        unable to document their claim to priestly rank.  It is perhaps this family 
        that is represented by the Uriah who helped repair the wall of Jerusalem.

HAKUPHA  (הקופא, bentHead of a family of postexilic temple servants of 
        lower rank.

HALACHAH  (הלכה, walkThe authoritative Jewish way of life as expressed
        in moral law and ritual precept.  It embraces the whole body of Jewish    
        teaching, legislation, and practices from the interpretation of the laws of
        the Bible through Jewish teachers from Ezra onward.  Although legalistic
        in content, the Halachah is designed to bring all human occupations into
        relation with the service of God. 

HALAH  (הלהA city or district in the Assyrian Empire, to which Shalma-
        neser exiled some of the Israelites in the ninth year of King Hosea.  The
        Revised Standard Version changed the traditional translation from “the 
        exile of this host” to “the exiles in Halah.”

HALAK, MOUNT (ההר הלק (ha har  hal ak), bald mountainA mountain
        mentioned as the southern limit of the conquest of Joshua.  The name &
        site are preserved in the Jebel Halaq on the Wadi Marra's northwestern 
        side, north of Abdeh.

HALF-SHEKEL TAX  (didracmon (di drak monThe temple tax required 
        annually of every Jew; it was worth about 2 Attic drachmas, (about 36 
        cents).

HALF-TRIBE (חצי שבט (khay tsee  shay bet)A term used chiefly in Joshua
        and I Chronicles, & sparingly in Numbers & Deuteronomy, always with
        reference to Manasseh.  Half of the tribe, like Reuben & Gad, requested
        permission to settle east of the Jordan River.  Permission was granted on
        condition that they lead the military invasion of Canaan and help in the
        establishment of settlements west of the Jordan.  The half-tribe east of the
        Jordan was given a part of Gilead and all of Bashan. The other half-tribe
        settled in central Palestine, just north of Ephraim, southwest of Issachar,
        southeast of Asher.

H-6

HALHUL (הלול, trembling, terror) A city of Judah in the hill-country Beth-zur
        district; 6.4 km north of Hebron.
     
HALI  (הלי, ornament, necklaceA border town in the territory of Asher; it 
        must be near Helkath, but its exact location is unknown.

HALL  (1. לשכה (lish kaw), chamber; 2. אולם העמודים (oo lawm  ha’ 
        mood eem), porch of the pillars; 3 ולם הכסא (oo lawm  ha kis say), 
        porch of the throne or judgment; 4. המלך בית (beth  ha ma leck ), 
        house of the king; 5. בית משתיא (beth  mish tah ya), banquet house; 
        6. aulh (ow leh); 7.  raitwrion (rahee it or ee on))
                   1.  A hall or room connected with the sanctuary, in which the sacri-
        ficial meal was eaten, and to which Saul and his servant were invited by 
        Samuel (I Samuel 9). This word is also used of the chambers of various 
        officials in the Jerusalem temple.
                   2.  The Hall or Porch of Pillars was a part of King Solomon’s palace,
        most likely a pillared porch at the entrance of the House of the Forest of 
        Lebanon.  Others see it as a separate building.
                   3.  The Hall or Porch of the Throne (Judgment) was another of King
        Solomon’s buildings.  Here the kings gave their legal judgments.  Some
        scholars have made it a chamber at one end of the House of the Forest of
        Lebanon, with that building and pillared porch providing an impressive 
        entranceway to it.  Others have made it an audience chamber at the en-
        trance to the royal residence itself.
                   4.  The king’s hall or house was the Persian King Ahasuerusaudi-
        ence chamber.  It was a great room a little over 58 meters on each side, 
        with 6 rows of pillars, 6 pillars in each row supporting the roof. The pil-
        lars were 2.1 meters around and almost 20 meters high.
                   5. King Belshazzar’s banqueting hall or house was the scene of a
        feast & the handwriting on the wall; it was a great audience chamber, a
        rectangular room about 15 meters by 48 meters & probably had a vaul-
        ted roof. The floors were paved with brick, & the plastered walls were
        decorated with colorful scenes in tile.
                   6.  King James Version translates aule as hall; the Revised Stan-
        dard Version translates it as “courtyard.”  
                   7.  The King James Version translates praitorion as hall in refer-
        ence to the governor's. official residence. The Revised Standard Version
        uses “praetorium” to translate this word.               

HALLEL  (הלל, Praise thou!)  A song of praise to the Lord.  To praise the Lord
        was one of the Levites’ duties.  The “Egyptian” Hallel (Psalm 113-118), 
        according to a tradition of Jesus’ century, was composed by Moses. It cele-
        brates God’s great deeds from the Exodus till the messianic time and was 
        recited in the homes at the Passover meal.  The “Great” Hallel (Psalms 
        120-136) praises God for having given rain and food to all flesh.

HALLELUJAH (הללו־יה (Praise (ye) the Lord!)  The form of doxology used in
        the fifth book of Psalms and in the work of the Chronicler.
                   The root-word hallel is used in both a secular and a religious sense.
        The secular use is the reason for the Jews interpreting the cultic excla-
        mation “Hallelujah” as an imperative:  “Praise Yah!”  But there is a Jewish
        tradition that originally “Hallelujah” is a very ancient enthusiastic cultic 
        shout not containing the divine name. It may be that the verb hallel had be-
        fore the Exile a profane & “heathenish” sense. In any case, there is no rea-
        son to see in “Hallelujah” the root of the Israelite hymns.  The custom of 
        starting songs of praise with an imperative is older than Israelite literature
        or the “hallelujah” in the Psalms.
                   The psalms containing “hallelujah” praise the Lord for his power & 
        his wisdom in Psalms 104-106, 115-117, 135, 146-150.  The last group of 
        Psalms listed combines all these motives in a general praise of all that God
        did, does, & will do.  “Hallelujah” appears in III Maccabees 7; the Egyptian
        Jews, saved from the king’s elephants, sang it going home in Alexandria.
                   The use of “Hallelujah” in the Christian churches varies. In the Eas-
        tern churches it has a long & living tradition with a great musical richness.
        During the Middle Ages the custom arose of combining the long melody
        of the final syllable “jah” with some words in Latin.  Luther accepted (1523)
        the “hallelujah” after the lessons as “eternal voice of the church,” but 
        sought to banish it without success in 1526.

H-7

HALLOHESH  (הלוהש (charmer)The father of Shallum, who, with his
        daughters, helped repair the walls of Jerusalem under Nehemiah.

HAM (הם, violence)  1.  The second of Noah’s three sons.  After the Flood he
        shared in the divine blessing and covenant.  However, the early Jahwist
        story tells that when Noah awoke from his drunken sleep and “knew 
        what his youngest son had done to him,” he cursed Canaan and con-
        demned him to the service of Shem and Japheth.  Because of the two 
        different sources of this story, it is best to separate this story from the 
        flood tradition and to infer that the original order of Noah’s sons was:  
        Shem, Japheth, and Canaan.  To harmonize the two accounts, an editor
        identified Ham as the father of Canaan.  Ham’s name is used in Psalms
        78, 105, and 106 symbolically for Egypt since Egypt was one of his sons.

HAM  (הםA city of the Zuzim in the region east of the Jordan.  The name is
        preserved in the modern village of Ham about 6.4 km south of Irbid.  The
        nearby tell or mound shows evidence of a settlement in the Bronze and 
        Iron ages (1300-900 B.C.) and the remains of a triple wall built of very 
        large stones. 

HAMAN  (המן, magnificentThe Persian king Ahasuerus' prime minister &
        an enemy of the Jews in the book of Esther.  Because Mordecai, a Jew of
        the line of Kish & the uncle of Esther refused to bow before him, Haman
        contrived a plot to destroy all the Jews.  He had a gallows specially pre-
        pared for Mordecai.  But through Esther’s intervention, who was also the
        wife of Ahasuerus, Haman’s plot was revealed, & he met the fate he had
        planned for Mordecai.  Haman’s ten sons were killed too.  Some scholars
        view the story of Esther as reflecting a struggle between the gods of 
        Babylon & Elam.  Others regard it as romantic fiction created in connec-
        tion with the Feast of Purim.  Still others believe it records a genuine 
        event of the 400s B.C. 

HAMATH (המת, fortress) 1.  An important town between Damascus and 
        Aleppo on the Orontes in Syria.  Hamath was during long periods the 
        center of an independent kingdom, the southern frontier of which bor-
        dered on the northern frontier of the Israelite kingdom.  The earliest per-
        iod of settlement known goes back to Neolithic times (6000-4000 B.C.).
        The eighth level from the top found in excavation seems to correspond 
        to the Old Babylonian period.  From the Hyksos period there are no 
        findings.
                   Hamath is one of the important centers for the finding of Hittite 
        hieroglyphic inscriptions.  In the time of David, Hamath was the capital  
        of an important kingdom, with which David collaborated.  The latter 
        conquered King Hadadezer of Zobah, perhaps through the help of Toi of
        Hamath. After the North-South split, Jeroboam II seems to have re-esta-
        blished the frontiers of the northern Israelite kingdom, so that the south 
        frontier of Hamath again became the northern frontier of the Israelite 
        kingdom.  The power of the kingdom of Hamath is also recognizable in 
        Assyrian royal inscriptions.  In the Greek Age Hamath was still of 
        importance.                        
              2.  A town which was also called Hamath-Zobah.  This town is 
per-
        haps also mentioned in Ezekiel 47, & it is probably the same as Zobah.

HAMATH, ENTRANCE OF (לבא המת (lay bo  ha math)  The northern
        border of the Promised Land’s ideal limits and of Israel’s possession in
        the New Age.  Solomon’s kingdom extended from the Brook of Egypt 
        in the south to the entrance of Hamath.  It was somewhere in the On 
        Valley between the Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon Mountains.  Some place
        it between Mount Hermon and Mount Lebanon.  Since it is associated 
        with certain cities, it should probably be placed in the territory of Riblah.
        It is not improbable, as some have suggested, that “entrance to Hamath” 
        should be rendered as “Labo-Hamath”, a town name below Riblah. 

HAMATH-ZOBAH  (המת צובה, fortress stationA designation of the town
        of Zobah in II Chronicle 8.

HAMMATH  (המת, hot spring)  1.  The “father” of Rechab, or the home of 
        the Kenites of the family of Rechab.
                   2.  A fortified town in Naphtali.  It is located at Hammam Tabari-
        yeh, just south of Tiberias on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee.

H-8

HAMMEDATHA  (המדתאThe father of Haman, archenemy of the Jews in 
        the book of Esther.

HAMMELECH  (המלךInstead of “the son of Hammelech,” as in the King 
        James Version, the Revised Standard Version translate it as “the king’s 
        son.”  This phrase may refer to any member of the royal household.

HAMMER.  (מקבה (mak keh baw); פטיש (pat tesh); sfura (seh fur ah)) 
        The hammer stone, a smooth or shaped stone held in the hand, was used 
        from earliest times down through the biblical period.  Beginning in the 
        Bronze Age (3000-1200 B.C.), the stone was sometimes perforated for 
        better grip or to receive a handle.  The term makkebah is used of the tool 
        of the stonemason.  The pattesh of Jeremiah 23 is also a stonemason’s
        tool. The Greek equivalent of this word is sphura, which means any ham-
        mer ormallet.  In Jeremiah 51, the context favors the translation “battle  
        ax” or “war club” for the Hebrew word mappets.

HAMMOLECHETH  (המלכת, she who reignsThe sister of Gilead, the 
        source of a tribal name, and the ancestor of several tribal families of 
        Manasseh.

HAMMON  (המון, hot springs (?))  1.  A border town in Asher. It is perhaps
        to be identified with Umm el- ‘Awamid, about 8 km northeast of Ras en-
        Naqurab.      2.  A Levitical town in Naphtali.

HAMMUEL  (המואל, warmth of GodA family or clan of the Simeon tribe  
        (I Chronicle 4).

HAMMURABI.  6th king of Babylon’s 1st Dynasty (1792-1750 B.C.); Sin-
        muballit’s son; Samsu-iluna’s father. 
                   The history of the King Hammurabi’s reign is known only in its 
        outlines. Apart from royal inscriptions, there are a large number of politi-
        cal and administrative letters and the official names given to the 42 years
        that Hammurabi ruled over Babylon. These names refer to all kinds of 
        royal activities, such as special building projects, votive offerings, temple
        statues, pious works, and wars.  The historical section of the preamble to 
        the Code of Hammurabi presents more evidence as to his kingdom’s maxi-
        mum extent than any other inscription, though its tenor is clearly hymnic
        and not historical.  It mentions all the major cities ruled by Hammurabi. 
                   There exist two more stone inscriptions referring to Hammurabi 
        that were poetic in nature.  The first is on a very broken basalt stela in 
        Sumerian and Akkadian, an inscription of his conquests.  The second is 
        an inscription on a broken statue, which addresses the king in Sumerian 
        and Akkadian, in hymnic terms.  The correspondence of Hammurabi con-
        sists mainly of about 140 letters that he sent to high administrative offi-
        cials touching mostly on legal and administrative matters.
                   In the history of Mesopotamia, Hammurabi & his period represent
        a crucial phase in the development of Babylonian civilization as well as 
        in the history of the city of Babylon.  Under the five kings of Babylon 
        before him, the city led an inconspicuous existence.  It can safely be as-
        sumed that the political status of Babylon repeatedly shifted from indepen-
        dence to more or less effective control by Isin or Larsa.  It seems that 
        Babylon’s rise to power started with the father of Hammurabi, who had  
        victories over Ur and Isin. 
                   From Hammurabi’s 7th to his 11th year he conquered Uruk, Isin,
        Malgum, and Rapiqu.  The following years up to the 29th have names 
        that do not refer to war.  From his 30th year to the end of his reign he 
        engaged in nearly uninterrupted warfare.  Most of the names of the war 
        years refer to coalitions against which he fought.  The “victories” of the
        early war years seemed to be of a somewhat defensive nature against the
        pressures caused by invading mountaineers. 
                   The second period of wars seems to have reduced rather than 
        extended his realm, to which he now likes to refer to as “Sumer & Ak-
        kad.”  The last years of Hammurabi are named after clearly defensive 
        measures to which he resorted in the north of the country.  Walls were 
        built along the Tigris and Euphrates, and Sippar was fortified by a wall. 
        It remains uncertain how much of Babylonia was held by the five kings 
        of the dynasty following Hammurabi in the next 150 years, each of them
        ascending the throne of his father. One thing, however, remains as the 
        enduring success of the rule of Hammurabi: all later kings of Babylonia  
        resided in Babylon, the other cities becoming provincial from then on.

H-9

                  During the peaceful period between the 12th & the 30th year, Baby-
        lonia seems to have become not only prosperous and politically important
        but also a center of learning.  The centuries which followed the reign of
        Hammurabi became something like the golden age to which the numerous
        Old Babylonia texts bear witness.  Intimately connected with the name of
        Hammurabi is, of course the law code which bears his name.
                   The name Hammurabi belongs to those Semitic but not Akkadian
        personal names which begins to appear around 2000 B.C.  The language
        of the people who bear these names is referred to as “Eastern Canaanite,”
        “West Semitic,” or “Amorite.”  Apart from some rulers of Larsa, Hammu-
        rabi is the first king to have such a name, as his father & 2 kings before 
        him had truly Akkadian personal names.  The meaning of “Hammurabi” 
        is still debated.  The first element, “Hammu” no doubt refers to a god, &
        the second part refers to healing, but a reliable translation cannot be given.

HAMONAH  (המונה, multitude)  A city where Gog hordes are to be destroyed
        after the unsuccessful attack on Israel by this force of evil.

HAMON-GOG  (המון גוג, multitude of Gog)  A valley in Transjordan where
        the multitude of dead from the armies of Gog are to be buried (Ezekiel 39).

HAMOR  (המון, he-assThe father of Shechem, killed with him in revenge
        by Simeon and Levi. 

HAMRAN (המרן, from the root meaning, “to be red, agitated”) The 1st son
        of clan chief Dishon (I Chronicles 1).

HAMSTRING  (עקר (aw kar)A verb meaning “to cut the muscle tendon 
        of the thigh.” To hamstring an animal completely disables or lames it.

HAMUL  (המול, sparedThe younger son of Perez, & the grandson of Judah,
        ancestral head of the Hamulites.

HAMUTAL  (המוטל, father-in-law of dew)  Wife of Josiah; mother of Jehoa-
        haz and Zedekiah.

HANAMEL  (הנמאל, probably “God is gracious”Son of Shallum, Jeremi-
        ah’s uncle (Jeremiah 32), from whom the prophet purchased a field at 
        Anathoth during the siege of Jerusalem.

HANAN  (הנן, shortened form of “God has been gracious”)   1.  A Benjamin
        descendant.     2.  A Benjaminite who was an ancestor of Saul.      3.  One
        of David’s Mighty Men.      4.  The head of a prophetic guild that occu-    
        pied a chamber in the temple.      5.  The head of a family of Nethinim that
        returned to Palestine after the Exile. 
                   6.  An assistant to the temple treasurers appointed by Nehemiah. 
        7.  A Levite who helped to interpret the law at the assembly of Ezra and
        also sealed the covenant (Nehemiah 8, 10).      8.  Another man who 
        sealed Ezra’s covenant.      9.  Another man who sealed Ezra’s covenant. 

HANANEL, TOWER OF  (הננאל מגדל (mig dal  han nah nelA tower on
        the northern rampart of Jerusalem.  The person for whom it was named 
        is not known.  It was replaced and eventually the Antonia Tower stood 
        where it once was. 

HANANI  (הנני, shortened form of “the Lord is gracious”)    1.  The father 
        of the prophet Jehu.      2.  A postexilic family of Levitical singers of the
        Heman group.      3.  A priest who divorced his foreign wife in Ezra’s time. 
            4.  A brother or kinsman of Nehemiah whose tidings of conditions in 
        Judah prompted Nehemiah’s work and who later was one of those put in
        charge of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 1, 7).      5.  A musician at the dedication
        of the walls of Jerusalem. 

H-10

HANANIAH (הנניהו, the Lord is gracious)    1.  An officer in Uzziah's army.
              2.  The father of a “prince” or administrative officer in Jeremiah's time.
              3.  A prophet who predicted Nebuchadnezzar's early fall & the early
        return of those exiled from Judah in 597 B.C. (Jeremiah 28).      4.  Grand-
        father or family of a sentry who arrested Jeremiah.      5.  A postexilic 
        descendant of David; son of Zerubbabel
                  6.  A postexilic person or family of the tribe of Benjamin.      7. 
        post-exilic family of singers of the Heman group.      8.  One of those who 
        divorced their foreign wives in Ezra's time.      9.  A perfumer or ointment
        maker, who helped restore Jerusalem's walls under Nehemiah.      10. 
        repairer of Jerusalem's walls under Nehemiah. The confusion in the lists 
        make it impossible to tell if he is the same man as the preceding entry.
                   11.  The “governor of the castle”; one of those whom Nehemiah put
        in charge of Jerusalem.      12.  A “chief of the people” who signed the 
        pledge of reform.      13.   A priest, one of the trumpeters at the dedication 
        of the wall of Jerusalem.      14.  Ancestor of a family of Levites returning
        with Ezra.      15.  One of the three youths who figure in the stories in the 
        book of Daniel and its apocryphal additions.

HAND (יד (yawd), power, sideBesides the numerous passages in which the  
        Bible uses “hand” simply to designate a part of the body, there are many 
        others in which the word has a metaphorical sense.  Most numerous are 
        those in which it occurs as a symbol of “power.”  The word can also be 
        used, like the words for many other parts of the human body, for “person”
        or in place of a personal pronoun.  There are many references to the 
        “hand” or power of God. In Hebrew as in English, the phrase right or left 
        “hand” can sometimes indicate position.

HANDBREADTH  (טפח (tay fakh)A measure based on the hand's width
        at the base of the fingers, slightly less than 8 cm or about 3 inches.  6
        handbreadths were equal to the common cubit. 

HANDKERCHIEF (soudarion, (soo dah ree on), from Latin root meaning
        “sweat“It may refer to something like our handkerchief, used to wipe 
        away sweat, or to a towel-like head dressing. In Acts 19 the “handkerchief”
        was used to bring power from Paul for the healing of the sick.

HANDPIKE  (מקל יד ( mak kal  yawd), staff of the hand, javelinA long 
        wooden staff with a pointed metal head; used as a weapon by foot soldiers.
        As used in Ezekiel 39, it may have been a quarterstaff, a thrusting spear or
        pike, a javelin, or a battle-ax.

HANDS, LAYING ON OF.  A ceremony occurring in both the Old Testament
        (OT) and the New Testament   (NT) in various contexts and meanings. 
              In the burnt offerings & sin offerings of the OT sacrificial cult, the
        officers were directed to lay their hands on the victims before they were 
        slain. In the case of sin offerings, the ceremony may have meant nothing
        more than a setting apart of the victim in consecration to its sacred pur-
        pose. It was only a transference of guilt from offerer to victim in the case
        of the scapegoat. 
                   Laying on of hands was also used to impart blessing. Jacob blessed
        the children of Joseph, & Jesus blessed the little children.  Here the under-
        lying idea seems to be a transference of spiritual wholeness and physical 
        vitality.  Another type of blessing was the conveyance of the Holy Spirit 
        by the laying on of hands.
              A special type of blessing through laying on hands occurs in rites 
        of ordination.  Moses ordained Joshua as his successor, a ceremony adop-
        ted in later times for ordination to the rabbinate, which may well have been
        the source of Christian ordination. Moses conveyed a commission, not the
        “spirit of wisdom,” for Joshua already possessed this.  The ordination was
        an outward sign of recognition of Joshua’s spiritual qualifications.
              In the NT ordination has the same sense.  The 7 were ordained by 
        the 12 by prayer & the laying on of hands. Paul & Barnabas were commis-
        sioned and dismissed for their missionary journey by the prophets and 
        teachers at Antioch.  In I Timothy 5, the ceremony probably refers, not to
        ordination, but to the reconciliation of penitents.  In later church usage, 
        one finds a variety of associations of the ceremony:  confirmation, ordina-
        tion, healing, reconciling penitents, and the imparting of blessings upon 
        both persons and objects. 

HANES  (הנסThe late name of the capital of the 20th Upper Egyptian district.
        The native Egyptian name reflected in the Hebrew word was Hwt-nn-nsw,
        the house of the royal child.”  The Greeks renamed the city Heracleopolis
        Magna. 

H-11

HANGING (תלה (taw law); מחנק (maw khaw nak), strangle; apagcw (ap
        ag ko), strangleAfter having been put to death, public enemies & crimi-
        nals might be hanged as a public warning; the dead man‘s hands were 
        tied together & slung over the gallows’ arm.  Biblical law does not recog-
        nize hanging as an execution form, but permits it afterward as long as the 
        corpse is taken down and buried the same day.  Joshua 8 and 10 records 
        that the Canaanite kings’ corpses were taken down & buried at sundown 
        on the day they were hanged.  Hanging oneself is referred to twice (II 
        Samuel 17 (nakhanaq) and Matthew 27 (apagcho)). 

HANGINGS  (קלעים (kel ah yeem)Drapes.  The hangings which surroun-
        ded the court of the tabernacle were made of fine linen and were hung 
        from pillars about 2.3 meters high; they were carried by the Levitical 
        family of Gershon. Before the gate of the tabernacle court was hangings
        of richly colored material and fine  linen, on which was embroidery.  A 
        similarly constructed screen hung at the door of the tent of meeting. 

HANNAH  (הנה, graceWife of Elkanah the Ephraimite; Samuel’s mother. 
        She made a vow that she would dedicate her child to God, which she did,
        saying that “as long as he lives, he is lent to the Lord.” 

HANNATHON (הנתן, favored placeA border town in Zebulun, perhaps 
        located about 9.5 km north of Nazareth; it could also be located at the 
        south end of the Plain of Acco. 

HANNIEL  (הניאל, grace of God)    1.  A Manassite leader, son of Ephod.  
        He was appointed, under the oversight of Eleazar and Joshua, to superin-
        tend the distribution of the Western Jordanian territory among the ten 
        tribes to be settled there.      2.  A leader or warrior of Asher; a son of Ulla. 

HANOCH  (הנוך, initiated)    1.  The ancestor and origin of the name of a 
        Midianite clan whose ancestry is traced to Abraham, through Keturah.  
              2.  The ancestor and origin of the name of a Reubenite clan.

HANUN  (הנון, God has been gracious)    1.  King of the Ammonites.  His 
        insult to the ambassadors of David caused Israel to besiege Rabbah.  
        The siege was apparently postponed until the end of the Aramean wars
        (II Samuel 10.  Then, despite stiff resistance by Hanun, the city was 
        captured and the inhabitants reduced to slavery. 
              2.  An inhabitant of Zanoah who helped repair 2 sections of the
        Jerusalem wall under Nehemiah. 

HAPHARAIM  (הפרים, 2 wellsA town in Issachar-Haphariam that also
        appears in the Shishak list of conquered Palestinian towns. 

HAPPINESS.  Usually the human condition of well-being which comes with
        God’s blessing or as divine reward for righteousness.  The Hebrew term
        is translated either “happy” or “blessed.” 
              The word “blessed” is appropriate, since man’s happiness is 
        recognized as the fruit of God’s freely given blessing, or as a divinely 
        granted reward for human merit.  In Luke, the New Testament adds a 
        feature absent in the Old Testament.  The new note is the prospective  
        nature of happiness: “Your reward is great in heaven.” 

HAPPIZZEZ (,הפצץ the dispersionA descendant of Aaron & the origin
        of the name of a family of temple priests under King David. 

HARA (הרא, mountainousThe place to which the king of Assyria exiled
        the Hebrew tribes Reuben, Gad, and half of Manasseh.  Some have 
        regarded Hara as the local designation of the mountainous region north
        of Gozan-Guzana.  Because I Chronicles 5 appears to be a faulty rendi-
        tion of II Kings 17 and 18, in which both the Hebrew and the primary 
        Greek Old Testament treat the word as a simple rather than a proper 
        noun, some have regarded Hara as a corruption of the “mountains of
        Media” that is found in II Kings. 

HARADAH (הרדה, terrorA stopping place in the journey of the Israelites 
        from Sinai.  The location is unknown. 

H-12

HARAN  (הרן, mountaineer)  1.  Son of Terah; brother of Abram and Nahor;
        father of Lot, Milcah, and Iscah.     2.   A Judahite; son of Caleb and his
        concubine Ephah.      3.  A Levite; son of Gershonite Shimei. 

HARAN (PLACE)  (הרן, parched, scorchedA city of north Mesopotamia
        Turkey) where Abraham lived, where his father Terah, died, and from 
        whence Abraham migrated to Canaan. The kinsmen of the patriarchs 
        continued to dwell as Arameans in Haran; Rebekah daughter of Bethuel,
        was brought from there.  Jacob fled there & married Laban’s daughters,
        Leah and Rachel; all his children except Benjamin were born there. 
              The devotions of Haran to the moon cult of Babylonia indicates
        that the city was founded by the Third Dynasty of Ur, perhaps around  
        2000 B.C.  Current excavations in Haran have revealed a long and conti-
        nuous history from Assyro-Babylonian through Islamic times. 

HARARITE  (הררי, mountaineer)  A tribal name of an unidentified tribe, 
        used in connection with the fathers of three members of “the Thirty” 
        Mighty Men of David:  Agee, father of Shammah; Shammah, father of
        Jonathon; Sachar, father of Ahiam. 

HARBONA  (הרבונאOne of the 7 eunuchs who served as chamberlains
        for Ahasuerus.  He suggested that Haman be hanged upon the gallows  
        he had prepared for Mordecai. 

HARBOR  (limhn (lim en)The word is used in the account of Paul’s
        voyage to Rome with reference to Fair Havens near Lasea in Crete

HARDEN THE HEART. (קשה (kaw sheh), stiff-necked; אמץ (’aw mats),
        active, vigorous; כבד (kaw bade); pepwrwmenhn (peh po ro meh
        nen), callous; sklhrunw  (skleh roo no), stubborn) A phrase expres-
        sing a firm set of mind, stubbornness, indifference, callousness, insensi-
        bility, inability to understand.  The biblical writers speak of God’s har-
        dening men’s hearts.  At the same time they avow men harden their own
        hearts.  They found no apparent inconsistency in ascribing this activity
        both to God and to men. 

HARE  (ארנבת (‘ar na beth)Any of several herbivorous rodents.  The 
        common hare of Palestine is somewhat smaller than the average hare,
        whereas the common hare of the northern regions is the same size and
        color of the English hare.  The Old Testament refers to the hare only to
        indicate that it is an unclean animal, but its assertion that hares chew 
        cud is erroneous. 

HAREPH  (הרף, autumn, scornThe founder of Beth-Gader. 

HARHAIAH (הרהיה, he was burning) Uzziel’s father, who helped repair  
        the walls of Jerusalem under Nehemiah. 

HARHAS  (הרהס, poor) Grandfather of Shallum, husband of Huldah. 

HAR-HERES  (הר הרס, mountain of the sunA mountain near Aijalon;
        probably identical with the border fortress of Beth-Shemesh. 

HARHUR  (הרהור, possibly ravenThe name of an ancestor & the origin
        of the name of a family of temple servants listed among return exiles. 

HARIM  (הרם, consecrated to God)    1.  A descendant of Aaron and the
        origin of the name for a priestly house in the reign of King David.     
        2.  The ancestor & origin of the name for a non-priestly family among
        the returned exiles.      3.  A priest who signed Ezra’s covenant.      
        4.  A chief of the people, and signatory to Ezra’s covenant. 

HARIPH  (הריף, autumn, scornHead of a family that resided in Jerusalem
        after the Exile and one of those who sealed Ezra’s covenant. 

H-13

HARMON  (ההרמונה (ha har mo nah), the palaceThe name Harmon ap-
        pears nowhere else in the Bible, & no place by this name is known.  Many
        of older versions have presupposed a common rather than a proper noun. 

HARMONY OF THE GOSPELS  ( See the entry in the New Testament 
        Apocrypha section of the Appendix). 

HARNEPHER  (הרנפר, from the Egyptian, meaning Horus is merciful)  
        A place or family in Asher. 

HAROD (הרד, trembling)   1.  A spring, the site of Gideon’s encampment
        while preparing for battle with the Midianites.  It is generally identified
        with a spring located on a northwestern spur of Mount Gilboa.
              2.  The home of two of David’s men, Shammah and Elika. 

HAROEH  (הראה, the seerSon of Shobal; probably the same as Reaiah 
        in I Chronicles 4. 

HAROSHETH-HAGOIIM (הגוים הרשת (har o sheth  ha goy eem), sculp-  
        ture [of] the foreignersA Canaanite town; home of Sisera, who was 
        defeated by Israel under Barak and Deborah.  Its location remains 
        unknown.  Scholars have tried to identify it with Tell ’Amir, Tell el-
        Harbaj, or someplace on the Plain of Sharon. 

HARPOON  (שכה (sook kaw), King James Version has “barbed iron”Men-
        tioned in Job 41 along with fishing spears as an inadequate weapon for 
        catching the sea monster Leviathan. 

HARROW  (שדד (saw dad), straight, even)  The harrow as a special tool is not
        known in ancient Palestine, but there are biblical references to some pro-
        cess other than plowing. 

HARSHA  (הרשא, enchanter, magicianThe ancestor and origin of the name
        for a family of temple servants listed among the returning exiles. (Ezra 2; 
        Nehemiah 7.) 

HART  (איל, (aw  yawl)the adult male of the Red Deer.  The general color 
        of their coat varies slightly with the seasons, but it tends toward a reddish 
        brown.  Various Old Testament references indicate that the ayal was an 
        available & edible game animal.  It can only be described as a reasonable
        hypothesis that the deer referred to in the Bible is the Red Deer. 

HARUM  (הרום, high)  The ancestor & the origin of the name for a family
        of the tribe of Judah

HARUMAPH (הרומף, flat-nosed) Jedaiah’s father, who helped repair the
        walls of Jerusalem in Nehemiah’s time. 

HARUPHITE  (הריפי, autumn rainThe gentilic designation of Shephatiah,
        one of the Benjaminite warriors who joined David at Ziklag. 

HARUZ  (הרוץ, diligent) Amon’s maternal grandfather. His name is proba-
        bly Arabic, and his place of origin is probably Jotbah. 

HARVEST.  The gathering of the crops.  The Gezer Calendar provides a clue
        to the harvest seasons in ancient Israel.  Olives were harvested at the 
        beginning of their year (mid-September to mid-November) by beating the
        trees with long sticks.  In March-April flax was harvested by cutting it off
        near the ground, then laying the stalks out to dry.  The harvesting of 
        barley took place in April or early May, while the wheat harvest occurred
        in May-June. During August-September the summer fruits—figs, grapes,
        and pomegranates—were harvested. 

HASADIAH  (הסדיה, whom the Lord lovesOne of Zerubbabel’s sons. 

H-14

HASHABIAH  (השביה, whom the Lord esteems)    1.  A Levite listed as an-  
        cestor of a musician of the sanctuary.     2.  A Levite, ancestor of Shema-
        iah, a returned exile.      3.  A Levite, son of Jeduthun; listed among the 
        musicians set apart by David to prophesy.      4.  A Hebronite, men-
        tioned as a royal deputy under King David for the area west of the 
        Jordan.      5.  A chief officer of the Levites under King David.  
                   6.  A chief of the Levites under King Josiah.      7.  A Merarite
        Levite among those who joined Ezra’s company at the River Ahava &
        perhaps a Levite who was among those signing Ezra’s covenant.      
        8.  One of the laymen among those persuaded by Ezra to divorce their
        foreign wives.      9.  A builder of Nehemiah’s wall.      10.  A Levite, 
        descendant of Asaph.      11.  A priest of the house of Hilkiah in the 
        time of Joiakim the high priest. 

HASHABNAH  (השבנה, God has esteemed me (probably)One of those  
        who sealed Ezra’s covenant. 

HASHABNEIAH (השבניה, God has esteemed me (probably))    1. The 
        father of Hattush, who helped repair Jerusalem's walls in Nehemiah's
        time.      2.  A Levite who participated in a liturgical blessing of Yahweh
        Yahweh in Ezra's time ; he might be the same person as Hashabiah (#7).  

HASHBADDANAH (השבדנה, God has esteemed me (probably))  A man,
        possibly a Levite and the same person as Hashabneiah (#2), who stood
        on Ezra’s left hand when the Law was read at the great assembly. 

HASHEM  (השם)  A Gizonite who was a member of the Thirty Mighty 
        Men of David. 

HASHMONAH  (השמנה, rich, opulent, nobleA stopping place along the
        route of Israel’s journey from Sinai. 

HASHUBAH  (השבה, whom Yahweh has esteemed) A son of Zerubbabel. 

HASHUM  (השם, rich) An ancestor and the origin of the name for one of
        the families that returned from exile. 

HASIDIM  (הסידים, the pious onesThe term hasid applies to one who    
        practices hesed
              The term hesed is frequently associated with “covenant,” as in
        the phrase “to keep covenant and hesed.”  In a sense, hesed denotes 
        the joint liability, the mutual obligation, of persons who are involved in 
        social, economic, or political relationships.  Hesed has been defined as
        the “virtue that knits together society.”  It was applied to the loyalty of
        wife to husband; the friendship of David and Jonathan; the ideals which
        the good wife & mother seeks to make a part of her family.  The Bible's
        older English translations have used “mercy,” “kindness,” or especially
        “loving kindness.”  The basic meaning of the word appears to be loyalty.
        Where hesed applies to God’s dealing with man, the Revised Standard 
        Version chooses “steadfast love.” 
                   A hasid is person characterized by hesed, a man of hesed.  As 
        applied to people, it denotes their ideal loyalty to God with the commu-
        nity of the faithful.  The English versions generally render hasidim as 
        “saints.”  In a few passages the Revised Standard Version (RSV) has 
        changed from “saints” to “faithful ones.”  In the passages where the 
        RSV has kept “saints,” the word has in each case a possessive suffix 
        referring to the Lord.  There was a point in time when merely belonging
        to the chosen people was title to the designation hasid, but with the 
        development of ethical monotheism the term came to have moral and
        spiritual implications. 

HASMONEANS (See the entry in the Old Testament Apocrypha/Influences  
        Outside the Bible section of the Appendix.).

HASRAH  (הסרה, povertyChronicle form of the name Harhas. 

HASSENUAH  (הסנאה, thornyA postexilic Benjaminite family name.

HASSHUB  (השוב, considerate)    1.  A member of the Merari clan of the 
        tribe of Levi, & the father of a certain Shemaiah who settled in Jerusalem
        after the Exile.      2.  Either one man who had two assignments in rebuil-
        ding the walls of Jerusalem in Nehemiah’s time or two builders with the
        same name.      3.  One of those who sealed the covenant in Ezra's time. 

H-15

HASUPHA  (השופא, bare, naked)  Ancestor and origin of the name for a 
        family of temple servants among the returned exiles. 

HAT  (כרבלה (kar beh lah), mantle, cloakOne of the articles of clothing with
        which the three Hebrews were cast into the furnace.  

HATCHET (כשיל (kash sheel), axe) One of the instruments used in breaking
        down the sanctuary’s carved wood. 

HATE, HATRED (שנא (sen ay)) Dislike, antipathy, aversion, between per-
        sons, in a variety of relationships. 
                 In the Old Testament the concepts derives its peculiar religious 
        meaning from the notion that God hates.  God hates evil, and so Israel 
        must hate evil.  God also hates idolatry & false worship.  It is important 
        to recognize that hate as a biblical concept is based essentially upon the 
        religious commitment to reject and turn away from those who deny God
        and his laws.  There is no sharp distinction between the power of evil &
        the actor; nor is there any explicit emphasis on overcoming hate with love.
              In the New Testament, Jesus’ teachings contain no holy hate 
        against people. Jesus admonishes his disciples to love even their ene-
        mies. But increasing hatred is a sign of the kingdom's approaching con-
        summation. The difficult passage enjoining hatred of family & self is
        intended to stress the unconditional character of discipleship.  “Hatred”
        is used nearly synonymously with “denying the self.”  
                   While life in the old age was characterized by hate, life in the new
        age is characterized by love. Renunciation or hatred of wickedness is moti-
        vated by God’s love for sinners; it moves the disciple to love those captive
        by wickedness. Especially in the Gospel and Letters of John the sharp anti-
        thesis between the life of love & of hate is drawn.  Hatred assumes almost
        cosmic dimensions in its demonic opposition to God’s love.  The church's
        mission is to reveal this love to the world, which continues in hate. 

HATHACH (התךA eunuch of Ahasuerus appointed to attend Queen Esther.
        It was through him that she learned from Mordecai about Haman’s plot 
        against the Jews. 

HATHATH  (התת, terror, dismay) A Calebite family. (I Chronicles 4.13) 

HATIPHA (הטיפא, seize) The ancestor and origin of the name of a family of
        temple servants (Ezra 2; Neh. 7).

HATITA  (הטיטא, digging)  A family of gatekeepers (Ezra 2; Nehemiah 7) 

HATTIL  (הטיל,wavingA family of “sons of Solomon’s servants” (Ezra 2;
        Nehemiah 7). 

HATTUSH  (הטוש)  1.  A postexilic descendant of David who returned to 
        Judah with Ezra; he was called the grandson of Shecaniah in I Chronicles
        3, but the son of the same man in Ezra 8.     2.  A repairer of the wall of 
        Jerusalem in Nehemiah 3, perhaps the same as #1 above.      3.  A post-
        exilic priest who signed the pledge of reform. 

HAURAN  (הורן, cavern placeA district east of the Jordan and the Sea of 
        Galilee, north of the Yarmuk River.  It marks the northeast limit of Eze-
        kiel’s ideal Israel.  It was occupied apparently by the kings of Damascus
        after the Israelite kingdom’s.  Tiglath-pileser III overran it in 732 B.C. &
        Ashurbanipal crushed a revolt there.  (See also the entry in the Old Testa-
        ment Apocrypha / Influences Outside the Bible section of the Appendix.).
           After the death of Herod, this territory fell to his son Herod Philip;
        in 37 A.D. Caligula bestowed it upon his favorite Herod Agrippa.  Hauran
        was again under Nabatean control 85 to 106, when Trajan finally added 
        it to the Roman province of Syria. 

HAVEN  (חוף (khofe), shore, cove, harbor)  Used primarily in the nautical 
        sense, as a place which offers safe anchorage and station ships. 

H-16

HAVILAH  (הוילה, perhaps “sandy”)  A land mentioned in the story of the
        Garden of Eden as producing excellent gold, bdellium gum, and the
        shoham (“onyx“) stone, and as being surrounded by the River Pishon. 
        The name also occurs as a son of Cush.  The Ishmaelites are also said 
        to have lived in the territory from Havilah to Shur.  The use of “Havi-
        lah” in the passage where Saul pursued the Amalekites is probably an
        error for Hachilah, which is a hill in the vicinity of Shur.  Opinions as
        to the location of Havilah have differed widely, but the most widely 
        accepted location is the west coast of Arabia.  The products of Havilah
        give the impression of an Arabian country, as those products are found
        in many parts of Arabia. 

HAVVOTH-JAIR  (הות יאיר, villages of Jair [he will enlighten]A group of 
        30 (Judges 10) or 60 (Deut. 3) villages located in Bashan in Gilead
        There are at least 3 accounts of how these villages received their name. 
              In Numbers 32 and Deuteronomy 3, these cities were taken by “Jair
        the son of Manasseh”—i.e., the Jair clan of the Manasseh group. In Judges
        10, there is mention of a judge named Jair, who had 30 sons, who ruled 
        over 30 cities.  In I Chronicles, there is mention of a connection between
        the clans of Manasseh & those of Judah.  These 3 explanations represent
        various traditions that arose to explain the name. The 1st account assu-
        ming that the conquest was made by a clan appears most likely to be 
        historical. 

HAWK  (נץ (nets); קאת (kaw ath), spew out, pelicanAny of several small 
        to medium-sized birds of prey, among them being the sparrow hawk, the
        marsh harrier, and the hen harrier.  This group of birds was unclean. 

HAY (See Grass) 

HAZAEL  (הזאל, whom God beholdsKing of Damascus from around 841-
        798 B.C.  Hazael was a servant of Ben-Hadad I of Damascus.  When 
        informed by the prophet Elisha that he was to be king of Damascus, 
        Hazael murdered his master and seized the throne of Damascus.  In 841 
        B.C., only Hazael resisted the Assyrian Shal-maneser III in Syria.  After
        2 unsuccessful assaults on Damascus Shallmaneser III left Hazael alone.
                   Hazael menaced the kingdoms of both Jehu of Israel & Jehoahaz of 
        Judah. He took all the Israelite lands east of the Jordan River, humbled 
        Israel & seriously reduced its military force.  When Hazael threatened to
        approach Jerusalem, King Joash of Judah bribed him with rich treasure 
        stripped from his palace and temple at Jerusalem.  A mighty warrior and 
        perhaps the greatest king of Damascus, Hazael was also a builder who 
        adorned his capital.  Hazael died and was succeeded by his son Ben-  
        hadad II. 

HAZAIAH  (הזיה, whom the Lord beholds)  An ancestor of a certain 
        Maaseiah, who was a Jewish lay leader living in postexilic Jerusalem. 

HAZAR-ENAN  (הצר עינן, village of fountainsAccording to Numbers
        34, a city on the frontier between Palestine and Hamath at the foot of 
        Mount Hermon. 

 HAZAR-GADDAH  (הצר גדה, village of fortuneA city in the southern
        part of Judah, mentioned between Moladah and Heshmon.  It may have
        been a shrine of Gad, the god of fortune.  The site is unknown. 

HAZAR-MAVETH  (הצר-מות, court of deathA Semitic people descended
        from Shem through Joktan who settled in the Wadi Hadhramaut in 
        southern Arabia.  This valley parallels the coast for about 320 km.  
        The economy of Hadramaut was based on the control of the frankin-
        cense groves and the caravan route, and Cana, the major frankincense
        port in Arabia. The history of this state is little known.  It appears to 
        have enjoyed two periods of great power in the 400s B.C. and from 1 
        A.D. to 200. 

HAZAR-SHUAL  (הצר שועל, village of jackalsA town of Simeon in the
        extreme south of Judah, always mentioned in close relationship with 
        Beer-sheba.  It was occupied by the Jews after the Exile.  The name 
        suggests that it was originally occupied a Canaanite clan with a jackal
        as its totem. 

H-17

HAZAR-SUSAH  (הצר סוסה, village of horsesA city of Simeon in the south-
        western part of Judah.  It was a sort of stables where Solomon kept the
        horses he imported from Egypt and sold to the Hittites and Syrians. 

HAZAZON-TAMAR  (הצצן תמר, pruning of the palm)  A city of the 
        Amorites which was conquered by Chedorlaomer and his allies.  It was
        apparently not far from Sodom; in I Chronicles 20 it is identified with
        En-Gedi on the west side of the Dead Sea.  It may be the same as the 
        Tamar fortified by Solomon. 

HAZER-HATTICON  (התיכון הצר, middle courtA place mentioned in
        Ezekiel 47 as the northeast corner of his ideal boundary of Israel. It may
        have been copied wrong, and should perhaps be “Hazar-enon.” 

HAZERIM  (הצריםThe King James Version interprets this word as a 
        place name.  The Revised Standard Version interprets it as a common  
        noun meaning “villages.” 

HAZEROTH  (הצרות, settlement)  A camping place of the Israelite after
        Kibroth-hattaavah.  Here Miriam and Aaron disputed with Moses over
        his marriage with a Cushite, and over his unique position as the sole 
        mediator between God and God’s people. 

HAZIEL  (הזיאל, vision of GodA Gershonite Levite.  (I Chronicles 23).

HAZO  (הזו, visionThe fifth son of Nahor and Milcah; probably to be 
        identified with the mountainous, uninviting region of Hazu in Northern
        Arabia. 

HAZOR  (הצור, enclosure)  1.  A tell or mound about 8 km southwest of 
        Lake Huleh, 16 km north of the Sea of Galilee.  The huge tell domi-
        nates the Plain of Huleh and the ancient Via Maris.  
              Hazor was a Canaanite royal city; its king, Jabin, headed the 
        northern Canaanite coalition against Joshua.  The alliance was defeated;
        Hazor was sacked.  About 100 years later Deborah and Barak led a 
        revolt against another Jabin who ruled northern Israel.  Israel won the
        Battle of Taanach and routed Jabin’s forces under Sisera.  To protect
        the Huleh Plain, Solomon rebuilt and fortified Hazor.  In 732 B.C., 
        Tiglath-pileser took it. 
           Archaeology has discovered cities from the Hyksos, Amarna, &
        post-Amarna periods, the last one possibly destroyed by Joshua.  The
        “Lower City” of Hazor wasn't rebuilt after its destruction.  A disco-
        very of great interest in this area was a series of 4 superimposed 
        Canaanite temples, one on top of the other.  On the tell, 21 habitation
        levels have been identified, dating to 2750-2500 B.C.  After Joshua’s
        conquest in the late 1200s B.C., 2 Hazors, presumably Israelite and 
        much poorer than the Canaanite one, preceded Solomon’s. 
              On the tenth level, a gate like those that Solomon built at 
        Megiddo and Gezer was discovered.  Over this city, Ahab (869-850)
        rebuilt the city, erecting a large public building & a heavily fortified
        citadel on the western tip of the mound.  The next city, from the time
        of Jeroboam II (786-746) contained the buildings of wealthy merchants.
        Above this were the ruins of the city destroyed by Tiglath-pileser in 732;
        there is a three-foot layer of ashes to mark this period and level.  The 
        Persians used the citadel in the 400s and 300s. 
             2.  A city of Judah in the Negeb, about 14 km southeast of el-’Auja. 
              3.  A city of Judah in the Negeb, according to the King James 
        Version.  The Revised Standard Version has the name as “Hazor-
        Hadattah.” 
              4.  A city north of Jerusalem reoccupied by the Benjaminites after
        the Exile.  (Nehemiah 11). 
              5.  A still unknown place in the Arabian Desert east of Palestine
        which Nebuchadrezzar despoiled in 598 B.C., either a single place or a 
        group of tribes. 

HAZOR-HADATTAH  (הצר הדתה, new townA village in the Negeb 
        district of Beer-sheba.  It is possibly southwest of Tuwani toward the 
        Dead Sea. 

HAZZELELPONI (הצללפוני, shade turned towards me) A sister of certain
        descendants of Judah (I Chronicles 4). 

H-18

HE (ה (hay)The Hebrew Alphabet's 5th letter as placed in the King James
        Version at the head of the 5th section of the acrostic psalm, Psalm 119. 

HEAD  (ראש (roshe), from the root “to shake”; kefalh (ke fah leh)A
        term used both literally and metaphorically in the Bible.  In an extended
        sense it is an appropriate name for the topmost part of anything, or as a
        “source of authority.”  The word “head” in the Bible is never connected
        with the intelligence; the intellectual powers were believed to be situated
        in the heart.  The most distinctive theological use of the word “head” 
        occurs in Ephesians and Colossians, where it describes the relationship
        of Christ to the Church. 

HEADBAND  (שביס (shaw beece), netting)  Probably a head ornament of
        gold or silver. (Isaiah 3).

HEADDRESS  (פאר (peh air), turbanA woman’s head-covering, ornamen-
        tal in character.  It was wound about the head without any undercover.  
        The Hebrew word is also used of the wedding garland of the bridegroom. 

HEALING, GIFTS OF.  Primitive Christianity possessed miraculous powers,
        including the power to heal.  From the beginning of his ministry Jesus 
        performed healing miracles.  His enemies attributed this power to Satan.
        In the power of the Spirit he began his ministry, proclaiming the kingdom,
        and affirming that healing was a sign, among others, that the rule of God
        had been inaugurated. 
                   The healing activity of Jesus and his disciples explains the place 
        of healing in the primitive church.  The gift is conferred by the Spirit.  
        The New Testament gifts of healing are an integral part of the mission &
        message of Jesus, and of the early church’s consciousness of their fulfill-
        ment; they must not be confused with psychiatry, or faith healing. 

HEALING, HEALTH  (שלם (sha lem), wholeness, peaceHealing may 
        be described in terms of the curing or restoring to health of a sick person
        by the closure of wounds or effective curing of the body or mind.  A 
        person may be described as healthy when they exhibit a body & mind 
        in which is functioning harmoniously. 
              Health: Longevity & Environment in the Bible—In antiquity,
        as in all ages, health was a highly prized possession among the Near 
        Eastern peoples.  The Hebrews tended to think of health as physical 
        strength and well-being.  Mental or emotional disturbances were gene-
        rally related to some specific organ.  The Hebrews’ pastoral and  agricul-
        tural  pursuits  made  a  robust physique desirable.  The weakling and 
        the invalid were treated with contempt by the ancient Hebrews. The 
        structure of society made life very difficult indeed for anyone who was
        not in full possession of his faculties. 
              Whenever blessings were invoked, length of days was one of the
        benefits most frequently sought.  However, if the individual lived beyond
        threescore and ten years, hardship and sorrow were the logical and expec-
        ted outcome.  In actual fact, life expectancy was nearer 60 than 70.  The
        advanced ages of the patriarchs living before the Flood are modest com-
        pared with early Babylonian mythology.  The advanced ages ascribed to
        Seth, Enoch, and others are symbolic or have to do with the clan or tribe
        that the name came to represent
              Palestine does not appear to have had widespread infection.  The
        valleys & wadis didn't normally afford a breeding ground for mosqui-
        toes, while the incidence of imported diseases was probably less than 
        in countries with flourishing trade.  Even with more city-dwellers in the
        700s B.C., the overall situation did not change.  It was only late in the 
        period of Old Testament (OT) history that the cities became overcrowded.
              Some diseases which were scourges in the ancient world have 
        now largely disappeared while others which were unknown in ancient 
        times are very common.  There can be no question that infant mortality
        was extremely heavy in antiquity; perhaps only 3 of every 10 children 
        would expect to survive to adulthood.  There was widespread lack of 
        hygiene and neglect of elementary precautions for safeguarding public  
        health.
              In earlier phases of Hebrew thought, disease was divine visitation
        consequent upon sin; this theory persisted throughout the entire biblical
        period.  There appears to be little awareness of the connection of environ-
        ment to disease.  Since God was the physician of God’s people, healing
        constituted a manifest token of God’s forgiveness.  Health was maintained
        by a punctilious observance of the divine commands. 
              Disease Prevention and the Mosaic Code—An important legis-
        lative step to counteract the effects of ignorance was achieved with the
        Mosaic code's sanitary section, which were more advanced than other
        Near Eastern peoples.  Moses may well be spoken of as preventive medi-
        cine‘s father. In the  OT's first 5 books, social hygiene became a science. 
                   The code’s requirements were for a time when the Hebrews 
        would be a sedentary people occupying the promised land.  The Mosaic
        law was a complete repudiation of magic.  By establishing Yahweh’s 
        moral supremacy, they eliminated the need for magic, and placed the 
        entire disease situation on a spiritual footing, where the personal relation-
        ship of the individual and God was the determining factor.  This did not
        exempt the righteous from sickness any more than it condemned the 
        wicked to lifelong affliction. 

H-19

              The moral concepts of holiness contained in the law indicated a
        new approach to sickness.  If one pursued a life of spiritual fellowship 
        with God, one was entertaining a valuable safeguard against sickness. 
        If one attempted to cure disease when it arose, that was a trespass upon
        God’s prerogatives. Instruction in the medical code, such as those in 
        Leviticus was a priestly function.  This was in keeping with the practice
        of giving to the priesthood the responsibility of instructing the people 
        in all knowledge. 
              The custom of observing certain days during each month on 
        which most activities were suspended had its roots in the religion of 
        the Old Akkadian period.  The ancient Babylonians interpreted the 
        lunar phases in the light of divine activity.  A type of horoscope was 
        drawn up which stated whether or not the particular day was propitious,
        and what kind of activity might be pursued.  In the older Babylonian 
        calendars there were nine principal days.  During Ashurbanipal's reign,
        the moon phases were represented by the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days;
        activity was restricted on these days. The term shapattu was reserved 
        for the day of the full moon. 
                   While the Hebrew Sabbath was perhaps associated with the new
        moon at one time, it was essentially a religious observance. It was 
        intended to provide an opportunity for mental and spiritual recreation, 
        and to keep vigor and efficiency at a consistent level.  Somehow, one 
        rest day in 7 best suits the needs of the human body; different ratios 
        have been tried, but have failed to achieve the same success. The pro-
        per Sabbath observance will determine how much physical well-being
        an individual can expect.  Thus, the idea becomes a principle of great 
        importance for the physical and spiritual health of both the individual  
        and the community. 
              If the preventive concepts enshrined in Sabbath observance were
        intended to promote individual and social well-being, the legislation 
        concerning the varieties of food was evidently enacted to serve as a 
        guide for maintaining health and vigor.  While other nations adjusted 
        their diets to the dictates of tradition, regarding some foods as “clean”
        and others as “unclean,” they were not as careful in identifying foods    
        as the Hebrews.
              Some scholars have suggested that this classification developed
        from the system of primitive taboos.  In ancient Egypt those animals &
        birds which were considered sacred were forbidden for food.  Only those
        animals which chewed the cud & parted the hoof were suitable for food,
        since they were exclusively vegetarian.  Vegetarianism was only restric-
        ted in that the fruit of newly planted trees was forbidden.  Under no cir-
        cumstances was the flesh of an animal that had died from natural causes
        to be eaten.  Of the aquatic creatures, those which had fins and scales 
        were clean, even those which preyed on other fish. 
           These rules were designed to protect the individual and communal
        health. There is far less chance of contracting food poisoning from a 
        vegetarian animal in the tropics, than there is when carnivores are eaten.
        The pig's flesh, which might cause trichinosis (tapeworm infestation), is
        especially dangerous in this way.  The pig is also the intermediate host 
        for a small tapeworm, which causes liver, lung, & other tumors. It must
        also be remembered, that animals who chew cud aren't wholly free from
        parasitic organisms. 
                   It is probable that the rules against eating animal flesh without 
        discrimination were intended to safeguard against certain fly bites.  The
        Hebrews, like other ancient Near Eastern cultures, restricted their diet to
        only to those aquatic creatures which had fins and scales.  The exclusion
        of all crustaceans removed one possible source of epidemic disease.  
        However, even certain varieties of clean fish can convey tularemia. 
                   The risk of infection by the parasitic organisms dealt with above 
        was greater then than it is now, because the preservation of meat under 
        subtropical climatic conditions was almost impossible.  Even with com-
        paratively fresh meat, Hebrew cooking would seldom ensure that any 
        parasitic organism would always be destroyed.  Under such conditions 
        the preventive approach is the best method of ensuring comparative free-
        dom from infestation.
                   The concern for public health also expressed itself in the effort to
        protect food & water from pollution.  Insistence on having a clean supply
        of water was most effective in forestalling amoebiasis, enteric fevers, 
        cholera, and spirochetal jaundice.  These preventive measures were of 
        particular importance for the welfare of a nation living under primitive
        conditions in the subtropics.
                [Health and Sexuality]---In the ancient world, circumcision was a
        quasi-religious rite, the mark of initiation into a tribe, or the sign  required 
        for manhood.  Among the Jews it claimed an overriding religious signifi-
        cance through its association with the Covenant.  It was the only form of 
        physical mutilation which the law sanctioned.  In antiquity the practice of 
        circumcision was thought to have certain positive hygienic values.  Modern
        medicine recommends circumcision as a way of preventing penis cancer,
        although they have begun to question its value. 
              The laws governing sexual union were based on the concept of the 
        family social unit, and precluded inter-marriage and polygamy.  The union
        between a man & his paternal half-sister, a not infrequent occurrence in the
        patriarchal period, was forbidden.  Because of the dangers of marrying 
        someone too closely related to oneself, the Mosaic law made it clear that 
        marriage was forbidden with certain degrees of blood relationship, & bran-
        ded as incestuous many of the unions common in other nations. Marriage 
        to half-sisters, stepdaughters, daughters of a stepson or a step-daughter, &
        the sister of a living wife is prohibited.  

H-20

              The moral nature of the Covenant demanded morality in the       
        “chosen people,” which meant no incest.  In view of the many sexual 
        deviations, the regulating of sexual function was of great importance if
        their witness to their Deity’s morality was to be believed.  A lack of
        restraint in marriage would subordinate the rights and privileges of 
        society as a whole to the dictates of a few dominant families, leading 
        to monopolized land and wealth, while the families themselves would
        inevitably be plagued with jealousy and intrigue.  Most believed that 
        biologically, prohibited unions led to reduced fertility & deterioration
        of physical and mental vigor.  In fact, there is no adequate reason for 
        regarding the prohibited unions as particularly dangerous. 
              Provisions for individual sexual hygiene form an important part
        of the Levitical approach to health.  The sexual act was associated with
        concepts of uncleanness. It is probable that the feelings of uncleanness
        were intended to serve as a form of control over sexual activity, and 
        as a safeguard against the promiscuity of the Canaanites or other con-
        temporary nations. 
                   The presence of blood, forbidden in all forms to the Hebrews, 
        meant that menstruation was a particularly defiling occurrence.  Any
        object of contact with a woman during the period of menstruation was
        considered unclean.  Levitical law saw the possibility of intercourse 
        during menstruation & legislated against it vigorously.  Any man who
        came into contact with the menstrual discharge was considered cere-
        monially unclean for seven days.  Coitus interruptus was held to be 
        an improper use of natural instinct.
              In instances of prolonged or heavy menstruation, the woman 
        was regarded as unclean throughout the period of discharge and for 
        seven further days.  Childbirth was surrounded with certain degrees 
        of defilement, although the baby itself was always considered to be 
        ceremonially clean.  The defiling influence of the birth of a female 
        child was greater than the birth of a male child.  Under normal circum-
        stances the parents didn't cohabit again until the baby had been weaned.
        It could be as long as two years.   
              Defilement also occurred from seminal emissions, and could 
        be removed by washing when a prescribed period of time had elapsed.
        Deviations of sexual practice such as homosexuality & bestiality were
        rigidly condemned in the Mosaic code.  These laws employed religious
        sanctions, restrictions on human sexual behavior, and at the same time
        they laid considerable stress on personal hygiene, when such matters 
        were regarded with varying degrees of indifference.  The prescribing 
        of a period of isolation was an important aspect of the preventive 
        approach implicit in this legislation.
              Among the Hebrews great emphasis was placed upon the 
        washing of the body, despite the frequent shortages of water.  These
        ceremonial washings were in a general religious sense symbolic of the
        removal of sin or moral defilement.  The stress laid on the cleansing 
        of anything which might be suspected of defilement was of fundamen-
        tal importance.  The risk of disease would be reduced appreciably, 
        while the isolation of potential carriers of disease for a specified period  
        would also help control the incidence of disease.
              The nomadic tribes of antiquity paid scant attention to sanitary 
        practices.  Mosaic legislation laid down carefully regulated sanitary 
        procedures for the Israelites.  The significance of the sanitary regulations
        is much greater than the amount of space they occupied in the Mosaic 
        preventive legislation.  A measure of control over air-borne & fly-borne
        plagues was afforded.  Thus an advanced degree of protection from 
        infectious disease was afforded.  The preventive approach was the 
        special contribution of the Hebrews to medical theory, and the principles
        enshrined in the OT are in harmony with the basic precepts of contempo-
        rary medicine.
                   In the light of earlier observations it will appear that health was a 
        divine gift.  When disease occurred, the sufferer could only look to God,
        the Physician; any human aid would usurp divine prerogatives.  Because
        sickness was a spiritual matter, healing could only properly follow a revi-
        val or revitalizing of the relationship between the individual and God.  
        There is no outline of medical treatment for disease in the OT. 
                   Jesus’ Approach to Health and Healing—While Jesus Christ 
        didn't attempt to explain disease, his attitude toward it marked an advance
        in thought on the OT opinions. Instead of showing contempt for the sick, 
        Jesus showed that his ministry was closely related to the frailty of body 
        and soul. Jesus was firmly convinced of God’s purpose for human whole-
        ness and salvation, and never once supported the OT concept of disease 
        as God’s punishment. He frequently envisaged disease as evil producing 
        imbalance within the personality.

H-21

           Because Jesus regarded each individual separately, he was able 
    see the influence of body and mind upon each other, concerning him-
        self with the sufferer’s body, mind, and spirit. His encounter with the 
        Samaritan woman changed a casual conversation into a powerful analy-
        sis, and confronted her with the person of the living Christ as the answer
        to her deepest needs. This talk is a superb example of non-directive coun-
        seling Any knowledge of Jesus’ approach to healing must come mostly 
        from inference, since his healing acts were not described in clinical 
        language. 
                   He rejected the idea that sickness was God’s punishment, nor
        did he encourage the belief that the sufferer ought to remain ill in order
        acquire courage or learn patience. Fundamental to his healings was his 
        conviction that disease was not a part of the divine order of things. In 
        some instances he attributed the incidence of illness to the evil in human
        life. Since his mission was to destroy the Devil’s works, it followed that
        he would heal the sick and the diseased. The circumstances largely deter-
        mined the mechanisms he employed, but these were generally secondary
        to his desire to grapple with sin.
              Jesus’ ministry was as much to the mind as to the body. He was 
        acutely aware of the place emotional conflict and “negative” emotions 
        had in causing disease. Jesus was aware that the bias towards evil in 
        humans meant that sin could have a great affect on one’s life. Modern 
        psychiatry has shown that sin’s effects takes place in the unconscious 
        mind. Christ’s healing influence and spiritual authority penetrated this 
        level, where many disorders have their beginning. It is interesting to note
        that different techniques were used for eachperson, indicating that Jesus 
        diagnosed the patient’s ailment and was aware of what contributed to it. 
                   Apparently, Jesus was trying through healings to raise the degree  
        of the sufferers’ spirituality. It was Jesus’ desire that people should be won
        for the divine kingdom. Entrance into the spiritual realm indicated the 
        operation of divine love, and human faith, by either the sick person or 
        someone close to them. The degree of faith varied with each person, but 
        Jesus called for some measure of faith to be present in each healing. Cer-
        tain healings took place without faith being mentioned, but it was implied
        in the sufferer’s response to Jesus’ words.
                   It must be remembered that the therapy Jesus did contained
        spiritual and psychological components, but the healings were more than
        the work of a shrewd psychologist. Matthew envisaged Christ’s healing 
        ministry as a fulfillment of Isaiah 53, which speaks of God’s Servant. The
        Hebrew text employs the simple words for “diseases” and “pains,” which
        relates the healing of sickness directly to the Servant’s work. If the Chris-
        tian church interprets the Isaiah passages correctly, it would appear that 
        the incarnate Lord dealt with disease, sickness, & human sin on the cross.
        His atonement avails for the mind, body and soul of a person.
              The restoration of the sick formed part of apostolic practices as 
        well, in conformity with what Christ commanded. In the days after Pente-
        cost, many healings took place at the hands of the apostles. In the main, 
        however, the healings were achieved by a powerful degree of suggestion
        linked to the sufferer’s faith. As time passed, the treatment of disease 
        became more uniform, employing the name or the power of Christ in 
        response to the expectant trust of the sufferer. From the experience of 
        Paul with Trophimus, it may be concluded that the healing power given 
        to the apostles diminished with the passing of time.
              There is little mention of anything specifically medical in biblical  
        literature. Consequently, there are no written lists of drugs such as have 
        survived from Mesopotamia and Egyptian cultures. Incense was an impor-
        tant tool in healing. While its primary function was to honor God in the 
        sanctuary, it probably served as a fumigant and deodorant also. The use 
        of aromatic oils & perfumes, such as myrtle, saffron, aloes, cassia, myrrh, 
        spikenard, & cinnamon, for personal hygiene was dictated by climatic &
        other considerations.
              Therapeutic substances in use among the Hebrews included the 
        renowned balm of Gilead as an unguent preparation. A number of herbs 
        were employed, including fennel, dill, spelt, cumin, anise, and the caper 
        berry. Olive oil was frequently administered internally and externally. 
        Herbs of a culinary nature, like dill, fennel, cumin, anise, spelt, marjoram,
        thyme, mint, and sage, played a prominent part in Hebrew diet. The bitter
        herbs of Exodus 12 were probably lettuce, endive, chicory, & water cress.

H-22

HEAP OF STONES  (גל אבנים (gal  ‘eh beh neem)A symbol used in 
        several different ways.  A heap of stones was raised over the body of
        Achan after he and his family had been stoned and burned.  A heap 
        of stones was made as a witness to the compact between Jacob and 
        Laban. 
                   It is also used with the connotation of a place which has be-
        come a heap of ruins & a reminder of the fate which God has in store
        for the sinful.  To warn that a city or house or an altar will become a 
        stone heap is to announce impending destruction.  The ancient Israe-
        lite, as the modern Arab peasant, thought that such heaps of stones 
        were inhabited by evil or dangerous spirits. 

HEART  (לב (labe); kardia (kar dee ah))  In the Bible it is the central and
        unifying organ of personal life.  The ancient Hebrews tended to attribute 
        psychological functions to certain organs of the body.  Of all such organs
        the heart was the chief, the center of physical vitality.  In the recesses of 
        the heart dwelt the thoughts, plans, attitudes, fears, & hopes which deter-
        mined the character of an individual. 
                   The word “heart” is only rarely used in a purely physical sense; it 
        denotes primarily the psyche at its deepest level.  All the emotions of which
        a person is capable may be attributed to the heart.  More than that, it is a 
        distinctly Hebrew conception that the heart is the center of intellectual life.
        The Hebrew language can hardly express the idea “to think” except by the 
        phrase “to say in the heart.” 
                   From this idea it is a natural step to the thought that it is the center 
        of the will and the moral life.  The hard or stubborn heart is sometimes 
        described as “uncircumcised.”  The idea of “perfection” or “wholeness” is
        also conveyed by the phrase “with all the heart.”  The heart, as the inner-
        most spring of the human personality, is directly open to God and God’s 
        influence, while at the same time being naturally inclined to evil.  As such,
        its betterment must lie rather in God’s transforming grace than in any
        educational activity on the part of humans. 
                   Since the term “heart” can mean the totality of feelings, thoughts,
        & desires of a person at the deepest source in his inner life, it sometimes 
        has the modern psychological term “personality.”  For Hebrews, persona-
        lity was diffused through the whole of the body, & the assignment of special
        functions to particular organs was loose and often inconsistent.

HEARTH  (יקוד (yek ode), burning; מוקדה (mo ked ow); הראל (har el) 
        and  ריאל(ar ee el), both translate as “altar”  or “hearth”In biblical times 
        the hearth was a depression in the floor for cooking food.  Ezekiel 43 uses
        both harel and ariel for the uppermost ledge of the altar of burnt offering,
        upon which the sacrifice was laid.  

HEAT AND COLD  (חם (khome), heat; חרה (khaw raw), cold; kauma 
        (kaw ma), heat; yucoV  (psoo kos), coldExtremes of atmospheric 
        temperature, annual and daily.

HEATH (ערער (‘ar ‘ar), needy, outcastThe true heath rarely is found in 
        Bible lands and doesn’t fit the geographical associations of the passage.   

HEAVE OFFERING (תרומה (ter oo maw)The portions of sacrifices and 
        offerings which were set apart, removed, or taken up, elevated, or “heaved”
        for Yahweh and the priests.

HEAVEN  (שמים (shaw maw yeem); רקיע (raw kee ah), firmament; רק 
        (rak); ouranoV (oo rah nos)The word “heaven” is used in the Bible
        in 2 senses: the upper part of the cosmic ocean which envelops the earth;
        or the immediate ceiling or canopy of the earth.  Heaven is portrayed: as 
        a metal strip; as a curtain; as a garment; with windows; with water skins; 
        with storehouses; with levels; and with pillars. 
                   The word raqia is translated “firmament,” but the word denotes 
        properly a strip of hammered metal.  In Job 26, God is said to polish it by
        breathing upon it with his wind.  Alternatively, the expanse is portrayed 
        as a strip of gauze stretched like a tent or a curtain.  Lastly, heaven is 
        regarded as a garment, an outspread blanket, a mantle or wrap in which 
        God enfolds God’s self.  Several other world religions also use this image.

H-23
                 
                The firmament, or celestial dam, was believed to be punctuated at 
        intervals by grilles or sluices, through which the rain was released. These  
        sluices have their counterparts in the “springs” or “fountains.”  The celes-
        tial waters were also conceived as being stored in skins or bottles, which 
        were tilted and emptied by God at his good pleasure, an image also found
        in other religions.  In the heavens were located the store-houses of the 
        winds, the hail, & darkness. Heaven was thought to rest upon pillars, which
        is also found in other religions. 
                   Finally, the concept of successive stages or strata of heaven is no-
        where explicitly articulated in the Old Testament.  It is in the Apocrypha 
        that we first encounter that notion of the seven heavens which was later to
        become a commonplace theme of Jewish and Arabic folklore. In the New
        Testament, only three strata appear to be recognized, which is the same as
        the number found in rabbinic sources. 

HEBER (הבר, companion)  1.  The ancestor & origin of the name for an impor-
        tant clan of the tribe of Asher.   2.  A Kenite; Jael's husband, the woman 
        who killed Sisera.  3.  A man or family of the tribe of Judah.  4.  A family
        of the tribe of Benjamin.

HEBREW LANGUAGE (עברי ('ib ree), from the root meaning to "pass over")
        In order to understand the Sitz im Leben, the "life situation" of the Old 
        Testament (OT), we must understand OT culture & the Hebrew culture, 
        of which the Hebrew language was a part.  The name of the ancestor Eber,
        son of Shem, is probably a construction from the name of the people.  It is
        a term denoting the Israelites and is often used by foreigners.  The word is
        also used by the Hebrews as a name for themselves.  In such cases, "He-
        brew" and "Israelite" would be interchangeable.  In other passages, the 
        Hebrews are a separate ethnic group in Canaan.
                   Eber's descendants include Abraham, Nahor, and Lot.  According 
        to the OT, Abraham is the ancestor of the Hebrews, Nahor the ancestor of
        the Arameans, and Lot the ancestor of the Moabites and the Ammonites.  
        The genealogies we have are constructions, and individuals appearing in 
        them may reflect ancient ethnic groups, towns, or countries.  Later inva-
        sions into Canaan are reflected in the traditions about the exodus from 
        Egypt and the entrance into Canaan under Joshua.  After the expulsion of
        the Hyksos from Egypt in the early 1500s several migrations probably 
        took place during more than a century. 
                   The Hebrew language is a branch of Canaanite & Amorite; Canaa-
        nite and Amorite are ancestral dialects, the merging of which explains the
        growth of biblical Hebrew.  Some OT texts are written in a language of a 
        more ancient structure than others.  Biblical Hebrew, the closest relative 
        of which is Moabite, is the result of the linguistic development which took
        place since the time when Ugaritic texts were written between 2100-1500
        B.C. 
                   With the exception of the small sections (Ezra 4 & 7, Jeremiah 10,
        and Daniel 2-7) which are in the Aramaic language, and a number of odd
        words and names in different languages, the OT canonical books are in 
        the Hebrew language.  The Hebrew language is called the “language (lip)
        of Canaan”; Judean language is called yehudiyot (יהודית) "the language 
        of Judah.” In the New Testament, “in Hebrew” is used to designate both 
        Hebrew & Aramaic.  “Hebrew” 'ibriyot (ﬠבﬧיﬨ) is used only in the later
        rabbinic literature.  
                   Hebrew is one of the Semitic languages and shares the general 
        characteristics of 3-letter roots, having mainly consonants represented by
        the letters of its alphabet, and the simplicity of its sentence structure.  
        More specifically it belongs to the Canaanitish branch of the northwest 
        Semitic group; its closest connections are with Ugaritic, Phoenician, 
        Moabitish, and Edomitish.  Inscriptions from Byblos, dating from the 
        1700s B.C., & Ugaritic texts from the 1300s indicate that this Canaanitish
        was not a uniform language across the region.  There was an eastern 
        Canaanitish, as well as a northern and southern Canaanitish.  Semitic 
        people were trying to adapt Egyptian hieroglyphic into a Semitic alphabet,
        as well as using an alphabet based on Assyrian cuneiform signs long 
        before the Hebrews entered the land.
                   The Biblical tradition is that the Hebrews' ancestors were associated
        with the incoming Arameans.  These early Hebrews entered the southern 
        area of Palestine, and adopted the local dialect of southern Canaanitish as
        they settled.  The earliest evidence of it in monument form is the Gezer 
        Calendar of perhaps the 900s B.C.  Some of the early songs and other 
        passages embedded in the OT may have been composed as early as the 
        900s.  Evidence shows a northern and southern dialect of Hebrew, but it 
        was the Jerusalem dialect which gradually imposed itself as the standard 
        literary dialect. 

H-24

                   The earliest Hebrew writing so far known uses a form of the old  
        Canaanitish alphabet of 22 characters, but the language had a wider 
        range of sounds than these signs could express. The pronunciation of 
        several letters was indicated by the presence or absence of a dot.  He-
        brew, like most Semitic languages is written from right to left. 
                   Hebrew Phonetics & Grammar—In the ancient form of writing,
        consonants alone were written, & there was no indication of what vowels
        were to be used.  A first step toward indicating vowels was the use of ו
        י, ה, and to a lesser extent א, to represent long vowels.  The primary 
        Greek translation of the OT shows that they were used inconsistently in 
        the text from which that was translated. They were always regarded as 
        secondary to the texts. 
                   As Hebrew came to be less and less the language of common inter-
        course, however, it was needful to have some way of indicating more 
        fully the vowel sounds.  This was done by the so-called “pointing,” or 
        providing the consonants with small signs, written above, within, or below
        them, to indicate the vowels with which they are to be pronounced.  Two
        older systems of this pointing are the Babylonian and the Palestinian, 
        which were used only when it was necessary to clarify what word was 
        being used.
                   All three systems are the work of the schools, and would seem to 
        have appeared first in Mesopotamia in the 400s B.C.  Thus at best they 
        represent only the late tradition as word pronunciation.  There was no 
        pronunciation in the early writing & often not even word division.  One 
        attempt at minimizing some elements of confusion was the reserving of  
        special form of 5 letters as final letters.  At the end of words, ך was 
        used for כ (k), ם was used for מ (m), ן was used for נ (n), ף was used
        for פ (p or ph), and ץ was used for צ (ts).  
                   The early writers of Hebrew would have been as little conscious 
        of grammar as were the pre-Islamic Arab poets.  However, as any lan-    
        guage comes more and more into use as a literary medium, it tends to 
        become "fixed."  In the case of Hebrew, the Jerusalem dialect came to be
        regarded as the standard form of the language.  It is doubtful that we can
        ever know the "when" & "how" of this process of "fixing," since we are 
        never sure which forms were written by the author and which are due to 
        later hands. 
                   Historical development in the language is discernible; the language
        of the poetical books, for example, is often more archaic.  The language 
        of such books as Ezra-Nehemiah, Chronicles, the Song of Songs, Ecclesi-
        astes, and Esther reveals a later form of Hebrew, showing a development
        of certain words and grammatical forms borrowed from surrounding cul-
        tures.  The literature produced in the period after the close of the canon 
        uses a language which shows even further development. 
                   There has been continuous cultivation of Hebrew as a literary lan-
        guage from the 900s B.C. to modern times, but whether there was conti-
        nuity as a spoken language is debatable.  The language of the Mishna has
        been cited as evidence that Hebrew was still a spoken language.  It is not
        impossible that Hebrew may have continued to be spoken in limited 
        circles of pious Jews on through the Middle Ages. 
                   The grammar of biblical Hebrew may be briefly summarized.  
        Hebrew words, which are combined in meaningful arrangements to form
        sentences, belong to three categoriesnouns, verbs, and particles, which
        indicate varying types of relationship among nouns and verbs.  Two 
        genders are recognized, masculine & feminine; 3 persons, the speaker, 
        the one addressed, and the one absent; two numbers, singular and plural. 
                   The nouns includes pronouns, adjectives, & the numerals.  There
        is a definite article, which is the letter added at the beginning of a word.  
        Nouns may be an original 3-letter word, or they may be derived from a 
        3-letter verb.  Personal pronouns have a form separate from the word or 
        are added as a suffix at the end of a word.  The indefinite pronouns are 
        expressed by common nouns specialized in meaning.  The possessive is 
        indicated by a shortened form of the noun with a prefix or suffix.  The 
        dual ending is for the most part limited to things which go in pairs, and  
        may be added to either a masculine or feminine form.
                   For numbers, “one” is an adjective which follows its noun; “two”
        is the noun senayim or sethayim (masculine and feminine respectively) 
        in the dual form; the gender of the number agrees with the gender of the
        noun with which it stands.  “Three” to “ten” are nouns which are the 
        opposite gender of the nouns with which they stand.  The tens are the 
        plurals of the units, with the exception of 20, which is the plural of “ten.”
        There are special words for “hundred,” “thousand,” and “ten thousand.” 
                   There are no true tenses for the Hebrew verb, but there are three 
        states—perfect (e.g. “I wrote,”), imperfect (e.g. “I write,” “I am writing,”
        “I will write,”), and imperative or command (e.g. “Write!”).   Verbs are 
        inflected or changed for number, person, and gender.  The characteristic
        feature of the verb, however is its system of derived stems to represent 
        aspects of the verbal action.  In Hebrew there are 7 basic forms which 
        involve changes in the 3-letter root word, most often by adding a letter, 
        which transform the word into the active, passive, intensive, or causative
        sense of the original word.

H-25

                 Particles are also added to words, and are of various kinds.  The
        letter ה (he) and the letters אי (ah ee) are added for questions of “where.”
        The interrogative pronouns are מי (me) for “who,” and מה (meh) for 
        “what.”  The negative particle is לא (low) for “not,” and אל (al) for 
        “nothing” or “never.”  The conditional articles are אם (eem) for “lo!” or 
        “if,” לו (loo) for “if,” and לולי (loo lay) for “if not.”  Other particles are
        prepositional and added to words.  ל (lah) is for “to” or “for;” ב (ba) is 
        for “in, at, by, with.”  The particle מן (min) is usually separate from the 
        word it is with and means “from” or “out of.”  There are no real Hebrew 
        adverbs in Hebrew. 
                   With limited grammar, it cannot be expected that biblical Hebrew
        should have the flexibility and adaptability that classical Greek has for 
        expressing thoughts.  The skill with which biblical writers have used the
        resources of the language is remarkable.  Sentences are of two kinds:  
        nominal, where the verb "to be" is understood in the sentence; & verbal,
        where the verb commonly precedes its subject.  The sentence order nor-
        mally is predicate, subject, object.
                   There is no verb “to have”; the possessive particles serve instead
        (e.g. “I shall have peace” is “It will be peaceful for me”).  Hebrew also 
        lacks that useful preposition “of;” it uses the form of adjective + noun 
        instead. This form of expression's great defect is that it isn't possible to 
        express the indefiniteness of one member & the definiteness of the other
        at the same time.
                   Sentence formation in early Hebrew was almost exclusively whole
        strings of sentences being connected merely by “and.”  The monotony is
        relieved by skillful use of the perfect and imperfect states.  The perfect 
        can be used for things conceptually finished and complete as well as for 
        those actually completed.  Similarly imperfect may be used for things 
        which have not yet happened, or for things which are conceptually incom-
        plete though they have already happened.  There is also a characteristic 
        use of the imperative to replace the conditional sentence.  The most char-
        acteristic construction is when a narrative passage begins with a verb 
        expressing an imperfect state, & all the succeeding verbs are expressed  
        in the perfect state.  In other words, the imperfect expresses an action yet 
        to take place, and all the other actions are regarded as an inevitable result 
        of that action. 
                   Poetic Forms and Loan Words—Hebrew poetry, like the poetry 
        of other languages, preserved many archaic forms & constructions.  There
        is no regular rhyming, but there is a rhythmic structure dependent on the 
        accent, and a characteristic feature of parallelism.  All attempts to find in 
        biblical Hebrew generally applicable patterns for the grouping of verses 
        into stanzas have failed. 
                   There is a considerable body of vocabulary borrowed from surroun-
        ding peoples & adopted into Hebrew with very little sense of their original
        meaning.  They may be words from the pre-Semitic inhabitants of the land,
        or words borrowed from one or another of the non-Semitic people with 
        whom the Hebrews had contact.  Several Hebrew names of months are 
        Akkadian or are descriptive of different civil officials or classes of people.
        Another group is of Egyptian origin and has to do with luxury items; words
        for other luxury items seem to have come from India.  In writings from 
        the Persian period we find words from Iran having to do with government
        offices and functions. 

HEBREW RELIGION.  Israel's religion was a phenomenon unique in the
        ancient world.  It first appeared along with the emergence of the Israelite
        people in the 1200s B.C., and had a history of approximately a thousand 
        years before becoming the Judaism that existed in the centuries immedi-
        ately before Christianity.  This 1,000-year history wasn't an evolution from
        lower forms of religion to a higher one.  Israel's faith retained throughout
        its history the essential and distinctive character with which it began.  
                     List of Topics—1. Religion of the Patriarchs;    
        2. Formative-Period;       3. [Covenant Response and Hope];      
        4. [God's Uniqueness];      5. [Israel's Institutions];      
        6. Monarchy: Saul; David; Solomon;       7. [Changes Under the         Monarchy];      8. [Israel’s (Northern Kingdom’s) Cult];      
        9. 700s B.C. [and Prophets] to Jerusalem’s Fall;      10. [Josiah's         Reforms];       11. Exile and Beyond;       12. [ Judaism: Mono-            theism; Keeping the Law; The Book].
                   1. Religion of the PatriarchsThough Israel's distinctive religion
        began with Moses, it was prepared for by the religion of the patriarchs,   
        who were part of a semi-nomadic migration to Palestine from 2000-1500
        B.C.  Their religion was of a distinctive sort quite different from the offi-
        cial paganism of the surrounding lands.  Their God was the God of the 
        clan, the personal God of the clan chief. 
                   The clan had archaic names for its deity (e.g. “the God (shield?) of
        Abraham”; “the fear (kinsman) of Isaac”; and “the Mighty One of Jacob.”).
        There were also personal names, such as Abiram and Ahimelech, in which
        God is spoken of as the "(divine) father/ brother” of the worshiper.  The 
        God of the patriarch was the unseen head of the clan; this God's cult was 
        simple and presided over by the clan father himself.

H-26
       
                As patriarchs entered Palestine, their cults were carried on at local
        shrines, and their gods were no doubt identified with the gods worshiped
        there.  The patriarchs worshiped God under the name El, often with a 
        descriptive word attached to it.  While these gods were worshiped locally,
        the patriarchal deity was no local god, but the patron deity of the clan 
        over whose fortunes that god watched.  As the patriarchal stock evolved 
        into Israel, their gods were identified with Yahweh and their traditions 
        were normalized as those of all Israel.  Their religion, with its sense of 
        an intimate bond supported by covenant & promise, profoundly influ-
        enced  Israel's faith.  It is probable that much of Israel's legal tradition 
        came to her through her own patriarchal ancestors rather than through 
        Canaanite mediation. 
                   2. Formative Period—Although it adapted practices of pre-Mosaic
        origin, Israel's religion began, as Israel did, in the events of the Exodus 
        and Sinai.  Its founder was Moses.  Studies revealed a considerable body 
        of material apparently stemming from Israel's formative period, including
        cultic confessions, poems, the Decalogue, and the Book of the Covenant.  
        From material of this sort a fair picture of Israel's religion in the formative 
        period may be drawn.  
                   Israel's religion did not center in an idea of God, but in the memory
        of a historical event as interpreted by faith.  It was a response to that event 
        in covenant form.  In that event a group of Hebrews, who had been held as
        state slaves in Egypt, were led from there by Moses, who in turn was led 
        by the “new” God, Yahweh, to the accompaniment of happenings so 
        marvelous that they were never forgotten.  
                    This rescue was interpreted as an act of Yahweh's unmerited favor 
        calling a people from bondage to God’s self.  These Hebrews then moved 
        to Sinai, where they made a solemn covenant with Yahweh to be Yahweh’s
        people.  A new society was thus formed where none had been before; their 
        obligation was a covenant response to the favor of Yahweh already 
        experienced. 
                   3. [Covenant Response and Hope]—The covenant form is an an-
        cient one which has its closest parallel in certain Hittite suzerainty treaties
        of a day slightly before that of Moses.  The King reminds them of his bene-
        volent acts, lays down the stipulations which he imposes and which they 
        are to accept.  These typically include the prohibition of foreign relations, 
        & of enmity with others of his vassals.  Unlimited trust is to be felt towards
        the Great King.  Vassals are to appear before him annually with tribute.  A 
        copy of the treaty is to be placed in the shrine & periodically read publicly.
        Sanctions are supplied by a series of blessings and cursings. 
                   The covenant was no bargain between equals, but a vassal's
        acceptance of the overlord's terms.  Early Israel was a primitive theocracy 
        in which Yahweh was king.  The covenant could be maintained only so 
        long as the Overlord's stipulations were met.  The heart of these was that 
        Israel honor Yahweh and have nothing to do with any other god. 
                  A note of hope & promise is also primitive.  This had been an origi-
        nal element in the religion of the patriarchs.  Yahweh's call to Israel in 
        Egypt had come precisely as one to a new future and to hope.  The earliest
        poems reveal a robust confidence that Israel will be assured her land, 
        given all material blessings, and made a great people victorious over all 
        her foes. 
                   Though Israel's religion did not center in a doctrine, her notion of  
        God was unique from the beginning.  Israel’s God was called Yahweh.  
        Though there is no agreement as to the meaning of this name, it is proba-
        bly best taken as a causative verb “to be” (He causes existence).  In the 
        course of time the original meaning was lost, & Yahweh became a proper 
        name. The name shows that Israel's God was from the beginning a high 
        God of cosmic domain.  Whether or not a God called Yahweh was wor-
        shiped before Moses is unknown.
                   4. [God's Uniqueness]From the beginning Israel was forbidden
        to worship any god but Yahweh.  So marvelous were his acts, Israel didn't 
        conceive of  Yahweh as having any rival.  Yahweh created the universe 
        quite alone.  For this reason Israel created no myth.  Her earliest poems 
        show that she was free of thinking in terms of myths.  Yahweh did have a
        heavenly host that was tempting to worship, but this was always prohibi-
        ted.  Even the gods of the patriarchs survived only in identification with 
        Yahweh.  Early Israel did not explicitly deny that other gods existed, but 
        if their existence was not denied, neither was their status as gods tolerantly
        granted.  They were robbed of all that made them gods, and were rendered
        nonentities, were undeified.

H-27
             
            Yahweh differed from the ancient world’s pagan gods in Yahweh’s
        essential nature.  No image of Yahweh could be made, and although God
        manifested power through nature, no one aspect of nature was more cha-
        racteristic of God than another.  God was not to be seen as a fertility god.
        Nature itself was robbed of personality.  It was primarily in historical 
        events that Yahweh manifested the existence of Yahweh.  Israel's religion
        offered no ritual technique for manipulating the unseen powers of nature
        for selfish ends.  God was one who had called Israel from bondage to a 
        new future as God’s people, and who demanded her obedience.
                   5. [Israel's Institutions]Israel's faith expressed itself in certain 
        tangible institutions.  Chief among these was her tribal league.  Israel 
        began her history as a league of 12 tribes, a sacral league of clans united
        in covenant with Yahweh.  There was no machinery of statehood whatso-
        ever.  The clans enjoyed complete independence, being obligated only to
        assist in the care of the central shrine and to respond to the call to arms.  
        In times of danger there would arise someone endowed with the divine 
        Spirit, a charismatic leader called a judge.  But the authority of the judge
        as not permanent or hereditary.  He was in no sense a king.  The tribal 
        league persisted for some 200 years, and in it Israel's distinctive institu-
        tions gained normative form. 
                   The focal point of the league was the tent shrine, housing the ark 
        of the covenant, which came finally to rest in Shiloh, where it remained 
        as long as the tribal league endured.  Clans would gather on feast days to
        seek the presence of Yahweh and to renew their allegiance to Yahweh.  
        Shiloh was the heart of the covenant league.  This shrine had a clergy 
        claiming Levitic lineage.  Though the later theory that all cultic personnel
        must be of the clan Levi didn't then apply, Levites enjoyed a great prestige.
        Since “Levite” could also refer to one pledged by vow, men of various 
        clans came gradually to be reckoned to Levi. 
                    As was true of all ancient religions, Israel's cult involved various 
        kinds of sacrifice.  A precise description of early sacrificial ritual is impos-
        sible.  In the wilderness it was certainly simple, and early Hebrew sacrifice
        had many parallels with Canaanite practice.  We may assume that as Israel
        entered Palestine, her worship was enriched by borrowing, and what was 
        borrowed was given the rationale of Yahwistic faith.
                    At the heart of Israel’s cult wasn't sacrifice, but great annual feasts,
        such as Passover, Feast of Weeks, & Feast of Booths, among others.  All
        these were older than Israel and, except for Passover, were of agricultural 
        origin.  Israel gave them a new meaning, making them celebrations of Yah-
        weh's historic acts in the Exodus.  Israel’s cult was thus no “history-less” 
        maintainer of material well-being, but a reminder of history. 
                    Since Israel's existence was based on her covenant with Yahweh, 
        covenant law was a central factor in her life from the beginning.  Laws fall
        into two general categories as regards form:  casuistic (“if a man—”) and 
        apodictic (“thou shalt [not]”).  Casuistic have numerous Mesopotamian 
        parallels, while apodictic are Israel's distinctive contribution and state the 
        covenant's basic stipulations.  As need arose to apply these stipulations to 
        tangible situations, Israel drew upon the legal tradition of her environment.
        Such borrowing was made into an expression of Israel's covenant faith.  
        Law was normally administered by the village elders in accordance with 
        tradition. The priest had the duty of deciding hard cases, and of giving 
        instruction on the law’s basis. 
                   6. [Monarchy: Saul, David, and Solomon]The period of Judges
        was a period of adjustment to situations, of the disintegration of old pat-
        terns & the intrusion of new ones.  Israel was driven to set up a monarchy 
        when the tribal league was destroyed by the Philistines late in the 1000s.  
        The change brought an inner transformation of her society which affected  
        her religion profoundly.
                    The monarchy brought the old order’s end.  The first king, Saul, 
        was made king by popular acclamation.  Because of his inability to over-
        come tribal independence, he failed.  But David succeeded.  First beco-
        ming king over Judah with Philistine consent & popular acclaim, he was 
        later acclaimed king by the northern tribes as well.  Seizing Jerusalem, a 
        city which had been Canaanite, as his capital, he also conquered Pale-
        stine’s other Canaanite cities and incorporated them in the state, & subse-
        quently won a sizable empire. 
                    Since the state was created by David and centered on his person, 
        it was necessary that a son succeed him.  As the state was progressively 
        organized under the crown, the tribal system became of less practical im-
        portance, until it was replaced by twelve administrative districts.  The 
        basis of social obligation was no longer Yahweh's covenant, but the state. 
        A certain weakening of the covenant idea was inevitable.
                  Adaptation that had been going on since the Conquest brought 
        Israel into contact with Canaan's material culture.  As she adopted the  
        agrarian life, she was tempted to take up the practice of the fertility cult.  
        This was especially so since she had absorbed into her structure peoples 
        who lived in one place in the land.  Though these became worshipers of 
        Yahweh, their local cults continued. 

 H-28

                The monarchy speeded up the process.  David and Solomon incor-
        porated thousands of Canaanites into the state, most of whom became 
        no more than nominal Yahwists.  As Solomon made treaties & marriages
        into royal families from surrounding lands, the cults of his foreign wives
        were fostered in Jerusalem.  His treaty with Tyre was the most profitable
        one.  Solomon's temple, built by Canaanite architects, introduced in its 
        symbolism many features that were foreign to Israel.  The institutions 
        of state that Israel adopted had to be borrowed from outside, so rites &
        concepts that were unknown to Israel before were introduced.  As a 
        result, there was an inevitable reduction in the stress placed on the 
        Exodus and Sinai events. 
               7. Changes in the MonarchyThe social and economic 
        changes were sudden and drastic.  As a clan society, she had no ruling 
        class, no social distinction or extremes of wealth and poverty.  This was
        all changed.  The royal court grew very rich, and the urban population 
        grew very rapidly; this weakened tribal ties and traditions.  Further, the 
        demands of state required a burden of taxation.  Solomon ultimately 
        drafted his subjects into forced labor.  As life was regulated under the 
        crown, notions of aristocracy and class distinction began to intrude. 
                   David sought to link his state with the old order.  By installing the
        ark in Jerusalem, and by appointing Abiathar of the house of Eli as one 
        of its two chief priests, he was able to present the state as a patron and 
        protector of the national religious heritage.  Although some thought that
        the temple that Solomon later built was a dangerous innovation, and 
        although other shrines were freely tolerated, the link that was to bind the
        future of Israel's faith to Jerusalem had been forged. 
                   The king played a central role in the temple cult.  The dogma was
        developed that Yahweh had chosen Zion as his seat and promised to 
        David an eternal dynasty.  The temple cult was enriched by sacrifices, 
        feasts, music, and poetry early on in its history.  Literary activity flou-  
        rished as the traditions of the past were collected and written down.  
        Because of economic and sectional grievances, and because of tension
        between the old order and the new, the northern tribes rebelled when 
        Solomon died, and thereafter went their own way.  The North became
        the kingdom of Israel, and the South became the kingdom of Judah. 
                  Throughout her history Judah remained loyal to the house of 
        David, who had brought the nation to its Golden Age.  Later genera-
        tions idealized him and desired no future save in terms of a restoration
        of the glories of his rule.  The state's theological basis was Yahweh's 
        choice of Zion and David.  This dogma gave to Judah a remarkable 
        stability.  Yet it meant a further shift from the ancient notion of covenant.
                   The Davidic covenant was of a different type from that of Sinai. 
        In it, the relationship of God and nation was unconditional and based 
        on promise.  In the process of guaranteeing God's favor, the people's 
        obligation to God was obscured; stress shifted from obedience to cove-
        nant law to meticulous celebration of the ritual.  It was in this official 
        cult that hope & promise were given definitive form.  The hope persisted
        that a future king, perhaps the next one, would make the promises actual.
        As the element of promise indigenous to Israel's faith was shaped by the
        dynastic ideal, there were sown the seeds of hope of the Messiah. 
                   8. [Israel’s (Northern Kingdom’s) Cult]The northern state of
        Israel began without dynastic tradition or official cult.  Selection of kings
        by prophetic designation and popular acclamation, though increasingly 
        a fiction, continued in principle until the days of Jehu.  Jeroboam I desig-
        nated Bethel and Dan, both ancient cult places claiming a Levitical tra-
        dition, as official shrines.  At both, Yahweh was seen as standing or 
        enthroned on a bull.  The bull had associations with the fertility cult and
        was thus an entering wedge for blending other beliefs into Yahweh's cult. 
                   This tendency was magnified by the large number of Canaanites 
        absorbed by Israel.  Shrines other than the two official ones, and of pre-
        Mosaic origins, were equally popular.  It was easy for pagan practices &
        notions to infiltrate the national religion.  In the 800s Israel was threa-
        tened with the official introduction of a foreign paganism, when Jezebel,
        wife of King Ahab brought the cult of the Tyrian Baal to the royal court.
        Many Israelites became overtly pagan, and those who resisted were per-
        secuted.  By the 700s Israel, even her official cult, was shot through with
        pagan practices.  Obligation to God was discharged by sacrifice & ritual,
        and God's promises were regarded as unconditional. 
                   Society meanwhile progressively disintegrated; covenant law 
        inevitably ceased to have meaning.  Though both Israel and Judah knew
        hard times both politically and economically, they were as well off as 
        they had been since Solomon.  In Israel wealthy landowners amassed
        property and dispossessed and enslaved the poor.  There was so such 
        moral degeneration that Israel's society was without moral standards.  
                   9. 700s B.C. [and Prophets] to Jerusalem’s Fall—Protest against
        these social trends was not slow in coming.  About the middle of the 700s
        B.C. there began the flowering of the prophetic movement in classical 
        form.  The prophets are not to be described as great spiritual pioneers.  
        On the contrary, they were heirs of a tradition centuries old who attacked
        abuses and pronounced judgment upon them in the light of the covenant 
        faith of Israel's past.

H-29

                   Prophets had been active in Israel since Saul; when they roused 
        their fellows to fight holy wars for Yahweh.  Later we find them on 
        good terms with the state yet reserving the right to criticize it.  After the
        North-South split, they were active in both states, but especially in 
        Israel (North).  They both encouraged and rebuked King Ahab.  Their 
        opposition to Jezebel's policy was met with persecution.  A split arose 
        in their ranks, with certain of them opposing both the state and those 
        prophets who sided with it.  Jehu's purge probably satisfied most of 
        them; making peace with the state, they placed their patriotic fervor &
        their integrity at its disposal.  The classical prophets held these profes-
        sionals in contempt, and broke with them. 
                   The first two prophets, Amos & Hosea, addressed the northern
        state in the generation before its fall.  Amos attacked mainly social 
        injustice, while Hosea's main target was the mixing of Yahwism with 
        paganism and outright apostasy.  Rejecting the empty paganized cult, 
        & the notion that Yahweh's promises were unconditional, both preached
        a message of judgment.  Though they called for penitence, they were 
        sure that the nation was doomed.  But neither they nor the prophets 
        who followed them sought to overthrow the state.  Yahweh was the 
        one to execute sentence.  Yet for all this, the note of promise was not 
        given up.
                   As Israel collapsed, the prophetic movement was carried for-
        ward in Judah (South) by Isaiah and Micah, who followed the pattern
        of Amos and Hosea.  All injustice, idolatrous practice, and rebellion 
        against Yahweh was viewed as breaches of the covenant.  Isaiah and 
        Micah also attacked the external cult by which the nation hoped to 
        satisfy God's demands, and the corrupt clergy as well.  They preached
        a message of judgment.  Isaiah in particular, was influenced by the 
        Davidic covenant's official theology.  His message was a powerful 
        reaffirmation of that theology, and a summons to the nation to trust in
        its promises; for Isaiah, the sole hope of Judah was to trust in Yahweh.
        As in the Davidic covenant, sinful Judah will be disciplined but not 
        cast off utterly.  Isaiah's hope was positively expressed in the promise
        of a just and victorious king of David's line.  Here the hope of the 
        Messiah, which became the norm in later Judaism, took shape. 
                   Judah had always gone back and forth between periods of reli-
        gious laxity and efforts at reform.  In the late 700s, the reform move-
        ment gained momentum, beginning with Hezekiah.  His predecessor 
        Ahaz had been forced to give official recognition to Assyria's gods.  
        As the Assyrian cults were offensive not only to loyal Yahwists but to
        all patriotic citizens as well, Hezekiah's struggle for independence 
        naturally led to their removal, & also awakened a nationalistic reaction
        against all religious features considered foreign.  Prophetic threats of 
        fate for Jerusalem similar to that of Samaria also played a part.  Effort
        was also made to close outlying shrines of Yahweh.  But Hezekiah's 
        reform didn't endure; the people weren't ready for it.  When Manasseh
        resumed loyalty to Assyria, the Assyrian cults were reinstated.  All 
        sorts of pagan rites were fostered.  Israel's religion was in danger of 
        becoming a polytheism. 
                   10. Josiah's ReformsAssyria’s collapse during Josiah’s reign
        left Judah open to the most sweeping reform of her history, aimed at    
        purging everything foreign.  There was a search for security in the 
        surer things of the past.  Reform was given added impetus & direction 
        by the discovery of a “book of the law,” which was probably some form
        of Deuteronomy.  Reflecting faithfully the Mosaic covenant's obliga-
        tions on both sides of the relationship between God and God's people, 
        Deuteronomy declares that the national hope lies in keeping covenant. 
                   The reform resulted in a ruthless purge of all pagan cults & prac-
        tices, both native and foreign.  It also abolished shrines of Yahweh 
        throughout Judah.  The ideal of a purified Israel united under the throne
        of David seemed to be largely realized.  Centralization of the cult was, 
        however, resisted & never accepted by many. The written law was ele-
        vated at the expense of the prophetic word.  The confidence grew that 
        the national safety had been secured, by meeting the demands of cove-
        nant law through cultic reform and ritual.  With Josiah's death in 609, 
        Judah's independence ended.  Subject first to Egypt, then to Babylon, 
        she was destroyed by the latter in 587. 
                   Josiah's violent death and independence’s end seemed to many a
        contradiction of Deuteronomy’s theology.  Under Jehoiakim, the reform
        was abandoned, yet clergy and people alike clung to the official dogma,
        that national safety was assured by the presence of Yahweh's temple.  
        Down to the end a miraculous intervention was expected.  The nation’s
        fall raised doubts about the national religion’s truth, as popularly under-
        stood, into question. 
                   Israel's faith was saved in good part by prophets who addressed 
        the nation in its darkest hour.  In all of them, the problem of the divine 
        justice is the central issue.  Jeremiah rejected the popular trust in the 
        permanence of temple and dynasty.  In his writing, the Babylonians 
        were the instruments of divine judgment.  Ezekiel declared that the 
        present calamity wasn't only God's doing, but positively his vindication
        as the righteous and sovereign Lord.  Explained thus, tragedy could not  
        destroy Israel's faith. 

H-30

                The prophets prepared for the survival of faith in other ways.  Jere-
        miah insisted on a repentant heart rather than cult ritual, & Ezekiel based
        divine justice on the actions of the individual.  The summons of both 
        these prophets to individual decision laid the foundation for a new com-
        munity of faith; both regarded the Exile as an interim, a purification.  
        Hope to both of them thus lay in a new act of divine grace.  Exiled Israel
        was thus not left hopeless, but could look forward to the promise of a 
        new future. 
                   11. Exile and Beyond—The Exile was a watershed in the history 
        of Israel's religion; the postexilic community gave the faith of old Israel 
        a new form.  In 587, Jewish life in Palestine was totally disrupted.  The 
        Jews around Jerusalem were few and poor.  Although the Exile was a 
        grievous emergency, Israel's faith persisted through it with an amazing 
        tenacity.  Traditions were jealously guarded, handed down & sometimes
        edited.  The sayings of the prophets were likewise preserved.  Yet, many
        still viewed the national disaster as proof of Yahweh's powerlessness, and
        these were acutely tempted to turn to the worship of Babylon's presuma-
        bly mightier gods.  The Exile had opened new horizons, because her faith
        could no longer continue as a national cult.  It had to adapt itself to the 
        great nations and their gods as never before, if it was to survive. 
                   With the comforting assurance that the penalty for sin had now 
        been paid, the writer of the second part of Isaiah declared that the Exile 
        was soon to end.  There would be a great new exodus, with Yahweh lea-
        ding the flock of Israel back to Zion.  None is God but Yahweh, who is 
        creator.  Israel is Yahweh's chosen witness before the world that Yahweh 
        is God. 
                   Yet Israel's role is not to be a passive one; she is to be Yahweh's 
        servant to bring the light of Yahweh's rule to the nations.  In the figure of 
        the Servant of the Lord the prophet gave the national suffering and the 
        national hope profound reinterpretation.  Yahweh's purpose is to triumph 
        through his suffering, persecuted, and rejected Servant.  Israel's hope was
        given a novel pattern quite different from the popular one, and one which
        was richly played upon in the New Testament.
                   Having conquered Babylon, Cyrus allowed the Jews to re-establish
        their life in Palestine.  The resulting post-exilic community was a church 
        rather than a nation.  It understood itself as the remnant of Israel.  It was 
        not a national unit or, strictly speaking, an ethnic one—there were foreig-
        ners and proselytes.  The danger of assimilation by pagans had to be com-
        bated vigorously, which led to a growing particularism and a tension with 
        the universalism implicit in monotheistic faith.  Judaism did not become 
        an actively missionary religion; the tendency was to look down on the 
        Gentile and to wish as few dealings with them as possible.
                   12. Judaism: Monotheism; Keeping the Law; The BookIn 
        Judaism, monotheism triumphed completely.  The hard core of Judaism 
        turned from paganism & idolatry resolutely.  The divine name, Yahweh,  
        came to be considered too sacred to be spoken; & various substitutes for  
        it were developed.  There was profound devotional piety & an equally pro-
        found concern for the conduct of the good life.  Yet in all this Judaism had
        no doubt that her God alone was God.  As God was exalted above his 
        creation, great play was allowed for the role of angelic beings.  Partly  
        from reflection on the problem of evil and partly from outside influence,
        the figure of Satan developed from an accuser of evildoers into God's  
        great adversary, who tempts all to evil.  Yet no proper dualism emerged;  
        God remained the sovereign Lord in whose providence all things occur. 
                   Hope for the future, always present in Israel's faith continued.  The 
        old national hope of the messianic king attached itself to Zerubbabel, only
        to be disappointed.  This hope was divorced from the existing order and 
        attached to the new order which God would establish at the end of history.
        Later Hebrew prophecy turned almost entirely from present history to the 
        last events of Yahweh's judgment and the establishment of Yahweh's trium-
        phant rule. 
                   As prophecy died out, there emerged a literature which sought to 
        describe in cryptic language the final cosmic struggle between God and 
        evil.  In this literature there appears the figure of the Son of Man, a pre-
        existent heavenly deliverer who would come in glory at the end of days.  
        Judaism also began to develop a belief in the resurrection, a thing 
        unknown in old Israel.  It was a borrowed concept, but it was adapted to  
        the Judaic faith. 
                   Judaism's most characteristic feature was its stress on keeping
        the law; in fact, to be a Jew was to keep the law.  The prophets had ex-
        plained the Exile as a result of a breach of covenant law; and this naturally
        led people to take the law more seriously.  And the postexilic community 
        had been constituted by a covenant committing it to the observance of the 
        (now written) law.  As hope was pushed to the end of history, the law was 
        accorded absolute validity for regulating conduct; it became virtually the 
        whole content of the obligation.  The temple cult remained a requirement 
        of the law, but one of lesser importance than overall obedience to the law.  
        Every village had its synagogue, where the law was read and expounded.
        The law superseded both priestly powers and prophetic word; prophecy 
        ceased in Israel.

H-31

               Judaism gradually developed a fixed, if unofficial, canon of scripture. 
        The 1st 5 books of the OT had authoritative status from the time of Ezra or
        soon after; and to this were subsequently added the prophets' books. By 
        the 100s B.C. most of the books of the OT as we know it were regarded 
        as holy scripture.  But the first five retained the pre-eminent position.  
        Judaism became a religion of the Book, committed to the observance of 
        written law. 
                   There was also the desire to build a “fence” around the law lest it be
        broken inadvertently.  The Pharisees arose as a class of scribes who devo-
        ted themselves wholly to studying the law and teaching it.  The oral law 
        became the hallmark of Judaism & ultimately crystallized into the Talmud.
        It enabled Judaism to survive when its temple was finally destroyed.  The 
        New Testament, however, affirms that this whole history of faith found its 
        conclusion in Christ, who is the fulfillment of its law and its hope, & who 
        gave to the Christian church, the Israel according to the Spirit, the awaited 
        new covenant. 

HEBREWS, LETTER TO THE.  The 19th book of the New Testament (NT) 
        canon.  Although we call Hebrews a “letter,” it has no author’s name and 
        no addressee, nor can we recognize an occasion or purpose.  It was not 
        written by Paul; style, form, and Christology speak against his authorship. 
        The western part of the early church refused until about 300 A.D. to accept
        Hebrews into the NT canon.  It was not until Pope Innocent I (405) agreed 
        upon all 27 books, that Hebrew became a fully acknowledged part of the 
        NT canon.  The letter’s  christological parts alternate with moral appeals.  
        There is a constant rhythm between these 2 components.  Except for the 
        last 4 verses, which seem like Paul’s writing, the integrity of the letter is 
        not questionable.
          Neither the word “letter” nor the term “to write” occurs in Hebrews.  
        Instead, we find the terms “word,” “speech,” “proclamation”(logos).  
        Hebrews is a unique book in the NT canon, especially as regards literary 
        character.  It is an epistle, or literary piece meant for general reading.  A 
        sermon or lecture has been used, because the good style and rhetorical 
        forms of Greek suggest a teacher or preacher.  It is probable that we have 
        in this epistle several sermons combined and collected by the author 
        himself. 
              When the Old Testament (OT) is used here, it is taken from the 
        primary Greek OT.  Moses and Jesus are discussed together in a simple 
        comparison.  The Old Covenant is the anti-type of the New Covenant; the
        author regards Christianity in the historical continuity with Israel and 
        Judaism, even though the author considers Christianity superior. 
               The earliest witness is Clement of Alexandria, who tells that Paul 
        wrote the letter in the Hebrew language.  He further tries to explain why 
        Paul didn't mention his own name at the beginning.  Origen has his doubts
        and concludes:  “Who really wrote the letter is known to God alone.”  
        Hebrew was taken as Paul’s until the Reformation.  Today, we do not have
        the resources any longer to make a clear decision, except that it isn't Paul.
        Nothing can be derived from the title “To the Hebrews,” because there are
        too many attributes of the typical Jewish Christian literature missing from 
        this epistle.
           As to where the epistle was sent, Alexandria, Rome, and Palestine 
        have been mentioned.  For Alexandria, no weighty arguments can be 
        given, except for the epistle’s kinship with Philo’s writing.  For Rome as 
        destination, it is also noteworthy that Rome always preserved a tradition 
        that Paul wasn't the author.  The salutation “those who come from Italy” 
        could point to expatriates sending their greetings homeward.  Although 
        nothing can be said for sure, Rome is most likely the letter’s destination.  
        And the close relation of Hebrews to writings like I Clement & the Reve-
        lation of John speak for the time at the end of the first century (81-96).
                   Hebrews’ theology is that of a post-apostolic Greek Christianity.  
        Hebrews stresses the coming of the end; the present time is called “these  
        last days.”  This idea is emphasized for the practical purpose of overco-
        ming weariness and weakening of faith.  In response, Christians should 
        disassociate themselves from the world & live as strangers upon the earth.
        Hebrews affirms that Christ has “appeared once for all at the end of the 
        age.”  The affirmation that the end of the age is present is more of a 
        Gnostic idea than it is a Jewish one.  Connected with the end of this age is
        the idea of pilgrimage.  Israel as the people wandering through the wilder-
        ness can be recognized as the prototype of Christianity.  In our pilgrimage
        we have Christ as leader; Christians are to follow in his steps by suffering.
        It is the way to the heavenly Jerusalem, the “new and living way.”

H-32

           The Christology of Hebrews is immediately developed in the opening chapter.  After the redemption “he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high.”  In Hebrews, there is no way to separate the sonship and the high priesthood of Christ; he was pre-existent and participated as Son in God’s creation.  He is God’s representative in the midst of this world and is our representative in heaven before God.  He is now the final one and has a cosmic power superior to angels and Moses.
           There is no explicit mentioning of Christ’s resurrection; the accent is upon his being in heaven.  In the same way, the crucifixion is not explicitly referred to, but is pre-supposed.  He had to suffer and undergo temptations, and because he did “he is able to help those who are tempted.”  He revealed himself as the very Messiah, the perfect one forever.
           The concept of Christ as the high priest runs through the letter as a whole.  By his death he unlocks the door to the eternal sanctuary in heaven.  His work means atonement for the sins of humans.  The title of high priest is used as if it was a familiar one to the readers.  With the philosopher Philo, Logos is also the high priest.  In Hebrews, Greek and Jewish traditions come together in this title and figure.  He is called by God, chosen from among men, acts on behalf of all, deals gently with all, is beset with weakness, is bound to offer sacrifice for himself, and he is bound to offer sacrifice for the sins of the people.  These characteristics and functions of the high priest explain the work of Christ Jesus.  The unique Melchizedek passages of Hebrews go back to Psalm 110 and perhaps to earliest liturgical traditions.  Melchizedek’s name means “Sedek is king,” or in Hebrews, “king of righteousness.”  Probably he is meant as the primeval man who returns as Messiah.  Philo also speaks of Melchizedek, so there must be a common tradition which is Gnostic in origin.
           In Hebrews more than in any other book of the New Testament canon, “faith becomes “faithfulness.”  “Faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”  Faith is obedience to that word which God has finally spoken in Christ Jesus.  Confession is the human response to God’s action in Christ. 
           The christological intention of Hebrews leads to the primary point of the ethical admonitions by speaking of “Son and sons” of the first-born in the singular and giving an ethical implication.  The admonitions are primarily concerned with the danger of apostasy or weariness and lack of hope.  Faith is perceived as faithfulness and sin more as the weakening of faithfulness than as disobedience or actual deed.  The historical setting has more to do with Gnosticism, perhaps in Jewish form, than it does with rabbinical ideas.  The author makes use of Gnostic material in his own independent way. 

HEBRON  (הברון, alliance))  1.  A Levite, third son of Kohath and the origin of 
        the name for the Hebronites. 2.  Son of Mareshah in a Calebite genealogy. 

HEBRON (CITY) (הברון, alliance))  1.  A city about 30 km south of Jerusalem 
        and 27 km west of the Salt (Dead) Sea.  Hebron was built on the hill er-
        Rumeideh just west of the modern city.  Hebron was a Canaanite royal city 
        in the hill country of Judah, around 1350 B.C. 
              Abraham purchased the cave at Mamre, near Hebron, for a family 
        sepulcher from a Hittite chieftain named Ephron.  At the time of the foun-
        ding, it was called Kiriath-arba and later came to be called Hebron.  In the 
        1300s the Hebron region was ruled by a local prince, Shuwardata, who ap-
        pears in several of the Amarna Letters.  3 clans of Anakim lived at Hebron 
        in Moses' time.  A generation later Hoham, king of Hebron, died at the 
        hand of Joshua & his forces in the latter’s victory over the southern Cana-
        anite coalition.  
                   Hebron itself was destroyed and its population devoted to the sword.
        Hebron seems to have been reoccupied by the 3 clans of the Anakim and 
        wasn't effectively controlled by the Israelites until its recapture by Caleb’s 
        forces after Joshua’s death.  Hebron was designated a Levitical city and a 
        city of refuge.  In the royal administrative reorganization, it became a dis-
        trict capital. 
                   Hebron is prominent in the story of David’s early career. It was one 
        of the cities to receive a gift from David.  For the first 7½ years of his reign
        it was the southern kingdom's capital while Ishbosheth ruled the north from
        Mananaim.  Several of David’s sons, including Absalom, were born at He-
        bron.  After Ishbosheth’s assassination, the north was united with the 
        south, and the capital moved to the newly captured Jerusalem. 

H-33

               Hebron was Absalom’s headquarters for his revolt against David.  
        Rehoboam (922-915 B.C.) had the fortifications at Hebron strengthened.  
        Hebron was probably occupied by Sennacherib in 701 and destroyed by 
        Nebuchadrezzar in 587. Hebron may have been a royal pottery at this time.
        It is not mentioned in the New Testament (See also entry in the appendix’s 
        Old Testament Apocrypha/ Influence Outside the Bible section.)

HEDGE (גדרה (geh day raw), fence; משוכה (mes oo kaw); שוך (sook))
        Hedges were constructed to protect vineyards from predators. Figuratively 
        the verb “hedge” is used to express God’s protection and his constraint. 

HEDGEHOG  (קפוד (kip pode), King James Version translates as “bittern”)
        Any small insect-eating mammals, around 25 to 30 cm long, covered with 
        a coat of short spines and having the power to roll themselves up in self-
        protection into a ball-like form.  The three passages that qippod appears in 
        describe inhabited areas which are to become desolate & the home of vari-
        ous wild creatures.

HEEL, LIFTED  (הגדיל עלי עקב (ha ga deal  ‘il lee  ‘ay keb), “made great the 
        heel [?] against me”The expression refers to the treachery of friends 
        (Job 13), who have interpreted the sick man’s distress as divine punish-
        ment, and have made him an object of social rejection.  It may have no 
        reference whatever to raising the heel to kick one and may simply mean 
        “has turned his back on me,” or “has turned his heel on me.”  Jesus ap-
        plies the words to Judas’ treachery & brought fresh significance to these 
        words.  The emphasis would seem to be that one who partook of one’s 
        bread, had violated the laws of hospitality, and had turned on his host. 

HEGAI  (הגיA eunuch of Ahasuerus, in charge of the women. 

HEGLAM  (הגלם, captivity) Son of Ehud, and the father of Uzza and Ahihud
        (I Chronicles 8). The father of Ehud is not mentioned in I Chronicles; in 
        Judges 3 he is Gera, grandson of Benjamin, father of both Ehud and the 
        Shimei who cursed David.  Gera would then be the ancestor and the ori-
        gin of the name for Heglam’s clan. 

HEIFER  (עגלת (‘eg lath)The heifer was used on the threshing floor and pre-
        sumably for other agricultural work.  A three-year-old heifer was sacrificed 
        in the Lord’s covenant with Abraham.  The neck of a heifer was broken in 
        removing the guilt of a murder from an unknown assailant from a commu-
        nity.  The term “heifer” is used figuratively in Judges 14, Jeremiah 46 and 
        50, Hosea 4 & 10.  The phrase which the King James Version translates as
        “heifer of three years old” is in other translation taken to be a place name, 
        Eglath-shelishiyah. 

HEIR (יורש (yay roshe )) An owner of property’s son. The heir, as a child, was
        no more than a slave. Through Christ humankind ceased to be slaves and 
        become heirs. All of the poor are “heirs of the grace of life.” 

HELAH (הלאה, necklaceOne of the two wives of Ashhur, descendant of 
        Judah and ancestor of Tekoa. 

HELAM  (הילם, strength of the peopleA city near the northern boundary of 
        Gilead, between Damascus & Hamath, where David defeated the Syrians. 

HELBAH  (הלבה, fertilityA town in Asher, from which the Israelites couldn't 
        expel the Canaanite population; it could be the same as Ahlab, because of 
        their similarity in Hebrew. 

HELBON  (הלבון, fertile)   A town northwest of Damascus, mentioned in the 
        lamentation for Tyre; particularly famous for its wine (Ezekiel 27). 

HELDAI (הלדי, mole (animal))   1.  One of David’s Mighty Men; a Netophathite 
        (II Samuel 23).      2.  One who brought gold and silver with which the pro-
        phet Zechariah was to make a crown for Joshua the high priest. 

H-34

HELECH  (הילך, from the root meaning strengthPossibly the Old Testament 
        name of Cilicia in Asia Minor.  Assyrian records refer to Cilicia as Hilakku.
        It revolted against Sennachraib in 696 & again under Esarhaddon (680-
        669).  There were mercenaries from Helech in the army of Tyre. 

HELEK (הלק, portion, lotA member of the Manasseh tribe, one of Manas-
        seh’s and Joseph’s descendants. 

HELEM  (הלם, blowA family of the tribe of Asher.  This name should proba-
        bly be Hotham (I Chronicles 7). 

HELEPH (הלף, exchange) A Naphtali border town, possibly to be identified 
        with modern-day Khirbet ’Arbathah. 

HELEZ  (הלץ, he has saved)    1.  One of David’s Mighty Men; either a Paltite 
        or a Peolonite; the latter is most likely the correct clan (II Samuel 23).      
        2.  A family of the tribe of Judah (I Chronicles 2). 

HELI  ( HliThe father or grandfather of Joseph in the genealogy of Jesus 
        (Luke 3). 

HELIOPOLIS (בית שמש (beth  sheh mesh, house of the sun)) The capital 
        of the Thirteenth Lower Egyptian nome, situated where the Nile Delta 
        begins, just northeast of modern-day Cairo.  In Genesis, its name is On. 
        Potiphera of the Joseph story is priest of that city.  Elsewhere Heliopolis is 
        mentioned only indirectly.
                   Heliopolis is perhaps best known as the home of the Egyptian theo-
        logy which bears its name.  The chief deity was Atum, which became 
        Atum-Re, the sun-god, who dominated the other gods: Shu (atmosphere); 
        Tefnut (moisture); Geb (earth); Nut (sky); Isis; Osiris; Seth; and Nephthys.
        Although Heliopolis played no important political role in Egyptian history,
        it remained one of its most outstanding cult centers.  The present site is re-
        latively poor in archaeological remains and shows no evidence of ancient 
        occupation after 525 B.C. 

HELKAI (הלקי, portion of the Lord) A priest, head of the Meriaoth house in the
        days of Joikim the high priest. 

HELKATH (הלקת, partition)  A Levitical border town in Asher, perhaps to be 
        identified with Tell el-Harbaj, located at the southern end of the Plain of 
        Acco in northern Israel, near the Mediterranean coast.  It is a low mound 
        with a surface of over 25,000 square meters.  It was occupied from 3000-
        2100 B.C., 1550-1200 B.C. and 1200-900 B.C. 

HELKATH-HAZZURIM (הלקת הצרים, field of sharp rocks) An area, presuma-
        bly near Gibeon’s Pool, the place where 12 of Joab’s men of war dueled 
        with 12 from the ranks of Abner. 

HELL.  See Dead, Abode of the; Gehenna. 

HELLENISM  The Greek spirit, character or civilization, or an enthusiasm for or
        devotion to this culture.  It is the civilization which spread over the Medi-
        terranean world as a result of Alexander’s conquests in the decade 334-
        325 B.C.  Unfortunately the aggressive actions of Jerusalem’s pro-Helle-
        nist party led to persecution.  It also created internal tensions with Juda-
        ism, resulting in attitudes of superiority which continued for centuries. 

HELLENISTS.  Greek-speaking Jews referred to in Acts 6 and 9, and contras-
        ted with the “Hebrews.  The tension between the two groups intensified the 
        problem of the admission of Gentiles to the church.  Foreign-born Jews in
        Jerusalem spoke various languages, including Greek.  It was probably 
        these “foreigners” or Greek-speaking Jews who were designated by the 
        term “Hellenists,” rather than Gentiles. 

HELMET (כובע ( ko bah); perikefalaia (peh rie keh fa lay ee ahA defen-
        sive headgear worn in battle, ordinarily made of leather for ordinary sol-
        diers, but of bronze for royalty and heroes.  In symbolic usage, the Lord 
        is pictured wearing the helmet of salvation, which is also part of a Chris-
        tian’s “armor.”

H-35

HELON (הלון, strengthA Zebulunite; the father of Eliah (Numbers 1, 2, 7, 10). 

HELPERS  ( antilhmyeiV (an ti lem psay ees))  One of the charismata or “gifts
        of the Spirit,” named by Paul. It is not a ministerial order, but rather a gift 
        possessed by deacons of the church. The verb form appears as a syno-
        nym of Martha’s service.  

HEM  (שול (shole), skirt; kraspedon (kras peh don), fringe) The King James 
        Version translation of shol and kraspedon (See Skirt and Fringe entries). 

HEMAM (הימם, defeat) The clan chief, Lotan’s second son, and a Horite sub-
        clan’s ancestor in Edom. 

HEMAN  (הימן, faithful)   1.  A Horite (Genesis 36).      2.  A “wise man” of the 
        “sons of Mahol,” part of a guild of dancers in Solomon’s time.  He is 
        called a son of Zerah, and is probably the same as Heman #3. 
              3.  A Kohathite, son of Joel; one of the leaders of the temple musi-
        cians under David and Solomon.  Perhaps the guild of Heman was origi-
        nally a guild of cultic prophets, which later became a musical guild. 

HEMDAN  (המדן, pleasant) The first son of clan chief Dishon; ancestor of 
        a native Horite sub clan in Edom. 

HEMLOCK (לענה (lah an aw), wormwood The King James Version 
        translation of the Hebrew word. 

HEMORRHAGE (pusiV  (poo sees)Any bleeding or flow of blood.  In the 
        Old Testament hemorrhage brought with it ceremonial defilement, thus im-
        posing serious restrictions upon the individual‘s religious & social life.  
        The woman with hemorrhage ( Matthew 23; Mark 5; Luke 8) probably had 
        a uterine cyst.  

HEN (PERSON)  (הן, graceIt is probable, however, that the original reading 
        was “Josiah.” 

HEN  (orniV (or nis), bird, fowl)  The female of the domestic fowl and of vari-
        ous other birds. 

HENA  (הנעA town mentioned in II Kings 18, 19; Isaiah 37.  Its location is not
        known. Hezekiah had begun an anti-Assyrian policy.  The Assyrian envoys 
        stated that Hezekiah would have no success and cited Hena among other 
        cities as an example of cities that had failed in their resistance of Assyria. 

HENADAD  (הנדד, perhaps favor of Hadad (weather god)The ancestor and 
        origin of the name for a Levitical house of priests mentioned in connection
        with the building of the temple under Zerubbabel, the repair of the Jerusa-
        lem wall, and the signing of Ezra’s covenant. 

HENNA  (כפר (ko pher))  A fragrant flowering shrub or tree.  In the Song of 
        Solomon 1 the lover is likened to the fragrant cluster of henna blossoms.  
        In the same book, chapter 4, the tree is listed with other fragrant spices in a
        metaphor in praise of the bride. 

HEPHER (הפר, pit, well)   1. Ancestor and origin of the name for a clan of the 
        Manasseh or Gilead tribe.     2.  A man or family of the Judah tribe. (I 
        Chron. 4).      3.  One of David’s Mighty Men (I Chron. 11).      4.  A Canaa-
        nite city whose king was defeated by Joshua and which is found in the lis-
        ting of Solomon’s administrative districts.  Hepher’s exact location is un-
        known; a site 3.2 km east of Arubboth, & Tell Ibshar have been suggested. 

HEPHZIBAH  (הפצי־בה, my delight is in her)    1.  The wife of King 
        Hezekiah, and the mother of Manasseh (II King 21).      2. symbolic name 
        for the restored Jerusalem, when God’s “delight” will again be in her.

H-36

HERALD (khrux, (keh ruz), preacher)   An officer making state or royal pro-  
        clamations public, or bearing ceremonial messages between princes and 
        powers.  In Daniel 3 it is used as “herald”’ in the New Testament it is used 
        metaphorically for the “preacher.”  The metaphor suggests the preacher is 
        herald in that he bears a message or proclamation given him by the hea-
        venly King.

HERB  (ארה (‘aw raw), to gather; Lacanon (lak an on)In II Kings 4, it 
        is more likely that a cereal or grain is meant.  Lachanon  is a cultivated, as 
        opposed to a wild plant. 

HERDSMAN  (רעה (raw aw); בוקר (bo kare), cattle-tenderA keeper of 
        domestic animals that go in herds. Ra’ah is more often translated as “shep-
        herd.”  Amos’ claim to be a boqar is interpreted as evidence of his lay ori-
        gin.  However, recent study by some suggests that it may be an official 
        priestly title.  

HERES, ASCENT OF (מעלה החרס (mah ‘ah leh  ha khah res), ascent of the 
        sunA place where Gideon turned back from pursuing the Midianites.  
        The translation is doubtful, but there is no agreement on an alternative. 

HERESH (הרש, mute) A Levite listed among the returned exiles. The name is 
        not in the parallel Nehemiah 11. 

HERESY (h airhsiV (hah ee res is), sect, factionOriginally, a school, sect, 
        faction; later, the opposite of orthodoxy.  The term “heresy” meant a philo-
        sophical school with its special doctrine.  The New Testament language is 
        influenced by Greek and Jewish terminology.  The new Christian usage of 
        the term, with reference to inner-Christian factions began with the Church.
        The Greek term was used in a bad sense, yet without the technical mea-
        ning of “schism,” which meant a dogmatic and organizational break.  
        Heresies were to be expected before the end time, while the possibility of 
        schisms were to be rejected. 

HERETH  (הרת, to cutA forest between Adullam and Giloh, about 10.4 km 
        east of Beit Jibrin, in which David hid after his sojourn in Moab. 

HERITAGE.  There is no clear distinction between the terms “inheritance” and 
        “heritage.”  In the Revised Standard Version, heritage is used for spiritual 
        things, inheritance is used for spiritual things. 
                  Land and territory were believed to come into possession of Hebrew 
        families by heritage.  They were theirs by divine gift, not by conquest, and 
        were passed on by inheritance.  Spiritual qualities, relationships with God, 
        and prosperity were accepted as part of the heritage. 

HERMOGENES  ( ErmogenhV, born of Hermes) Someone mentioned with
        Phygelus as having deserted Paul. 

HERMON, MOUNT  (הרמון, from the root meaning destructionThe moun-
        tain which forms the southern spur of the Anti-Lebanon Range. Mount Her-
        mon reaches a height of about 2,700 meters, and its crown is seen from 
        many places in Palestine.  The impressive view of Mount Hermon has 
        always fascinated people, and it has long been a sacred mountain.  Mount 
        Hermon was used as a cult place also in later periods. 

HEROD (FAMILY) (הורדוס, from the root meaning descentThe dynasty 
        which under Rome ruled Jewish Palestine from 37 B.C.-70 A.D. (See also 
        the entry in the Old Testament Apocrypha / Influences Outside the Bible 
        section of the Appendix.).
              Assuming that Jesus was born in 6 B.C., he was born towards the 
        end of Herod the Great’s rule.  Herod’s grandson was poisoned by his 
        remaining uncle; that uncle, Antipater, was the last of many executed by 
        Herod, only 5 days before Herod himself died in 4 B.C.  The usurpation 
        of the throne by Herod and the many murders throughout his reign can't 
        be condoned.  But, when taken in context with the common practice of 
        the royalty of his time, it must be said that his behavior mirrored that 
        found in Rome itself.  The greatest condemnation of Herod would have 
        to be that he was as bad as all those around him who sought the power of
        a throne.  Josephus’ account shows that Herod felt only indifference and 
        unconcern for Jewish law and ethics.  
              Certainly his unadmirable career discloses qualities which, if ad-
        dressed to worthy purposes, would have appeared admirable.  His rise to 
        power took place at a time of civil war and of internal upheavals.  Out of 
        this chaos, he carved a relatively tranquil kingdom in his segment of the 
        Roman Empire.  And within that kingdom that he paid so dearly for, he 
        established a high degree of order and peace in the midst of chaos.

H-37
         
              Archelaus was aware of the Jews’ broad hostility to his family.  
        He placated his own countrymen through kindliness and forbearance and
        by the gesture of deferring his ascension to the throne until the kingship 
        willed to him by his father could be confirmed by Rome.  His intentions 
        were frustrated first by a revolt in 4 B.C., and second by his brother 
        Antipas, who contested his right to the throne. He went to Rome to plead
        his case, but before a decision could be rendered, a third Jewish deputa-
        tion was in Rome to plead for autonomy. 
              Augustus’ decision divided the kingdom into halves.  He named 
        Archelaus ethnarch, rather than king, of Judea, Idumea, and Samaria.  In 
        the other half, Antipas became the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, & Philip
        the tetrarch of several small northeastern regions. The brutal treatment by
        Archelaus of Jews and Samaritans caused people to go to Rome to de-
        nounce him to Augustus.  Archelaus was banished to France in 6 A.D. 
             The tetrarchy of Herod Philip, Herod and Cleopatra’s son, inclu-
        ded Batanea,  Trachonitis, and nearby districts northeast of the Sea of 
        Galilee.  The only description we have of his reign is one from Josephus, 
        namely that it was one of tranquility and prosperity.  There is some con-
        fusion as to who Philip’s wife was.  It is most likely that Mark 6 is in 
        error in speaking of Herodias as the wife of Philip.  Philip’s wife was 
        Herodias’ daughter, Salome, who dance for Herod right before the behea-
        ding of John the Baptist. When Philip died without issue in 34, his tetrar-
        chy was for three years attached to Syria, but in 37 it was assigned to 
        Agrippa I.  
                   Herod Antipas was a younger brother of Archelaus, son of Herod 
        and Malthace.  He was named tetrarch of Galilee and Perea.  He founded 
        the city of Tiberias by the Sea of Galilee.  Antipas met Herodias, the wife
        of Herod II, and wanted her.  Antipas divorced the daughter of the Naba-
        tean king and married Herodias.  John the Baptist was put to death, either
         because of fear of rebellion, or John’s criticism of Antipas’ marriage to 
        Herodias.  
                   War broke out in 36 between Antipas and Aretas, king of Nabatea;
        Antipas’ army was destroyed.  Agrippa, the brother of Herodias, was 
        given the territory previously held by the tetrarch Philip, & received the 
        title of king in 37.  Antipas went to Rome seeking a more royal title, but
        due to some damning charges by Agrippa, Antipas was banished to Lyons 
        in France in 39.  
                   Agrippa, son of Herod the Great’s son Aristobulus, had been in 
        Rome since he was 6 years old.  In 23 or 29 A.D. financial need brought 
        him to Palestine.  After several failed attempts at employment, he man-
        aged to borrow money in Alexandria and returned to Rome.  There he 
        succeeded in becoming a protégé of Caligula.  When indiscreetly he ex-
        pressed openly the wish that Caligula would soon succeed Tiberius, the 
        latter cast Agrippa into jail.  After Caligula acceded to the throne, he gran-
        ted to Agrippa the tetrarchy of Philip.
                   On arriving in Palestine Agrippa incurred the jealousy of Herod 
        Antipas; thereafter Antipas lost his tetrarchy, which came to be added to 
        Agrippa’s possession.  Agrippa was helpful in the ascent of Claudius to 
        the Roman throne, and gained more territory as a result.  From 41-44 
        Agrippa as king ruled over virtually the same land that Herod the Great 
        ruled over.  He died at the age of 54, survived by three daughters and a 17
        year-old son named Agrippa.  Until he was old enough, the kingdom was 
        reduced to a province. 
                   At the age of 23, Agrippa II succeeded an uncle and brother-in-law,
        Herod, to the throne in Chalcis.  A little later Nero added to his territory 
        portions of Galilee & Perea; thereby Agrippa was king over part of Judea.
        Little is related about Agrippa II in subsequent times, and this little is most 
        unfavorable.  When the rebellion against Rome broke out in 66, Agrippa’s
        troops participated in the assault on Jerusalem by Cestius Gallus.  The 
        emperor Galba was murdered before Agrippa reached Rome; Vespasian 
        was now elected emperor. At the end of the war, in 70, Agrippa had addi-
        tional territories added to his possessions.  He and Bernice moved to 
        Rome around 75.  There Bernice was the mistress of Titus.  The end of 
        the Herodian dynasty came to an end with his death in 100. 
                   Herod’s Family in the New Testament (NT)—Virtually all that is
        told in the NT about the members of the family of Herod is either missing
        or different from what Josephus reports.  What follows is a comparison 
        between the NT and Josephus material on the Herod family: 
                    1.  Acts 12 relates that Agrippa [I] persecuted the church, slay-
            ing James the son of Zebedee and arresting Peter, who was re-
            leased from jail by angels.  Agrippa, angry with the people of Tyre 
            and Sidon responded with a speech.  “An angel of the Lord smote 
            him, . . . he was eaten by worms and died.”  
                    In Josephus’ Antiquities, he relates that Agrippa, on seeing an 
            owl, was seized with abdominal pains, taken to his palace, and died
            there five days later.

H-38

                    2.  After Paul has appealed to Caesar, it is related that when 
            Agrippa [II] & Bernice arrived at Caesarea, Festus laid Paul’s case 
            before the king (Acts 25).  Agrippa gave Paul permission to speak. 
            Agrippa and Festus agreed that Paul had done nothing to deserve 
            death or imprisonment.  
                   Not one word of the narrative is found in Josephus.  
                   3.  The passages in Mark 6, Matthew 14, and Luke 3 relate the
            circumstances of the death of John the Baptist.  Mark calls Antipas 
            “king”; Luke correctly designates him tetrarch.  The name Antipas 
            does not appear in the NT.  The NT  knows nothing of the “seven 
            veils” in which legend dressed Salome.  In Luke 13, the Pharisees 
            told Jesus that Herod wanted to kill him.  In a third passage, found 
            only in Luke 23, Pilate, learning that Jesus was a Galilean, brought
            him to Antipas.  Jesus answered none of Antipas’ questions.  Herod
            and his soldiers mocked him and sent him back to Pilate.  The ab-
            sence of a comparable passage in Mark, Matthew, and John sug-
            gests strongly that this passage is legendary. 
                   The account in Josephus of John’s death is bare.  The “seven 
            veils” of Salome in Josephus is probably an embellishment.  There
            is no mention of Herod’s intent to kill Jesus, or of Jesus’ appea-
            rance before him. 
                   4.  Only Matthew mentions Archelaus.  
                    Josephus’ account of Archelaus can be found in the fourth 
            paragraph of this article.  
                   5.  Paul in Romans 16 sends greetings to the family of Aristo-
            bulus.”  The conjecture that this Aristobulus is Herod the Great's 
            grandson is farfetched. 
                    6.  Drusilla is mentioned in passing (Acts 24) as one of Felix’s
            three wives, and as the third and youngest daughter of Agrippa I.  
            In 53 or 54 she married the Roman procurator of Palestine, Felix. 
                    7.  Bernice, the sister of Agrippa II is mentioned in Acts 25.  
            No mention is made of this incident in Josephus’ accounts.  
                    8.  While not a Herodian, Felix was married to a Herodian 
            (Acts 23).  
                    For Josephus’ account of Felix, see Biblical entry on Felix, 
            paragraph 2.  
                    9.  Luke 1 states that the events described in the gospel began
            “in the days of Herod [the Great].”  
                   Mat. 2 states that “Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in 
            the days of Herod the King.”  The 3 Wise Men and the “slaughter 
            of the innocents” is a part of Matthew’s account.  Those who have 
            assessed this material have expressed a range of judgment from 
            full confidence through full skepticism.  The price of skepticism as
            to the reliability of ascribing Jesus' birth to the last year Herod the 
            Great’s reign is that the precise year of his birth becomes quite 
            unknown. It is, however, the price which strict historical study 
            demands.  
                   All the above NT material is absent from Josephus. 
                   10.  For the Herodians see separate Biblical entry.  
                   11.  Herodias is mention in Mark 6 as first the wife of Herod 
            Philip. She was the second wife of Herod Antipas, and he was her 
            second husband.  She had a hand in the death of John the Baptist.  
                    Actually, Herodias’ first husband was most likely Herod II, 
            not Herod Philip. 
                   12.  Philip is mentioned in Luke 3 in order to fix the chrono-
            logy of John the Baptist.  Luke describes his tetrarchy as Ituraea 
            and Trachonitis.  Philip plays no role in the gospel.  He was the 
            son of Herod the Great and of Cleopatra of Jerusalem.  The city of
            Caesarea Philippi was founded by him.  Philip married Salome, 
            the daughter of Herodia. 
                   13.  Salome was the daughter of Herodias; we get the name 
            from the historian Josephus, the daughter in Matthew 14, Mark 6, 
            and Luke 3 is unnamed.  Salome danced before her stepfather, 
            Herod Antipas on his birthday.  She asked for and received John 
            the Baptist’s head on a platter.
                   Josephus is silent on the above incident. Modern, liberal scho-
            larship regards it as legendary.  On the assumption of a historically
            reliable account, the problem of the age of Salome at the time of 
            the incident is frequently raised.  It is argued by some that Salome
            could scarcely have been a young maiden at the time she danced, 
            since her husband-to-be was 50; if Salome danced at all, she must 
            have been 45 or 50.  
                    The best judgment of the gospels is that they are religious tracts 
        rather than historical research; the material they include about the Herod
        family is clearly legendary.  It is used primarily to set chronology and to 
        relate Christianity to its Jewish background.  The NT material on Herod’s
        family adds virtually nothing to the knowledge of them.  It increases the 
        perplexities rather than illuminating dark places. 

H-39
           
HERODIANS (Herwdianoi (hare od ee ah noy)) Literally adherents of Herod     or as one scholar put it: those among the Jews who . . . Desired the resto-
        ration of the national kingdom under the sons of Herod.” In 3 passages 
        (Mark 3 and 12; Matthew 22), the Herodians are mentioned as opponents 
        of Jesus, along with the Pharisees; the Herodians are not mentioned in 
        Luke or John. 
                    The problems we face are: a more specific identification of the “He-
        rodians” than just Herod or their dynasty; an answer to why Luke avoids 
        the term altogether; and making the Herodians synonymous with the 
        Sadduccees.  More specific identification of the “Herodians” from the 3 
        passages is impossible because of their vagueness.  If some specific 
        identification must be made, the best is that they are followers of Herod
        Antipas.  
                   The avoidance of the term by Luke may be a deliberate attempt 
        by Mark, whom Luke uses, to avoid the more far-fetched assumptions.  
        Finally there is nothing in Matthew which actually identifies the Herodians 
        with the Sadducees, for Matthew 16 merely substitutes the Sadducees 
        for the Herodians of Mark 8.  There's no direct statement in the gospels 
        which equates Herodians and Sadducees.

HERODIAS  ( HrodiaV A wife of Herod Antipas and the daughter of Aristo-
        bulus and Bernice; granddaughter of Herod the Great.  Herodias’ exact 
        dates are unknown beyond placing her between 1-50 A.D.
              Herodias was first married to one of her uncles.  Mark 6 and Mat- 
        thew 14 identify him as Philip.  From historical data outside of the Bible, 
        it is more like the uncle’s name is Herod.  Herod Antipas was a half bro-
        ther of the first husband of Herodias.  Antipas had divorced his first wife,
        a Nabatean princess, to make room for Herodias.  John the Baptist de-
        nounced this marital irregularity.  After Salome’s dance and demand John
        was beheaded. According to the historian Josephus, Herodias prevailed 
        upon the reluctant Antipas to go to Rome to petition Caligula to make him
        king.  Instead, the emperor banished Antipas to Lyons, and Herodias ac-
        companied him there.

HERODION (Hrwdiwn)  A Christian man greeted in Romans 16 by Paul, who 
        called him a fellow countryman. 

HERODIUM (Hrwdeion (hare od ay ee on)A fortress palace and tomb 
        monument some 6 km southeast of Bethlehem.  The ruins of the Herodian
        citadel are still visible. 
              Herodium was both a desert retreat & part of a chain of fortresses 
        Herod erected to protect his kingdom.  After 40 B.C., when he was attacked
        by hostile Jews nearby, he erected a fortress called Herodium on the Idu-
        mean frontier, & the luxurious palace by the same name near Bethlehem.  
        Herod artificially raised and crowned the hill with a ring of three concentric
        walls with round towers at the four cardinal directions.  A grand stairway of
        200 white marble steps mounted to the citadel; an expensive aqueduct 
        was built to provide water.  Under Roman administration Herodium was
        the capital of one of 11 toparchies.  As one of the three last stronghold of 
        Jewish resistance, Herodium was reduced by Lucilius Bassus in 72 A.D. 

HERON  (אנפה (an aw faw), unclean birdAny of a family of wading birds 
        with a long thin neck and long legs, whose haunt is water, and whose food 
        is fish and other water animals.  In the 1800s, Tristam found 7 varieties
        of heron common in the lake regions of Palestine in his day.  

HESHBON  (השבון, an accounting or understanding) An important city in the 
        northern part of Greater Moab, the city of Sihon, king of the Amorites, 
        about 80 km due east of Jerusalem.  The city about it was bitterly contes-
        ted between Moab and Israel; it was conquered by Eglon of Moab & won 
        back by Israel in the time of the judges. The territory then remained perma-
        nently Israelite until after Ahab's death.  From that time on, it remained in 
        Moabite hands.  Around 600 B.C., Heshbon seems to have fallen into the 
        hands of the Ammonites.  In the period of Greek influences, it was part of 
        the Nabatean kingdom.  After the fall of the Jewish state, Heshbon was an-
        nexed to the Roman province of Syria. 

HESHMON (השמון, rich soil) A town in southwestern part of Judah; it may be 
        the source of the word “Hasmonean,” another label for the Maccabee 
        family. 

H-40

HETH (הת, terror) An ancestor and originator of the name for the Hittites; it 
        appears in the story of the acquisition of the cave of Machpelah by 
        Abraham. 

HETHLON (התלן, covered placeA place on the hypothetical northern border
        of Israel (Ezekiel 47).

HEWERS OF WOOD (עצים חטבי (khaw ta by ‘ates eem)) One of the lowest 
        classes of Servant. These workers are to be distinguished from those who 
        felled trees for building purposes. These are really gatherers of fire-wood, 
        listed last among covenanting people.

HEXATEUCH.  The modern scholarly designation of the first 6 books of the
        Bible.  It had been apparent to scholars for a long time that the Pentateuch,
        traditionally understood to be the work of Moses, was not only a composite
        of different strands, but the truncated section of a more extensive composi-
        tion.  It must have included the book of Joshua, if there was to be a suitable
        conclusion to the story of Israel’s beginning.
                  The Promised Land theme demands the fulfillment related in the 
        conquest & settlement found in Joshua.  Source analysis located the fami-
        liar Pentateuchal sources in that book.  The composite narrative was as-
        signed to the combination of Jahwist and Elohwist, while the boundary lists 
        and other technical data were apparently the work of the Priestly writer.  
        The whole book bore the unmistakable stamp of Deuteronomic redaction.  
        It was generally agreed that the Priestly Writer was present in Joshua but 
        did not extend beyond it. 
                   In recent scholarship, the Hexateuchal reconstruction has come un-
        der suspicion.  It is clear that the Hexateuch and the Deuternomic history 
        represent overlapping and conflicting reconstructions.  In the larger biblical
        narrative, Joshua is in the middle, with strong connections in both direc-
        tions.  The claims made for the integrity of the Deuteronomic history have 
        more evidence to commend them than those of the Hexateuch. 
                   It may be best to postulate the existence of two major and slightly 
        overlapping works covering the books from Genesis through Kings:  the 
        combined Jahwist, Elohwist, and Priestly history, plus an account of the 
        conquest and settlement in the Promised Land; and the Deuteronomic his-
        tory beginning with Moses’ farewell speeches and coming down to the fall 
        of Judah and the Exile.  The editor who combined these two strands either 
        removed the last part of the Jahwist, Elohwist, and Priestly account or blen-
        ded it into the present book of Joshua.  The term “Hexateuch” has proved 
        useful in the history of criticism, but it is doubtful whether the literary com-
        position it designated ever existed as an independent entity. 

HEZEKIAH  (הזקיה, strength of the Lord)  1.  King of Judah (715-687 B.C.); 
        son and successor of Ahaz. 
                   Hezekiah came to the throne at the age of 25 and reigned 29 years. 
        Hezekiah was remembered by later generations as an able and vigorous 
        ruler and a pious king.  He came to the throne at a critical time.  Israel had
        fallen in 722-721 B.C. into the hands of Sargon II, Judah had been seri-
        ously weakened by the Syro-Ephraimitic War and by the Edomites and
        Philistines.  The annual tribute to Assyria was an intolerable burden upon 
        her resources.  Further, religious conditions under Ahaz had become chao-
        tic.  People were beginning to see that only the power of Yahweh could 
        save them from the might of Assyria. 
                   Unquestionably, a religious reform took place.  The disastrous fall 
        of Israel to the north was powerfully used by the contemporary prophets 
        Isaiah and Micah to point to the moral of a return to the worship of Yah-
        weh.  It may be contended that Hezekiah’s interests were largely political, 
        but the distinction between religious enthusiasm and patriotism was not 
        always easy to see in ancient Israel.  Hezekiah removed the high places, 
        broke down the pillars, and cut down the Asherah.  These & other reforms
        would not have the support of all the people, and the inevitable reaction 
        came during the reign of Hezekiah’s son Manasseh.  
              The Chronicler has a long account of the religious reformation in II
        Chronicles 29-31.  The restoration of the temple was followed by a great 
        celebration of the Passover.  Then the whole land, including the northern 
        territories of Ephraim and Manasseh was cleansed of idolatry.  What took 
        3 chapters to describe in II Chronicles, is given only one verse in II Kings 
        18.  
             The tendency has been to disregard in large measure the account of
   is based on reliable traditions.  Isaiah makes no specific reference to any 
        the Chronicler.  Such a judgment, however, is unwarranted, as his material
        reformation during his time, perhaps because he saw that the real motive 
        was not a religious one, and because the religious reform was successful 
        only in part.  

H-41

              There is also no reason to doubt that Hezekiah’s messengers met 
        with little success in Ephraim and Manasseh, but had limited success in 
        Asher and Zebulun farther to the north.  The Assyrians probably saw the 
        importance of having a place of worship to rival the official place in Jeru-
        salem. That the sending of messengers had political implications is certain.
              Hezekiah’s other concern was to strengthen Judah politically.  He 
        began to strengthen the defenses of Jerusalem. He cut through the solid 
        rock in order to bring the water of the Gihon spring into the city.  Sargon 
        records a victorious campaign against Aziru, Ashdod's king, but apparently
        Hezekiah did not join in this rebellion in 711.  Six years later Sargon died, 
        & widespread intrigue began.  In all probability Hezekiah intrigued openly
        both with Merodach-baladan of Babylon & the Ethopian Pharaoh Shabako
        against Assyria; he withheld his tribute. Hezekiah also saw an opportunity 
        to retaliate against the Philistines.  
                   After settling affairs in his eastern kingdom, Sennacherib turned to 
        the west.  In 701 Sennacherib invaded Palestine and in an extensive cam-
        paign put down the rebellion.  A large Egyptian and Ethiopian army had 
        marched to relieve Ekron, but it was defeated.  Then Sennacherib turned 
        against the fortified cities of Judah, such as Lachish and Debir.  While the 
        siege of Lachish was still in progress, Hezekiah, seeing that further resis-
        tance was useless, sent a message to Sennacherib offering to surrender &
        promising to pay whatever tribute was imposed upon him.  Hezekiah took 
        all the silver from the temple and the royal treasuries, and “stripped the 
        gold from the doors of the temple of the Lord.  
              II Kings 18-19 raises many difficult problems, as it contains a 
        second list of demands from Sennacherib.  Also, the siege of Libnah was 
        interrupted by news of an approaching Egyptian army under Tirhakah, but
        Tirhakah did not become king until 689 B.C., 12 years after the original 
        story.  From the evidence available to us it is not possible to reconstruct 
        the history of subsequent events.  It seems preferable to adopt the hypo-
        thesis that the existing story is made up of 2 campaigns, the second of 
        which took place between 689-686 and was made memorable by a plague
        which decimated the Assyrian army. 
              2.  An ancestor of the prophet Zephaniah (Zephaniah 1).     3.  Son 
        of Neariah, descendant of the royal family of Judah (I Chronicles 3).      
        4.  Head of a family whose descendants returned with Nehemiah from 
        Babylonian exile. (Nehemiah 7). 

HEZION  (הזיון, visionGrandfather of Ben-hadad I of Syria (I Kings 15)  

HEZIR (הזיר, swine, boar)  1.  A descendant of Aaron; the ancestor and origin 
        of the name of a priestly house in King David’s time.  2.  One of the 
        chiefs of the people who sign the covenant of Ezra (Nehemiah 10). 

HEZRO  (הצרו, protected)  A Carmelite who is numbered among David’s Thirty 
        mighty men.  (I Samuel 23).

HEZRON (הצרון, enclosed, protected)  1.  The ancestor and origin of the 
        name for a clan of the tribe of Reuben.     2. The ancestor & origin of the 
        name of a clan of the tribe of Judah.  The name is included in both of the 
        New Testament genealogies (Genesis 46; Numbers 26; I Chronicles 2; 
        Matthew 1; Luke 3).      3.  A city on the southern border of Canaan, be-
        tween Kadesh-barnea and Addar.


H-42

No comments:

Post a Comment